{"id":513273,"date":"2026-03-04T07:20:08","date_gmt":"2026-03-04T07:20:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/513273\/"},"modified":"2026-03-04T07:20:08","modified_gmt":"2026-03-04T07:20:08","slug":"surrey-judges-sexual-exploitation-decision-confirmed-by-appeal-court-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/513273\/","title":{"rendered":"Surrey judge\u2019s sexual exploitation decision confirmed by appeal court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>              Surrey judge\u2019s sexual exploitation decision confirmed by appeal court<\/p>\n<p class=\"pubStamp\">Published 3:30 pm Tuesday, March 3, 2026<\/p>\n<p>The Court of Appeal for British Columbia has upheld a Surrey judge\u2019s decision to convict a man of sexual interference and sexual exploitation related to a teenaged girl.<\/p>\n<p>A sexual assault charge was conditionally stayed.<\/p>\n<p>There is a publication ban on any evidence that could identify the girl, who was 15 and 16 years old at the time of the offences which occurred over 18 months.<\/p>\n<p>Mark Douglas Hallwachs appealed his convictions. He was 42 at the time of the crimes, committed between Nov. 1, 2014 and April 30, 2016.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe primary issue on appeal is whether the judge misapprehended evidence material to her assessment of the complainant\u2019s credibility,\u201d Justice Lauri Ann Fenlon noted in her <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bccourts.ca\/jdb-txt\/ca\/26\/00\/2026BCCA0083.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">March 3 reasons for <\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bccourts.ca\/jdb-txt\/ca\/26\/00\/2026BCCA0083.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">judgment<\/a> delivered in Vancouver.<\/p>\n<p>Justices Margot Fleming and Lisa Warren concurred with Fenlon\u2019s decision to dismiss the appeal.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInitially, the complainant did not consent to the sexual contact, but did not know how to stop it. Eventually, she started to have feelings for the appellant and agreed to sexual activity with him on an ongoing basis,\u201d Fenlon said.<\/p>\n<p>But this stopped after the girl\u2019s mother found out what was happening.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe complainant\u2019s parents went to the police but were told the complainant would need to make a statement in order for the investigation to proceed,\u201d the appeal court judge noted. \u201cAt that time, the complainant refused to do so, feeling that she loved the appellant and wanted to protect him. It was not until she was 19 years old and began to realize the impact of the events on her life that she contacted the police to make a statement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Hallwacks denied having any sexual contact with the girl. He argued that the Surrey judge erred in assessing the teen\u2019s credibility.<\/p>\n<p>Fenlon noted that \u201cdemonstrating a misapprehension is a high standard for an appellant. They must point to a plainly identifiable error, not merely suggest that the judge may have erred.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI see no basis in the judge\u2019s reasons to suggest that she misapprehended the complainant\u2019s evidence,\u201d she found. \u201cFurther, in assessing the appellant\u2019s argument that the judge should not have drawn the inference she did, context is important. The issue before the judge was not when the assaults occurred, but whether they happened.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fenlon noted that the provincial court judge found that the complainant \u201cdid not consent to the sexual activity at issue.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>She further explained that \u201ceven when sexual assault complainants are entirely mistaken about details such as time and place, it is for judges to determine what significance this will have on an assessment of their credibility and reliability.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cI see no material error in the judge\u2019s reasoning in this case,\u201d Fenlon concluded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Surrey judge\u2019s sexual exploitation decision confirmed by appeal court Published 3:30 pm Tuesday, March 3, 2026 The Court&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":512720,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[194299],"tags":[49,48,87674],"class_list":{"0":"post-513273","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-surrey","8":"tag-ca","9":"tag-canada","10":"tag-surrey"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513273","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=513273"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513273\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/512720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=513273"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=513273"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=513273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}