{"id":228064,"date":"2025-10-21T00:04:19","date_gmt":"2025-10-21T00:04:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/228064\/"},"modified":"2025-10-21T00:04:19","modified_gmt":"2025-10-21T00:04:19","slug":"why-progressive-stock-sank-on-monday","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/228064\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Progressive Stock Sank on Monday"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Veteran <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/stock-market\/market-sectors\/financials\/insurance-stocks\/?utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">insurance company<\/a>Progressive(NYSE: PGR) suffered a case of the Mondays on the first stock trading day of this week. Its shares took a nearly 3% hit that session, on the back of two pessimistic analyst updates. Additionally, this occurred on a day when the S&amp;P 500(SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) traded up, rising by 1.1%.<\/p>\n<p>Downed with a downgrade<\/p>\n<p>Of the pair, the more impactful was the one issued by Bob Huang of white-shoe investment bank Morgan Stanley. Huang downgraded his recommendation to underweight (i.e., hold) from his previous rating of equalweight (neutral). He accompanied this with a substantial <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/terms\/p\/price-target\/?utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">price target<\/a> reduction to $265 per share &#8212; previously, he had flagged the stock as being worth $265 apiece.<\/p>\n<p>Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now, when you join Stock Advisor. <a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=53e82dfd-d3d8-46db-9f2e-6f8ea181b0a0&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001159%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_veh%3Dtop_incontent_pitch_feed_partner%26ftm_pit%3D18402&amp;utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">See the stocks \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\" alt=\"Person looking at laptop screen with head in hands.\" src=\"https:\/\/barchart-news-media-prod.aws.barchart.com\/FC\/9bd9c63eb34caa078f9712a82c3eb8d5\/%3Furl%3Dhttps%253a%252f%252fg.foolcdn.com%252feditorial%252fimages%252f839011%252fperson-looking-at-laptop-screen-with-head-in-hands.jpg%26amp%3Bw%3D700\"\/><\/p>\n<p class=\"caption\">Image source: Getty Images.<\/p>\n<p>According to reports, Huang&#8217;s main concern is that Progressive is entering a cycle where pricing power for insurers will be weaker. Given that the pricing of premiums is critical to an insurance company&#8217;s fundamentals, this is sure to impact key line items for the company.<\/p>\n<p>The analyst believes this will have enough of a negative impact for Progressive to post per-share earnings declines in both 2026 and 2027.<\/p>\n<p>More progress wanted<\/p>\n<p>Compounding that, Huang&#8217;s peer Alex Scott of Barclays also reduced his price target, although he left his recommendation of equalweight unchanged. Scott&#8217;s new fair-value assessment is $257 per share, down from the preceding $271.<\/p>\n<p>Pessimism is in the air with Progressive at the moment; last week, the company released discouraging <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/investing\/2025\/10\/15\/why-progressive-stock-tumbled-by-almost-6-today\/?utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">preliminary third-quarter results<\/a>. Although it showed decent growth in certain line items, it failed to meet analyst estimates for the period.<\/p>\n<p>Should you invest $1,000 in Progressive right now?<\/p>\n<p>Before you buy stock in Progressive, consider this:<\/p>\n<p>The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the <a href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=8686c28d-d46b-4654-9393-726b3fa00493&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001093%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26ftm_pit%3D17514&amp;utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">10 best stocks<\/a> for investors to buy now\u2026 and Progressive wasn\u2019t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.<\/p>\n<p>Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you\u2019d have $646,805!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005&#8230; if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you\u2019d have $1,123,113!*<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s worth noting Stock Advisor\u2019s total average return is 1,055% \u2014 a market-crushing outperformance compared to 189% for the S&amp;P 500. Don\u2019t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"ticker_pitch\" href=\"https:\/\/api.fool.com\/infotron\/infotrack\/click?apikey=35527423-a535-4519-a07f-20014582e03e&amp;impression=8686c28d-d46b-4654-9393-726b3fa00493&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fool.com%2Fmms%2Fmark%2Fe-sa-bbn-bn%3Faid%3D8867%26source%3Disaeditxt0001093%26ftm_cam%3Dsa-bbn-evergreen%26ftm_pit%3D17514%26ftm_veh%3Darticle_pitch_feed_partners%26company%3DProgressive&amp;utm_source=globeandmail&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=article&amp;referring_guid=16ce49b7-943f-4505-81ef-8051235a5f05\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">See the 10 stocks \u00bb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*Stock Advisor returns as of October 20, 2025<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/author\/4067\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Eric Volkman<\/a> has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Progressive. The Motley Fool recommends Barclays Plc. The Motley Fool has a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fool.com\/legal\/fool-disclosure-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">disclosure policy<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" style=\"display:none;\" referrerpolicy=\"unsafe-url\" src=\"https:\/\/barchart-news-media-prod.aws.barchart.com\/FC\/9bd9c63eb34caa078f9712a82c3eb8d5\/pixel%3Fslug%3Dmotleyfoolgm-2025-10-20-why-progressive-stock-sank-on-monday\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Veteran insurance companyProgressive(NYSE: PGR) suffered a case of the Mondays on the first stock trading day of this&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":228065,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[45,49,48,2640,2637,2636,2639,2638,2641,100,6499,33197,1837],"class_list":["post-228064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-markets","tag-business","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-futures","tag-index-market-quote","tag-index-market-quotes","tag-index-market-symbol","tag-index-market-symbols","tag-indices","tag-markets","tag-netflix-inc","tag-nflx","tag-the-globe-and-mail"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=228064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/228064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/228065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=228064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=228064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=228064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}