Federation Asset Management is reformed, according to a letter to its investors signed off by CEO Cameron Brownjohn. The firm’s come to Jesus moment arrived \u2013 ever timely \u2013 after it stupidly sank 65 per cent of its flagship evergreen fund, Federation Alternative Investments II, into logistics business Sendle, which is now in liquidation.\u00a0<\/p>\n
In the letter, Brownjohn conceded Federation made a “bad investment” \u2013 which will not go down as the most searching piece of self-criticism in the history of funds management \u2013 and that the firm is focused on doing better for its clients. Doing better, in Federation’s telling, includes a magnanimous confirmation that it won’t extract any benefit from allocating to Sendle, and that it has agreed to write off performance fees that were otherwise owed to it. But how is it that Federation could’ve accrued performance fees from a fund it has decimated?\u00a0<\/p>\n
Federation’s fund uses what the industry calls a deal-by-deal carry structure. Under that fee model, each investment is assessed in isolation against a hurdle rate \u2013 clear it and the manager gets paid, regardless of what the rest of the portfolio returns.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Losses on one deal also have no bearing on what the manager earns from another \u2013 in industry parlance, non-netting. The manager effectively holds a portfolio of call options on each deal’s upside. The fund investor, meanwhile, bears all the downside.<\/p>\n
You need a premium subscription to unlock this article<\/p>\n
\n
\n You can\u2019t afford not to…
\n <\/p>\n