![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/70c8fc80.png\")
<\/p>\nA panel appointed by the Newfoundland and Labrador government says a proposed energy deal with Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0is not in the province\u2019s best interests.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
In a report Tuesday, the three-person panel outlines a series of concerns with the non-binding framework agreement to share power from Labrador, signed by the provinces\u2019 hydroelectric utilities in 2024.<\/p>\n
It says the Newfoundland and Labrador government must make \u201csignificant decisions\u201d before resuming negotiations with Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0to come up with an arrangement that serves the province.<\/p>\n
At stake are billions of dollars and significant new power capacity at a time when Canada is racing to expand its energy sovereignty amid major uncertainty in global politics, with war in the Middle East and an American government upending its historic relationships.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe speed of progress is not up to us alone,\u201d said Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Tony Wakeham in a news release Tuesday. \u201cIt depends on how urgently\u00a0Quebec\u00a0and the federal government choose to act in addressing the issues raised by the independent review committee.\u201d<\/p>\n
Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n
The panel criticizes the pricing structures and power allocations in the framework agreement, and accuses the former Liberal government of meddling in negotiations, which it says may have resulted in a weaker deal for Newfoundland and Labrador.<\/p>\n
The three panellists also accuse Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0of being in a conflict of interest as a minority shareholder and primary customer of proposed hydroelectric developments along the Churchill River in Labrador.<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t![\"Get](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/national.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\tGet breaking National news<\/p>\n
Get breaking Canada news delivered to your inbox as it happens so you won’t miss a trending story.<\/p>\n
Their report said the draft deal, as it stands, would bring roughly $36 billion in present-day dollars to Newfoundland and Labrador\u2019s treasury until 2085. The former Liberal government underestimated, overestimated or left out information from its valuations of several parts of the agreement, it said.<\/p>\n
Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0and Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro are joint owners of the 5,428-megawatt power plant at Churchill Falls. The framework agreement they signed in late 2024 would put an end to a 1969 contract allowing Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0to buy most of the energy from the facility at basement-floor prices.<\/p>\n
Set to expire in 2041, the contract has long been a source of bitterness in Newfoundland and Labrador, where some feel the province was cheated by Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec.<\/p>\n
The draft deal would also allow Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec, alongside Newfoundland and Labrador Hydro, to lead new developments on the Churchill River. If the two utilities proceed, they would ultimately share more than 9,000 megawatts of power from the river, of which Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0would be entitled to roughly 80 per cent despite being a minority owner.<\/p>\n
Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n
Newfoundland and Labrador would get more money from Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0for electricity from Churchill Falls and an increasing amount of power over the course of the agreement, the panel noted. But those increases slow to a trickle after 2041.<\/p>\n
That risks limiting long-term economic growth and undercutting western Labrador\u2019s mining sector, which is already stunted by a lack of available power.<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tMore on Canada
\n\t\t\tMore videos\n\t\t<\/p>\n
The panel said the Newfoundland and Labrador government must decide how much economic growth it is willing to give up in exchange for income from selling power from the Churchill River, the report said.<\/p>\n
Under its terms of reference, the panel was tasked in December to determine whether the draft deal is in the \u201cbest long-term interests of the people of the province.\u201d The deal was unveiled in late 2024 in St. John\u2019s by Newfoundland and Labrador\u2019s previous Liberal government. If finalized, it would expire in 2075.<\/p>\n
Wakeham, a Progressive Conservative, had demanded a review of the proposal since the day it was announced. He assembled the panel just weeks after his party formed government last fall, halting all negotiations of final agreements to wait for the committee\u2019s report.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe (independent review committee) concludes that despite the benefits, the memorandum of understanding in its current form is not in the public interest,\u201d their report said.<\/p>\n
In a brief statement on social media,\u00a0Quebec\u00a0Premier Christine Fr\u00e9chette said she had spoken with Wakeham on Monday and that they both \u201cagree on the importance of reaching a win-win agreement in the near term.\u201d<\/p>\n
Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n
\u201cToday, more than ever, it is essential to work with our neighbours to ensure the economic and energy development of\u00a0Quebec, as well as that of Newfoundland and Labrador. I will meet with Mr. Wakeham soon.\u201d<\/p>\n
Chris Huskilson, a former chief executive of Nova Scotia-based power company Emera Inc., led the group. His team included former EY executive Michael Wilson, who previously criticized the draft deal and said Newfoundland and Labrador could get better terms.<\/p>\n
Wakeham had promised that the panel members would present their report in person on Tuesday. However, his office said Friday that would no longer happen. The members decided their report speaks for itself, a spokesperson said.<\/p>\n
\n\t\t© 2026 The Canadian Press\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A panel appointed by the Newfoundland and Labrador government says a proposed energy deal with Hydro-Qu\u00e9bec\u00a0is not in…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":680261,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[49,48,4717,295,16622,66],"class_list":["post-680260","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-energy","tag-environment","tag-quebec-politics","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680260","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=680260"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/680260\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/680261"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=680260"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=680260"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=680260"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}