{"id":681496,"date":"2026-05-20T08:24:28","date_gmt":"2026-05-20T08:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/681496\/"},"modified":"2026-05-20T08:24:28","modified_gmt":"2026-05-20T08:24:28","slug":"free-space-twin-field-quantum-key-distribution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/681496\/","title":{"rendered":"Free-space twin-field quantum key distribution"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 560, 7\u201311 (2014).<\/p>\n

Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on Bell\u2019s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661\u2013663 (1991).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W. & Zbinden, H. Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145\u2013195 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scarani, V. et al. The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301\u20131350 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liao, S.-K. et al. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution. Nature 549, 43\u201347 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liao, S.-K. et al. Satellite-relayed intercontinental quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 030501 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yin, J. et al. Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1,200 kilometers. Science 356, 1140\u20131144 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yin, J. et al. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres. Nature 582, 501\u2013505 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yin, J. et al. Satellite-to-ground entanglement-based quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 200501 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ren, J.-G. et al. Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation. Nature 549, 70\u201373 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Y.-A. et al. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres. Nature 589, 214\u2013219 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lu, C.-Y., Cao, Y., Peng, C.-Z. & Pan, J.-W. Micius quantum experiments in space. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035001 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xu, F., Ma, X., Zhang, Q., Lo, H.-K. & Pan, J.-W. Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 025002 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lo, H.-K., Curty, M. & Qi, B. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130503 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Braunstein, S. L. & Pirandola, S. Side-channel-free quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 130502 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, X.-B. Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230503 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lo, H.-K., Ma, X. & Chen, K. Decoy state quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 230504 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lucamarini, M., Yuan, Z. L., Dynes, J. F. & Shields, A. J. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557, 400\u2013403 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Minder, M. et al. Experimental quantum key distribution beyond the repeaterless secret key capacity. Nat. Photon. 13, 334\u2013338 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, S. et al. Beating the fundamental rate-distance limit in a proof-of-principle quantum key distribution system. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021046 (2019).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, Y. et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution through sending or not sending. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100505 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhong, X., Hu, J., Curty, M., Qian, L. & Lo, H.-K. Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field type quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 100506 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fang, X.-T. et al. Implementation of quantum key distribution surpassing the linear rate-transmittance bound. Nat. Photon. 14, 422\u2013425 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, J.-P. et al. Sending-or-not-sending with independent lasers: secure twin-field quantum key distribution over 509 km. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 070501 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, H. et al. Field test of twin-field quantum key distribution through sending-or-not-sending over 428 km. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 250502 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, J.-P. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over a 511 km optical fibre linking two distant metropolitan areas. Nat. Photon. 15, 570\u2013575 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, J.-P. et al. Quantum key distribution over 658 km fiber with distributed vibration sensing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 180502 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pittaluga, M. et al. 600-km repeater-like quantum communications with dual-band stabilization. Nat. Photon. 15, 530\u2013535 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, S. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution over 830-km fibre. Nat. Photon. 16, 154\u2013161 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, Y. et al. Experimental twin-field quantum key distribution over 1,000 km fiber distance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 210801 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, L., Lin, J., Jing, Y. & Yuan, Z. Twin-field quantum key distribution without optical frequency dissemination. Nat. Commun. 14, 928 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhou, L. et al. Experimental quantum communication overcomes the rate-loss limit without global phase tracking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 250801 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, W. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution without phase locking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 250802 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, J.-P. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution with local frequency reference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 260802 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pittaluga, M. et al. Long-distance coherent quantum communications in deployed telecom networks. Nature 640, 911\u2013917 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cao, Y. et al. Long-distance free-space measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260503 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y.-H. et al. Free-space and fiber-integrated measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution under high background noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100802 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pirandola, S., Laurenza, R., Ottaviani, C. & Banchi, L. Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications. Nat. Commun. 8, 15043 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bennett, C. H. et al. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Briegel, H.-J., D\u00fcr, W., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932\u20135935 (1998).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cirac, J. I., Ekert, A. K., Huelga, S. F. & Macchiavello, C. Distributed quantum computation over noisy channels. Phys. Rev. A 59, 4249\u20134254 (1999).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rideout, D. et al. Fundamental quantum optics experiments conceivable with satellites\u2014reaching relativistic distances and velocities. Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 224011 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wang, X.-B., Yu, Z.-W. & Hu, X.-L. Twin-field quantum key distribution with large misalignment error. Phys. Rev. A 98, 062323 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fried, D. L. Optical resolution through a randomly inhomogeneous medium for very long and very short exposures. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1372\u20131379 (1966).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jiang, C., Hu, X.-L., Xu, H., Yu, Z.-W. & Wang, X.-B. Zigzag approach to higher key rate of sending-or-not-sending twin field quantum key distribution with finite-key effects. New J. Phys. 22, 053048 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y. et al. Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution. Nature 640, 47\u201354 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Du, H. et al. Twin-field quantum key distribution with optical injection locking and phase encoding on-chip. Optica 11, 1385\u20131390 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Guo, J. et al. Chip-based laser with 1-hertz integrated linewidth. Sci. Adv. 8, 9006 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wei, K. et al. High-speed measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031030 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cao, L. et al. Chip-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using integrated silicon photonic systems. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 011001 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Semenenko, H. et al. Chip-based measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution. Optica 7, 238\u2013242 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

You, L. et al. Superconducting nanowire single photon detection system for space applications. Opt. Express 26, 2965\u20132971 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Halder, M. et al. Entangling independent photons by time measurement. Nat. Phys. 3, 692\u2013695 (2007).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Anderson, R., Bilger, H. R. & Stedman, G. E. \u2018Sagnac\u2019 effect: a century of Earth-rotated interferometers. Am. J. Phys. 62, 975\u2013985 (1994).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hu, X.-L., Jiang, C., Yu, Z.-W. & Wang, X.-B. Universal approach to sending-or-not-sending twin field quantum key distribution. Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 045031 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vitanov, A., Dupuis, F., Tomamichel, M. & Renner, R. Chain rules for smooth min-and max-entropies. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 59, 2603\u20132612 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhong, X., Wang, W., Qian, L. & Lo, H.-K. Proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of twin-field quantum key distribution over optical channels with asymmetric losses. npj Quantum Inf. 7, 8 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y.-H. Free-space twin-field quantum key distribution [data set]. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.19162195<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Li. H. InteractionFreePy. GitHub http:\/\/github.com\/hwaipy\/InteractionFreePy<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Bennett, C. H. & Brassard, G. Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing. Theor. Comput. Sci. 560,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":681497,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[23349,49,48,3673,314,3230,37833,5964,66],"class_list":["post-681496","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-applied-and-technical-physics","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-general","tag-physics","tag-quantum-information","tag-quantum-optics","tag-quantum-physics","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/681496","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=681496"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/681496\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/681497"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=681496"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=681496"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=681496"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}