{"id":268230,"date":"2025-11-07T17:49:16","date_gmt":"2025-11-07T17:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/268230\/"},"modified":"2025-11-07T17:49:16","modified_gmt":"2025-11-07T17:49:16","slug":"cant-distinguish-between-unmarried-daughters-divorced-daughters-while-granting-freedom-fighters-pension-madras-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/268230\/","title":{"rendered":"Can&#8217;t Distinguish Between Unmarried Daughters &#038; Divorced Daughters While Granting Freedom Fighters Pension: Madras High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Madras High  Court recently reiterated that a divorced daughter, who was in an impoverished  circumstance, would also be a dependent to claim the Freedom Fighters Pension.<\/p>\n<p>Justice V Lakshminarayanan  adopted the view taken by the Supreme Court in the case of Khajani Devi, where  the Supreme Court had held that the special family pension and the Swatantrata  Sainik Samman Pension Scheme were intended to honour the valour of uniformed  people who laid down their lives or suffered for the cause of the country. The Supreme  Court had held that any demeaning interpretation of the scheme to deprive the  unsung heroes of the country of benefits meant to ensure a life of dignity to  their dependents. <\/p>\n<p>Following the above  view of the Supreme Court, the court observed as under,<\/p>\n<p>    \u201cWhen the  Supreme Court has spoken, Judicial discipline requires that I adopt the same  view and not attempt to distinguish the same, as sought to be done by the  learned Deputy Solicitor General. Since, the view of Khajani Devi&#8217;s case has  been approved by the Supreme Court, and as the circumstances in that case are  similar to the case on hand, I am of the view that the writ petition should  succeed. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order is  quashed,\u201d the court observed.    <\/p>\n<p>The court was hearing  a petition filed by a freedom fighter&#8217;s daughter seeking to transfer the pension  from her deceased mother&#8217;s account to her account. The court was informed that  the woman&#8217;s father Shanmuga Thevar was a freedom fighter from Burma who had  joined the Indian National Army in Burma led by Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. It  was submitted that the petitioner&#8217;s father was imprisoned in Rangoon Jail for 6  months. After his release, the family had been reduced to impoverished  circumstances and thus, instead of residing in Burma, they shifted their  resident to India. <\/p>\n<p>It was submitted  that after the father&#8217;s demise, the petitioner&#8217;s mother was granted a pension  by the State as well as the Central Government. Now, after the mother&#8217;s demise,  the petitioner had approached the court to transfer the pension to her account.  <\/p>\n<p>The court was  also informed that the petitioner had married a Singapore citizen and had two  children from the marriage. However, due to the cruelty at the hands of the husband,  she sought a divorce, and came back to the country, and the children&#8217;s custody was  with the husband. She submitted that she had been residing with her mother till  her death.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner  also submitted that she had also sought a pension from the State of Tamil Nadu, and the same was allowed by way of a court order, wherein the court had  remarked that she was eligible for pension.<\/p>\n<p>The Central  Government, however, objected to the plea and argued that to be eligible as a  dependant, the daughter had to satisfy two conditions. Firstly, it had to be  shown that she did not have any independent source of income, and secondly, she  must not be married. In the present case, the Deputy Solicitor General argued  that the petitioner did not have any right to seek a pension as she was not  covered under the scope of the scheme.<\/p>\n<p>The court noted  that in Khajani Devi&#8217;s case also, the petitioner was the daughter of a freedom  fighter and the Supreme Court had allowed her to get the freedom fighter&#8217;s  pension as her father&#8217;s dependent. <\/p>\n<p>Though the Deputy  Solicitor General placed reliance on some other cases, the court noted that the  same dealt with compassionate appointments and it could not be compared with  the freedom fighters&#8217; pension.<\/p>\n<p>    \u201cThe pension  is being granted by the Union of India in recognition of the hardship that had  been undergone by freedom fighters during the independence movement. To compare  such hardship with compassionate appointment, in my view, would not be  appropriate,\u201d the court said.     <\/p>\n<p>Thus, noting that  the woman was entitled to a pension from the date of her application, the court  directed the authorities to do the needful within 8 weeks. The court directed  the Union Government to forward the papers to the State of Tamil Nadu, which shall  conduct an enquiry to ascertain whether the petitioner was in an impoverished  circumstance and whether she was dependent on her parents during their lifetime.  On receipt of the report, the court directed the central government to pass  appropriate orders.<\/p>\n<p>Counsel for  Petitioner: A.P.Surya Prakasam, N. Abiragan<\/p>\n<p>Counsel for  Respondents: M\/s. R. Rajesh Vivekananthan, Deputy Solicitor General Of India<\/p>\n<p>Case Title: Thillai  Lokanathan v. The Deputy Secretary and Others <\/p>\n<p>Citation: 2025  LiveLaw (Mad) 405<\/p>\n<p>Case No: WP  No. 29353 of 2025<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Madras High Court recently reiterated that a divorced daughter, who was in an impoverished circumstance, would also&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":268231,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[45,49,48,123373,133,123372,123371,123370,9611,131,132],"class_list":{"0":"post-268230","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-personal-finance","8":"tag-business","9":"tag-ca","10":"tag-canada","11":"tag-divorced-daughter","12":"tag-finance","13":"tag-freedom-fighters-pension","14":"tag-justice-v-lakshminarayanan","15":"tag-madras-high-court","16":"tag-pension","17":"tag-personal-finance","18":"tag-personalfinance"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=268230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/268230\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/268231"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=268230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=268230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=268230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}