That is, at least, if their emerging technologies can be dialed-in for accuracy and democratized in price.<\/p>\n
They\u2019re the conclusions of a recent overview paper<\/a> funded by the UCI titled \u201cNutritionally Relevant Technological Advancements in Professional Cycling.\u201d<\/p>\n Authored by leading brains who have worked with Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe, Netcompany-Ineos, Visma-Lease a Bike, and Tudor Pro Cycling, the study picks over seven technologies with the potential to transform elite training and nutrition.<\/p>\n Four of them are already known and have been covered in great detail.<\/p>\n Power meters are first on the list. They need no introduction \u2013 you\u2019ve probably got one, if not two. They\u2019ve already changed everything about pro and amateur performance.<\/p>\n Next up: Continuous glucose monitors<\/a>\u00a0(remember Supersapiens?), heat sensors<\/a>, and portable lactate monitors<\/a>.<\/p>\n These three are stirring excitement in the endurance community and have been covered extensively here on Velo.<\/p>\n It\u2019s the three remaining technologies on the UCI\u2019s paper that caught our attention.<\/p>\n Why? Because we\u2019ve barely heard of them.<\/p>\n \u201cNoninvasive muscle fiber typing\u201d, \u201cultrasound for muscle glycogen and skinfolds\u201d, and \u201cportable substrate metabolism monitors\u201d are about as niche as you can get right now.<\/p>\n They\u2019re the preserve of specialist medical units, not your garage pain cave.<\/p>\n But if the UCI\u2019s panel of elite physiologists deemed them worthy a mention, that means something. These specialist devices and the data they measure have transformational potential. And that\u2019s why we want you to know about them.<\/p>\n Why should we care? But first, why should we even care about some far-flung future revolution?<\/p>\n Because, whether you like it or not, cycling is a sport that\u2019s performed by athletes but dictated by tech and data.<\/p>\n The WorldTour is ever on the hunt for the next technical revolution that will give the competitive edge.<\/p>\n Heart rate monitors, bike computers, and power meters took their turns accelerating training and performance. Those who adopted them first were winning before they even pinned their numbers<\/p>\n But since then, cycling\u2019s high-speed evolution has been driven by equipment suppliers<\/a> and \u201ccarbohydrate revolutions.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n Heart rate variability bands, breathing sensors, and glucose\/lactate wearables have been touted as the next must-haves of performance tech. But they\u2019ve not truly moved the needle yet.<\/p>\n Mass-market muscle fiber scanners, metabolism monitors, and ultrasound scanners might be the next budding breakouts behind them.<\/p>\n Think when Tadej Poga\u010dar is retired, Paul Seixas has won five Tours de France, and Mathieu van der Poel has transitioned to Liv Golf.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s a primer on what they are, and the challenges they face:<\/p>\n 1. Muscle fiber scanners The concept: Are you fast-twitch or slow-twitch? What\u2019s the best way for you to train?<\/p>\n Muscles are made up of slow- and fast-twitch fibers. We all carry approximately a 50-50 split between fast and slow, but likely lean a little more one way or the other.<\/p>\n You probably know the score. Fast twitch fibers are about explosive sprint power and force. Slow twitch are for endurance and efficiency.<\/p>\n If you\u2019re more fast-twitch, you\u2019re Robert F\u00f6rstemann. If you\u2019re slow-twitch, you\u2019re Chris Froome.<\/p>\n Why muscle fiber typing matters<\/p>\n Understanding whether an established athlete is more slow- or fast-twitch is apparent from their palmar\u00e8s. What are they naturally good at?<\/p>\n But for many all-rounders or emerging talents, it\u2019s not so clear.<\/p>\n And understanding an athlete\u2019s muscle composition impacts a lot more than their results. It gives insights into their fueling and recovery needs, and how prone they might be to overreaching.<\/p>\n At present the best way to discover an individual\u2019s slow\/fast proportion is with a muscle biopsy. And what athlete wants their leg sliced open?<\/p>\n The only non-invasive workaround is with a scanner similar to an MRI machine called a \u201cproton magnetic resonance spectroscope.\u201d<\/p>\n If you\u2019ve ever had to pay for an MRI, you\u2019ll know the key limitation.<\/p>\n Cost and availability.<\/p>\n Even the most well-monied WorldTour team would struggle to justify sending its 30-rider roster for muscle typing, even on an infrequent basis.<\/p>\n Velo isn\u2019t aware of any WorldTour team performing these tests on a mass basis.<\/p>\n The future?<\/p>\n The UCI paper is uncharacteristically hyped for muscle fiber typing.<\/p>\n It would benefit talent identification and could push training prescription to a new precision. Sadly, there\u2019s no sign of an affordable breakout solution for measuring this right now. And there\u2019s no suggestion of one emerging within the Poga\u010dar era.<\/p>\n Until then, jump tests and time to exhaustion tests provide a low-budget, low-certainty workaround. Our friends at Outside Online wrote more on that, here<\/a>.<\/p>\n 2. Ultrasound for muscle glycogen and skinfolds The concepts: (a) Are you loaded with carbs and ready to train? (b) Or maybe you hit the carbs too hard\u2026 What\u2019s your real bodyfat percentage?<\/p>\n Ultrasound, it\u2019s the thing they use to monitor pregnancies, right?<\/p>\n Correct. Ultrasound can be useful for many other things too \u2013 including measuring glycogen concentration in muscles and levels of subcutaneous fat.<\/p>\n For athletes, both of those things matter a lot.<\/p>\n The concentration of glycogen in the muscle essentially indicates how well-carbed you are. Think of it as a fuel gauge. A true measure of subcutaneous fat is invaluable in a sport where athletes obsess over shaving grams from already dangerously lean bodies<\/a>.<\/p>\n Why ultrasound matters for measuring muscle glycogen<\/p>\n An athlete who knows their muscle glycogen concentration has a powerful insight into when to train and when to rest. Longer-term tracking indicates whether they need to adjust their diet, fueling, and training load.<\/p>\n As legendary trainer Brad Stulberg wrote for Outside<\/a> when investigating a first-gen muscle glycogen ultrasound tool, \u201cit allows athletes to quantify the fine line between optimal and overtraining.\u201d<\/p>\n Think of it as a type of Whoop strap, but for your energy stores, not your nervous system.<\/p>\n Why ultrasound matters for measuring body fat<\/p>\n Meanwhile, ultrasound scanning for subcutaneous fat provides a gold-standard measure of body composition.<\/p>\n In the WorldTour, this is currently assessed with skinfold calipers.<\/p>\n However, these tests can be riddled with flaws and are prone to inaccuracy if not performed correctly. And that can have negative downstream impacts on riders chasing race weight or recovering from nutritional deficiencies like RED-S.<\/p>\n Velo understands that Uno-X Mobility sends its riders for ultrasound body composition checks on an infrequent basis. The Scandi team is perhaps the only squad to do this.<\/p>\n As above regarding muscle typing, the cost and logistical difficulties are enormous. Yes, ultrasound scanners are available in all medical settings, but you\u2019re not going to find one in a team service course.<\/p>\n Smaller, portable units are available, but their accuracy and consistency is \u2026 questionable.<\/p>\n The future?<\/p>\n The Musclesound<\/a> glycogen measurement gadget which emerged more than a decade ago was written off by authors of the UCI paper. They argue the concept is flawed and its data doesn\u2019t stack up to laboratory testing.<\/p>\n However, the brand remains active and uses validation studies to promote itself, primarily to the medical community, for a variety of purposes.<\/p>\n More independent studies are needed<\/a> \u2026 but watch this space. The premise is intriguing.<\/p>\n 3. Portable substrate metabolism tests The concept: Find out how many carbs you can actually burn<\/p>\n High-carb fueling transformed modern endurance.<\/p>\n \u201cThe carbohydrate revolution\u201d has been as important to accelerating the Poga\u010dar-era WorldTour as the simultaneous evolutions in bike and tire technology.<\/p>\n But riders who choke down 120g of carbs per hou<\/a>r might not actually make use of all of that slosh of sugar. And the only way to find out your true carbohydrate threshold is with \u201ccarbohydrate oxidation tests.\u201d<\/p>\n Why metabolism testing matters<\/p>\n Even in the big-budget modern WorldTour, few riders are treated to costly lab-based \u201ccarbox\u201d protocol. Even then, they\u2019re not a perfect assessment of your gut\u2019s ability to shuttle sugar due to the reverse causality between carb intake and carb oxidation.<\/p>\n As the UCI\u2019s boffins explain better than us, \u201can athlete may have an increased requirement for dietary carbohydrates because of an increased carbohydrate oxidation, but may equally have an increase in carbohydrate oxidation because of a high carbohydrate intake.\u201d<\/p>\n That aside, metabolic testing remains the best available measure of cycling efficiency and energy expenditure \u2013 and that influences nutrition plans, training structure, and much more. Kilojoule measures from power meters are only a close proxy.<\/p>\n Nutrition staff at multiple WorldTour teams have told us they see such precision planning as the next necessary step in the evolution of cycling performance.<\/p>\n The obvious challenge? Like with the previous two technologies, the cost and availability of lab-based metabolic testing is prohibitive.<\/p>\n There are a small collection of mass-market at-home alternatives available, such as those made by INSCYD and the increasingly popular Lumen<\/a> device. But be warned \u2013 authors of the paper are skeptical of the validity of Lumen, in particular.<\/p>\n The future?<\/p>\n For now, scientifically sound metabolic tests will remain in exercise laboratories, well out of the reach of us weekend warriors.<\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Z8A_2174-1200x750.jpg\"\/)
The UCI funded paper discusses what\u2019s being used now and points out how they could be improved for the next generation of athletes. (Photo: Gruber Images)<\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/GettyImages-1519182746.jpg\"\/)
Are you a fast twitch sprinter or a slow twitch climber? In future, there may be more accessible ways to find out. (Photo: Tim de Waele\/Getty Images)<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/GettyImages-464032170.jpg\"\/)
No prizes for guessing whether legendary track sprinter F\u00f6rstemann is predominantly fast or slow twitch. (Photo: Alex Livesey\/Getty Images)
\nThe challenges?<\/p>\n
\n![\"heart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Z8D_3932-1-1200x947.jpg\"\/)
Body composition is typically measured with skinfold callipers, which can lead to inconsistent measurements. (Photo: Gruber Images)<\/p>\n![\"skinfold](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/GettyImages-1205711992-1200x801.jpg\"\/)
Skinfold testing is currently the most easily accessible method to measure body fat.
\nThe challenges?<\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Z8B_8792-1-1200x800.jpg\"\/)
How many carbs do you really need? Metabolic testing helps you find out. (Photo: Gruber Images)<\/p>\n![\"metabolic](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/GettyImages-494883141.jpg\"\/)
Metabolic testing is currently an expensive and unpleasant process conducted in a lab by trained professionals. (Photo: Graig Abel\/NHLI via Getty Images))
\nThe challenges?<\/p>\n