![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/70c8fc80.png\")
<\/p>\nNew documents are laying out the potential route for the controversial pipeline from Alberta to B.C.\u2019s coast.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The documents, obtained by CBC News<\/a>, show a number of options for the pipeline, with the majority of those ending in northern B.C.<\/p>\n Alberta has released a new promotional video<\/a> as it continues to make its case for a new oil pipeline to the B.C. Coast.<\/p>\n \u201cMy takeaway, looking at all of them, was that it was going further north than Northern Gateway and a lot of terminuses in Nisga\u2019a<\/a> territory,\u201d Heather Exner-Pirot, with the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said.<\/p>\n Exner-Pirot, who is also a special advisor on energy to the Business Council of Canada, said the routes appear to be selected for political advantage to go through areas more supportive of oil and gas, rather than economics.<\/p>\n Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n \u201cThe Nisga\u2019as are co-proponents of Ksi Lisims LNG, so a very pro-development nation.\u201d<\/p>\n The proposed routes show one \u2014 the north route \u2014 going from the Fort McMurray region of northern Alberta to Observatory Inlet in northern B.C., about 130 kilometres north of Prince Rupert near the Alaska border.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\tGet daily National news<\/p>\n Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you’ll never miss the day’s top stories.<\/p>\n The other two would start from near Fort Saskatchewan, on the northeast side of the Edmonton region, and have three possible end points.<\/p>\n One of the lines could split past the Rocky Mountains and go north to end in Nasoga Gulf, near Observatory Inlet, while the other proposed option would follows the same path as Enbridge\u2019s failed Northern Gateway route and split at Terrace to connect with the coastal communities of Kitimat and Prince Rupert.<\/p>\n The\u00a0Northern Gateway<\/a> pipeline was supposed to connect Alberta\u2019s oilpatch to a port in Kitimat, B.C., but the plan came apart a decade ago<\/a> when the federal Liberals banned tankers carrying large amounts of crude oil from British Columbia\u2019s northern coast.<\/p>\n From the muskeg and boreal forests of northern Alberta to the rugged woods and mountainous terrain of northern B.C., the routes could pose geographically complexities.<\/p>\n \t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t2:16 \n\t\t\tMore on Politics All would require lifting the federal ban on northern oil tankers \u2014 something the B.C. government and many coastal First Nations oppose.<\/p>\n Story continues below advertisement<\/p>\n But Alberta may be trying to give Ottawa room to maneuver.<\/p>\n \u201cIf they were to proceed with the northern route through Prince Rupert, at least they can maintain their ban for all of that waterway south of Prince Rupert,\u201d said Grant Sprague, Alberta\u2019s former deputy energy minister from 2013 to 2016 and 2019 to 2023.<\/p>\n \u201cThose are challenging waters, in my understanding, so maybe that\u2019s not a bad compromise.\u201d<\/p>\n The Alberta government is consulting directly with British Columbians on these proposed routes and B.C.\u2019s premier says he\u2019s being left out of these discussions altogether.<\/p>\n \u201cWe need to be at the table, we should be at the table, we hope to be at the table, but we\u2019re not yet,\u201d Eby said last Monday.<\/p>\n Alberta is also looking at a possible southern route to the Vancouver area, seemingly favoured by Ottawa.<\/p>\n The federal government has jurisdiction over inter-provincial pipelines, so it will make the final call.<\/p>\n \u2014 with files from Ben O\u2019Hara-Byrne, Global News<\/p>\n \n\t\t© 2026 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"New documents are laying out the potential route for the controversial pipeline from Alberta to B.C.\u2019s coast. The…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":667626,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[217542,135658,257588,217541,45,49,48,257589,714],"class_list":["post-709257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-alberta-bc-pipeline-dispute","tag-alberta-pipeline","tag-alberta-pipelines","tag-bc-pipeline","tag-business","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-nisgaa","tag-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=709257"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/709257\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/667626"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=709257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=709257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=709257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"Get](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/national.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"Click](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Carney-Eby-WEB.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tWill Carney, Eby see eye-to-eye on Alberta pipeline project?\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n
\n\t\t\tMore videos\n\t\t<\/p>\n