{"id":295428,"date":"2025-11-20T12:32:08","date_gmt":"2025-11-20T12:32:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/295428\/"},"modified":"2025-11-20T12:32:08","modified_gmt":"2025-11-20T12:32:08","slug":"how-trump-reversed-course-on-the-epstein-files-as-his-administration-faces-lingering-suspicion-about-their-release","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/295428\/","title":{"rendered":"How Trump reversed course on the Epstein files as his administration faces lingering suspicion about their release"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n President Donald Trump<\/a> on Wednesday sought to bring a swift end to perhaps the most damaging saga of his term, signing a measure<\/a> compelling the release of the Epstein files after losing a monthslong, tooth-and-nail fight to prevent their disclosure.\n <\/p>\n

\n The decision represents a stunning reversal for the president aimed chiefly at quelling a brewing GOP revolt and restoring his iron grip over the party. But few believe the path will be so easy from here.\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cI HAVE JUST SIGNED THE BILL TO RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES,\u201d Trump posted on Truth Social late in the day, framing the overwhelming votes for it in Congress as a result of his involvement.\n <\/p>\n

\n The measure becoming law is now set to open a fraught new stage in the push for the files<\/a> tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, putting the Justice Department under fresh scrutiny and testing the White House\u2019s ability to pivot attention away from the president\u2019s past dealings with Epstein and toward more advantageous political ground.\n <\/p>\n

\n At an unrelated press conference earlier Wednesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi would only say that the Justice Department would \u201cfollow the law\u201d when asked about the Epstein files.\n <\/p>\n

\n But already, officials face growing suspicion from Capitol Hill and their MAGA base that the administration will use a just-opened, Trump-ordered criminal investigation as an excuse to keep some of the Epstein case file under wraps.\n <\/p>\n

\n Justice officials, meanwhile, are scrambling to balance their probe with a looming December deadline for releasing the documents after being caught off-guard by both Trump\u2019s demand for a new investigation and his subsequent sudden support Sunday evening for making all the Epstein files public, according to a person familiar with the matter.\n <\/p>\n

\n And even as the White House tries to accelerate past the controversy to focus on next year\u2019s midterm elections, there remains little sign that Trump\u2019s supporters are anywhere near ready to leave it behind.\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cThis is a storyline that\u2019s going to continue to dog the president into the second year of his presidency,\u201d said Alex Conant, a longtime GOP operative. \u201cThe Epstein conspiracies have reached moon landing status. And we\u2019ll never stop talking about it.\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n The relentless intrigue surrounding the Epstein files marks the rare issue that has driven a wedge between Trump and the Republican Party he\u2019s led for the last decade, exposing a vulnerability for the White House made all the more frustrating by the fact that it\u2019s largely the result of a series of self-inflicted wounds.\n <\/p>\n

\n Since it became clear that he could not suppress the files\u2019 release, Trump has tried to reunify the GOP behind a new effort to tie Epstein directly to the Democratic Party.\n <\/p>\n

\n In announcing he\u2019d signed the bill, Trump focused squarely on Democrats, writing, \u201cPerhaps the truth about these Democrats, and their associations with Jeffrey Epstein, will soon be revealed,\u201d and adding, \u201cThis latest Hoax will backfire on the Democrats just as all of the rest have!\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n The offensive has drawn on newly disclosed Epstein emails that mention various prominent Democrats, alongside numerous references to Trump \u2014 a development that White House officials hope will put them back on offense after months under siege. (Corresponding with Epstein would not be a crime, and there\u2019s no evidence in the emails that any of them participated in Epstein\u2019s wrongdoing.)\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cAll of a sudden there existed a real opportunity to change the narrative,\u201d one official told CNN, noting that aides had only limited knowledge of what was in the documents compiled by Epstein\u2019s estate until a House committee released them last week.\n <\/p>\n

\n But the strategic shift comes after months of failed gambits, dismissals and outright resistance to releasing the files \u2014 all of which has sapped precious attention and time from the administration\u2019s core agenda.\n <\/p>\n

\n The president now faces some of the lowest approval ratings of his term so far, as well as the twin challenges of waging an uphill battle toward the midterms while keeping a lid on the simmering divisions over Epstein.\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cI think the president was in the right position at the end,\u201d GOP Sen. Mike Rounds said of his support for the Epstein measure. \u201cThe rest of the story now is that they will have to deliver on that package in very short order, and then it\u2019s going to depend upon what\u2019s in the package and what\u2019s been withheld.\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n Trump\u2019s signature on the bill \u2014 and the credit he claimed for its success \u2014 capped a public push for the files that the president himself first fueled nearly a year-and-a-half ago, after he pledged on the campaign trail to release the materials if elected.\n <\/p>\n

\n His team then leaned into that off-hand commitment as a way to energize a segment of the GOP base that\u2019s been fixated on the Epstein files and has been convinced they would implicate a range of powerful figures in the late financier\u2019s sexual abuse of young girls.\n <\/p>\n

\n The administration further heightened expectations in February, when Bondi distributed \u201cEpstein Files\u201d binders to conservative influencers at the White House. The event was a dud; virtually all of the information was already public, sparking public backlash and opening the door to months of private tensions among top DOJ officials.\n <\/p>\n

\n Bondi later claimed the administration was poring over newer materials, only for the DOJ to announce months later that no \u201cfurther disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n The ensuing firestorm pitted the White House against many of the MAGA figures who had aided Trump\u2019s rise, sparked a bipartisan effort on Capitol Hill to force the release of the files and prompted an internal scramble to tamp down an issue that threatened to consume the administration through much of the summer.\n <\/p>\n

\n That effort became more challenging in the wake of revelations that magnified Trump\u2019s past connections to Epstein, including that the president\u2019s name had surfaced in the files. (Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein.)\n <\/p>\n

\n Within the White House, aides sought to manage the expectations of their allies, trying to explain that publicizing the rest of the files risked harming victims and violating the privacy of people whose names were in the documents but not credibly accused of wrongdoing.\n <\/p>\n

\n Trump, meanwhile, repeatedly took to social media to try to browbeat Republicans in line, insisting that the files he once vowed to release were now little more than a Democratic \u201choax.\u201d Yet neither approach succeeding in quelling the calls for more disclosure.\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cWe\u2019re trying to explain to people that they\u2019re believing in something that does not exist,\u201d a senior White House official said. \u201cThat\u2019s why it\u2019s so frustrating.\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n At one point, as the congressional effort to compel the Epstein files\u2019 release gained steam, officials floated launching the new DOJ investigation as a way to alleviate the pressure and block any more documents from being released, an administration official said.\n <\/p>\n

\n But it\u2019s not clear whether the option made it to Trump. A White House official said the idea of an investigation into Democrats came after the emails were released by the House oversight panel last week. The Justice Department declined to comment.\n <\/p>\n

\n During Wednesday\u2019s unrelated press conference, Bondi said that \u201cnew information\u201d obtained by investigators had prompted her to reopen the Epstein matter without specifying what that was.\n <\/p>\n

\n So last Friday, as the House vote on releasing the files loomed, Trump abruptly called for the DOJ to probe Epstein\u2019s connections to a handful of Democrat-aligned figures including former President Bill Clinton. He also sought an inquiry into the banking giant JPMorgan Chase\u2019s associations with Epstein. (Responding to the probe, spokespeople for Clinton and JPMorgan maintained they were not involved in Epstein\u2019s crimes.)\n <\/p>\n

\n The White House insists Trump has always been on the side of releasing the files. \u201cPresident Trump has never been against releasing the Epstein files \u2014 rather, he has always been against Republicans falling into the Democrat trap of talking about this rather than focusing on the historic tax cuts signed into law, the fact that zero illegal aliens have entered our country in five months, and the many other accomplishments of the Trump Administration on behalf of the American people,\u201d White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement to CNN.\n <\/p>\n

\n And since the opening of the new investigation, multiple White House officials have insisted to CNN that Trump will not stand in the way of the documents being released and that aides have little reason to believe the new investigation will affect that process, though Bondi declined to offer any explicit assurances on Wednesday.\n <\/p>\n

\n Within the DOJ, some officials have lamented that Trump\u2019s novel support for releasing the files amounts to a lose-lose \u2014 with Bondi and her department now facing dueling directives to both run an investigation and make public its pertinent documents.\n <\/p>\n

\n The White House\u2019s belated bid now to lean into the Epstein files as a political attack line has also generated some grumbling among allies on Capitol Hill and in the broader Trump orbit who had hoped to move on from a challenging period.\n <\/p>\n

\n In the last two weeks, some of these allies noted, Trump oversaw an end to the record-long government shutdown, promoted the administration\u2019s efforts on key affordability issues and hosted a series of high-profile diplomatic events.\n <\/p>\n

\n Yet as Trump and his aides try to turn the tables on Democrats over Epstein, \u201cthis is all anyone\u2019s talking about,\u201d Conant said.\n <\/p>\n

\n \u201cThe power of the presidency is the ability to set the agenda,\u201d he added. \u201cAnd to the extent that this is a distraction, it does undermine what else he can do.\u201d\n <\/p>\n

\n CNN\u2019s Hannah Rabinowitz contributed to this story.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"President Donald Trump on Wednesday sought to bring a swift end to perhaps the most damaging saga of…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":295429,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[29],"tags":[49,48,75,348],"class_list":["post-295428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-tv","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-entertainment","tag-tv"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=295428"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/295428\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/295429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=295428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=295428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=295428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}