{"id":564825,"date":"2026-03-27T18:02:08","date_gmt":"2026-03-27T18:02:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/564825\/"},"modified":"2026-03-27T18:02:08","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T18:02:08","slug":"ranking-the-10-best-nhl-first-round-playoff-matchups-that-are-still-realistically-in-play","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/564825\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking the 10 best NHL first-round playoff matchups that are still realistically in play"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Did you catch another subtle sign of spring from the last few days? The NHL standings page added an \u201cIf Playoffs Started Today\u201d link at the top of the page. And it doesn\u2019t just go to a page that says \u201c\u2026 it would be way too early, calm down.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s because we\u2019re almost there. There are just three weeks left in the NHL season, and while that\u2019s plenty of time for teams to shift around the standings, it\u2019s close enough to the playoffs that we can start thinking ahead to potential matchups. And as always, some are better than others.<\/p>\n<p>Today, let\u2019s have a look at some of those first-round matchups that are realistically in play, with a ranking of the 10 best. We\u2019ll use the numbers from <a href=\"https:\/\/hockeystats.com\/playoff-odds\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">HockeyStats.com<\/a> and limit our list to matchups with at least a 10 percent chance of happening (heading into last night\u2019s games).<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019ll count them down, working our way to the best possible matchups \u2014 most of which, of course, will not happen because we\u2019ll have jinxed it. We\u2019ll get there, but let\u2019s take this from the top \u2026<\/p>\n<p>No. 10: Utah Mammoth vs. Anaheim Ducks<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 61.0 percent, one of the highest we\u2019ll see on this list, so we might as well try to sell it.<\/p>\n<p>The history: None, given this will be the Mammoth\u2019s first postseason appearance, although the Ducks did face the Arizona Coyotes in one playoff series way back in 1997.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Most of the usual stuff we look for in a great matchup isn\u2019t here, but that\u2019s OK because there\u2019s something to be said for novelty. And it would be oddly fun to see the Ducks be the old established franchise staring down the punk kids with the weird name. Beyond that, these are two up-and-coming teams who\u2019ve spent most of the year silencing doubters. And while the Ducks would probably be slight favorites thanks to home ice, it\u2019s a winnable matchup for the Mammoth, which keeps the door open for our dream of seeing them <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7139763\/2026\/03\/23\/nhl-weekend-rankings-pacific-division-playoff-standings\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">hang a banner for winning a division they\u2019re not in<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>No. 9: Nashville Predators vs. Colorado Avalanche<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 40.5 percent, by far the most likely of several possible matchups for the Avs.<\/p>\n<p>The history: They\u2019ve split two meetings, a Preds win in 2018 and an Avalanche sweep in 2022.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Whether it\u2019s Nashville, Utah, the Los Angeles Kings or someone else, the narrative for Colorado\u2019s first round will be the same \u2014 the overwhelming favorite against the scrappy underdog nobody thinks has a real chance. Given that, the Predators are probably the best casting choice for the role of David going up against Goliath. They\u2019re not even supposed to be a playoff team, and sure seemed to be selling at the deadline just a few weeks ago. But they\u2019ve emerged as the favorite to grab the last spot in the West, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/5431301\/2024\/04\/21\/predators-nhl-playoffs-u2-concert\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">they didn\u2019t even need Bono this time<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Could they beat the Avalanche? It wouldn\u2019t make one bit of sense if they did. And given how this season is going, that means there\u2019s a good chance it happens.<\/p>\n<p>No. 8: Buffalo Sabres vs. Boston Bruins<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 21.2 percent. By the way, there\u2019s going to be a lot of the Sabres in this post. You\u2019ve been warned.<\/p>\n<p>The history: There\u2019s a ton, as they\u2019ve met eight times in the postseason, most of them in the Adams Division days. The most recent came in 2010, a series the Bruins won and maybe <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/1969884\/2020\/08\/05\/bruins-flyers-comeback-2010\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">wish they hadn\u2019t<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: This matchup would feature two of the season\u2019s most surprising teams, so any attempt at predicting how it would go would seem pointless. It\u2019s probably the most interesting matchup available for the Bruins now that their odds of drawing the Montreal Canadiens are close to zero.<\/p>\n<p>You\u2019d get the dynamic of a rookie head coach against a guy who\u2019s been doing it forever, a goaltending matchup that would favor the underdog, and a ton of playoff debuts (probably including James Hagens). We could all do a lot worse.<\/p>\n<p>And the winner moves on to the second round, meaning their playoff run would <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=NYqzx68cuJ0\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">get to see a few May days<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>No. 7: Detroit Red Wings vs. Tampa Bay Lightning<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 11.4 percent, which is a lot more than the \u201czero\u201d you might expect <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7145585\/2026\/03\/25\/detroit-red-wings-ottawa-senators-march-playoffs\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">based on Tuesday night<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The history: They faced off in back-to-back years in surprisingly feisty series in 2015 and 2016, with the Lightning winning both. Those are the two most recent playoff series the Red Wings have played.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: It would be an interesting battle between a young-ish team trying to build something and an old one trying to squeeze as much as they can out of a diminishing contention window. But the real fun here would be the Steve Yzerman factor, as the Wings GM could claim partial credit for building both teams. He was hailed as a genius when he left Tampa and eventually came home to Detroit; that reputation has been tarnished by the lack of results so far. No better way to flip that narrative than beating your old team, right? Maybe, but Julien BriseBois might not agree.<\/p>\n<p>(By the way, speaking of Tampa homecomings: Honorable mention honors go to the Lightning facing Martin St. Louis and the Habs in what would be a rematch of a recent Stanley Cup Final, something you don\u2019t often get to say about divisional rivals.)<\/p>\n<p>No. 6: Montreal Canadiens vs. Buffalo Sabres<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 37.2 percent, with two paths to get there \u2014 either the Canadiens drop to a wild-card, or the Sabres drop to second in the division.<\/p>\n<p>The history: They were rivals in the classic Adams Division days and have faced each other seven times in the postseason, although the most recent was back in 1998.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Do you like exciting young teams? How about offense? Can I interest you in two crazy loud buildings? Cool, you\u2019re in, because this would be fantastic.<\/p>\n<p>Really, this one pretty much sells itself. I\u2019m not sure the ceiling is quite as high as some other matchups, but the floor feels like a six-game classic at minimum.<\/p>\n<p>No. 5: Ottawa Senators vs. Buffalo Sabres<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 23.6 percent, nestled in between the Hurricanes and Lightning as the Senators\u2019 second most likely matchup.<\/p>\n<p>The history: Way more than you probably think, although you have to go back a ways. They faced each other twice in the pre-cap days, including the Senators\u2019 very first playoff appearance back in 1997, which ended with a Game 7 overtime winner <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=ZV7V_fQJrbY\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">ripping through Ron Tugnutt\u2019s glove<\/a>. They split meetings in 2006 and 2007, including <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=wKrbibJxmLs\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">this all-time Team Chaos classic<\/a>. Mix in some regular-season nastiness along the way, and this is one of those underrated rivalries that wouldn\u2019t need a ton of heat to start simmering again.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Our third and final Sabres pick isn\u2019t the best possible matchup for Buffalo. That would be a battle of the bandwagons against the Blue Jackets, aka \u201cJarmo-geddon.\u201d But that one\u2019s hanging on by a thread, clocking in under 1 percent as a first-round meeting, and we promised we\u2019d stay in the realm of the realistic.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the Senators wouldn\u2019t be a bad fallback. They\u2019re a sneaky great team that would give the Sabres all they could handle. And if you think <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7132603\/2026\/03\/20\/buffalo-sabres-nhl-playoffs-bandwagon-team\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">the Sabres\u2019 bandwagon is full now<\/a>, wait until Brady Tkachuk and friends are embracing the heel role.<\/p>\n<p>No. 4: Montreal Canadiens vs. Carolina Hurricanes<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 16.5 percent, which is higher than you\u2019d think given it would require Ottawa or Boston passing Montreal on the standings and knocking them down to a wild-card.<\/p>\n<p>The history: They faced each other twice, in 2002 and 2006, with Carolina winning both. But the real history here is more recent, with the whole <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/1058139\/2019\/07\/01\/what-don-waddells-reaction-to-the-sebastian-aho-offer-sheet-says-im-actually-surprised-it-wasnt-more\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">offer sheet kerfuffle around Sebastian Aho<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/2795758\/2021\/08\/28\/karmas-a-rodeo-why-the-hurricanes-tendered-an-offer-sheet-to-the-canadiens-jesperi-kotkaniemi\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">later Jesperi Kotkaniemi<\/a>. Granted, that all happened under Marc Bergevin and Don Waddell, but some of the bad blood lingers, especially between the fan bases.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Even putting aside the offer sheet stuff, this would be a fun matchup with serious upset potential. The Canadiens have played the Hurricanes twice this year and won both while scoring 12 times, which isn\u2019t what you want to see if you\u2019re a Carolina fan worried the goaltending could be a postseason weak link. (The two teams play again on Sunday.) Both teams have potent offenses and question marks in net, and the whole thing could even end up being a battle between Brandon Bussi and Jacob Fowler, two pure rookies who give off some serious Steve Penney vibes.<\/p>\n<p>Also, if you combined Martin St. Louis\u2019 thighs with Rod Brind\u2019Amour\u2019s upper body, you\u2019d create the perfect human form. I\u2019m not sure why this matters but I think it might.<\/p>\n<p>No. 3: Columbus Blue Jackets vs. Pittsburgh Penguins<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 67.0 percent<\/p>\n<p>The history: They\u2019ve faced each other twice, in 2014 and 2017, with the Penguins winning both.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: First of all, because it involves Columbus. While the Sabres may be the greatest bandwagon team of all time, this year\u2019s Blue Jackets aren\u2019t all that far behind. They\u2019ve only won one seven-game series in franchise history, so they\u2019ve got the lovable underdog thing sewn up. But they\u2019ve also been one of the best teams in the league since making a coaching change in January, so this could turn into a real run.<\/p>\n<p>Standing in their way? Only the Penguins, the other half of what might be the most one-sided rivalry in the league. For Columbus fans, the Pens are the bullies who always show up to kick sand in their faces. But that animosity really only goes one way, with Pittsburgh fans focusing their ire on teams like the Capitals and Flyers. On this week\u2019s podcast, Sean Gentille described it as the hockey version of <a href=\"https:\/\/knowyourmeme.com\/memes\/i-feel-bad-for-you-i-dont-think-about-you-at-all\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">that Don Draper meme<\/a>, and he\u2019s not wrong.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s one way to change that, and it\u2019s with the Blue Jackets finally slaying the dragon. The storyline would write itself, especially if Columbus ends up hosting Game 1 for the first time ever. You\u2019d have Dan Muse at 43 years old against Rick Bowness, who\u2019s been coaching almost that long. Oh, and did we mention it could be Sidney Crosby\u2019s last playoff run? Where\u2019s Brandon Dubinsky when you need him. This series would absolutely rock.<\/p>\n<p>No. 2: Vegas Golden Knights vs. Edmonton Oilers<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 49.6 percent, which feels like it should be higher until you remember that both teams could still drop out of the playoffs entirely.<\/p>\n<p>The history: Two meetings, with the Knights winning in 2023 and the Oilers getting payback last year.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: There would be a ton of star power, including 2015 draft cousins Connor McDavid and Jack Eichel crossing paths yet again. There\u2019d be even more pressure, since a first-round exit would have to be viewed as utterly disastrous for both teams, almost certainly costing some people their jobs. And given the goaltending on both sides, it\u2019s possible every game would finish 11-10.<\/p>\n<p>Also, seeing Mitch Marner and Zach Hyman trade playoff goals would make Toronto Maple Leafs fans sad. OK, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7144242\/2026\/03\/25\/toronto-maple-leafs-fans-tank-stretch-run\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">even sadder<\/a>. What more could you want?<\/p>\n<p>No. 1: Minnesota Wild vs. Dallas Stars<\/p>\n<p>The odds: 98 percent, and it feels like it\u2019s been that way since December.<\/p>\n<p>The history: The Stars have beaten the Wild twice, in 2016 and 2023, both times in six games. But more importantly, Norm Green Sucks.<\/p>\n<p>Why it could be great: Because while this is the obvious pick, it\u2019s still the right one. These are arguably two of the three best teams in the league. And look, we all realize they shouldn\u2019t be facing each other in round one. The playoff format is not ideal, and this is one of those years where it\u2019s really going to yield some really unfortunate results.<\/p>\n<p>That stinks. But also, it kind of rules, at least if you\u2019re a neutral fan who just wants to watch an epic matchup in round one. Is it fair that one of these teams will be out right away? Not remotely. But it\u2019s also true that winning a Cup means eventually going through the best of the best. That\u2019s not an argument in favor of the current format, but it is a reason to give yourself permission to enjoy it anyway.<\/p>\n<p>So sit back, forget about fairness and just enjoy two monsters going toe-to-toe. It would be just about the most star-studded opening round matchup we\u2019ve ever seen. And there\u2019d be no shortage of pressure \u2014 remember, the Wild haven\u2019t won a playoff round since 2015 while the Stars fired their coach last year for losing in the conference final. The stakes couldn\u2019t be higher, and it would be disappointing if we didn\u2019t get seven games and multiple overtimes. You\u2019re morally obligated to pretend to be outraged about the whole thing, but you\u2019re still going to love every second of it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Did you catch another subtle sign of spring from the last few days? The NHL standings page added&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":564826,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[766,740,741,49,48,748,758,755,757,742,453,761,743,760,448,744,753,82,745,765,767],"class_list":{"0":"post-564825","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sports","8":"tag-anaheim-ducks","9":"tag-boston-bruins","10":"tag-buffalo-sabres","11":"tag-ca","12":"tag-canada","13":"tag-carolina-hurricanes","14":"tag-colorado-avalanche","15":"tag-columbus-blue-jackets","16":"tag-dallas-stars","17":"tag-detroit-red-wings","18":"tag-edmonton-oilers","19":"tag-minnesota-wild","20":"tag-montreal-canadiens","21":"tag-nashville-predators","22":"tag-nhl","23":"tag-ottawa-senators","24":"tag-pittsburgh-penguins","25":"tag-sports","26":"tag-tampa-bay-lightning","27":"tag-utah-mammoth","28":"tag-vegas-golden-knights"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=564825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/564825\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/564826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=564825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=564825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=564825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}