![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/70c8fc80.png\")
<\/p>\nIn the pre-internet days, even a mega-sized record store stocked perhaps 100,000 titles of all eras and all genres. That is a quaint concept now, given that streaming music platforms now draw on a library of about 250 million songs, a number that used to increase by about 100,000 tracks a day as musicians \u2014 pro and amateur, good and bad \u2014 around the world sought to distribute their music.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Overwhelming, yes, but nothing compared to what\u2019s happening today, thanks to AI.<\/p>\n
Using tools such as Suno, Google Magenta, Loudly, Mubert, and perhaps a dozen other online sites, creating a new song is as easy as entering a few text prompts. Results are delivered within seconds. And an astounding number of these tracks are being uploaded to Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube Music and every other platform.<\/p>\n
Deezer, the Paris-based streamer, appears to be watching the situation more closely than most. Back in January 2025, the company, which employs in-house AI-detection software, reported that 10,000 AI-generated tracks were being uploaded daily. By April, that number was 15,000. In September 2025, the company found that the number had increased to 30,000, which climbed to 50,000 by November. This year started with 60,000 AI uploads in January. The most recent figure is 75,000, which has surely already been eclipsed.<\/p>\n
Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n
Again, that\u2019s the number of AI-created songs per day.\u00a0To put it another way, these tracks account for 44 per cent of all downloads to Deezer. Meanwhile, the number of human-created songs sits at around 95,500 per day, a figure that has barely budged over the last 15 months. The robots are gaining. Fast.<\/p>\n
And if Deezer is experiencing this problem, you can bet that all the other streamers are, too. Deezer has offered to make its AI-detection software available to all streamers<\/a>, which, by the way, has sniffed out 13.4 million AI tracks since the beginning of 2025.<\/p>\n You may ask why this is a big deal. First, let\u2019s consider the energy costs. Each of these fake takes electricity, anywhere from 0.001 to 0.01 watt-hours, which may not seem like much, but if you do the math, the overall amount of daily energy consumption creating junk that almost no one will hear is significant. Add in the costs to run servers for storage and transmission and the problems multiply.<\/p>\n Then there are the bots deployed to \u201clisten\u201d to these tracks, which pump up streaming numbers and fraudulently sucks up royalties. They suck up a lot of energy, too, but that\u2019s not the biggest issue. This is where we encounter streaming fraud.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\tGet daily National news<\/p>\n Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you’ll never miss the day’s top stories.<\/p>\n Last month, a 54-year-old North Carolina man pleaded guilty to masterminding a multi-year scheme that sucked away millions in streaming royalties. Over seven years, Michael Smith used AI<\/a> to create hundreds of thousands of junk songs, which he then posted to all the streaming platforms. He then used several battalions of bots to \u201clisten\u201d to the fake songs (that is, to stream them automatically). This \u201clistening\u201d was distributed over thousands of different automated accounts, which made the fraud very difficult to detect.<\/p>\n Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n When things were moving at maximum speed, Smith was deriving revenue from over 660,000 streams a day, which worked out to about $1.2 million a year. All he had to do was let the software run and watch the money gush into his accounts. Who got hurt? This money came from the pool of royalties from which all legitimate musicians are paid. This meant that payments to humans were lower than they should have been, per the rules of payouts.<\/p>\n He was finally caught in September 2024. Part of his sentence was the forfeiture of more than US$8 million in royalties<\/a>. We\u2019ll see if he gets any jail time when he again appears before a judge on July 29. The maximum penalty is five years.<\/p>\n Meanwhile, human performers are being victimized. Paula Toledo is a Vancouver-based singer whose music was co-opted and re-released by bots using a fraudster\u2019s account. She had all kinds of trouble proving to Spotify, Apple, etc., that she was the rightful owner of that music.<\/p>\n Grace Mitchell, an American-Australian singer-songwriter, was shocked to discover that her music had also been stolen and re-released by persons unknown who then profited from royalties that should have gone to her.<\/p>\n A while back, I ran across an \u201cartist\u201d on Spotify that sounded suspiciously like Van Morrison. It was, but someone had simply uploaded a legitimate Van Morrison album under a different name. I have a singer-songwriter friend who recently discovered that her music had been hijacked, too.<\/p>\n Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n Finally, there are the fake singers who do not exist IRL. Xania Money, SiennaRose and Eddie Dalton are all cyber creations. IngaRose<\/a> is an AI-generated thing that hit the top of the iTunes sales chart in Canada, the U.S., the U.K., France and New Zealand earlier this year with the song Celebrate Me, which was also used in nearly 300,000 TikTok videos. Breaking Rust, an AI-generated act, hit the top of the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales chart back in November with a song called Walk My Walk.<\/p>\n \n\t\t\tMore on Entertainment Last year, people were faked out by a generic-sounding California folk rock band called The Velvet Sundown. And just last week, I ran into Promptgenix<\/a>, a mysterious group that released three albums in two months. No bio, no info, nothing. It turned out that they were created by an AI engine called Promptgenie by someone who complained that he was doing this because he couldn\u2019t find any song by a human that he liked.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n The situation is only going to get weirder. A survey from last November \u2014 a million years ago in the AI music evolution \u2014said that 97 per cent of listeners were fooled by AI music<\/a>. And while many people say they disapprove of \u201cart\u201d being made by software, possibly up to 50 per cent of U.S. listeners aren\u2019t bothered by it<\/a>, according to a 2025 report by Luminate.<\/p>\n Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n![\"Get](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/1767930311_275_national.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tMore videos\n\t\t<\/p>\n