![\"increase\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/up.png\")
<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/p>\n
Released:\u00a02025-10-10<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n Select geography
\n
\n Canada
\n Newfoundland and Labrador
\n Prince Edward Island
\n Nova Scotia
\n New Brunswick
\n Quebec
\n Ontario
\n Manitoba
\n Saskatchewan
\n Alberta
\n British Columbia
<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Canada
\n<\/p>\n
21,015,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.3%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Canada
\n<\/p>\n
7.1%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.L.
\n<\/p>\n
241,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.9%\u00a0![\"decrease\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/down.png\")
<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.L.
\n<\/p>\n
10.6%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.1\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 P.E.I.
\n<\/p>\n
93,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-1.0%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 P.E.I.
\n<\/p>\n
9.7%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
1.6\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.S.
\n<\/p>\n
525,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.2%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.S.
\n<\/p>\n
6.2%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.3\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.B.
\n<\/p>\n
406,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
1.2%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.B.
\n<\/p>\n
8.1%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.4\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Que.
\n<\/p>\n
4,640,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.1%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Que.
\n<\/p>\n
5.7%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.3\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Ont.
\n<\/p>\n
8,200,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.1%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Ont.
\n<\/p>\n
7.9%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.2\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Man.
\n<\/p>\n
740,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.5%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Man.
\n<\/p>\n
6.2%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.5\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Sask.
\n<\/p>\n
620,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.1%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Sask.
\n<\/p>\n
6.0%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
1.3\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Alta.
\n<\/p>\n
2,606,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
1.7%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Alta.
\n<\/p>\n
7.8%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
-0.6\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 B.C.
\n<\/p>\n
2,945,000<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.3%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 B.C.
\n<\/p>\n
6.4%<\/p>\n
September\u00a02025<\/p>\n
0.2\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nHighlights<\/p>\n
Employment increased by\u00a060,000\u00a0(+0.3%) in September and the employment rate rose by\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a060.6%. The unemployment rate was unchanged at\u00a07.1%.<\/p>\n
Employment was up in the core-aged group (25\u00a0to\u00a054\u00a0years old) both for women (+76,000; +1.2%) and men (+33,000; +0.5%), while it fell among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older (-44,000; -1.0%). There was little change in employment for youth aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024.<\/p>\n
There were more people working in manufacturing (+28,000; +1.5%), health care and social assistance (+14,000; +0.5%) and agriculture (+13,000; +6.1%). On the other hand, employment decreased in wholesale and retail trade (-21,000; -0.7%).<\/p>\n
Employment increased in Alberta (+43,000; +1.7%), New Brunswick (+4,700; +1.2%) and Manitoba (+3,900; +0.5%), while it declined in Newfoundland and Labrador (-2,200; -0.9%).<\/p>\n
In September, there was an increase in full-time employment (+106,000; +0.6%) while part-time employment fell (-46,000; -1.2%).<\/p>\n
Average hourly wages among employees increased\u00a03.3% (+$1.17\u00a0to $36.78) on a year-over-year basis in September, following growth of\u00a03.2% in August (not seasonally adjusted).<\/p>\n
Employment up in September, following declines in previous two months <\/p>\n
Employment increased by\u00a060,000\u00a0(+0.3%) in September, partially offsetting a cumulative decline of\u00a0106,000\u00a0(-0.5%) over the previous two months. From January to September, employment has recorded little net growth (+22,000; +0.1%).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Chart\u00a01\u00a0
<\/p>\n The employment rate\u2014the proportion of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older who are employed\u2014rose\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a060.6% in September, following consecutive declines in July and August. The employment rate in September was\u00a00.5\u00a0percentage points lower than the recent peak of\u00a061.1% recorded in January and February\u00a02025.<\/p>\n The employment increase in September was concentrated in full-time work (+106,000; +0.6%). In comparison, part-time employment fell by\u00a046,000\u00a0(-1.2%) in September. Both full-time and part-time employment were little changed compared with the beginning of the year.<\/p>\n In September, public sector employment rose by\u00a031,000\u00a0(+0.7%). Variations in the number of private sector employees (+22,000; +0.2%) and self-employed workers (+7,900; +0.3%) were smaller in the month.<\/p>\n Employment rises for core-aged women and men<\/p>\n Employment increased in the core-aged group (25\u00a0to\u00a054\u00a0years) both among women (+76,000; +1.2%) and men (+33,000; +0.5%) in September, following declines in August. This was associated with a rebound in the employment rate of core-aged women (+0.9\u00a0percentage points to\u00a080.4%) and core-aged men (+0.3\u00a0percentage points to\u00a086.1%) in September, from recent lows recorded in August.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Infographic\u00a01\u00a0
<\/p>\n Employment fell among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older in September (-44,000; -1.0%) and the employment rate for this group decreased by\u00a00.4\u00a0percentage points to\u00a033.6%. On a year-over-year basis, the employment rate among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older was down\u00a00.6\u00a0percentage points.<\/p>\n There was little change in employment for youth aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0in September and the employment rate for this group was unchanged at\u00a053.8%. The youth employment rate had trended down from a high of\u00a059.6% in March\u00a02023\u00a0to\u00a054.0% in August\u00a02024, a rate not previously seen since February\u00a01999\u00a0(excluding\u00a02020\u00a0and\u00a02021). Since August\u00a02024, the youth employment rate has hovered around\u00a054.0%.<\/p>\n Unemployment rate unchanged at\u00a07.1%<\/p>\n The overall unemployment rate was unchanged at\u00a07.1% in September, following a\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage point increase in August. Since the start of\u00a02025, the unemployment rate has increased by\u00a00.5\u00a0percentage points.<\/p>\n There were more people in the labour force in September and the participation rate rose by\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a065.2%. This represents the proportion of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0and older who were either employed or looking for work. The participation rate was unchanged on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n Unemployment rate down among core-aged men in September and up among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older<\/p>\n Among core-aged men, the unemployment rate fell\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a06.2% in September. Despite the decline in the month, it has generally trended up since the start of the year and was up\u00a00.6\u00a0percentage points compared with January. Among core-aged women, the unemployment rate in September (5.8%) was little changed both in the month and compared with the start of the year.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a02\u00a0
<\/p>\n The unemployment rate for people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older rose\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a05.5% in September, coinciding with a decline in employment among that group. The increase in the unemployment rate among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older in September follows four consecutive months of little change.<\/p>\n Unemployment rate up among young students
<\/p>\n Infographic\u00a02\u00a0
<\/p>\n The youth unemployment rate edged up to\u00a014.7% in September, the highest rate since September\u00a02010\u00a0(excluding\u00a02020\u00a0and\u00a02021). Compared with\u00a012\u00a0months earlier, the youth unemployment rate was up\u00a01.2\u00a0percentage points.<\/p>\n The increase in the youth unemployment rate over the\u00a012\u00a0months to September was primarily due to rising unemployment among students. In September\u00a02025, the unemployment rate among youth attending school was\u00a017.1%, up\u00a03.1\u00a0percentage points from the same month in\u00a02024. In comparison, the unemployment rate among youth not attending school was\u00a011.9% in September, virtually unchanged from\u00a012\u00a0months earlier (not seasonally adjusted).<\/p>\n The elevated unemployment rate among youth attending school in September follows a difficult summer student job market in\u00a02025. On average over the months of May to August\u00a02025, the unemployment rate for returning students\u2014those who attended school full time in the spring and intended to return to school full time in the fall\u2014stood at\u00a017.9%, the highest rate since the summer of\u00a02009\u00a0(18.0%), excluding the year\u00a02020, during the COVID-19\u00a0pandemic (not seasonally adjusted).<\/p>\n Employment increases in manufacturing as well as health care and social assistance<\/p>\n Employment in manufacturing rose in September (+28,000; +1.5%), the first increase since January. The increase was concentrated in Ontario (+12,000) and Alberta (+7,900). Prior to the increase in September, employment in manufacturing had recorded a net decline of\u00a058,000\u00a0(-3.1%) from January to August.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a03\u00a0
<\/p>\n In health care and social assistance, employment increased by\u00a014,000\u00a0(+0.5%) in September, following little change in August. On a year-over-year basis, employment in health care and social assistance was up\u00a053,000\u00a0(+1.8%).<\/p>\n Employment in agriculture rose in September (+13,000; +6.1%) for the first time since January. Gains were concentrated in Ontario (+5,200), Alberta (+4,500), and British Columbia (+2,900). Compared with September\u00a02024, employment in agriculture was little changed.<\/p>\n Employment in wholesale and retail trade declined by\u00a021,000\u00a0(-0.7%) in September, following little change in July and August. Despite the decline in September, employment in wholesale and retail trade was up by\u00a061,000\u00a0(+2.1%) on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n Largest employment gain in Alberta<\/p>\n In Alberta, employment rose in September (+43,000; +1.7%), more than offsetting declines recorded in July and August. The unemployment rate in the province fell\u00a00.6\u00a0percentage points to\u00a07.8% in September and was little changed on a year-over-year basis. In September, the unemployment rates in the census metropolitan areas (CMAs<\/a>) of Calgary (8.1%) and Edmonton (8.7%) were both little changed compared with\u00a012\u00a0months earlier (three-month moving averages). <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Map\u00a01\u00a0
Infographic\u00a03\u00a0
<\/p>\n Employment also increased in New Brunswick (+4,700; +1.2%) and Manitoba (+3,900; +0.5%) in September. Despite more people being employed, the unemployment rate increased in both provinces (by\u00a00.4\u00a0percentage points to\u00a08.1% in New Brunswick and by\u00a00.5\u00a0percentage points to\u00a06.2% in Manitoba), as more people searched for work.<\/p>\n In Quebec, employment was little changed for a third consecutive month in September. The unemployment rate in Quebec in September (5.7%) was down from the recent peak of\u00a06.3% recorded in June, and little changed on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n Employment was also little changed in Ontario in September. The unemployment rate in the province increased by\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a07.9% in September, as more people searched for work. The unemployment rate in the province was up\u00a00.8\u00a0percentage points from September\u00a02024. In the CMA<\/a> of Toronto, the unemployment rate was unchanged at\u00a08.9% in September\u00a02025\u00a0and was up\u00a00.8\u00a0percentage points on a year-over-year basis (three-month moving averages).<\/p>\n In the spotlightThe proportion of people working in jobs unrelated to their education or training increases slightly<\/p>\n In addition to impacting the likelihood of finding a job, changing labour market conditions can affect the ability of workers to secure employment related to their skills and qualifications. This can mean having to accept a job that is unrelated to their field of study or a position for which they are overqualified in terms of their skills or experience.<\/p>\n In September\u00a02025, the Labour Force Survey collected additional information related to skills mismatches, to measure the extent to which workers were in jobs related to their education or training and whether workers believed they were overqualified or underqualified for their job.<\/p>\n The analysis focuses on core-aged (25\u00a0to\u00a054\u00a0years) workers with a postsecondary certificate diploma or degree, which includes apprenticeship or trades certificates or diplomas, other postsecondary certificates or diplomas below a bachelor’s degree as well as bachelor’s degrees and higher levels of education.<\/p>\n In September,\u00a016.4% of core-aged workers with a postsecondary certificate, diploma or degree worked in a job or business that was unrelated to their education or training, up\u00a00.9\u00a0percentage points from\u00a012\u00a0months earlier. The increase was higher among workers aged\u00a025\u00a0to\u00a034\u00a0(+1.6\u00a0percentage points to\u00a018.2%).<\/p>\n Core-aged workers who were recent immigrants (who had landed in Canada within the previous five years) remained more likely to be working in a job unrelated to their education or training (21.2%) than their counterparts who were born in Canada (15.2%). More than\u00a04\u00a0in\u00a010\u00a0recent immigrants (41.9%) reported this was mainly because no jobs were available in their field, or they had been unable to find a job related to their education or training. In contrast, Canadian-born workers (56.3%) were over three times more likely than core-aged recent immigrants (17.3%) to indicate that they were working in a job unrelated to their education or training mainly because they had chosen to work in a different type of job.<\/p>\n Overqualification increases among recent immigrants<\/p>\n In September\u00a02025,\u00a021.8% of core-aged workers with a postsecondary certificate, diploma or degree reported being overqualified for their current role, little changed compared with September\u00a02024.<\/p>\n The proportion of recent immigrants who indicated that they were overqualified for their job reached\u00a034.7% in September\u00a02025, up\u00a04.2\u00a0percentage points compared with September\u00a02024. At the same time, this proportion fell slightly among workers born in Canada (-1.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a018.5%) and was little changed at\u00a021.6% among established immigrants (admitted more than\u00a010\u00a0years earlier).<\/p>\n In September\u00a02025, recent immigrants who reported that they were overqualified were concentrated in sales and service (29.8%) and business, finance and administration (17.6%) occupations.<\/p>\n Did you know we have a mobile app?<\/p>\n Download our mobile app and get timely access to data at your fingertips! The StatsCAN<\/a> app is available for free on the App Store<\/a> and on Google Play<\/a>.<\/p>\n
On January\u00a01,\u00a02016, the world officially began implementation of the 2030\u00a0Agenda for Sustainable Development<\/a>\u2014the United Nations’ transformative plan of action that addresses urgent global challenges over the next\u00a015\u00a0years. The plan is based on\u00a017\u00a0specific sustainable development goals.<\/p>\n The Labour Force Survey is an example of how Statistics Canada supports the reporting on the Global Goals for Sustainable Development. This release will be used in helping to measure the following goals:<\/p>\n
The Labour Force Survey (LFS<\/a>) estimates for September reflect labour market conditions during the reference week of September\u00a014\u00a0to\u00a020,\u00a02025.<\/p>\n The sample size of the LFS<\/a> is approximately\u00a065,000\u00a0households, representing over\u00a0100,000\u00a0respondents each month. For more information, see the Guide to the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n This analysis focuses on differences between estimates that are statistically significant at the\u00a068% confidence level. Monthly estimates may show more sampling variability than trends observed over longer periods. For more information, see “Interpreting Monthly Changes in Employment from the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.”<\/p>\n LFS<\/a> estimates at the Canada level do not include the territories.<\/p>\n The LFS<\/a> estimates are the first in a series of labour market indicators released by Statistics Canada, which includes indicators from programs such as the Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (SEPH<\/a>); Employment Insurance Statistics; and the Job Vacancy and Wage Survey. For more information on the conceptual differences between employment measures from the LFS<\/a> and those from the SEPH<\/a>, refer to section\u00a08\u00a0of the Guide to the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n The employment rate is the number of employed people as a percentage of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older. The rate for a particular group (for example, youth aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0years) is the number employed in that group as a percentage of the population for that group.<\/p>\n The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed people as a percentage of the labour force (employed and unemployed).<\/p>\n The participation rate is the number of employed and unemployed people as a percentage of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older.<\/p>\n Full-time employment consists of persons who usually work\u00a030\u00a0hours or more per week at their main or only job.<\/p>\n Part-time employment consists of persons who usually work less than\u00a030\u00a0hours per week at their main or only job.<\/p>\n Total hours worked refers to the number of hours actually worked at the main job by the respondent during the reference week, including paid and unpaid hours. These hours reflect temporary decreases or increases in work hours (for example, hours lost due to illness, vacation, holidays or weather; or more hours worked due to overtime).<\/p>\n This release refers to the gender of a person<\/a>. The category “men” includes men, as well as some non-binary persons. The category “women” includes women, as well as some non-binary persons. Given that the non-binary population is small, data aggregation to a two-category gender variable is necessary to protect the confidentiality of responses provided.<\/p>\n Seasonal adjustment<\/p>\n Unless otherwise stated, estimates presented in this release are seasonally adjusted, which facilitates comparisons by removing the effects of typical seasonal variations. For more information on seasonal adjustment, see Seasonally adjusted data \u2013 Frequently asked questions<\/a>.<\/p>\n Population growth in the Labour Force Survey<\/p>\n The LFS<\/a> target population includes all persons aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older whose usual place of residence is in Canada, with some exceptions (those living on reserves, full-time members of the regular Armed Forces and persons living in institutions). The target population includes temporary residents\u2014that is, those with a valid work or study permit, their families, and refugee claimants\u2014as well as permanent residents (landed immigrants) and the Canadian-born.<\/p>\n Information gathered from LFS<\/a> respondents is weighted to represent the survey target population using population calibration totals. These totals are updated each month, using the most recently available information on population changes derived from Canada’s official population estimates, with minor adjustments being made to reflect the LFS<\/a> target population.<\/p>\n While the LFS<\/a> population totals are generally aligned with official demographic estimates, the official estimates should be considered the official measure of population change in Canada. More information on how population totals in the LFS<\/a> are calculated can be found in the article “Interpreting population totals from the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.”<\/p>\n Updates to the Labour Force Survey sample design beginning in April\u00a02025<\/p>\n Every\u00a010\u00a0years, the LFS<\/a> sample is redesigned to reflect changes in population characteristics and updated geographical boundaries. The updated sample design\u2014based on the\u00a02021\u00a0Census population characteristics and the\u00a02021\u00a0Standard Geographical Classification\u2014is being phased in from April to September\u00a02025. For more information, see Section\u00a04\u00a0of the Guide to the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n Data for the Labour Market Indicators program are now available for September\u00a02025.<\/p>\n Next release<\/p>\n The next release of the LFS<\/a> will be on November\u00a07. October data will reflect labour market conditions during the week of October\u00a012\u00a0to\u00a018.<\/p>\n
More information about the concepts and use of the Labour Force Survey is available online in the Guide to the Labour Force Survey (Catalogue number71-543-G<\/a>).<\/p>\n The product “Labour Force Survey in brief: Interactive app<\/a>” (Catalogue number14200001<\/a>) is also available. This interactive visualization application provides seasonally adjusted estimates by province, gender, age group and industry.<\/p>\n The product “Labour Market Indicators, by province and census metropolitan area, seasonally adjusted<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This interactive dashboard provides customizable access to key labour market indicators.<\/p>\n The product “Labour Market Indicators, by province, territory and economic region, unadjusted for seasonality<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This dynamic web application provides access to labour market indicators for Canada, provinces, territories and economic regions.<\/p>\n The product “Labour market indicators, census metropolitan areas, census agglomerations and self-contained labour areas: Interactive dashboard<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This dashboard allows users to visually explore the estimates using an interactive map as well as time series charts and tables.<\/p>\n The product Labour Force Survey: Public Use Microdata File (Catalogue number71M0001X<\/a>) is also available. This public use microdata file contains non-aggregated data for a wide variety of variables collected from the Labour Force Survey. The data have been modified to ensure that no individual or business is directly or indirectly identified. This product is for users who prefer to do their own analysis by focusing on specific subgroups in the population or by cross-classifying variables that are not in our catalogued products.<\/p>\n Contact information<\/p>\n For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact us (toll-free 1-800-263-1136; 514-283-8300; infostats@statcan.gc.ca<\/a>) or Media Relations (statcan.mediahotline-ligneinfomedias.statcan@statcan.gc.ca<\/a>).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Released:\u00a02025-10-10
Select geography
Canada
Newfoundland and Labrador
Prince Edward Island
Nova Scotia
…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":202767,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[43,44,41,39,42,40],"class_list":{"0":"post-202766","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-headlines","8":"tag-headlines","9":"tag-news","10":"tag-top-news","11":"tag-top-stories","12":"tag-topnews","13":"tag-topstories"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=202766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/202766\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/202767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=202766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=202766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=202766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/magnify-clip.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
<\/a>
\nEmployment rate up in September, following two consecutive declines
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cg251010a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nEmployment rate by age group, September\u00a02025
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/g251010a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate unchanged in September
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cg251010a002-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate by age group, September\u00a02025
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/g251010a002-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nEmployment change by industry, September\u00a02025
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/cg251010a003-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate by province and territory, September\u00a02025
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/mc251010a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rates by census metropolitan area (CMA)
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/g251010a003-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nSustainable Development Goals<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/08_SDG_EN.png\"\/ "\\"Goal")
\n![](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/09_SDG_EN.png\"\/ "\\"Goal")
<\/p>\n
\n \u00a0\u00a0Note to readers
\n <\/p>\n
\n
\nProducts
<\/p>\n