![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/slim-sallee-weird.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
The left-hander had his best season by going 21-7 with a 2.06 ERA (136 ERA+) for the world champion 1919 Cincinnati Reds.\u00a0That fine stat line isn\u2019t the most noteworthy part of Sallee\u2019s career year.\u00a0He dominated while striking out just 24 in 227.2 innings pitched, or less than a whiff (0.949) per 9 innings pitched.\u00a0Opposing hitters had to come up swinging, as Sallee\u2019s miserly 20 walks works out to 0.79 for every 9 IP.\u00a0 Sallee is one of seven post-1900 hurlers with more wins (at least 10 Ws) than bases on balls.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Using numbers per 9 innings is an appropriate way to analyze Sallee\u2019s unique performance, as he tossed 22 complete games in 28 starts with a lone no-decision.\u00a0 Slim\u2019s only relief appearance resulted in a win despite giving up two earned runs and four hits in 3 IP against the Boston Braves on July 30.\u00a0This 21-game winner didn\u2019t appear until the 10th game of the season and had a few longer-than-normal stretches between starts, indicating the possibility of nagging injuries.<\/p>\n
This was done by a pitcher who started with both feet on the rubber.\u00a0Being extremely tall for the era at 6-3 provided an advantage, but it was Sallee\u2019s multiple release points and arm angles that confounded the opposition.\u00a0Strikeouts were much lower in the pre-1920 Dead Ball era, but even that doesn\u2019t reduce how mind-boggling Slim\u2019s 1919 starts are and how he dominated hitters who almost always made contact.<\/p>\n
Sallee tossed six games with no Ks or walks along, with another 13 starts with a lone strikeout or free pass \u2013 but not both. Weird numbers fans will want to check the 13-hit July 17 complete game at Ebbets Field against the Brooklyn Robins.\u00a0Sallee improved to 10-3 in the 5-1 Reds win.\u00a0Cincinnati turned just one double play, so the lefty was often pitching with Robins runners on base.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/slim-sallee-weird2.jpg\")
The battery for the Cincinnati Reds in the 1919 World Series: Catcher Bill Rariden and pitcher Slim Sallee. Source: San Francisco Chronicle, October 13, 1919.<\/p>\n
Then there was the 14-hit 4-2 complete game road victory against the Cubs on September 1 that boosted Sallee\u2019s record to 17-6.\u00a0Cincinnati turned a lone double play, so Sallee had to finesse his way through a parade of Cubs baserunners. Since Slim\u2019s strikeouts were a rare event, was he a master of inducing double plays?\u00a0There were 23 double plays in 28 starts, or 0.79 per game.\u00a0If that sounds low for the ultimate pitch-to-contact season, it was merely 11.4 percent above average.<\/p>\n
The 1919 Reds ranked fourth in the eight-team National League with 98 double plays in 140 games, or 0.70 per contest. Shouldn\u2019t there have been more twin killings during the Dead Ball years?\u00a0Unlike today, teams often went for a sacrifice bunt with a runner on first or first and second with less than two outs.\u00a0That reduced double-play opportunities. A softer ball also meant many grounders trickled to infielders who could only get one out. Compare that to today\u2019s sharply hit balls that give fielders adequate time to turn two. Dinky early 1900s gloves resulted in more infield hits and errors. Additionally, some teams used sheep and goats to help trim the grass, and the primitive-by-today\u2019s-standards groundskeeping meant bad hop hits were a regular occurrence.<\/p>\n
Most ballgames in 1919 were played in an hour and 40 minutes to two hours and 15 minutes.\u00a0That pace was too leisurely for Sallee.\u00a0Nine of his starts were wrapped up in 1:30 (90 minutes) or less.\u00a0The most amazing quick performance came at home on September 21. \u201cSallee Day\u201d attracted a solid crowd of 10,000. Even though the guest of honor lost 3-1 to Brooklyn, the game took a breathtaking 55 minutes.\u00a0The lesson is obvious.\u00a0Never arrive late when Sallee was on the mound.<\/p>\n
Cincinnati made its first World Series appearance against the infamous Chicago White (Black) Sox. Many believe that an honest effort by the Sox would have led to an easy victory in the best of 9 Series, but the 1919 Reds were a top-notch team, as shown by their 96-44 (.686 winning percentage) record. That was six games better than the 88-52 (.629) White Sox regular season.<\/p>\n
In addition to Sallee, the Reds had a group of formidable starters. Dutch Ruether went 19-6 with a 1.82 ERA (154 ERA+), Fellow 19-game winner Hod Eller had the rotation\u2019s highest ERA at 2.39 for a 117 ERA+.\u00a0Right-hander Ray Fisher put in one of the finest performances ever by a back of the rotation starter by going 14-5 with a 2.17 ERA (129 ERA+). Swingman Jimmy Ring deserved a better record than 10-9, as his 2.26 ERA was 24 percent better than the National League norm.<\/p>\n
Sallee had a typical performance in Game 2 of the Series, as he tossed a 10-hit complete game in a 4-2 victory over the Black Sox. Slim struck out a pair with a lone walk.\u00a0He got a quick hook (by 1919 standards) in Game 7.\u00a0Sallee pitched 4.1 innings while giving up four runs.\u00a0Two of those runs were unearned, as the Reds committed four errors in a sloppy performance. Sallee finished this eight-game World Series with a 1-1 record and a 1.35 ERA in 13.1 IP.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s safe to say that no starting pitcher will come within light years of Slim Sallee\u2019s incredible season of constantly getting hitters out through soft contact.<\/p>\n
Follow me on Instagram: @rip_mlb<\/a><\/p>\n Follow me on Facebook: ripbaseball<\/a><\/p>\n Follow me on Bluesky: @ripmlb<\/a><\/p>\n Follow me on Threads: @rip_mlb<\/a><\/p>\n