Want more from NBC Select? Sign up<\/a> for our newsletter, The Selection, and shop smarter.<\/p>\n The best running watches of 2026<\/a><\/p>\n My top picks come from a mix of small and large brands like Coros, Amazfit, Garmin and Apple. I request running watches directly from brands \u2014 every watch on this list was loaned to me for testing purposes. I include key specifications like size, weight and battery life within the \u2018What to Know\u2019 dropdown.<\/p>\n Best running watch overall<\/a> Display: 43.4mm\u00a0| Thickness: 11.8mm\u00a0| Weight (no straps): 27g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 19 days\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): up to 41 hours\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, dual-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: no\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Slim, light and comfortableExcellent battery lifeDual-band GPS I was shocked by how good the Coros Pace 4<\/a> is for runners \u2014 it\u2019s a goldilocks watch that hits just the right mix of features and price to make it great for basically anyone. It serves beginners and marathoners alike \u2014 I never felt the need to \u201cupgrade\u201d as I progressed on my running journey.<\/p>\n I love how lightweight and compact the Pace 4 is. Many running watches dwarf my small wrists, leading to a generally uncomfortable fit. The Pace 4 is small, but not too small, and has enough buttons that you can comfortably control the watch via touchscreen or buttons alone. <\/p>\n Using the watch and the Coros app feels streamlined compared to Garmin, Amazfit and others. Sure, it doesn\u2019t have as many lifestyle features (no tap-to-pay, no music streaming), but it puts running and training front and center, with an intuitive app that never feels cluttered or overwhelming.<\/p>\n It takes my top spot because the value per dollar is unmatched. There are almost no running watches with features like dual-band GPS, route creation, course pacing and strategy, hill alerts, marathon training plans, recovery metrics and class-leading long battery life for $250. The closest comparison I can think of is the Garmin Forerunner 265<\/a>, which is far more expensive. <\/p>\n You can also choose between a silicone and a nylon strap at purchase (most brands make you buy one or the other afterwards), and it comes in an ultralight plastic version (linked above) and a lightweight aluminum version<\/a> that costs just a little more.<\/p>\n Best running watch for beginners<\/a> Display: 36.7mm\u00a0| Thickness: 11.2mm \u00a0| Weight (no straps): 15g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 7 days\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): up to 5 hours\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, single-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: yes\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Small and comfortableBeginner-friendly appCompetitive price<\/p>\n Something to note<\/p>\n Cannot turn it offSome data needs a subscription If you are just starting out as a runner and have never owned a fitness tracker or smartwatch, the Fitbit Charge 6 is a great option. It\u2019s small, subtle, and simple to use \u2014 I felt comfortable swiping through the watch and app after only a few minutes of use. The Fitbit software in particular is very straightforward, with less complicated features than other brands. <\/p>\n The small size, while a blessing most of the time, is a bit of a mixed bag while running \u2014 you can only see one or two stats on your wrist during runs, less than competitors with bigger screens.<\/p>\n Again, this watch is best for beginners. If you are planning to run a marathon, you will outgrow the Fitbit Charge 6 quickly \u2014 it has shorter GPS battery life, less advanced running metrics and minimal controls compared to my other recommendations. You can read more in my Fitbit Charge 6 review<\/a>.<\/p>\n Best budget running watch<\/a> Display: 45mm\u00a0| Thickness: 11mm \u00a0| Weight (no straps): 38g \u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 12 days\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): up to 24 hours\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: no\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Excellent valueFour button controls<\/p>\n Something to note<\/p>\n Finicky softwareFingerprint magent Amazfit<\/a> is a budget-friendly brand that undercuts the competition on price, and the Active 3 Premium is a prime example of that. It has features runners, cyclists and anyone working out outdoors can appreciate, namely four buttons (two on each side), long battery life, and a durable (albeit fingerprint-y) metal case and sapphire crystal screen.<\/p>\n The downside is software: The watch and watch app are less intuitive than other options on this list. The app has loads of useful features not often found at this sub-$200 price, including coaching plans, built-in running workouts, recovery times and offline maps and navigation, they just require patience to get up and running.<\/p>\n Best premium running watch<\/a> Display: 47mm\u00a0| Thickness: 12.9mm \u00a0| Weight (no straps): 56g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 15 days\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): up to 26 hours\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, multi-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: yes\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Very accurate multi-band GPSOffline maps and reroutingAmple metrics and features<\/p>\n Something to note<\/p>\n Very expensiveSoftware learning curve If you love running and spare no expense to get the best gear possible, check out the Garmin Forerunner 970. It\u2019s Garmin\u2019s most advanced, most premium running watch, fit for any task, from 5K to ultra-marathon. <\/p>\n It\u2019s bursting at the seams with features. First, it\u2019s a GPS powerhouse: It\u2019s arguably the most accurate watch on this list for distance, mapping and navigation with its multi-band GPS. Second, it has the most training, recovery, workout and course features of all our recommendations \u2014 so much so that it\u2019s often overwhelming (especially when some training tools are only available on the Garmin Connect website<\/a>, not the mobile app.)<\/p>\n What keeps the 970 out of the top spot is price \u2014 it\u2019s significantly more expensive than every other watch on this list. Garmin does make the lower priced Garmin Forerunner 570<\/a> and budget-friendly Garmin Forerunner 165<\/a>, but the Coros Pace 4<\/a> is still a better value comparatively. You can learn more about the brand in my Garmin watch<\/a> guide.<\/p>\n Best running watch for battery life<\/a> Display: 49mm\u00a0| Thickness: 12.5mm\u00a0| Weight (no straps): 76g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 18 days\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): up to 55 hours\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, dual-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 100 meters\u00a0| ECG: no\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Incredible battery lifeMulti-band GPSFast and responsive to use The sleeper hit of this list, the Suunto Race 2 is a battery life king that\u2019s more sleek and user-friendly than its performance-focused marketing would suggest. The watch and mobile app are both clear, snappy and responsive, with detailed metrics and features that are not overwhelming. Maps and navigation are another standout (also clear, detailed and responsive); they load faster and pan quicker than on competitors like the Garmin Forerunner 970<\/a>. <\/p>\n But it\u2019s battery life where the Suunto Race 2 laps the competition: It gets up to 55 hours of battery life doing dual-band GPS activities. Turn on battery saving features like tour mode and that number can reach up to 200 hours.<\/p>\n If you love the Suunto aesthetic but want something smaller and cheaper for your local turkey trot, consider the Suunto Run<\/a> instead.<\/p>\n Best running watch from Apple<\/a> Display: 40mm or 44mm\u00a0| Thickness: 10.7mm\u00a0| Weight (no straps): 26.3g or 32.9g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 18 hours\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): unlisted\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, single-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: no\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Syncs seamlessly with iPhoneSlim and comfortableMultiple size options<\/p>\n Something to note<\/p>\n Short battery lifeDimmer screenLess training features If you\u2019re an iPhone person, any Apple Watch can pull double duty as a great beginner running watch. Like Fitbit, it\u2019s incredibly easy to use, but has more detailed running, health and sleep metrics \u2014 no subscription required. Its square screen is perfect for showing multiple metrics while running, and it easily syncs with your phone for controlling things like music or calls.<\/p>\n Where it\u2019s lacking compared to a traditional running watch is training and battery life. It doesn\u2019t have nearly as many training features as our other picks, and the 18-hour battery life is miniscule compared to a Coros or a Garmin.<\/p>\n Best running watch from Google<\/a> Display: 41mm or 45mm\u00a0| Thickness: 12.3mm\u00a0| Weight (no straps): 31g or 36.7g\u00a0| Battery life (watch): up to 30 or 40 hours\u00a0| Battery life (GPS): unlisted\u00a0| Built-in GPS: yes, dual-band\u00a0| Water resistance: yes, up to 50 meters\u00a0| ECG: yes\u00a0| Compatible with: iPhone and Android<\/p>\n What we like<\/p>\n Syncs easily with Google appsAccurate dual-band GPSVery bright screen<\/p>\n Something to note<\/p>\n So-so battery lifeFewer physical buttons This Android smartwatch also works great as a running watch for most people for two reasons: software and accuracy.<\/p>\n It has robust software that lets you do all the smartwatch stuff but also do things like build custom runs, with stages, intervals and more. It also has more in-depth training and recovery metrics than most smartwatches.<\/p>\n Perhaps more important: it\u2019s very accurate. It uses dual-band GPS and an advanced heart rate tracker to deliver consistent results, in my experience.<\/p>\n It\u2019s biggest miss for me is the lack of physical buttons \u2014 it\u2019s harder to control running with sweaty hands or gloves on because of it.<\/p>\n How I tested running watches<\/a> I\u2019ve been a runner for more than six years, and use smartwatches and fitness trackers to monitor stats during and after my runs. I test running watches for at least two weeks, using as many features as possible and comparing them to other watches. During testing, I typically wear two running watches (one on each wrist) so I can compare individual workouts across devices. I pay close attention to the following factors during testing:<\/p>\n Comfort: A running watch is useless if it\u2019s so uncomfortable I don\u2019t enjoy wearing it. I wear each watch day and night to see if it becomes uncomfortable, disrupts my sleep or irritates my skin.GPS tracking: I compare distance, pace and map data between devices to see how consistent they are.Training features: I try out all the key training features each watch has to offer, noting how approachable and useful they are short and long term.Battery life: I make note of how often I have to charge each device, and how easy it is to use the included charger.Compatibility: Not every running watch works with every smartphone. I test and include options for both iPhone and Android users.How to shop for a running watch<\/a><\/p>\n Shopping for a running watch is all about your needs and goals. Keep these key factors in mind as you shop:<\/p>\n Size<\/a><\/p>\n The best running watch is the one that fits your wrist. That can be hard to find, as many running watches only come in one size, and that size is often big. I have smaller wrists (about a 6-inch circumference), and have tested dozens of wearables, so I know that I prefer my running watches between 42 and 45 millimeters in size. You can get a good feel for this by going to a store and trying on running watches in person, noting how different watch sizes feel. Fleet Feet<\/a>, REI<\/a> and Dick\u2019s Sporting Goods<\/a> are good options for this.<\/p>\n Features and goals<\/a><\/p>\n More features isn\u2019t always better. Brands like Garmin are the most impressive on paper because they can do the most things, but that can make them overwhelming to use in practice. <\/p>\n Think about how you use technology, and what kinds of tech experiences you enjoy. Tech-averse or love simplicity? Go for simpler, streamlined options like the Coros Pace 4<\/a> or an Apple Watch. Data and app-obsessed? Advanced watches from Garmin are for you.<\/p>\n This goes hand in hand with your goals \u2014 anyone trying to hit a PR marathon time will find advanced training features from Coros and Garmin useful. People just trying to log steps and get more active will get more than enough from Fitbit and Apple watches.<\/p>\n Frequently asked questions<\/p>\n What is dual-band GPS?<\/p>\n Single-band GPS devices listen to one frequency from a satellite to determine your location. Dual-band devices listen to two satellites, and multi-band devices listen to two or more, leading to more precise location tracking than single-band devices.<\/p>\n Do you really need a running watch?<\/p>\n That depends on your goals and needs, as outlined above. Running watches are best for anyone who values GPS accuracy, battery life, training tools and recovery metrics to assist with specific goals.<\/p>\n Why trust NBC Select?<\/a><\/p>\n I am a reporter<\/a> at NBC Select who covers technology, fitness and the outdoors, including stories on workout headphones<\/a>, walking shoes<\/a> and point-and-shoot cameras<\/a>. I\u2019ve been testing smartwatches, fitness trackers and running watches for years \u2014 I try new models constantly, comparing them against previous versions and similar competitors. For this story, I leveraged my years of testing experience to pick the best running watches on the market today.<\/p>\n Catch up on NBC Select\u2019s in-depth coverage of tech and tools<\/a>, wellness<\/a> and more, and follow us on Facebook<\/a>, Instagram<\/a>, Twitter<\/a> and TikTok<\/a> to stay up to date.<\/p>\n![\"Coros](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Screenshot-2025-11-17-at-9-c199a8.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/coros-watch-75b2d7.jpg\")
The Coros Pace 4 is comfortable and compact, and doesn\u2019t overwhelm smaller wrists.Courtesy Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"Fitbit](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AMAZON-Fitbit-Charge-6-Fitness-Tracker-with-Google-apps-Heart-Rate-on-Exercise-Equipment-6-Months-Pr.jpeg\"){kind=tracking}
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Fitbit-Charge-602-e17072.jpg\")
The FitBit Charge 6 is slim and subtle on the wrist.<\/p>\n![\"Amazfit](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/AMAZON-Amazfit-Active-3-Premium-GPS-Running-Smart-Watch-132-AMOLED-Sapphire-Display-12-Day-Battery-4.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Amazfit-Active-3-Premium-70852d.jpg\")
Right out of the box, the watch face for the Active 3 Premium is very running-focused.Courtesy of Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"Garmin](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/AMAZON-Garmin-Forerunner-970-Premium-GPS-Running-and-Triathlon-Smartwatch-AMOLED-Display-Built-in-LE.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/garmin-forerunner-970-003025.jpg\")
The Forerunner 970 only comes in one size,\u2014 47 millimeters \u2014 a bit big on smaller wrists like mine.Courtesy Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"Suunto](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Screenshot-2025-08-29-at-11-de3c83.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Suunto-Race-2-8174e9.jpg\")
The Suunto Race 2 is surprisingly sleek and stylish considering its size and weight.Courtesy Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"Apple](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/AMAZON-Apple-Watch-SE-3-GPS-40mm-Smartwatch-with-Starlight-Aluminum-Case-with-Starlight-Sport-Band--.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/apple-watch-se-3-cc0a6e.jpg\")
The square screen of the Apple Watch SE 3 displays a lot more information at once than most of its competitors.Courtesy of Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"Google](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/google-pixel-watch-4-5cf896.jpg\"){kind=tracking}
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/google-pixel-watch-cf5216.jpg\"){kind=tracking}
The Google Pixel Watch 4 is one of the more stylish recommendations on this list.Courtesy of Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n![\"A](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/running-watches-38c6d4.jpg\")
I typically wear two watches at the same time (one on each wrist) and compare data between the two. (I don\u2019t wear four at once, as pictured above.)Courtesy Harry Rabinowitz<\/p>\n