{"id":549169,"date":"2026-03-20T14:47:09","date_gmt":"2026-03-20T14:47:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/549169\/"},"modified":"2026-03-20T14:47:09","modified_gmt":"2026-03-20T14:47:09","slug":"china-becomes-factory-to-the-factories-as-intemediate-good-exports-soar-mckinsey","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/549169\/","title":{"rendered":"China becomes &#8216;factory to the factories&#8217; as intemediate good exports soar: McKinsey"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China is becoming a \u201cfactory to the factories,\u201d ramping up its exports of industrial components like smartphone parts, processors, memory chips and lithium-ion batteries, destined for final assembly in economies like Southeast Asia.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe may buy fewer \u2018Made in China\u2019 goods going forward, but more products will have internal components manufactured in China,\u201d says Jeongmin Seong, a partner at the <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/company\/mckinsey\/\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/company\/mckinsey\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">McKinsey<\/a> Global Institute (MGI), the consulting firm\u2019s research arm.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>China\u2019s exports of consumer goods declined by 2% last year, yet exports of intermediate goods rose by 9%.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Trade between the U.S. and China declined by 30% last year, due to U.S. President Donald Trump\u2019s steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Yet \u201cChina stepped up to diversify its trading partners, and mostly with emerging economies,\u201d explains Seong, who is also the author of a new MGI report on global trade. Those new trading partners, mostly manufacturing hubs, had more need for cheap machinery and components from China, rather than more costly finished products.<\/p>\n<p>MGI\u2019s report, titled <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/mgi\/our-research\/geopolitics-and-the-geometry-of-global-trade-2026-update\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/mgi\/our-research\/geopolitics-and-the-geometry-of-global-trade-2026-update\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Geopolitics and the Geometry of Global Trade,<\/a> notes that the U.S. also changed its trading partners last year. The country successfully replaced two-thirds of the goods it previously sourced from China, sourcing smartphones from India and laptops from Southeast Asia.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>ASEAN in particular is playing a key role in tariff-induced trade adjustments. Southeast Asian countries were already picking up manufacturing business moving out of China, as companies tried to manage earlier tariffs on Chinese goods and diversify their supply chains in the wake of the COVID pandemic.<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u2019s newest trade war is likely to accelerate the shift to adopt \u201cChina plus one\u201d supply chains.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cASEAN played the role of matchmaker for the global supply chain and kept it from breaking up,\u201d Seong says. \u201cASEAN\u2019s exports grew about 14%, which is more than two times as fast as the global average.\u201d Notably, Southeast Asia ramped up trade with both China and the U.S., with the ASEAN-China and ASEAN-U.S. trade corridors being two of the world\u2019s fastest growing, according to MGI.<\/p>\n<p>Despite post-\u201dLiberation Day\u201d concerns last year that <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/fortune.com\/asia\/2025\/04\/05\/trump-liberation-day-tariffs-no-leader-world-trade\/\" href=\"https:\/\/fortune.com\/asia\/2025\/04\/05\/trump-liberation-day-tariffs-no-leader-world-trade\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">globalization was dead<\/a>, global trade hasn\u2019t declined. Seong sees less evidence that countries are moving manufacturing back home or to neighboring countries. \u201cDespite a lot of headlines about onshoring, reshoring and nearshoring\u2014that is not happening at a global scale,\u201d he says. \u201cMore countries are getting connected over longer distances, and in that sense, we can argue that globalization is continuing.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Instead, trade is being reconfigured along geopolitical lines. Countries are trading more with aligned countries, and trading less with countries seen as competitors or rivals. It\u2019s not just the U.S.; China, too, has increased trade with Southeast Asia, Europe, Latin America and Africa as its geopolitical contest with Washington intensifies.<\/p>\n<p>Investment, too, is being configured across geopolitical lines. The U.S. is investing more in its allies; it\u2019s sourcing investment from allies like Japan, South Korea, and the Middle East, particularly in areas like semiconductors. China, on the other hand, is now <a aria-label=\"Go to https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/mgi\/our-research\/the-fdi-shake-up-how-foreign-direct-investment-today-may-shape-industry-and-trade-tomorrow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/mgi\/our-research\/the-fdi-shake-up-how-foreign-direct-investment-today-may-shape-industry-and-trade-tomorrow\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">a net investor overseas<\/a>, not just because the country is investing more, but also because U.S. investment into the country has dried up.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Last year, the geopolitical distance of foreign direct investment plunged by 13%, while the same metric declined by just 7% in trade, according to MGI. (\u201cGeopolitical distance\u201d is MGI\u2019s metric for measuring how closely two countries are aligned in their foreign policies, politics, and alliances.)<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMoney can move faster than physical networks,\u201d Seong explains.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Tariffs may come and go, Seong suggests, but a deeper shift of who trades and invests with whom is likely to endure long after the latest trade war headlines fade. \u201cGeopolitical events like tariffs could be short-term splashes, but structural waves\u2014like the geopolitical realignment we\u2019re seeing\u2014will endure,\u201d he concludes.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"China is becoming a \u201cfactory to the factories,\u201d ramping up its exports of industrial components like smartphone parts,&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":549170,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[45,49,48,95,46,2277,25178,4992],"class_list":["post-549169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-economy","tag-business","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-china","tag-economy","tag-geopolitics","tag-mckinsey","tag-tariffs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=549169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549169\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/549170"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=549169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=549169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=549169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}