Toto Wolff has said Mercedes plans on reducing the number of teams it supplies with its power units once the next regulation cycle rolls around.<\/p>\n
Mercedes currently powers four of the 11 teams on the F1 grid, including the factory team, but Mercedes\u2019 team boss and F1 CEO Toto Wolff has said this number will reduce by the time the next regulation cycle begins.<\/p>\n
Toto Wolff: Mercedes will reduce customer team supply<\/p>\n
Want more PlanetF1.com coverage? Add us as a preferred source on Google<\/a> to your favourites list for news you can trust.<\/p>\n Mercedes High-Performance Powertrains (HPP) is one of the five power unit manufacturers in Formula 1, alongside Ferrari, Honda, Audi, and Red Bull Powertrains\/Ford.<\/p>\n Fully owned by the Mercedes parent company, its power units are fitted into the back of the Mercedes team\u2019s cars, as well as long-standing customers McLaren and Williams, while it will also power Alpine in F1 2026 after Renault pulled the plug on its own F1 engine programme.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the most commonly used power unit on the grid as a result, with Ferrari units up next as the Italian manufacturer\u2019s products can be found in the back of the factory team, as well as Haas and Cadillac (which is developing its own unit).<\/p>\n But while Mercedes<\/a> has three customer teams for the start of the new regulation cycle, which is currently planned for a full five-year stint after talks to evaluate a switch to a V10 or V8 formula before 2030 fell apart towards the end of 2025, HPP plans on reducing the number of teams it supplies for the next ruleset.<\/p>\n \u201cI think where our current mindset is, also discussing with Ola [Kallenius, Mercedes CEO], is that we will reduce the number of teams we are going to supply in the next cycle,\u201d Wolff told the\u00a0Beyond the Grid\u00a0podcast.<\/p>\n \u201cWe don\u2019t know whether the truth is between two and three [in total]; I guess it depends on new regulations going forward. Are they rather simple or not?<\/p>\n \u201cWhat is it we believe we can learn by supplying more, whilst at the same time needing to lock in some designs earlier?<\/p>\n \u201cWhen you consider how many engines we need to ship to Melbourne, for all of us, 16 engines\u2026 you know, if you\u2019re Honda on your own, four or five.<\/p>\n \u201cSo that means longer lead times, longer production cycles. All of that going forward, it\u2019s not going to be four [teams] anymore.\u201d<\/p>\n At the start of a new regulation cycle, the advantage of supplying so many teams is that Mercedes will very rapidly accumulate far more testing mileage and data than a rival like Audi or Honda, both of whom will only power a single team.<\/p>\n But there are downsides, as HPP managing director Hywel Thomas explained.<\/p>\n \u201cI think that we\u2019ve shown in the past that having more than one team, you\u2019re getting more data, you\u2019re getting more information. You\u2019re just getting more kilometres,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cBecause you\u2019ve got all those cars, you\u2019ve got four times the engineers all sitting around telling you, \u2018No, you can do this better. You can do this more this way\u2019, and that is very, very beneficial to have all that coming at you.<\/p>\n \u201cDoesn\u2019t always feel like it, but it definitely is in terms of making a great product.<\/p>\n \u201cBut the flip of that is, we\u2019ve got to make a lot of hardware. We\u2019ve got to make a few decisions earlier.<\/p>\n \u201cNot sure making those decisions earlier really hurts you sometimes, because you can run things a bit too close to the wind. I think that is the flip.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m not even sure whether the right place is one team, two teams, three teams, or four teams. I\u2019m not sure. There\u2019s definitely a sweet spot in there somewhere. I think it\u2019s probably nearer four than one.\u201d<\/p>\n \u2018Mercedes HPP exists to win championships with Mercedes\u2019<\/p>\n An uncomfortable truth for Mercedes is that HPP has clearly been producing world-championship level equipment, with McLaren\u00a0 wrapping up comfortable Constructors\u2019 Championship victories in 2024 and \u201925, as well as powering Lando Norris to a maiden Drivers\u2019 Championship in \u201925.<\/p>\n Mercedes finished in second in 2025, but scored just 56 per cent of the points tally racked up by its leading customer team, with neither of its drivers able to fully join in the hunt for the title.<\/p>\n With Wolff referring to McLaren as the \u2018enemy in the house\u2019, Thomas outlined that the remit of HPP is not primarily to achieve success with a customer.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat isn\u2019t always visible to people is just how much the Mercedes PU is part of the overall Mercedes F1 entity,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cWe are wholly owned by Mercedes. We exist to do one thing, and that\u2019s to win World Championships with Mercedes.<\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s what we talk about forever at the factory. Of course, we say it\u2019s better to have won that championship than not, but we are absolutely part of the Mercedes team.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m sitting here in Mercedes\u2019 kit. That\u2019s why I sit in a Mercedes garage, and it\u2019s why the relationships with the engineering group in Brackley are so strong.\u201d<\/p>\n Wolff was even firmer in his assessment of the situation, stating that \u201cno one is interested\u201d in the success achieved by a customer team, and that the focus of HPP is on achieving the same level of success with the factory interest.<\/p>\n \u201cThe raison detre for HPP is to win World Championships with the works team,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is Mercedes but, in order to make the economies work and also to use it as a test bench and a comparison to the works team, it\u2019s good that we have the customer supply situation.<\/p>\n \u201cThere will always be a part of Hywel, and I think HPP, that is allowed to cheer for their power unit to have won a championship. The mindset that we always had is that this power unit has won a Constructors\u2019 World Championship.<\/p>\n \u201cThat means our car wasn\u2019t good enough to beat McLaren. And that\u2019s the sheer simple fact.<\/p>\n \u201cFor us, being able to benchmark ourselves, you can at least take the power unit out of the equation. That\u2019s the thing that is good enough to win a championship.<\/p>\n \u201cSo on the chassis side, we haven\u2019t done that. And in that respect, there are many reasons why we do have these relationships with Williams, with McLaren, Alpine this year, to benefit from the faster development, fault fixes, the investment from the Mercedes group.<\/p>\n \u201cBut we are here, and Mercedes gives us this opportunity to decorate the most important shopping window to make the works team win.<\/p>\n \u201cNobody else is interested in some kind of customer success outside of our little micro cosmos. It is the Mercedes team, and then there is the McLaren team, and then there is the Williams team, and that\u2019s something that we always bear in mind.\u201d<\/p>\n Want to be the first to know exclusive information from the F1 paddock? Join our broadcast channel on WhatsApp<\/a> to get the scoop on the latest developments from our team of accredited journalists.
You can also subscribe to the PlanetF1 YouTube channel<\/a> for exclusive features, hear from our paddock journalists with stories from the heart of Formula 1 and much more!<\/p>\n