{"id":397995,"date":"2026-01-09T09:01:16","date_gmt":"2026-01-09T09:01:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/397995\/"},"modified":"2026-01-09T09:01:16","modified_gmt":"2026-01-09T09:01:16","slug":"6-rules-changes-the-pga-tour-is-enacting-in-2026-and-what-triggered-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/397995\/","title":{"rendered":"6 rules changes the PGA Tour is enacting in 2026 (and what triggered them)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Change has been afoot at the PGA Tour: new investment<\/a>; new leadership<\/a>; new schedule<\/a> and field sizes.<\/p>\n

Next up: new rules. Six of them, effective immediately.<\/p>\n

On Tuesday, the Tour shared with its players five new model local rules (plus one modification to its preferred-lies protocol) that it will institute beginning at the 2026 season opener, the Sony Open in Honolulu next week.<\/p>\n

\u201cGood, common-sense outcomes for the game at the highest level,\u201d Steve Rintoul, the PGA Tour\u2019s vice president, Rules & Officiating, told GOLF.com of the new MLRs, which were passed by the USGA and R&A on Jan. 1. \u201cA continuation of what was established with the 2019 modernization of the Rules.\u201d<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what you need to know about each rule change, with context from Rintoul about why the Tour is implementing the tweaks. <\/p>\n

Note: All the explanations in the \u201cnitty-gritty\u201d sections below are from the USGA and R&A\u2019s \u201cAdditional Clarifications of the 2023 Rules of Golf,\u201d<\/a> which was last updated Jan. 1.<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Player Has Not Played from Wrong Place When Unaware Ball Might Have Moved<\/p>\n

In simple terms: If it is determined that a player moved his ball, but he didn\u2019t know that he moved it, he will be penalized only one shot instead of two for not returning his ball to its original resting place.<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty: If a player causes their ball at rest to\u00a0move\u00a0and they fail to replace it before making their next\u00a0stroke\u00a0when they were neither aware that the ball had\u00a0moved\u00a0nor that it might have\u00a0moved, the player gets\u00a0one penalty stroke\u00a0under Rule 9.4b (unless any of the exceptions under that Rule apply) but has not played from a\u00a0wrong place\u00a0if it subsequently becomes known that they caused the ball to\u00a0move.<\/p>\n

But when a player is aware their ball at rest might have\u00a0moved\u00a0and fails to replace it before making their next\u00a0stroke, the player gets the\u00a0general penalty\u00a0for playing from a\u00a0wrong place\u00a0under Rule 14.7a if it subsequently becomes known that they caused the ball to\u00a0move. The\u00a0general penalty\u00a0applies even if the ball was not replaced because the player incorrectly determined that it did not\u00a0move\u00a0or that they were not the cause.<\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: If this scenario rings a bell, that\u2019s probably because it happened in a high-profile setting not long ago, at the 2025 Open Championship at Royal Portrush. That\u2019s where Shane Lowry, in the second round, caused his ball to move<\/a> fractionally with a practice swing on the 12th hole \u2014\u00a0but said he had no idea that he had done so.<\/p>\n

After the round, officials showed Lowry a close-up replay of the moment, and, after a lengthy deliberation, slapped him with a two-stroke penalty. Lowry called the penalty \u201chard to take\u201d but added, \u201cIf the ball moved and I caused it to move and it moved, it\u2019s a two-shot penalty. The last thing I want to do is sit there and argue and not take the penalty and then get slaughtered all over social media tonight for being a cheat.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rintoul said that penalty \u2014 and others like it \u2014\u00a0didn\u2019t feel right. \u201cHe\u2019s getting penalized with two strokes for something he didn\u2019t really even know he\u2019d done,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cSo now it\u2019s all based on what the player knew.\u201d<\/p>\n

But what if it appears from a replay that a player should have reasonably detected that a ball moved? In such an instance, could officials overrule a player\u2019s word?<\/p>\n

\u201cThis [rule] is all about a player who has no knowledge at all that he caused the ball to move,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cHe can\u2019t be a clairvoyant.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Limited or Extended Relief for Embedded Ball <\/p>\n

In simple terms: If a player\u2019s ball comes to rest in another player\u2019s pitch mark, he may take free relief; previously, players were granted relief only if their balls settled in their own pitch marks.<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty: In addition to when relief is allowed under Rule 16.3a, if a\u00a0referee\u00a0determines that it is\u00a0known or virtually certain\u00a0that part of a player\u2019s ball is below the level of the ground in a pitch-mark in the\u00a0general area\u00a0that is cut to fairway height or less that has not been repaired in some way and was made as a result of any player\u2019s\u00a0stroke, the player may take free relief using the procedures in Rule 16.3b.<\/p>\n

A pitch-mark has been repaired in some way when it has been pressed down or undergone any form of repair by anyone whether deliberate or incidental, and regardless of the quality or completeness of the repair.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Examples of repaired in some way include when a pitch-mark has been pressed down with a club or foot, anyone has attempted to repair it with a\u00a0tee\u00a0or some other device, or when the pitch-mark is in an area over which a mower has passed or has been otherwise prepared by maintenance staff. A pitch-mark that has been repaired in some way can and will often result in a visible indentation from which there is no relief under this Local Rule.<\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: We\u2019ve seen this bit of misfortune unfold a few times in recent years. At the 2002 Players Championship, Paul Casey was in the hunt in the final round when his tee shot on the par-5 16th improbably settled into another player\u2019s pitch mark<\/a>; from that horrid lie, Casey was forced to lay up and he managed only a par, eventually finishing third. That same week, a Sam Burns tee shot also found another player\u2019s pitch mark, on the 10th hole.<\/p>\n

Then there was Shane Lowry (yes, again!) at the 2025 PGA Championship, where in the second round his tee shot on the short par-4 8th hole trundled into a pitch mark. After an official denied Lowry relief, Lowry chunked his approach and then took out his anger<\/a> on the turf from which he\u2019d just hit.<\/p>\n

Rintoul said part of the motivation for wanting to amend this rule is that it\u2019s been difficult to adjudicate. Determining whether a player\u2019s ball has settled in his own pitch mark or another player\u2019s, he said, can be a guessing game. \u201cWe\u2019ve seen it time and time again,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201dWe\u2019re getting this ruling wrong, players are getting this ruling wrong \u2014\u00a0it\u2019s not a good look for the game.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Internal Out of Bounds<\/p>\n

In simple terms: Internal out of bounds will be designated as O.B. only for shots played from the teeing area.<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty: During play of [specify hole number], the [specify location or side] of the hole, defined by [insert description of method of defining\u00a0out of bounds, for example, white stakes], is\u00a0out of bounds\u00a0for any\u00a0stroke\u00a0that must be made from the\u00a0teeing area.<\/p>\n

These are\u00a0boundary objects\u00a0during the play of [specify hole number] for any\u00a0stroke\u00a0that must be made from the\u00a0teeing area. At all other times, they are [immovable\u00a0| movable]\u00a0obstructions.\u00a0<\/p>\n


\n \"internal <\/a><\/p>\n

Internal out of bounds, at a major?! Here\u2019s why it\u2019s at the PGA Championship<\/a><\/p>\n

By:<\/p>\n


\n Josh Berhow <\/a><\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: PGA Tour players will look for any edge, including, say, playing down an opposing fairway to effectively make a hole shorter. To discourage such tactics and protect the integrity of its host sites, the Tour has, at times, installed internal O.B. zones. At Sony Open venue Waialae, for example, the Tour has employed internal O.B.<\/a> on two different holes. Same goes for the 18th hole at the Players Championship, where, before 2021, some players would launch their tee shots over the lake to the 9th hole, which set up an easier angle into the green. The O.B.s curbed such sly shotmaking but created another problem. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cIt actually handcuffed a player who was further down the hole, perhaps behind a tree,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cYou know, he tried to drive it down the fairway, got it stuck behind a tree and now he couldn\u2019t even chip out sideways because he had this internal out of bounds in his way. The internal out of bounds wasn\u2019t really installed for that guy. It was installed for guys that are standing on the tee trying to bomb it down this other fairway. So the governing bodies had given us an option where this internal out of bounds can still be applied. But it would apply only to tee shots for strokes made from the tee area.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Immovable Obstructions Close to Putting Green<\/p>\n

In simple terms: Players may be granted \u201cextra relief\u201d from the apron or fringe if an immovable obstruction \u2014\u00a0not just sprinkler heads \u2014\u00a0is in their line of play. \u00a0<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty: When a ball lies anywhere other than on the putting green, an immovable obstruction on the player\u2019s line of play is not, of itself, interference under Rule 16.1. Free relief is normally not allowed.<\/p>\n

But if the aprons or fringes of putting greens are cut short enough that putting from off the green is likely to be a common choice of stroke, immovable obstructions that are close to the putting green may interfere with such strokes.<\/p>\n

In that case, the Committee can choose to give an extra relief option under Rule 16.1 when a player\u2019s ball lies in the general area and an immovable obstruction close to the putting green is on the player\u2019s line of play.<\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: The Tour already permits relief when a sprinkler head is in a player\u2019s putting or chipping line, assuming the sprinkler is within two club-lengths of the green and the player\u2019s ball is within two club-lengths of the sprinkler. Under the new rule, the scope of obstructions will be broadened to include such things as microphone holes or damage caused by the removal of other movable obstructions.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe player can\u2019t fix that right now,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cWe\u2019ve had numerous cases where microphones got pulled up and left a huge hole and the guys were like, \u2018What now?\u2019 And I was like, \u2018Well, if it was a sprinkler head, I can help you.\u2019 It just didn\u2019t make any sense.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Broken or Significantly Damaged Club Replaced with Similar Club Purpose<\/p>\n

In simple terms: A player can repair or replace a significantly damaged club mid-round with components from his bag, assuming the damage was not caused by abuse.<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty: When replacing a club under this local rule:<\/p>\n

\u2014The replacement club must fill the gap created when the player took the broken or damaged club out of play to ensure the progression of the set is maintained.<\/p>\n

\u2014Rule 4.1b(4) is modified to allow a replacement club to be built from parts being carried by or for the player or any other player who is playing on the course. But the other restrictions of Rule 4.1b(4) continue to apply. For example, the player must not add or borrow any club being carried by or for any other player who is playing on the course.<\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: Players previously have been permitted to swap out damaged clubs mid-round but that process involved sending \u201csomebody scurrying back to the locker room to get another component,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cThis makes the replacement so much more efficient. If a player happens to have another clubhead in the bag, it\u2019s fine to use that as a replacement.\u201d<\/p>\n

And, no, because it\u2019s only a component, it wouldn\u2019t be considered an illegal 15th club.<\/p>\n

Rule Change: Preferred Lies Modification <\/p>\n

In simple terms: The relief area for preferred lies has been reduced from a club-length (about 46 inches) to scorecard length (about 11 inches).<\/p>\n

The nitty-gritty (by way of the Tour\u2019s memo to players): A scorecard length is used universally by other organizations, and will provide fairer outcomes during competition as the ball will be placed from closer to its original spot. <\/p>\n

The Tour philosophy when preferred lies is used does not change. It is used only in cases of extreme mud throughout the golf course, when relief from temporary water takes a player outside the fairway, or when poor fairway conditions are likely to negatively impact the competition. <\/p>\n

If a ball is placed outside of the scorecard length by mistake, it can be corrected without penalty before the next stroke is made.<\/p>\n

What drove the rule change: As much as anything, this change was about getting the PGA Tour in sync with the other big tours and tournament-organizing bodies. \u201cWe\u2019re probably the only major organization that\u2019s not conducting preferred lies with a shorter relief area,\u201d Rintoul said. \u201cI think we are probably the last ones to catch up with this. No matter where the players play, they should be dealing with things that are pretty standard. And I think that was a big part of the decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

Rintoul added that this amendment was driven largely by the players, who felt like a club-length\u2019s relief was not only unnecessary but at times also inequitable. \u201cThere was a lot of times where guys could really take advantage of it around the green and almost get the ball up on the collar or even change the grain, as soon as you get into Bermuda grass. You got 46 inches one way and 46 inches the other way, you can change the grain for a chip shot significantly, to make it so much easier. I\u2019m not saying that\u2019s a bad thing, but it\u2019s just, is that what we want? And I think this was really led by the players that, \u201cHey, maybe we should look at this.\u201d <\/p>\n

Rintoul noted that modern-day agronomy also made the decision a logical one. \u201cThe conditions of golf courses is so good, so why do these guys need 92 inches \u2014\u00a046 inches one direction, 46 inches the other?\u201d he said. \u201cThey really don\u2019t.\u201d <\/p>\n

In the 2025 season, preferred lies were in play in 21 rounds. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Change has been afoot at the PGA Tour: new investment; new leadership; new schedule and field sizes. Next…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":397996,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[443],"tags":[49,48,622,82],"class_list":["post-397995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-golf","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-golf","tag-sports"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=397995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/397995\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/397996"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=397995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=397995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=397995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}