Messages from strangers and acquaintances are often the first way targets of abuse imagery learn that images of them are spreading online. Not only is the material disturbing itself \u2014 everyone, it seems, has already seen it. Someone was making sexually explicit images of Brewer, and then, according to her followers who sent her screenshots and links to the account, were uploading them to an OnlyFans and charging a subscription fee for them.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u201cIt was the most dejected that I’ve ever felt,\u201d Brewer told me in a phone call. \u201cI was like, let’s say I tracked this person down. Someone else could just go into X and use Grok and do the exact same thing with different pictures, right?\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n
@kylie.brewer<\/a> <\/p>\n Please help me raise awareness and warn other women. We NEED to regulate AI\u2026 it\u2019s getting too dangerous #leftist<\/a> #humanrights<\/a> #lgbtq<\/a> #ai<\/a> #saawareness<\/a> <\/p>\n \u266c original sound – Kylie Brewer\ud83d\udc9d<\/a> <\/p>\n Brewer is a content creator whose work<\/a> focuses on feminism, history, and education about those topics. She\u2019s no stranger to online harassment. Being an outspoken woman about these and other issues through a leftist lens means she\u2019s faced the brunt of large-scale harassment campaigns primarily from the \u201cmanosphere,\u201d including \u201cred pilled\u201d incels and right-wing influencers with podcasts for years. But when people messaged her in early January about finding an OnlyFans page in her name, featuring her likeness, it felt like an escalation.\u00a0<\/p>\n One of the AI generated images was based on a photo of her in a swimsuit from her Instagram, she said. Someone used AI to remove her clothing in the original photo. \u201cMy eyes look weird, and my hands are covering my face so it kind of looks like my face got distorted, and they very clearly tried to give me larger breasts, where it does not look like anything realistic at all,\u201d Brewer said. Another image showed her in a seductive pose, kneeling or crawling, but wasn\u2019t based on anything she\u2019s ever posted online. Unlike the \u201cnudify\u201d one that relied on Grok, it seemed to be a new image made with a prompt or a combination of images.\u00a0<\/p>\n Many of the people messaging her about the fake OnlyFans account were men trying to get access to it. By the time she clicked a link one of them sent of the account, it was already gone. OnlyFans prohibits deepfakes and impersonation accounts. The platform did not respond to a request for comment. But OnlyFans isn\u2019t the only platform where this can happen: Non-consensual deepfake makers use platforms like Patreon<\/a> to monetize abusive imagery of real people.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cI think that people assume, because the pictures aren’t real, that it’s not as damaging,\u201d Brewer told me. \u201cBut if anything, this was worse because it just fills you with such a sense of lack of control and fear that they could do this to anyone. Children, women, literally anyone, someone could take a picture of you at the store, going grocery shopping, and ask AI or whatever to do this.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n A lack of control is something many targets of synthetic abuse imagery say they feel \u2014 and it can be especially intense for people who\u2019ve experienced sexual abuse in real life. In 2023, after becoming the target of deepfake abuse imagery, popular Twitch streamer QTCinderella told me<\/a> seeing sexual deepfakes of herself resurfaced past trauma. \u201cYou feel so violated\u2026I was sexually assaulted as a child, and it was the same feeling,\u201d she said at the time. \u201cLike, where you feel guilty, you feel dirty, you feel like, \u2018what just happened?\u2019 And it\u2019s bizarre that it makes that resurface. I genuinely didn\u2019t realize it would.\u201d<\/p>\n Other targets of deepfake harassment also feel like this could happen anytime, anywhere, whether you\u2019re at the grocery store or posting photos of your body online. For some, it makes it harder to get jobs or have a social life; the fear that anyone could be your harasser is constant. \u201cIt’s made me incredibly wary of men, which I know isn’t fair, but [my harasser] could literally be anyone,\u201d Joanne Chew, another woman who dealt with severe deepfake harassment for months, told me last year<\/a>. \u201cAnd there are a lot of men out there who don’t see the issue. They wonder why we aren’t flattered for the attention.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u2018I Want to Make You Immortal:\u2019 How One Woman Confronted Her Deepfakes Harasser<\/p>\n \u201cAfter discovering this content, I\u2019m not going to lie\u2026 there are times it made me not want to be around any more either,\u201d she said. \u201cI literally felt buried.\u201d<\/p>\n Brewer\u2019s income is dependent on being visible online as a content creator. Logging off isn\u2019t an option. And even for people who aren\u2019t dependent on TikTok or Instagram for their income, removing oneself from online life is a painful and isolating tradeoff that they shouldn\u2019t have to make to avoid being harassed. Often, minimizing one\u2019s presence and accomplishments doesn\u2019t even stop the harassment.<\/a><\/p>\n Since AI-generated face-swapping algorithms became accessible at the consumer level in late 2017<\/a>, the technology has only gotten better, more realistic, and its effects on targets harder to combat. It was always used for this purpose: to shame and humiliate women online. Over the years, various laws have attempted to protect victims or hold platforms accountable for non-consensual deepfakes, but most of them have either fallen short or present new risks of censorship and marginalize legal, consensual sexual speech and content online. The TAKE IT DOWN Act<\/a>, championed by Ted Cruz and Melania Trump, passed into law in April 2025 as the first federal level legislation to address deepfakes; the law imposes a strict 48-hour turnaround requirement on platforms to remove reported content. President Donald Trump said<\/a> that he would use the law, because \u201cnobody gets treated worse online\u201d than him. And in January<\/a>, the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act passed the Senate and is headed to the House. The act would allow targets of deepfake harassment to sue the people making the content. But taking someone to court has always been a major barrier to everyday people experiencing harassment online; It\u2019s expensive and time consuming even if they can pinpoint their abuser. In many cases, including Brewer\u2019s, this is impossible\u2014it could be an army of people set to make her life miserable.<\/p>\n \u201cIt feels like any remote sense of privacy and protection that you could have as a woman is completely gone and that no one cares,\u201d Brewer said. \u201cIt\u2019s genuinely such a dehumanizing and horrible experience that I wouldn’t wish on anyone… I\u2019m hoping also, as there’s more visibility that comes with this, maybe there\u2019s more support, because it definitely is a very lonely and terrible place to be \u2014 on the internet as a woman right now.\u201d<\/p>\n About the author<\/p>\n Sam Cole is writing from the far reaches of the internet, about sexuality, the adult industry, online culture, and AI. She’s the author of How Sex Changed the Internet and the Internet Changed Sex.<\/p>\n ![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1920x1080_deepfakes_04-4.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"Samantha](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/404-sam-10--1-.jpg\")
<\/p>\n