{"id":480538,"date":"2026-02-17T11:13:24","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T11:13:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/480538\/"},"modified":"2026-02-17T11:13:24","modified_gmt":"2026-02-17T11:13:24","slug":"evolutionary-causes-and-consequences-of-gene-duplication","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/480538\/","title":{"rendered":"Evolutionary causes and consequences of gene duplication"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kuzmin, E., Taylor, J. S. & Boone, C. Retention of duplicated genes in evolution. Trends Genet. 38, 59\u201372 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reams, A. B. & Roth, J. R. Mechanisms of gene duplication and amplification. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a016592 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Soltis, P. S. & Soltis, D. E. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 561\u2013588 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dehal, P. & Boore, J. L. Two rounds of whole genome duplication in the ancestral vertebrate. PLoS Biol. 3, e314 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Z. et al. Multiple large-scale gene and genome duplications during the evolution of hexapods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4713\u20134718 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fern\u00e1ndez, R. & Gabald\u00f3n, T. Gene gain and loss across the metazoan tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 524\u2013533 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, 1970).<\/p>\n

Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531\u20131545 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gibson, T. A. & Goldberg, D. S. Questioning the ubiquity of neofunctionalization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000252 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gout, J.-F. & Lynch, M. Maintenance and loss of duplicated genes by dosage subfunctionalization. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2141\u20132148 (2015). This study finds that specific genes can be lost if their expression levels become too low and their paralogues assume most of the contribution to fitness, leading the study\u2019s authors to propose the model of ADS, which postulates that the expression levels of paralogues diverge while their total expression remains constant.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lynch, M. & Force, A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459\u2013473 (2000).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McKeown, A. N. et al. Evolution of DNA specificity in a transcription factor family produced a new gene regulatory module. Cell 159, 58\u201368 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harms, M. J. & Thornton, J. W. Historical contingency and its biophysical basis in glucocorticoid receptor evolution. Nature 512, 203\u2013207 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cortez-Romero, C. R., Lyu, J., Pillai, A. S., Langanowsky, A. & Thornton, J. W. Symmetry facilitated the evolution of heterospecificity and high-order stoichiometry in vertebrate hemoglobin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2414756122 (2025). Using ancestral sequence reconstruction, the authors identify the mutations that promoted the transition of haemoglobin from a homodimer to a homotetramer, and later to a selective heterotetramer of paralogues.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pillai, A. S. et al. Origin of complexity in haemoglobin evolution. Nature 581, 480\u2013485 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Katju, V. & Lynch, M. The structure and early evolution of recently arisen gene duplicates in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Genetics 165, 1793\u20131803 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dennis, M. Y. et al. Evolution of human-specific neural SRGAP2 genes by incomplete segmental duplication. Cell 149, 912\u2013922 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1983).<\/p>\n

Papp, B., P\u00e1l, C. & Hurst, L. D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424, 194\u2013197 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Veitia, R. A. Gene dosage balance: deletions, duplications and dominance. Trends Genet. 21, 33\u201335 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ascencio, D. et al. Expression attenuation as a mechanism of robustness against gene duplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2014345118 (2021). By introducing a second copy of around 800 essential genes in yeast, the authors show the immediate fitness effects of duplications and observe attenuation mechanisms by which the expression of the second copy is reduced.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stoebel, D. M., Dean, A. & Dykhuizen, D. The cost of expression of Escherichia coli lac operon proteins is in the process, not in the products. Genetics 178, 1653\u20131660 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kafri, M., Metzl-Raz, E., Jona, G. & Barkai, N. The cost of protein production. Cell Rep. 14, 22\u201331 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fujita, Y., Namba, S., Kamada, Y. & Moriya, H. Impact of maximal overexpression of a non-toxic protein on yeast cell physiology. eLife 13, RP99572 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vavouri, T., Semple, J. I., Garcia-Verdugo, R. & Lehner, B. Intrinsic protein disorder and interaction promiscuity are widely associated with dosage sensitivity. Cell 138, 198\u2013208 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bhattacharyya, S. et al. Transient protein-protein interactions perturb E. coli metabolome and cause gene dosage toxicity. eLife 5, e20309 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Prelich, G. Gene overexpression: uses, mechanisms, and interpretation. Genetics 190, 841\u2013854 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Youn, J.-Y. et al. Functional analysis of kinases and transcription factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using an integrated overexpression library. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 7, 911\u2013921 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shen, W. et al. The regulatory mechanism of the yeast osmoresponse under different glucose concentrations. iScience 26, 105809 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kondrashov, F. A. & Kondrashov, A. S. Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications. J. Theor. Biol. 239, 141\u2013151 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perry, G. H. et al. Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 39, 1256\u20131260 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hardwick, R. J. et al. Haptoglobin (HP) and Haptoglobin-related protein (HPR) copy number variation, natural selection, and trypanosomiasis. Hum. Genet. 133, 69\u201383 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Robinson, D. et al. Gene-by-environment interactions influence the fitness cost of gene copy-number variation in yeast. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 13, jkad159 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sionov, E., Lee, H., Chang, Y. C. & Kwon-Chung, K. J. Cryptococcus neoformans overcomes stress of azole drugs by formation of disomy in specific multiple chromosomes. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000848 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Selmecki, A., Gerami-Nejad, M., Paulson, C., Forche, A. & Berman, J. An isochromosome confers drug resistance in vivo by amplification of two genes, ERG11 and TAC1. Mol. Microbiol. 68, 624\u2013641 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergin, S. et al. Analysis of clinical Candida parapsilosis isolates reveals copy number variation in key fluconazole resistance genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 68, e0161923 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Iantorno, S. A. et al. Gene expression in Leishmania is regulated predominantly by gene dosage. mBio 8, e01393-17 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dekel, E. & Alon, U. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature 436, 588\u2013592 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Robinson, D., Place, M., Hose, J., Jochem, A. & Gasch, A. P. Natural variation in the consequences of gene overexpression and its implications for evolutionary trajectories. eLife 10, e70564 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Naseeb, S., Ames, R. M., Delneri, D. & Lovell, S. C. Rapid functional and evolutionary changes follow gene duplication in yeast. Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171393 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bautista, C. et al. Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane\u2019s sieve. Nat. Commun. 15, 10319 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Todd, R. T. & Selmecki, A. Expandable and reversible copy number amplification drives rapid adaptation to antifungal drugs. eLife 9, e58349 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, Z. & Ren, Q. Why are essential genes essential? \u2014 The essentiality of Saccharomyces genes. Microb. Cell 2, 280\u2013287 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hausser, J., Mayo, A., Keren, L. & Alon, U. Central dogma rates and the trade-off between precision and economy in gene expression. Nat. Commun. 10, 68 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keren, L. et al. Massively parallel interrogation of the effects of gene expression levels on fitness. Cell 166, 1282\u20131294.e18 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gelperin, D. M. et al. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. Genes Dev. 19, 2816\u20132826 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sopko, R. et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell 21, 319\u2013330 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arita, Y. et al. A genome-scale yeast library with inducible expression of individual genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e10207 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hawkins, J. S. et al. Mismatch-CRISPRi reveals the co-varying expression-fitness relationships of essential genes in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. Cell Syst. 11, 523\u2013535.e9 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Otto, R. M., Turska-Nowak, A., Brown, P. M. & Reynolds, K. A. A continuous epistasis model for predicting growth rate given combinatorial variation in gene expression and environment. Cell Syst. 15, 134\u2013148.e7 (2024). The authors use CRISPR interference to modulate the expression of pairs of genes participating in metabolic pathways and show how epistasis can result from changes in expression of the two genes.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Clark, T. et al. CRISPR activation screens: navigating technologies and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 42, 1017\u20131034 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Siddiq, M. A., Duveau, F. & Wittkopp, P. J. Plasticity and environment-specific relationships between gene expression and fitness in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 2184\u20132194 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moreno, P. et al. Expression Atlas update: gene and protein expression in multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D129\u2013D140 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, Q., Szklarczyk, D., Wang, M., Simonovic, M. & von Mering, C. PaxDb 5.0: curated protein quantification data suggests adaptive proteome changes in yeasts. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 22, 100640 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rice, A. M., Li, Y., Donnelly, P. & McLysaght, A. Evolution of dosage-sensitive genes by tissue-restricted expression changes. Genome Biol. Evol. 17, evaf132 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qian, W., Ma, D., Xiao, C., Wang, Z. & Zhang, J. The genomic landscape and evolutionary resolution of antagonistic pleiotropy in yeast. Cell Rep. 2, 1399\u20131410 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rogers, R. L., Shao, L. & Thornton, K. R. Tandem duplications lead to novel expression patterns through exon shuffling in Drosophila yakuba. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006795 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Loehlin, D. W. & Carroll, S. B. Expression of tandem gene duplicates is often greater than twofold. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5988\u20135992 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Song, M. J., Potter, B. I., Doyle, J. J. & Coate, J. E. Gene balance predicts transcriptional responses immediately following ploidy change in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 32, 1434\u20131448 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Semple, J. I., Vavouri, T. & Lehner, B. A simple principle concerning the robustness of protein complex activity to changes in gene expression. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 1 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dephoure, N. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3, e03023 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Y. et al. Overdosage of balanced protein complexes reduces proliferation rate in aneuploid cells. Cell Syst. 9, 129\u2013142.e5 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ishikawa, K., Makanae, K., Iwasaki, S., Ingolia, N. T. & Moriya, H. Post-translational dosage compensation buffers genetic perturbations to stoichiometry of protein complexes. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006554 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spealman, P., de Santana, C., De, T. & Gresham, D. Multilevel gene expression changes in lineages containing adaptive copy number variants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 42, msaf005 (2025). This study shows how adaptive duplications during experimental evolution can become subject to post-transcriptional and post-translational regulatory mechanisms that further tune total gene expression.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qian, W., Liao, B.-Y., Chang, A. Y.-F. & Zhang, J. Maintenance of duplicate genes and their functional redundancy by reduced expression. Trends Genet. 26, 425\u2013430 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Edger, P. P. et al. Subgenome dominance in an interspecific hybrid, synthetic allopolyploid, and a 140-year-old naturally established neo-allopolyploid monkeyflower. Plant Cell 29, 2150\u20132167 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liang, Z. & Schnable, J. C. Functional divergence between subgenomes and gene pairs after whole genome duplications. Mol. Plant 11, 388\u2013397 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bird, K. A. et al. Replaying the evolutionary tape to investigate subgenome dominance in allopolyploid Brassica napus. New Phytol. 230, 354\u2013371 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schnable, J. C., Wang, X., Pires, J. C. & Freeling, M. Escape from preferential retention following repeated whole genome duplications in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 3, 94 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gillard, G. B. et al. Comparative regulomics supports pervasive selection on gene dosage following whole genome duplication. Genome Biol. 22, 103 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thompson, A., Vo, D., Comfort, C. & Zakon, H. H. Expression evolution facilitated the convergent neofunctionalization of a sodium channel gene. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1941\u20131955 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thompson, A., Zakon, H. H. & Kirkpatrick, M. Compensatory drift and the evolutionary dynamics of dosage-sensitive duplicate genes. Genetics 202, 765\u2013774 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gout, J.-F. et al. Dynamics of gene loss following ancient whole-genome duplication in the cryptic Paramecium complex. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad107 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pe\u00f1alba, J. V. et al. The role of hybridization in species formation and persistence. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 16, a041445 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chang, A. Y.-F. & Liao, B.-Y. Reduced translational efficiency of eukaryotic genes after duplication events. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1452\u20131461 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nguyen Ba, A. N. et al. Detecting functional divergence after gene duplication through evolutionary changes in posttranslational regulatory sequences. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003977 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Johri, P., Gout, J.-F., Doak, T. G. & Lynch, M. A population-genetic lens into the process of gene loss following whole-genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac118 (2022). The authors find that expression reduction and the accumulation of coding mutations in one of two paralogues both predate its loss, leading them to extend the ADS model showing that the cumulative activity of paralogous proteins is also under selection; results also highlight that evolutionary fates are determined early on.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ganko, E. W., Meyers, B. C. & Vision, T. J. Divergence in expression between duplicated genes in Arabidopsis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2298\u20132309 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Evans-Yamamoto, D. et al. Parallel nonfunctionalization of CK1\u03b4\/\u03b5 kinase ohnologs following a whole-genome duplication event. Mol. Biol. Evol. 40, msad246 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shi, T., Gao, Z., Chen, J. & Van de Peer, Y. Dosage sensitivity shapes balanced expression and gene longevity of homoeologs after whole-genome duplications in angiosperms. Plant Cell 36, 4323\u20134337 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Drummond, D. A., Bloom, J. D., Adami, C., Wilke, C. O. & Arnold, F. H. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 14338\u201314343 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Serohijos, A. W. R., Rimas, Z. & Shakhnovich, E. I. Protein biophysics explains why highly abundant proteins evolve slowly. Cell Rep. 2, 249\u2013256 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DeLuna, A. et al. Exposing the fitness contribution of duplicated genes. Nat. Genet. 40, 676\u2013681 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

VanderSluis, B. et al. Genetic interactions reveal the evolutionary trajectories of duplicate genes. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 429 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kuzmin, E. et al. Exploring whole-genome duplicate gene retention with complex genetic interaction analysis. Science 368, eaaz5667 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kolodrubetz, D., Kruppa, M. & Burgum, A. Gene dosage affects the expression of the duplicated NHP6 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 272, 93\u2013101 (2001).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DeLuna, A., Springer, M., Kirschner, M. W. & Kishony, R. Need-based up-regulation of protein levels in response to deletion of their duplicate genes. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000347 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Iohannes, S. D. & Jackson, D. Tackling redundancy: genetic mechanisms underlying paralog compensation in plants. New Phytol. 240, 1381\u20131389 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Diss, G., Ascencio, D., DeLuna, A. & Landry, C. R. Molecular mechanisms of paralogous compensation and the robustness of cellular networks. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 322, 488\u2013499 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kafri, R., Bar-Even, A. & Pilpel, Y. Transcription control reprogramming in genetic backup circuits. Nat. Genet. 37, 295\u2013299 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kafri, R., Levy, M. & Pilpel, Y. The regulatory utilization of genetic redundancy through responsive backup circuits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11653\u201311658 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Loker, R. & Mann, R. S. Divergent expression of paralogous genes by modification of shared enhancer activity through a promoter-proximal silencer. Curr. Biol. 32, 3545\u20133555.e4 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vande Zande, P., Siddiq, M. A., Hodgins-Davis, A., Kim, L. & Wittkopp, P. J. Active compensation for changes in TDH3 expression mediated by direct regulators of TDH3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 19, e1011078 (2023). This study presents the regulatory mechanisms that mediate the upregulation of TDH2 in response to the deletion of its paralogue TDH3 in yeast, providing a clear demonstration that active compensation between paralogues can arise from shared regulation.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Springer, M., Weissman, J. S. & Kirschner, M. W. A general lack of compensation for gene dosage in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 368 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dandage, R. et al. Single-cell imaging of protein dynamics of paralogs reveals sources of gene retention. iScience 28, 112771 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Teufel, A. I., Liu, L. & Liberles, D. A. Models for gene duplication when dosage balance works as a transition state to subsequent neo- or sub-functionalization. BMC Evol. Biol. 16, 45 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wilson, A. E. & Liberles, D. A. Dosage balance acts as a time-dependent selective barrier to subfunctionalization. BMC Ecol. Evol. 23, 14 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mihajlovic, L. et al. A direct experimental test of Ohno\u2019s hypothesis. eLife 13, RP97216 (2025). By evolving Escherichia coli cells with one or two copies of a fluorescent protein, the authors experimentally validate the fact that although gene duplication leads to relaxed selection, the rate of phenotypic evolution remains unchanged if one of the two copies is inactivated.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Conant, G. C. & Wagner, A. Asymmetric sequence divergence of duplicate genes. Genome Res. 13, 2052\u20132058 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, P., Gu, Z. & Li, W.-H. Different evolutionary patterns between young duplicate genes in the human genome. Genome Biol. 4, R56 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Qiu, Y., Liu, S.-L. & Adams, K. L. Concerted divergence after gene duplication in polycomb repressive complexes. Plant Physiol. 174, 1192\u20131204 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ascencio, D., Ochoa, S., Delaye, L. & DeLuna, A. Increased rates of protein evolution and asymmetric deceleration after the whole-genome duplication in yeasts. BMC Evol. Biol. 17, 40 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gagnon-Arsenault, I. et al. Transcriptional divergence plays a role in the rewiring of protein interaction networks after gene duplication. J. Proteom. 81, 112\u2013125 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mattenberger, F., Sabater-Mu\u00f1oz, B., Toft, C. & Fares, M. A. The phenotypic plasticity of duplicated genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the origin of adaptations. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 7, 63\u201375 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, J.-T. et al. The fate of recent duplicated genes following a fourth-round whole genome duplication in a tetraploid fish, common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Sci. Rep. 5, 8199 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lien, S. et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533, 200\u2013205 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kryuchkova-Mostacci, N. & Robinson-Rechavi, M. Tissue-specificity of gene expression diverges slowly between orthologs, and rapidly between paralogs. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005274 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hoffmeier, A. et al. A dead gene walking: convergent degeneration of a clade of MADS-box genes in crucifers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 2618\u20132638 (2018).<\/p>\n

PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dibyachintan, S. et al. Cryptic genetic variation shapes the fate of gene duplicates in a protein interaction network. Nat. Commun. 16, 1530 (2025). This study shows how the effects of new mutations on protein\u2013protein interactions of two paralogous proteins are contingent on the cryptic genetic variation accumulated following duplication, and dictate which mutations can subfunctionalize the paralogues.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sane, M., Diwan, G. D., Bhat, B. A., Wahl, L. M. & Agashe, D. Shifts in mutation spectra enhance access to beneficial mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2207355120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sane, M., Parveen, S. & Agashe, D. Mutation bias alters the distribution of fitness effects of mutations. PLoS Biol. 23, e3003282 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cope, A. L., Schraiber, J. G. & Pennell, M. Macroevolutionary divergence of gene expression driven by selection on protein abundance. Science 387, 1063\u20131068 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aub\u00e9, S., Nielly-Thibault, L. & Landry, C. R. Evolutionary trade-off and mutational bias could favor transcriptional over translational divergence within paralog pairs. PLoS Genet. 19, e1010756 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, S. & Chen, Y. Fine-tuning the expression of duplicate genes by translational regulation in Arabidopsis and maize. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 534 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Blake, W. J., Kaern, M., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422, 633\u2013637 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chapal, M., Mintzer, S., Brodsky, S., Carmi, M. & Barkai, N. Resolving noise\u2013control conflict by gene duplication. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000289 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

David, K. T. et al. Convergent expansions of keystone gene families drive metabolic innovation in Saccharomycotina yeasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2500165122 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nocedal, I. & Laub, M. T. Ancestral reconstruction of duplicated signaling proteins reveals the evolution of signaling specificity. eLife 11, e77346 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ukken, F. P., Dowell, N. L., Hajra, M. & Carroll, S. B. A novel broad spectrum venom metalloproteinase autoinhibitor in the rattlesnake Crotalus atrox evolved via a shift in paralog function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2214880119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harms, M. J. et al. Biophysical mechanisms for large-effect mutations in the evolution of steroid hormone receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11475\u201311480 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grassi, L. et al. Identity and divergence of protein domain architectures after the yeast whole-genome duplication event. Mol. BioSyst. 6, 2305\u20132315 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mallik, S., Tawfik, D. S. & Levy, E. D. How gene duplication diversifies the landscape of protein oligomeric state and function. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 76, 101966 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, X. et al. Widespread expansion of protein interaction capabilities by alternative splicing. Cell 164, 805\u2013817 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baker, M. E. Steroid receptors and vertebrate evolution. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 496, 110526 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Thornton, J. W. Evolution of vertebrate steroid receptors from an ancestral estrogen receptor by ligand exploitation and serial genome expansions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5671\u20135676 (2001).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ortlund, E. A., Bridgham, J. T., Redinbo, M. R. & Thornton, J. W. Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis. Science 317, 1544\u20131548 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bridgham, J. T., Brown, J. E., Rodr\u00edguez-Mar\u00ed, A., Catchen, J. M. & Thornton, J. W. Evolution of a new function by degenerative mutation in cephalochordate steroid receptors. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000191 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Anderson, D. W., McKeown, A. N. & Thornton, J. W. Intermolecular epistasis shaped the function and evolution of an ancient transcription factor and its DNA binding sites. eLife 4, e07864 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Starr, T. N., Picton, L. K. & Thornton, J. W. Alternative evolutionary histories in the sequence space of an ancient protein. Nature 549, 409\u2013413 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mui\u00f1o, J. M. et al. Evolution of DNA-binding sites of a floral master regulatory transcription factor. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 185\u2013200 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pougach, K. et al. Duplication of a promiscuous transcription factor drives the emergence of a new regulatory network. Nat. Commun. 5, 4868 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gera, T., Jonas, F., More, R. & Barkai, N. Evolution of binding preferences among whole-genome duplicated transcription factors. eLife 11, e73225 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Siggers, T., Reddy, J., Barron, B. & Bulyk, M. L. Diversification of transcription factor paralogs via noncanonical modularity in C2H2 zinc finger DNA binding. Mol. Cell 55, 640\u2013648 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hudson, W. H. et al. Distal substitutions drive divergent DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors through subdivision of conformational space. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 326\u2013331 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shen, N. et al. Divergence in DNA specificity among paralogous transcription factors contributes to their differential in vivo binding. Cell Syst. 6, 470\u2013483.e8 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Casewell, N. R., Wagstaff, S. C., Harrison, R. A., Renjifo, C. & W\u00fcster, W. Domain loss facilitates accelerated evolution and neofunctionalization of duplicate snake venom metalloproteinase toxin genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2637\u20132649 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Z. et al. A tale of two copies: evolutionary trajectories of moth pheromone receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221166120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lavy, T., Yanagida, H. & Tawfik, D. S. Gal3 binds Gal80 tighter than Gal1 indicating adaptive protein changes following duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 472\u2013477 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Park, Y., Metzger, B. P. H. & Thornton, J. W. Epistatic drift causes gradual decay of predictability in protein evolution. Science 376, 823\u2013830 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Capra, E. J. & Laub, M. T. Evolution of two-component signal transduction systems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 325\u2013347 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Capra, E. J., Perchuk, B. S., Skerker, J. M. & Laub, M. T. Adaptive mutations that prevent crosstalk enable the expansion of paralogous signaling protein families. Cell 150, 222\u2013232 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ghose, D. A., Przydzial, K. E., Mahoney, E. M., Keating, A. E. & Laub, M. T. Marginal specificity in protein interactions constrains evolution of a paralogous family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2221163120 (2023). Using deep mutational scanning, the authors show that single mutations can lead to the loss of specificity within paralogues that have diversified to mediate different signalling pathways.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, J. M. Natural selection and the concept of a protein space. Nature 225, 563\u2013564(1970).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DePristo, M. A., Weinreich, D. M. & Hartl, D. L. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 678\u2013687 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xie, V. C., Pu, J., Metzger, B. P., Thornton, J. W. & Dickinson, B. C. Contingency and chance erase necessity in the experimental evolution of ancestral proteins. eLife 10, e67336 (2021). Using phage-assisted continuous evolution, the authors show that, although the starting genotype constrains the group of accessible outcomes (contingency), the observed outcome in different replicates derived from the same starting genotype might vary (chance).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bloom, J. D., Labthavikul, S. T., Otey, C. R. & Arnold, F. H. Protein stability promotes evolvability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5869\u20135874 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bershtein, S., Segal, M., Bekerman, R., Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Robustness\u2013epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein. Nature 444, 929\u2013932 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tokuriki, N. & Tawfik, D. S. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 596\u2013604 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tokuriki, N., Stricher, F., Serrano, L. & Tawfik, D. S. How protein stability and new functions trade off. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000002 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zheng, J., Guo, N. & Wagner, A. Selection enhances protein evolvability by increasing mutational robustness and foldability. Science 370, eabb5962 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Metzger, B. P. H., Park, Y., Starr, T. N. & Thornton, J. W. Epistasis facilitates functional evolution in an ancient transcription factor. eLife 12, RP88737 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Herrera-\u00c1lvarez, S., Patton, J. E. J. & Thornton, J. W. The structure of an ancient genotype\u2013phenotype map shaped the functional evolution of a protein family. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1656\u20131669 (2025). Using combinatorial mutagenesis on the reconstructed ancestors of paralogous steroid receptor and high-throughput binding assays with DNA motifs, the authors find that some DNA motifs are bound by more genotypes, which can influence which DNA motif specificity is likely to fix during evolution.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tuckey, A. J. et al. Structural and functional characterisation of a reconstructed ancestral strigolactone receptor. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.08.03.668049<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Ikezaki, Y. et al. Molecular evolution of terpene synthase underlying the diversification of isoprene emission in Fagaceae. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.07.31.667835<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Bridgham, J. T., Carroll, S. M. & Thornton, J. W. Evolution of hormone-receptor complexity by molecular exploitation. Science 312, 97\u2013101 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Horowitz, N. H. On the evolution of biochemical syntheses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 31, 153\u2013157 (1945).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Light, S. & Kraulis, P. Network analysis of metabolic enzyme evolution in Escherichia coli. BMC Bioinform. 5, 15 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Carroll, S., Bridgham, J. & Thornton, J. W. Evolution of hormone signaling in elasmobranchs by exploitation of promiscuous receptors. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 2643\u20132652 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Steube, N. et al. Fortuitously compatible protein surfaces primed allosteric control in cyanobacterial photoprotection. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 756\u2013767 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Copley, S. D., Newton, M. S. & Widney, K. A. How to recruit a promiscuous enzyme to serve a new function. Biochemistry 62, 300\u2013308 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lemieux, P., Bradley, D., Dub\u00e9, A. K., Dionne, U. & Landry, C. R. Dissection of the role of a Src homology 3 domain in the evolution of binding preference of paralogous proteins. Genetics 226, iyad175 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lynch, M. The evolution of multimeric protein assemblages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1353\u20131366 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Levy, E. D. & Teichmann, S. in Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science Vol. 117 (eds Giraldo, J. & Ciruela, F.) 25\u201351 (Academic Press, 2013).<\/p>\n

Schweke, H. et al. An atlas of protein homo-oligomerization across domains of life. Cell 187, 999\u20131010 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pereira-Leal, J. B., Levy, E. D., Kamp, C. & Teichmann, S. A. Evolution of protein complexes by duplication of homomeric interactions. Genome Biol. 8, R51 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kaltenegger, E. & Ober, D. Paralogue interference affects the dynamics after gene duplication. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 814\u2013821 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dandage, R. et al. Frequent assembly of chimeric complexes in the protein interaction network of an interspecies yeast hybrid. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 1384\u20131401 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leducq, J.-B. et al. Evidence for the robustness of protein complexes to inter-species hybridization. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003161 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ng, D. W.-K., Chen, H. H. Y. & Chen, Z. J. Heterologous protein-DNA interactions lead to biased allelic expression of circadian clock genes in interspecific hybrids. Sci. Rep. 7, 45087 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergendahl, L. T. et al. The role of protein complexes in human genetic disease. Protein Sci. 28, 1400\u20131411 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hochberg, G. K. A. et al. Structural principles that enable oligomeric small heat-shock protein paralogs to evolve distinct functions. Science 359, 930\u2013935 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cisneros, A. F., Nielly-Thibault, L., Mallik, S., Levy, E. D. & Landry, C. R. Mutational biases favor complexity increases in protein interaction networks after gene duplication. Mol. Syst. Biol. 20, 549\u2013572 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cisneros, A. F. et al. Paralog interference preserves genetic redundancy. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.06.13.659495<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Herskowitz, I. Functional inactivation of genes by dominant negative mutations. Nature 329, 219\u2013222 (1987).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gerasimavicius, L., Livesey, B. J. & Marsh, J. A. Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure. Nat. Commun. 13, 3895 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Badonyi, M. & Marsh, J. A. Prevalence of loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mechanisms across genetic disease phenotypes. Nat. Commun. 16, 8392 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pal, T., Dibyachintan, S., Cisneros, A. F. & Landry, C. R. Phenotypic dominance emerges from activity fitness functions and molecular interactions. Genetics https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/genetics\/iyaf254<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wente, S. R. & Schachman, H. K. Shared active sites in oligomeric enzymes: model studies with defective mutants of aspartate transcarbamoylase produced by site-directed mutagenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 31\u201335 (1987).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ringel, A. E. et al. Yeast Tdh3 (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase) is a Sir2-interacting factor that regulates transcriptional silencing and rDNA recombination. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003871 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Bercoff, A., Makino, T. & McLysaght, A. Duplicability of self-interacting human genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 160 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Diss, G. et al. Gene duplication can impart fragility, not robustness, in the yeast protein interaction network. Science 355, 630\u2013634 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Marchant, A. et al. The role of structural pleiotropy and regulatory evolution in the retention of heteromers of paralogs. eLife 8, e46754 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Singh, P. P. et al. On the expansion of \u2018dangerous\u2019 gene repertoires by whole-genome duplications in early vertebrates. Cell Rep. 2, 1387\u20131398 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Malaguti, G., Singh, P. P. & Isambert, H. On the retention of gene duplicates prone to dominant deleterious mutations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 93, 38\u201351 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baker, C. R., Hanson-Smith, V. & Johnson, A. D. Following gene duplication, paralog interference constrains transcriptional circuit evolution. Science 342, 104\u2013108 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Charrier, C. et al. Inhibition of SRGAP2 function by its human-specific paralogs induces neoteny during spine maturation. Cell 149, 923\u2013935 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fossati, M. et al. SRGAP2 and its human-specific paralog co-regulate the development of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Neuron 91, 356\u2013369 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Marques, A. C., Vinckenbosch, N., Brawand, D. & Kaessmann, H. Functional diversification of duplicate genes through subcellular adaptation of encoded proteins. Genome Biol. 9, R54 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bruno, L. et al. Selective deployment of transcription factor paralogs with submaximal strength facilitates gene regulation in the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1372\u20131380 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yeh, C.-W. et al. Altered assembly paths mitigate interference among paralogous complexes. Nat. Commun. 15, 7169 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mallik, S. & Tawfik, D. S. Determining the interaction status and evolutionary fate of duplicated homomeric proteins. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008145 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mallik, S., Cisneros, A. F., Landry, C. R. & Levy, E. D. Co-translational assembly promotes functional diversification of paralogous proteins. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.01.22.634331<\/a> (2025). This preprint shows that homomeric paralogues typically emerge due to barriers against heteromerization and have a higher functional divergence than heteromeric ones, with co-translational assembly acting as a strong barrier against heteromerization.<\/p>\n

Hsiao, T.-L. & Vitkup, D. Role of duplicate genes in robustness against deleterious human mutations. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000014 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dean, E. J., Davis, J. C., Davis, R. W. & Petrov, D. A. Pervasive and persistent redundancy among duplicated genes in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000113 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dandage, R. & Landry, C. R. Paralog dependency indirectly affects the robustness of human cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8871 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Greco, B. M. et al. PARPAL: PARalog Protein Redistribution using Abundance and Localization in yeast database. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/g3journal\/jkaf148<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Despr\u00e9s, P. C. et al. Compensatory mutations potentiate constructive neutral evolution by gene duplication. Science 385, 770\u2013775 (2024). Using deep mutational scanning libraries, this study identifies more than 200 pairs of loss-of-function alleles that complement each other when forming heteromers, representing direct examples of subfunctionalization and dependency between duplicates.<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boncoeur, E. et al. PatA and PatB form a functional heterodimeric ABC multidrug efflux transporter responsible for the resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to fluoroquinolones. Biochemistry 51, 7755\u20137765 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Emlaw, J. R. et al. A single historical substitution drives an increase in acetylcholine receptor complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018731118 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ashenberg, O., Rozen-Gagnon, K., Laub, M. T. & Keating, A. E. Determinants of homodimerization specificity in histidine kinases. J. Mol. Biol. 413, 222\u2013235 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Finnigan, G. C., Hanson-Smith, V., Stevens, T. H. & Thornton, J. W. Evolution of increased complexity in a molecular machine. Nature 481, 360\u2013364 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hochberg, G. K. A. et al. A hydrophobic ratchet entrenches molecular complexes. Nature 588, 503\u2013508 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, T.-Y., Ha, C. W. & Huh, W.-K. Differential subcellular localization of ribosomal protein L7 paralogs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 27, 539\u2013546 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Natan, E., Wells, J. N., Teichmann, S. A. & Marsh, J. A. Regulation, evolution and consequences of cotranslational protein complex assembly. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 42, 90\u201397 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Natan, E. et al. Cotranslational protein assembly imposes evolutionary constraints on homomeric proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 279\u2013288 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shiber, A. et al. Cotranslational assembly of protein complexes in eukaryotes revealed by ribosome profiling. Nature 561, 268\u2013272 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mallik, S. et al. Structural determinants of co-translational protein complex assembly. Cell 188, 764\u2013777.e22 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bertolini, M. et al. Interactions between nascent proteins translated by adjacent ribosomes drive homomer assembly. Science 371, 57\u201364 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Eyre-Walker, A. & Keightley, P. D. The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 610\u2013618 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keeling, D. M., Garza, P., Nartey, C. M. & Carvunis, A.-R. The meanings of \u2018function\u2019 in biology and the problematic case of de novo gene emergence. eLife 8, e47014 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stoltzfus, A. On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 169\u2013181 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Assis, R. et al. Models for the retention of duplicate genes and their biological underpinnings. F1000Research 12, 1400 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Presser, A., Elowitz, M. B., Kellis, M. & Kishony, R. The evolutionary dynamics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction network after duplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 950\u2013954 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sandve, S. R., Rohlfs, R. V. & Hvidsten, T. R. Subfunctionalization versus neofunctionalization after whole-genome duplication. Nat. Genet. 50, 908\u2013909 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Assis, R. & Bachtrog, D. Neofunctionalization of young duplicate genes in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17409\u201317414 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Braasch, I. et al. The spotted gar genome illuminates vertebrate evolution and facilitates human-teleost comparisons. Nat. Genet. 48, 427\u2013437 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fitch, W. M. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Biol. 20, 406\u2013416 (1971).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pauling, L. & Zuckerkandl, E. Chemical paleogenetics: molecular \u201crestoration studies\u201d of extinct forms of life. Acta Chem. Scand. 17, S9\u2013S16 (1963).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vialle, R. A., Tamuri, A. U. & Goldman, N. Alignment modulates ancestral sequence reconstruction accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1783\u20131797 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hochberg, G. K. A. & Thornton, J. W. Reconstructing ancient proteins to understand the causes of structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 46, 247\u2013269 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schulz, L. et al. Evolution of increased complexity and specificity at the dawn of form I Rubiscos. Science 378, 155\u2013160 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ng, J. Z. Y. et al. Origin of chaperone dependence and assembly complexity in Rubisco\u2019s biogenesis. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.09.22.677769<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Merkl, R. & Sterner, R. Ancestral protein reconstruction: techniques and applications. Biol. Chem. 397, 1\u201321 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cano, A. et al. Misrepresenting biases in arrival: a comment on Svensson. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.32942\/X2SG6V<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

Stoltzfus, A. & Norris, R. W. On the causes of evolutionary transition:transversion bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 595\u2013602 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lee, H., Popodi, E., Tang, H. & Foster, P. L. Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in the bacterium Escherichia coli as determined by whole-genome sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2774\u2013E2783 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhu, Y. O., Siegal, M. L., Hall, D. W. & Petrov, D. A. Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2310\u2013E2318 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ossowski, S. et al. The rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 327, 92\u201394 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. Patterns of nucleotide substitution in Drosophila and mammalian genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1475\u20131479 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hershberg, R. & Petrov, D. A. Evidence that mutation is universally biased towards AT in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001115 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lynch, M. R. Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 961\u2013968 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Matsushita, T. & Kano-Sueoka, T. Non-random codon usage of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations in the human HLA-A gene. J. Mol. Evol. 91, 169\u2013191 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fryxell, K. J. & Moon, W.-J. CpG mutation rates in the human genome are highly dependent on local GC content. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 650\u2013658 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wojciechowski, M., Czapinska, H. & Bochtler, M. CpG underrepresentation and the bacterial CpG-specific DNA methyltransferase M.MpeI. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 105\u2013110 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cano, A. V., Rozho\u0148ov\u00e1, H., Stoltzfus, A., McCandlish, D. M. & Payne, J. L. Mutation bias shapes the spectrum of adaptive substitutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119720119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Horton, J. S. & Taylor, T. B. Mutation bias and adaptation in bacteria. Microbiology 169, 001404 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mendez, R., Fritsche, M., Porto, M. & Bastolla, U. Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000767 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Levy, E. D. A simple definition of structural regions in proteins and its use in analyzing interface evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 403, 660\u2013670 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Garcia-Seisdedos, H., Empereur-Mot, C., Elad, N. & Levy, E. D. Proteins evolve on the edge of supramolecular self-assembly. Nature 548, 244\u2013247 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yampolsky, L. Y. & Stoltzfus, A. Bias in the introduction of variation as an orienting factor in evolution. Evol. Dev. 3, 73\u201383 (2001).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cano, A. V. & Payne, J. L. Mutation bias interacts with composition bias to influence adaptive evolution. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008296 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gitschlag, B. L., Stoltzfus, A. & McCandlish, D. M. Molecular adaptation reflects taxon-specific mutational biases. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.09.03.674101<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

McShea, H. et al. The effectiveness of selection in a species affects the direction of amino acid frequency evolution. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2023.02.01.526552<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Schaper, S. & Louis, A. A. The arrival of the frequent: how bias in genotype-phenotype maps can steer populations to local optima. PLoS One 9, e86635 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sung, W., Ackerman, M. S., Miller, S. F., Doak, T. G. & Lynch, M. Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18488\u201318492 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Kuzmin, E., Taylor, J. S. & Boone, C. Retention of duplicated genes in evolution. Trends Genet. 38, 59\u201372…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":480539,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[3878,3880,3875,49,48,3877,1925,3879,3673,3876,58822,66],"class_list":{"0":"post-480538","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-science","8":"tag-agriculture","9":"tag-animal-genetics-and-genomics","10":"tag-biomedicine","11":"tag-ca","12":"tag-canada","13":"tag-cancer-research","14":"tag-evolutionary-genetics","15":"tag-gene-function","16":"tag-general","17":"tag-human-genetics","18":"tag-proteins","19":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/480538","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=480538"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/480538\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/480539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=480538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=480538"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=480538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}