{"id":60067,"date":"2025-08-10T22:23:08","date_gmt":"2025-08-10T22:23:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/60067\/"},"modified":"2025-08-10T22:23:08","modified_gmt":"2025-08-10T22:23:08","slug":"newsquawk-week-ahead-us-cpi-us-retail-sales-china-cpi-rba-aussie-uk-jobs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/60067\/","title":{"rendered":"Newsquawk Week Ahead: US CPI, US Retail Sales, China CPI, RBA, Aussie &#038; UK Jobs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mon: Norwegian CPI (Jul), Japanese Mountain Day HolidayTue: US-China truce deadline (likely to be extended), RBA Announcement (Aug), UK Jobs Report (Jun), German ZEW Survey (Aug), US CPI (Jul), EIA STEO, OPEC MOMRWed: German Final CPI (Jul), Spanish Final CPI (Jul)Thu: Norges Bank Announcement, Australian Jobs Report (Jul), UK GDP (Jun\/Q2), Swedish CPIF (Jul), EZ Flash GDP (Q2) and Employment (Q2), US PPI (Jul)Fri: Japanese GDP (Q2), Chinese Activity Data (Jul), US Retail Sales (Jul), US University of Michigan Prelim (Aug)<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Potential Trump-Putin Summit (Tbc): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">The Kremlin said a US\u2013Russia summit will take place \u201cin the coming<br \/>\ndays,\u201d while the White House said it is working on the details and that<br \/>\nPresident Trump is open to the meeting. Russia\u2019s deputy UN ambassador,<br \/>\nPolyanskiy, said Russian President Putin may meet President Trump next week,<br \/>\nbut was not aware of any planned meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President<br \/>\nZelensky. Putin suggested the UAE as a \u201csuitable\u201d venue following talks with<br \/>\nUAE President Al Nahyan. Kremlin aide Ushakov said discussions will focus on a<br \/>\nUkraine ceasefire but dismissed Washington\u2019s mention of a trilateral summit<br \/>\nwith Zelensky, with Putin reiterating conditions for such a meeting are \u201cfar<br \/>\nfrom\u201d being met. The summit comes amid Trump\u2019s recently shortened deadline for<br \/>\nMoscow to show progress or face new sanctions; some analysts suggest Putin may<br \/>\nbe using the talks to buy time and blunt US measures. Kyiv and European leaders<br \/>\nremain cautious of any deal struck without Ukraine present, warning it could<br \/>\ninvolve territorial concessions. Markets will likely focus on confirmation of<br \/>\ntiming, venue, and thereafter, whether the summit produces substance. On the<br \/>\nflip side, a lack of progress could see additional Russian sanctions alongside<br \/>\nsecondary sanctions for countries doing business with Russia.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Chinese Inflation (Sat): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">July CPI Y\/Y is expected at -0.1% (prev. -0.1%), with M\/M seen at<br \/>\n+0.3% (prev. -0.1%), while PPI Y\/Y is forecast at -3.4% (prev. -3.6%). ING<br \/>\nnotes deflationary pressures persist as activity moderates, with<br \/>\nanti-price-competition measures unlikely to deliver early relief. Meanwhile,<br \/>\nSCMP highlights continued weakness in food prices (June -0.3% Y\/Y, fifth<br \/>\nmonthly decline), driven by severe oversupply in pork (-8.5% Y\/Y) and eggs<br \/>\n(-7.7%), with farmers reporting widespread losses and weak end-market demand.<br \/>\nMarginal improvements are expected in H2, but the scope for recovery remains<br \/>\nlimited, according to SCMP.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Us-China Truce Deadline (Tue): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">The US-China tariff truce, set to expire on August 12th, is likely<br \/>\nto be extended by 90 days, according to US Commerce Secretary Lutnick on<br \/>\nThursday. Following the meeting in Sweden, Beijing has confirmed consensus on<br \/>\nthe extension, but the White House has yet to formally announce the move, with<br \/>\nUSTR Greer saying the two sides are \u201cworking towards\u201d a deal. The current pause<br \/>\nfollows months of tariff escalation, with US duties on Chinese imports reaching<br \/>\nup to 145% since April, met in turn by Chinese retaliatory tariffs of up to<br \/>\n125% and export controls on key raw materials. The decision comes as US<br \/>\nPresident Trump\u2019s new tariffs on imports from ~90 countries took effect on<br \/>\nAugust 7th, whilst more notably for Beijing, the US imposed an extra 25%<br \/>\nstacked penalty on India for the import of Russian oil, with China also likely<br \/>\nin the firing line. Markets will focus on confirmation of the extension and<br \/>\nextension period, alongside any threats of penalties, whilst there is a<br \/>\nnon-zero chance of no extension and a return to eye-watering tariffs.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">RBA Announcement (Tue):<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">The RBA is likely to cut rates at its meeting next week as a<br \/>\nrecent Reuters poll showed all 40 economists surveyed unanimously expect the<br \/>\nRBA to cut the Cash Rate by 25bps to 3.60%, while money markets are pricing in<br \/>\na 98% likelihood of a 25bps cut and a 2% probability of a larger 50bps<br \/>\nreduction. As a reminder, the RBA surprised markets at the last meeting by<br \/>\npausing on rates amid wide expectations for a 25bps cut, while its decision was<br \/>\nmade by a majority of 6-3 votes and stated that the Board will be attentive to<br \/>\nthe data and evolving assessment of risks to guide its decisions. RBA also<br \/>\nnoted that inflation has continued to moderate and the outlook remains<br \/>\nuncertain, although the Board continues to judge that the risks to inflation<br \/>\nhave become more balanced and the labour market remains strong. Furthermore,<br \/>\nthe Board remained cautious about the outlook, particularly given the<br \/>\nheightened level of uncertainty about both aggregate demand and supply, and it<br \/>\njudged that it could wait for a little more information to confirm that<br \/>\ninflation remains on track to reach 2.5% on a sustainable basis. RBA Governor<br \/>\nBullock noted during the post-meeting presser that there will be more data and<br \/>\nnews by the next meeting, and it was appropriate to have a cautious stance on easing,<br \/>\nbut noted she is confident they are on a path to ease further, although timing<br \/>\nis the question and they can expect rates to decline if inflation slows as<br \/>\nexpected. Since then, the language from the central bank hasn\u2019t provided much<br \/>\nto shift the dial, although the data releases would support the case for a cut<br \/>\nafter disappointing jobs data which showed the Unemployment Rate unexpectedly<br \/>\nrose in June to its highest in three and a half years of 4.3% (Prev. 4.1%),<br \/>\nwhile inflation continued to soften in Q2 with headline Australian CPI YY<br \/>\nslowing to 2.1% vs. Exp. 2.2% (Prev. 2.4%).<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Uk Jobs Report (Tue): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Expectations are for the ILO unemployment rate in the 3-month<br \/>\nperiod to June to hold steady at 4.7%, whilst average earnings (ex-bonus) 3M\/YY<br \/>\nare forecast to remain at 5.0%, according to Reuters. As a reminder, the prior<br \/>\nrelease showed the ILO unemployment rate continued to tick higher, rising to<br \/>\n4.7% in the 3M period to May from 3.6%. However, the large contraction in the<br \/>\nMay HMRC payrolls change was revised materially higher and wage growth remained<br \/>\nat an elevated rate. This time around, economists at Pantheon Macroeconomics<br \/>\nexpect the upcoming report to show \u201cpayroll job falls easing and earnings<br \/>\ngrowth holding at a solid pace\u201d. More specifically, the consultancy is of the<br \/>\nview that June\u2019s payroll drop will be revised to a smaller 8K month-to-month<br \/>\nfall and July\u2019s print to come in at -7k. For the unemployment rate, PM expects<br \/>\nanother print of 4.7%, whilst vacancies appear to have stabilised and could<br \/>\neven be rising again. On the wage front, Pantheon expects a slowdown in the 3M<br \/>\nY\/Y ex-bonus metric to slow to 4.8% from 4.9%, which would be below the MPC\u2019s<br \/>\nQ2 forecast of 5.2%. From a policy perspective, up until the August BoE policy<br \/>\nannouncement, it had appeared that the MPC was increasingly focused on the<br \/>\nloosening in the labour market. However, absent a marked deterioration in the<br \/>\nupcoming report, the latest vote split suggests that the stubbornness of<br \/>\ninflation could limit the BoE\u2019s easing plans. As it stands, the next 25bps rate<br \/>\ncut is not fully priced until February 2026.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">US CPI (Tue):<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">US July CPI is expected to rise by +0.2% M\/M at the headline level<br \/>\n(prev. +0.3%), with the annual rate seen rising to 2.8% Y\/Y from 2.7%. The core<br \/>\nrate of inflation is expected to rise by +0.3% M\/M (prev. +0.2%), with the<br \/>\nannual rate of core inflation expected to rise to 3.0% Y\/Y from 2.9%. Wells<br \/>\nFargo says that the data will bring further signs of higher tariffs pushing up<br \/>\nprices. \u201cIt is still early in the price adjustment process to see how higher<br \/>\nimport taxes will ultimately be distributed between the end-customer, domestic<br \/>\nsellers and foreign exporters,\u201d the bank writes, \u201cat the same time, growing<br \/>\nconsumer fatigue is making it more difficult to raise prices in general.\u201d Wells<br \/>\nFargo expects inflation to pick up, but not ratchet higher, in H2 of this year,<br \/>\nand sees both the core CPI and core PCE deflator returning to around 3% in Q4.<br \/>\nSome on the Fed are more concerned about the labour market (Waller and Bowman),<br \/>\nbut others still believe that inflation is further away from the Fed\u2019s goals.<br \/>\nHigh inflation and fears of higher inflation ahead in response to tariffs is<br \/>\nseeing the Fed hold a wait-and-see approach. However, with the recent July NFP<br \/>\nreport painting a softer picture of the labour market than initially thought<br \/>\n(due to chunky downward revisions), markets are now looking for a rate cut in<br \/>\nSeptember. Fed\u2019s Daly has since spoken on the matter, noting the Fed cannot<br \/>\nwait forever.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Norges Bank Announcement: <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Norges Bank is expected to keep rates steady at 4.25%, after the<br \/>\nBank unexpectedly cut rates by 25bps at the last meeting. Policymakers<br \/>\nexplained their decision by suggesting core inflation declined somewhat faster<br \/>\nthan expected, and as such, their inflation outlook is lower than previously<br \/>\nexpected. On future policy, the Bank said it \u201cwill be reduced further in the<br \/>\ncourse of 2025\u201d, should the economy evolve as projected. Into this meeting, the<br \/>\nBank will have two inflation reports to digest; June\u2019s Core CPI-ATE printed a<br \/>\ntouch above the consensus (but in line with Norges Bank\u2019s own forecast). July\u2019s<br \/>\nmetrics are yet to come out, SEB predicts CPI-ATE (Y\/Y) will print at 3.0% (vs.<br \/>\nNorges Bank forecast of 3.1%). Given both SEB and Danske Bank call for a cut in<br \/>\nSeptember and December, a softer inflation outturn for July could have policy<br \/>\nimplications in the immediacy \u2013 particularly in the context of a gradually<br \/>\ncooling labour market.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Australian Jobs Report (Thu): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">There are currently no forecasts for the Australian jobs report,<br \/>\nwhich in June metrics missed expectations, with employment rising just 2k (exp.<br \/>\n+20k) and the jobless rate climbing to 4.3% (exp. 4.1%) \u2013 the highest since<br \/>\nlate 2021. The report comes after the RBA\u2019s August meeting, in which the<br \/>\ncentral bank is likely to cut rates. A recent Reuters poll showed all 40<br \/>\neconomists surveyed unanimously expect the RBA to cut the Cash Rate by 25bps to<br \/>\n3.60%, while money markets are pricing in a 98% likelihood of a 25bps cut and a<br \/>\n2% probability of a larger 50bps reduction. As a reminder, the RBA surprised<br \/>\nmarkets at the last meeting by pausing on rates amid wide expectations for a<br \/>\n25bps cut, while its decision was made by a majority of 6-3 votes, and it<br \/>\nstated that the Board will be attentive to the data and evolving assessment of<br \/>\nrisks to guide its decisions. Markets will focus on whether the July jobs data<br \/>\nconfirms a trend of soft hiring and rising unemployment.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">UK GDP (Thu):<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Expectations are for M\/M GDP in June to pick up to 0.1% from -0.1%<br \/>\nwith the Q\/Q growth rate expected to slow to 0.1% from 0.7%. As a reminder, the<br \/>\nMay release showed a second M\/M monthly decline. Albeit it followed on from a<br \/>\nstrong Q1, which was artificially boosted by the front-loading of expected<br \/>\ntariffs. This time around, analysts at Investec hold an above-consensus<br \/>\nforecast of +0.3%, noting that \u201cmanufacturing activity, according to the PMI<br \/>\nindices, looks less soft than before\u201d. Additionally, the desk looks for an<br \/>\nexpansion in the services sector and for construction to rebound from the 0.6%<br \/>\nretracement seen in May. A 0.3% outturn would lead to a Q2 Q\/Q rate of 0.2% and<br \/>\nleave the economy in a position to grow by some 1.2%-1.3% over 2025 as a whole,<br \/>\na touch above the official Spring Statement forecast from the OBR of 1.0%. From<br \/>\na policy perspective, a soft outturn would further limit available headroom for<br \/>\nUK Chancellor Reeves and likely see desks revise up their forecasts for the<br \/>\nongoing \u201cblack hole\u201d in the UK\u2019s finances. The implications for monetary policy<br \/>\nare likely less severe, with the MPC more biased to see how developments on the<br \/>\ninflation front turn out.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Japanese GDP (Fri): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Japanese GDP Y\/Y for Q2 is expected to print at -0.7% (prev. +2.2%<br \/>\nin Q1). Industrial production is expected at +1.7% for June (vs -0.1% in May).<br \/>\nJune Industrial Production is expected at +1.7% (prev. -0.1%). ING notes<br \/>\nexports weakened sharply in Q2, with inventories also dragging, though services<br \/>\nand private consumption have shown recovery. The BoJ\u2019s latest meeting kept<br \/>\nrates at 0.50% unanimously, reiterating readiness to hike if the economy and<br \/>\nprices track forecasts, but emphasising high trade-policy uncertainty. Governor<br \/>\nUeda, at the post-policy presser, said the Japan-US trade deal was \u201cgreat<br \/>\nprogress\u201d, reducing downside risks but with tariff impacts yet to fully emerge;<br \/>\nhe expects some negative effect in H2, though a tariff-driven economic<br \/>\nnose-dive now seems unlikely. Underlying inflation is seen stalling before<br \/>\ngradually re-accelerating, with achieving 2% \u201ccloser than before,\u201d and wage<br \/>\ngrowth expected to turn positive by year-end. There was also confusion<br \/>\nregarding the US-Japan trade deal, in which \u201ctariff stacking\u201d saw<br \/>\nmiscommunication, although on Friday, Japan&#8217;s trade negotiator Akazawa said<br \/>\nthat they have been able to confirm a non-stacking stance from the US, and<br \/>\nthere is no discrepancy between the US and Japan that there is no tariff<br \/>\nstacking.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Chinese Activity Data (Fri): <\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">There are currently no central expectations for the Chinese<br \/>\nactivity data, although the trend is expected to show further moderation in<br \/>\neconomic activity. ING sees industrial production slowing to ~6.2% Y\/Y (prev.<br \/>\n6.5%), retail sales easing to 4.6% Y\/Y (as the boost from trade-in policies<br \/>\npeaks), and fixed asset investment holding near 2.8% Y\/Y YTD amid subdued<br \/>\nprivate sector participation. The data, however, is lagging and could prove to<br \/>\nbe stale, contingent on the US-China tariff truce, which is set to expire on<br \/>\nAugust 12th. The truce is likely to be extended by 90 days, according to US<br \/>\nCommerce Secretary Lutnick on Thursday. That being said, participants should be<br \/>\ncognizant that there is a non-zero chance of no extension and a return to<br \/>\neye-watering tariffs.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Us Retail Sales (Fri):<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Headline retail sales are expected to rise by +0.5% M\/M in July<br \/>\n(prev. +0.6%), with the ex-autos measure seen cooling to +0.2% M\/M (prev.<br \/>\n+0.5%). Retail sales in June rose more than expected, partly due to a surprise<br \/>\njump in auto sales. However, Pantheon Macroeconomics noted that the data was<br \/>\nflattered by this gain, despite falling unit sales and rising prices from<br \/>\ntariffs. Pantheon expects real retail spending to stagnate ahead, with Q3<br \/>\nconsumption likely to grow by less than 1%. Participants will be watching the<br \/>\nRetail Sales data to see if there is a slowdown in consumer spending, given the<br \/>\nrecent jobs report showed a weaker labour market than initially thought due to<br \/>\nthe chunky, downward two-month net revisions.<\/p>\n<p data-v-64ab016d=\"\">This article originally appeared on <a href=\"https:\/\/newsquawk.com\/daily\/article\/?id=4816-week-ahead-highlights-include-us-cpi-and-retail-sales-china-inflation-and-activity-data-rba-aussie-jobs-uk-jobs-gdp-potential-trumpputin-meeting-uschina-truce-deadline&amp;utm_source=forexlive&amp;utm_medium=research&amp;utm_campaign=partner-post&amp;utm_content=week-ahead\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\" class=\"article-link\" data-v-64ab016d=\"\">Newsquawk<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Mon: Norwegian CPI (Jul), Japanese Mountain Day HolidayTue: US-China truce deadline (likely to be extended), RBA Announcement (Aug),&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":60068,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[45,49,48,46],"class_list":["post-60067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-economy","tag-business","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-economy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60067\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}