\n From cement to sugar and, most recently, oil refining, the billionaire industrialist has consistently stressed local manufacturing as a means of achieving economic self-sufficiency.\n <\/p>\n
\n Nonetheless, two unusual inconsistencies continue to dominate public debate: why Dangote’s products are frequently cheaper outside of Nigeria than within it, and why his much-touted refinery, built to alleviate Nigeria’s energy difficulties, is meeting strong opposition from the exact people it is intended to serve.\n <\/p>\n
Why Dangote Cement is cheaper outside Nigeria<\/p>\n
\n Dangote has openly said that the price differential between his exporting cement and what Nigerians pay domestically is primarily caused by Nigeria’s high tax and regulatory burden.\n <\/p>\n
\n During a press conference with members of the press on Monday, exporting permits his company to avoid a variety of taxes that would dramatically increase production expenses at home.\n <\/p>\n
\n \u201cWhen you look at my invoice, the cement I export is cheaper than the one I\u2019m selling domestically, because that\u2019s how exports work\u2026 in export I\u2019m saving a lot of money, I\u2019m not paying 30% income tax, I\u2019m not paying 2%, education, I\u2019m not paying 1% health, I\u2019m not paying 7.5% VAT, and I\u2019m not paying 10% withholding tax.\u201d\n <\/p>\n
\n By eliminating these costs, the Nigerian billionaire noted that he would be able to price Nigerian cement competitively in global markets against producers from Turkey, Russia, and China.\n <\/p>\n
\n In fact, Nigeria’s fiscal framework makes it cheaper to sell locally produced items overseas than at home, reflecting deeper structural flaws in the economy.\n <\/p>\n
\n \u201cSo when you reduce all these taxes, I can afford to go and compete with the international market, with the likes of Turkey, Russia, and China,\u201d he stated.\n <\/p>\n
\n The implication is clear: Nigerian consumers bear the cost of high taxes, various levies, and regulatory inefficiency. While local production is sometimes marketed as a remedy to high pricing, Dangote’s experience demonstrates how policy decisions can undercut that goal.\n <\/p>\n
Backlash against the refinery built to solve fuel scarcity<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n Fuel queues have been a frequent aspect of Nigerian life since the early 1970s. Dangote claims that the refinery immediately addresses this past failure.\n <\/p>\n
\n Despite its potential to stabilize fuel supplies, relieve foreign exchange pressure, and provide thousands of jobs, the refinery has faced opposition from a variety of sources.\n <\/p>\n
\n Critics are concerned about market dominance, pricing power, and the concentration of such a valuable national asset in private hands.\n <\/p>\n
\n Others contend that gasoline costs have not plummeted as swiftly or severely as anticipated.\n <\/p>\n
\n \u201cPeople are always trying to look at the negative, when you look at it, since when has Nigeria been having problems with fuel queues? Since 1972, somebody has addressed this problem, and you\u2019re calling the company that addressed this issue names,\u201d he stated.\n <\/p>\n
\n Dangote also spoke about his battle against importing fuel.\n <\/p>\n
\n Rather than relying on imports to maintain stable prices, he believes Nigeria should focus on attracting more domestic investors to the energy sector.\n <\/p>\n
\n Increased competition, he claims, will automatically balance market power and strengthen regulation.\n <\/p>\n
\n \u201cWhat you do is you invite more people to invest, when you have many investors, then you can regulate market shares.\n <\/p>\n
\n But even if you\u2019re going to regulate now, what are you regulating? You don\u2019t use imports to checkmate domestic production, cause you are creating jobs elsewhere,\u201d he added.\n <\/p>\n