{"id":234966,"date":"2025-10-23T17:55:07","date_gmt":"2025-10-23T17:55:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/234966\/"},"modified":"2025-10-23T17:55:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-23T17:55:07","slug":"horror-doesnt-need-the-academys-permission-to-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/234966\/","title":{"rendered":"Horror doesn\u2019t need the Academy\u2019s permission to matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dear reader, I\u2019m delighted to tell you that, if you\u2019ve ever been at a social function and had to hear someone utter the words, \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/toni_collette\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Toni Collette<\/a> should\u2019ve been nominated for an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/oscars\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Oscar<\/a> for \u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/hereditary\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Hereditary<\/a>,\u2019\u201d you may be entitled to compensation. (Smaller monetary rewards may be awarded to those who have seen similar sentiments on social media. Please record your responses and tie them to the foot of a carrier pigeon, in care of me; the pigeon will know where to bring it.) It\u2019s not that Collette\u2019s performance in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/ari-aster\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Ari Aster\u2019s<\/a> 2018 horror film is so bad that it\u2019s worthy of a class action lawsuit, but rather, that her work is so incredibly good that hearing about how Collette was robbed of a nomination has become utterly banal. Anyone who\u2019s seen the film knows it firsthand, and anyone who hasn\u2019t has probably heard chatter that Collette was overlooked because \u201cHereditary\u201d is a horror film. Would it have been nice to see Collette included among her contemporaries in the best actress lineup, especially if she could\u2019ve knocked out a less-deserving performance like, oh, I don\u2019t know, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/glenn_close\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Glenn Close<\/a> in \u201cThe Wife\u201d? Of course. But we can\u2019t change the past; we can only advocate for a different future moving forward.<\/p>\n<p>This year, horror aficionados came close to seeing this wrong finally righted for the first time in years when <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/demi_moore\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Demi Moore<\/a>, director Coralie Fargeat and their film \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_substance\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Substance<\/a>\u201d were nominated in three of the big four categories \u2014 best picture, best director, best actress and best actor \u2014 at the Oscars. Despite the film\u2019s absurd splatter gore, timely parody and hyper-stylized direction, all things the Academy doesn\u2019t typically take kindly to, Moore\u2019s chances looked decent. While \u201cThe Substance\u201d was an unlikely win for the film itself, Moore took home gold at the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/golden_globes\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Golden Globes<\/a> two months before, and if she won the Oscar, it would be the first time a horror film has won in a big four category since <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/natalie_portman\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Natalie Portman<\/a> took home the Oscar in the same category for \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/black_swan\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Black Swan<\/a>\u201d in 2010. (Prior to this, no horror film has won in a big four category since \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_silence_of_the_lambs\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Silence of the Lambs<\/a>\u201d swept the Oscars in 1991.) But despite the thrust behind her, Moore lost to Mikey Madison for \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/anora\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Anora<\/a>,\u201d causing both horror buffs and casual viewers to contemplate what it might take for a new horror film to not just break through the awards space, but win.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-874734\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/silence-of-the-lambs.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1692\" height=\"1142\" class=\"wp-image-874734 size-full\"  \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-874734\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Orion Pictures) Anthony Hopkins and Jodie Foster in \u201cSilence of the Lambs\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Because horror is a genre built on excess, it\u2019s also an easy punching bag. Films aren\u2019t doing well? Blame the gore, blame the violence, blame the lack of new ideas. Critics have pronounced the genre dead just as many times as they\u2019ve proclaimed its resurrection as soon as another hit comes along.<\/p>\n<p>The genre is, after all, still enjoying another renaissance period, which many viewers hope will be enough for awards voters to take horror seriously. After being mired by C-movie slashers and torture porn \u2014 some of which admittedly got a bad rap \u2014 throughout the 2000s, horror got a much-needed boost at the turn of the decade, when \u201cBlack Swan\u201d returned an air of prestige to the genre. Films like \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_witch\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Witch<\/a>,\u201d \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_babadook\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">The Babadook<\/a>\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/it_follows\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">It Follows<\/a>\u201d pushed this resurgence even further throughout the 2010s, with Collette\u2019s performance in \u201cHereditary\u201d bringing the genre back into awards conversation and further cementing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/a24\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">A24<\/a>, the movie\u2019s distributor, as a huge theatrical power player. With horror dominating both the box office and the larger zeitgeist year-round, the genre has long since graduated from the days of seasonal Halloween releases and studios dumping their frightful flops into theaters in January to die a quick death during the post-holiday slow season. While the genre\u2019s renewed mainstream status does make one wonder what a horror movie needs behind it to actually pick up awards, instead of just being part of the tertiary conversation, that question misses the point of why horror has become so popular once more. A genre as wide-reaching and weird as this one doesn\u2019t need golden statues to be legitimized. In many ways, horror has already won, and trying to push it back toward Oscar glory is a futile, Sisyphean endeavor.<\/p>\n<p>From a purely mathematical standpoint, horror\u2019s dominance is irrefutable. Consider this year\u2019s box office numbers from late summer into early fall. Thanks to some mysterious marketing, stellar trailers and months of word-of-mouth hype, Zach Cregger\u2019s \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/weapons\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Weapons<\/a>\u201d opened domestically with a cool $43.5 million against its $38 million budget, and earned the top spot across three more weekends in August. Funnily enough, the only thing that could topple the \u201cWeapons\u201d reign was another horror film, \u201cThe Conjuring: Last Rites,\u201d which raked in a jaw-dropping $84 million over Labor Day weekend \u2014 not bad for the middlingly reviewed sixth film in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_conjuring\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">long-running franchise<\/a>. A cynic might argue that, like pumpkin-flavored treats appearing in stores during the first week of August, these successes are merely the product of early excitement for the Halloween season. But even a skeptic can\u2019t deny the power of \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/sinners\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Sinners<\/a>,\u201d which dominated the box office and cultural conversation for weeks following its April 18 release. Whether these films are born of an original idea, or they\u2019re the sequel of a sequel based on a true story, horror has real draw.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-874737\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/the-conjuring.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"1692\" height=\"1142\" class=\"wp-image-874737 size-full\"  \/><\/p>\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-874737\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">(Warner Bros. Pictures) Vera Farmiga as Lorraine Warren and Patrick Wilson as Ed Warren in \u201cThe Conjuring: Last Rites\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For scare obsessives and curious minds, this has long been the case. Any horror fan will tell you that, despite the peaks and valleys inevitable with all types of filmmaking, the genre has always had its strong contenders and hidden gems, underseen by mainstream American audiences. There are plenty of scrappy indie thrillers and international chillers that can pick up the slack outside of the glitzy domestic market, where Hollywood horror often gets lost in its own self-important sauce. But because horror is a genre built on visual and emotional excess, it\u2019s also an easy punching bag. Films aren\u2019t doing well? Blame the gore, blame the violence, blame the lack of new ideas. Critics have pronounced the genre dead just as many times as they\u2019ve proclaimed its resurrection as soon as another string of hits comes along. It was already safe to say that the genre wasn\u2019t going anywhere decades ago. But now that horror seems to have secured a permanent place in awards speculation, those old questions of whether or not these films could be taken seriously seems to have finally quieted, replaced by the roar of heightened prestige.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Start your day with essential news from Salon.<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/newsletter?utm_source=onsite&amp;utm_medium=organic&amp;utm_campaign=crash-course-edit-signup\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Sign up for our free morning newsletter<\/a>, Crash Course.<\/p>\n<p>But the resurgence in horror\u2019s popularity didn\u2019t happen overnight, either. This era of \u201celevated\u201d horror \u2014 a phrase I deign to use, given that fantastic, well-rounded horror films have existed since the genre\u2019s inception \u2014 owes a great deal to A24 and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/neon\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">NEON<\/a>, the two distributors turned production companies that have led the charge in validating horror for a new generation. NEON and A24 are not merely production companies or film distributors; they are capital-B brands, marketing themselves as much as they do their movies. One of A24\u2019s earliest horror hits, \u201cThe Witch\u201d \u2014 a spare yet dreadful and beautifully shot folktale \u2014 did considerable work synonymizing the company with prestige horror. What started as buzz among niche horror circles about the latest A24 acquisition soon broke through to the mainstream, with moviegoers excited by the opportunity to see something that might be different from the typical slasher or ghost story. NEON has followed suit, wisely throwing millions of dollars toward marketing to make a film like \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/longlegs\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Longlegs<\/a>\u201d into grassroots hits.<\/p>\n<p>It would\u2019ve been incredible to see something as bold and in-your-face as \u201cThe Substance\u201d take home a best picture Oscar, but accolades are no longer the definitive proof of a genre\u2019s financial viability \u2014 the viewers are.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s not just that A24 and NEON are distributing and producing innovative horror, but that these films exist alongside the companies\u2019 wide spate of other titles that reflect more classic ideas of what prestige filmmaking looks like. Both companies hold titles with best picture wins, with NEON repping \u201cAnora\u201d and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/parasite\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Parasite<\/a>,\u201d and A24 behind \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/everything_everywhere_all_at_once\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Everything Everywhere All at Once<\/a>\u201d \u2014 with several others in either company\u2019s portfolio nominated for the Academy\u2019s biggest award. And it doesn\u2019t take a discerning eye to realize that the horror movies distributed and produced by these companies share similar themes and narratives to their awards-bait dramas, told in ways that skew scarier. Don\u2019t call it a coincidence that so much of the marketing for \u201cLonglegs\u201d included pull quotes from critics comparing the film to \u201cSilence of the Lambs.\u201d If Jonathan Demme\u2019s procedural, which is arguably just as much of a thriller and drama as it is a horror film, could take home Oscar gold, what\u2019s stopping NEON and A24 from breaking through industry red tape with the right entry into their personal horror canons?<\/p>\n<p>While that would be an exciting achievement for horror in its current state, it\u2019s one that simply isn\u2019t necessary. Contemporary horror has already sailed past the grace period that detractors used to give the genre when it would surge before inevitably stumbling once more. These days, those falters are fewer. And though there are still plenty of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/2025\/01\/31\/companion-exudes-exactly-the-kind-of-self-important-arrogance-it-desperately-tries-to-parody\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">cheap knockoffs<\/a> of better movies and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.salon.com\/topic\/the_monkey\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eye-rollingly dumb<\/a> splatter films desperately trying to mooch goodwill from the genre\u2019s popularity, the number of horror films that at least have some worthwhile redeeming qualities outnumber the duds. Even films I haven\u2019t been crazy about, like \u201cWeapons,\u201d are interesting in the ways that they dare to be different, even if they strike out when they swing for the fences. The genre doesn\u2019t need to be legitimized by awards voting bodies because it already has a growing army of dedicated viewers, curious enough to roll the dice and spend their hard-earned cash on risk-taking filmmaking. Granted, it would\u2019ve been incredible to see something as bold and in-your-face as \u201cThe Substance\u201d take home a best picture Oscar, but accolades are no longer the definitive proof of a genre\u2019s financial viability \u2014 the viewers are.<\/p>\n<p>So don\u2019t be discouraged if the <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/cevangelista413\/status\/1980449211352252875\" rel=\"nofollow\">awards campaign<\/a> for Amy Madigan\u2019s delightfully menacing \u201cWeapons\u201d villain, Aunt Gladys, doesn\u2019t score the impeccable character actor her second Oscar nomination. If you want to see her character\u2019s influence, take a scroll through some Instagram carousels while hungover on November 1. You\u2019ll be sure to notice at least 15 Aunt Gladyses, in cheap auburn wigs and overdrawn red lipstick. Even if it can\u2019t be measured by dollars and cents, that\u2019s a real cultural impact. Spending the next 10 years lamenting Madigan\u2019s potential snub would be nothing more than reductive, implying that her work is only worthy if it\u2019s awarded by stuffy voters who maintain little respect for horror, anyway. Horror has always been the underdog genre, a category of filmmaking defined by its fearlessness and rejection of permission. No amount of prestige can change that, nor should it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"red_box\">Read more<\/p>\n<p class=\"white_box\">about innovative thrills and chills<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Dear reader, I\u2019m delighted to tell you that, if you\u2019ve ever been at a social function and had&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":234967,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[49,48,75,337],"class_list":["post-234966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-movies","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-entertainment","tag-movies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234966\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}