Researchers examined how different alcohol policies could reduce drinking and its related health risks.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Get the news and events in Victoria, in your inbox every morning.<\/p>\n
Thank you! Your submission has been received!<\/p>\n
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
UVic\u2019s Adam Sherk holds a beer bottle with a mock-up of a cancer warning label. Photo: UVic<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.prod.website-files.com\/5d907be7e6be584dbf47653c\/627c04f93171273fa66fefcc_Trust-Mark.svg\")
<\/p>\n
Many were rattled in 2023 when the federal government lowered the recommended alcohol intake from two drinks a day to two a week\u2014or ideally, zero.\u00a0<\/p>\n
But the Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction\u2019s reasoning was backed by a growing body of evidence that booze is a net negative for our health. Heart disease, stroke, and cancer risks all accompany that after-work martini.\u00a0<\/p>\n
While British Columbians are overall drinking less<\/a> these days\u2014especially after the government changed its recommendations\u2014many are still consuming more than the recommended weekly number.\u00a0<\/p>\n New research from UVic\u2019s Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), published this week in The Lancet<\/a>, says adding warning labels to drinks could prevent a cancer diagnosis for hundreds of Canadians every year.\u00a0<\/p>\n The researchers examined how different alcohol policies could reduce drinking and its related health risks.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cThese are evidence-based policies that jurisdictions are considering\u2014there\u2019s a cancer-warning bill in the Canadian Senate right now,\u201d says Adam Sherk, the study\u2019s lead author. Bill S-202<\/a>, which would amend the Food and Drugs Act to require cancer warnings on alcohol, is headed to its third senate reading.<\/p>\n Stay connected to your city with the Capital Daily newsletter.<\/p>\n By filling out the form above, you agree to receive emails from Capital Daily. You can unsubscribe at any time.<\/p>\n \u201cWe wanted to see just how big of a difference bringing in these policies could make in reducing alcohol-related cancers.\u201d<\/p>\n To understand the most effective approach, Sherk and his team looked at five different scenarios:<\/p>\n Setting price minimums per serving in a container, with an additional $1.75 per serving included (ex. a standard bottle of wine has five servings, adding $8.75 to the bottle\u2019s price)Setting the price minimum to $2 per serving in a container\u00a0Rotating multi-message labels, including drinking guidelines and health risksAdding labels that warn against the cancer risks of alcoholA combination of Nos. 2 and 4<\/p>\n The last of that list was shown to be the most effective model for reducing the number of yearly alcohol-related cancer diagnoses and deaths in Canada. In 2022, alcohol caused an estimated 9498 cases of cancer and 3866 cancer deaths. A combination of cancer-risk labels and cost increases could reduce the number of cases by 674 (7%) and the number of deaths by 216 (5.6%), according to the study.<\/p>\n This modelling doesn’t include the other deadly effects of drinking, from car accidents to liver failure\u2014if it did, Sherk says the reduction in deaths would be even larger.<\/p>\n \u201cWe believe this is the first study to model the impacts of warning labels on cancer cases and deaths, but cancers are just one of many potential health harms related to drinking,\u201d says Sherk.<\/p>\n The researchers also looked at a real-world model in Yukon and Northwest Territories, where alcohol warning labels have been in place since 2017. Yukon\u2019s warnings led to a 6.6% decline in the consumption of labelled drinks.\u00a0<\/p>\n Cigarettes are another known carcinogen that were once a part of everyday life for many. Prior to the 1960s, the Canadian government had no recommendations or warnings about tobacco products and nearly half the population was considered smokers.\u00a0<\/p>\n But once the links to cancer became more clear, public health campaigns\u2014including labels and pictures of the health risks on cigarette packaging\u2014and strong regulations over the decades reduced the number of daily smokers in Canada to just 11% of the country (as of 2022).<\/p>\n