Table 1 Transition temperatures (T) and associated enthalpies of transition (\u0394H) for compounds 1\u20134 determined by DSC on cooling at a rate of 10\u2009\u00b0C min\u22121Polarised optical microscopy<\/p>\n
Compound 1 melts into the SmAF phase and in cells prepared with either parallel or anti-parallel rubbed surfaces, forms blocky textures when viewed using polarised optical microscopy (POM) (Fig.\u00a0S1a<\/a>). From azimuthal rotation of the cell with respect to the polarisers, it is clear that most of the blocky domains are orientated with the director close to the rubbing direction but with some slight in plane \u03d5 rotation diving the texture into domains. The blocky texture results from the restriction of splay deformations by the electrostatic cost of polarisation splay and the restriction of bend deformation by the formation of layers33<\/a>,45<\/a>. Heating into the SmA phase retains these domains (Fig.\u00a0S1b<\/a>), but they are lost upon reaching the N phase where a uniform planar texture is obtained. Upon cooling back into the SmAF phase a monodomain texture is obtained (Fig.\u00a0S1c<\/a>) regardless of cell thickness. No evidence of director twist27<\/a>,31<\/a>,46<\/a> is found even in cells using anti-parallel rubbed planar alignment layers.<\/p>\n Immediately upon transitioning to the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase, striations appear parallel to the rubbing direction with an average periodicity of around 1.2\u2009\u03bcm at 80\u2009\u00b0C (Fig.\u00a01<\/a>). While the average periodicity of these striations is generally independent of cell thickness, the periodicity takes a greater possible range of values for increasing cell thickness. Upon cooling, these striations behave quite differently depending on cell thicknesses. For thin cells (1.6\u2009\u03bcm) the striation periodicity decreases to around 0.8\u2009\u03bcm by crystallisation at around 55\u2009\u00b0C (Fig.\u00a01<\/a>). For thicker cells (5\u2009\u03bcm) the striations initially decrease in periodicity before larger less uniformly shaped striations grow in to become the dominant texture (Fig.\u00a01b<\/a>). For 10\u2009\u03bcm thick cells the non-uniform striations grow into thick and distinct defect lines, though these do not have to encompass a full domain and do not show alternative optical activity upon slight de-crossing of the polarisers (Fig.\u00a01c<\/a>). 20\u2009\u03bcm thick cells behave similarly to the 10\u2009\u03bcm thick cell, except the temperature threshold for the defect lines is much closer to the \\({{{\\rm{SmA}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition (Fig.\u00a01d<\/a>). These striations are clearly distinct from alternating polarisation domains36<\/a> and form even when a monodomain SmAF texture aligned under an in-plane electric field is cooled into the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase. They are also retained upon applying a weak in-plane electric field parallel to the polarisation direction.<\/p>\n Fig. 1: Optical properties of the compound 1 and 2 and phase diagram between them. POM images taken for compound 1 at 80\u2009\u00b0C filled into parallel rubbed, planar aligned cells with a cell gap of a 1.6\u2009\u03bcm, b 5\u2009\u03bcm, c 10\u2009\u03bcm and d 20\u2009\u03bcm. POM images of 2 at 80\u2009\u00b0C filled into parallel rubbed, planar aligned cell with a cell gap of 5\u2009\u03bcm on e heating directly after melting from the crystal phase and f subsequent cooling after heating to the nematic phase. Corresponding macroscopic texture of an entire 4\u2009\u03bcm cell filled with 2 at 80\u2009\u00b0C on g heating and h cooling. The brown background colour comes from the hot stage plate. i Transmission intensity of white light through a sample of 2 in a 5\u2009\u03bcm thick planar aligned parallel rubbed cell. j Binary phase diagram between 1 and 2 with 100% compound 1 on the right and 100% compound 2 on the left. The red vertical dashed line marks the point where the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase switches polymorphism from the highly scattering to the striated, as discussed in the text. For all POM images polarisor axis\u2019 and rubbing direction are marked by the blue, purple and black arrows, respectively.<\/p>\n The smectic phase, SmCF, exhibited by 2 shows quite different behaviour where in cells of 1.6, 5, 10, and 20\u2009\u03bcm thickness the texture is consistently grainy and nondescript (Fig.\u00a01e<\/a>) when the sample is cooled from the preceding NTBF phase resulting in significant light scattering and low light transmission though the cell (Fig.\u00a01i<\/a>). The SmCF phase in compound 2 is monotropic and the texture exhibited by the phase on melting directly from the crystal phase is distinctly different (Fig.\u00a01f<\/a>). The melt texture is paramorphotic of the crystal phase but does not show any of the defects and scattering found in the phase on cooling. On heating the melted SmCF texture to \u00a0~\u00a010\u2009\u00b0C below the transition into the NTBF the defects found on cooling begin to form and the transmission through the sample drops significantly, but does decrease to the values obtained on cooling. While selective reflection is difficult to be observed on cooling a faint blue colour can be seen in the SmCF phase with the naked eye on heating, suggesting that this phase does retain the helical structure of the preceding NTBF phase.<\/p>\n If the SmCF phase is helical than the differences in optical textures on heating\/cooling could result from the fact that the greatest change in pitch length (i.e., likely close to the phase transition) occurs in the same temperature regime as the scattering texture forms. These defects would then be the result of plastic deformation of the pitch though contraction and dilation47<\/a>. However, so far the scattering texture have precluded optical measurement of any pitch length in the SmCF phase. We also note that the scattering behaviour of 2 in the SmCF phase is not isolated to cell confinement geometries and shows the same highly scattering and opaque appearance when filled into capillaries or as bulk samples in droplet form or in vials, demonstrating that it is not a result of confinement.<\/p>\n Binary phase diagram between 1 and 2<\/p>\n Construction of binary phase diagrams is a well-established technique in liquid crystal science to demonstrate whether two materials posses the same phase by establishing miscibility between the two materials across the full phase diagram48<\/a> and has been well applied to the NF phase already49<\/a>. Binary mixtures of 1 and 2 were created and the resulting phase diagram shown in Fig.\u00a01j<\/a>. From the binary phase diagram of 1 and 2 the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase is completely miscible with the SmCF phase demonstrating that the SmCF phase is heliconic that the two phases are structurally the same. The studies presented so far have shown the SmCF found in 241<\/a> is the same as as the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase reported by us36<\/a> and so we shall refer to the SmCF phase of 2 as a \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase from here on.<\/p>\n The apolar-polar transition temperature (whether this is N-NS or SmA-SmAF) is roughly linear with concentration while the transition to helical order, whether this is nematic of smectic type, is actually stabilised with a peak at around 30% of 1 for both the NTBF and the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase indicating that the molecular origins of ferroelectric order vs spontaneously chiral differ for these systems. It also points to the possibility of using mixtures in the future to construct systems with wide phase existence for application purposes. We note that the peak of chiral phase stability also roughly coincides with the point at which the transition pattern switches between \\({{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{TBF}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) to \\({{{\\rm{SmA}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\). It is also this point where the texture and scattering behaviour changes from the highly scattering uncharacteristic texture to the striated texture. Seemingly, the key difference is the fact that the SmCF texture on cooling is from the NTBF phase, while the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) texture is cooled from a SmAF phase.<\/p>\n The formation of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase clearly differs depending on the phase preceding it and here we speculate on the origin of the difference in textures. There could be a significantly larger change in pitch at the NTBF\u2013SmCF transition vs the \\({{{\\rm{SmA}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\), though this feels unlikely due to our expectation that the temperature dependence of the pitch at the \\({{{\\rm{SmA}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition will at least be somewhat similar to that at the NF\u2013NTBF transition i.e., a steep temperature dependence41<\/a>. We do note a very slight unwinding of the helix just before the NTBF\u2013SmCF transition (Fig.\u00a0S13<\/a>). This is different from the much more significant unwinding of the helix observed for the transition from an NTBF phase to a non-helical SmCP phase42<\/a> where the helix unwinds critically.<\/p>\n An alternative is that forming layers in a system with an existing helical structure could result in significant defect formation due to potential deformation of the helix to form the regularly spaced smectic layers, although this does not seem to occur for the apolar twist bend nematic and associated smectic phases14<\/a>,50<\/a>,51<\/a>, though the much smaller pitch, lack of polarity and vastly different origins (electric vs elastic) make this a less than optimal comparison.<\/p>\n Another alternative is that the mechanism of phase structure formation in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) could vary significantly depending on the phase preceding it. This will mostly likely be true to some extent as observation of the temperature-dependent tilt implies that the transition to the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase from the SmAF is only 2nd order while the NTBF\u2013SmCF transition is weakly first-order, however, whether this explains the differences in textures vs some alternative pitch defect effect remains to be determined. It could also be reminiscent to the formation of chevron defects in the SmC* phase where cooling from a SmA forms chevron structures due to surface pining52<\/a> which can be somewhat reduced when formed from a De Vries SmA phase where the randomly orientated molecular tilt reduces chevron formation53<\/a>.<\/p>\n Electro-optics and ferrielectric switchingCurrent response measurements<\/p>\n The current response of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) of 1 in a 4\u2009\u03bcm cell with out of plane bare ITO electrodes is not a single peak, indicating complete reversal of the polarisation. Instead, the current response shows a small peak pre-polarity reversal and a larger peak post-polarity reversal (Fig.\u00a02a<\/a>). As such, in the original publication36<\/a>, the phase was given the subscript designation of \u201cP\u201d to indicate polar, as the exact nature of the polarity was unclear from those initial measurements. We suggested that the small peak is associated with the emergence of molecular tilt. From the ground state at E\u2009=\u20090\u2009V\/\u03bcm, increasing the electric field results in the first large peak corresponding to the full reversal of the polarisation vector from a \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) state to a non-tilted, non-helical SmAF state. The small peak is then the reformation of the tilt and helix. The peak cannot be due to variation in the helical pitch length as this would not modulate the polarisation beyond a small variation due to changes in the region of partial pitch that may form due to the degenerate anchoring condition of the bare ITO electrode. Variation in the tilt angle, however, would modulate the effective polarisation observed upon switching. Throughout this next section, we shall refer to the smaller peak as the \u201ctilt\u201d peak and the larger one as the \u201cpolarisation reversal\u201d peak.<\/p>\n Fig. 2: Current response of compounds 1 and 2 in their helical phases. Electro-optic and current response to an 20\u2009Hz, 10\u2009VRMS applied triangle wave for a compound 1 at 75\u2009\u00b0C, b compound 2 at 75\u2009\u00b0C. c shows a schematic diagram for the stationary structures formed within the switching process of compound 1 and 2 in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase. d Electro-optic and current response to an 20\u2009Hz, 10\u2009VRMS applied triangle wave for compound 2 at 99\u2009\u00b0C. e Shows a schematic diagram for the stationary structures formed within the switching process of compound 2 in the NTBF phase. Each compound is filled into a 4\u2009\u03bcm thick cell with bare ITO electrodes. The top portion of the graphs shows the transmission through the cell placed with between crossed polarisers as detected by a photo-diode while the bottom portion is the current response. Within each schematic diagram the red line indicates the applied voltage.<\/p>\n The following discussion is given in context of the current response corresponding to a negative to positive application of electric field. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase of 2 shows a similar current response to that of 1 in terms of a tilt peak and a polarisation reversal peak (Fig.\u00a02b<\/a>), although the response\u2019s do differ in several ways. For 1 the tilt peak initially occurs at a more negative electric field (0.43\u2009V\/\u03bcm) than for 2 (0.1\u2009V\/\u03bcm) and is distinctly separate from the polarisation reversal peak. For 2 the peak appears the grow out of the main reversal peak seen for the NTBF phase as it moves to increasingly negative voltages. We interpret this as a consequence of their different phase transitions. Presumably, for 1 in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase, the viscosity is similar to other smectic phases even close to the SmAF – \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition, while for 2 the viscosity close to the NTBF – \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition is lower, having just transitioned from the lower viscosity nematic phase. For both samples, the peaks develop very similarly. Both the tilt peak and the polarisation reversal peak broaden and move to longer timescales, though this timescale shift is much more apparent for the polarisation reversal peak, which may indicate that the tilt peak is less affected by the viscous-dynamics of the phase.<\/p>\n The electro-optic response was measured simultaneously to the current response by measuring the transmission of 589\u2009nm light through the sample set between crossed polarisers (Fig.\u00a02<\/a>). Again, as for the current response, there are similarities and differences. Both samples show changes in the transmission that couple to the tilt peak or the polarisation reversal peak prohibiting either peak being predominately due to ion flow and accumulation. The electro-optic response is horn like for both samples, although clearly much sharper for 2 indicative of the lower field thresholds for the optical changes, resulting in a narrowed peak. The horn shape itself can be understood by considering that transmission through a birefringent LC slab is given by:<\/p>\n $$\\frac{T}{{T}_{o}}={\\sin }^{2} \\, 2\\phi {\\sin }^{2}\\left(\\frac{\\pi \\Delta nd}{\\lambda }\\right)$$<\/p>\n \n (1)\n <\/p>\n where T\/To is the transmission ratio, \u03d5 is the angle between director and polarisor, \u0394n is the birefringence, d the cell thickness and \u03bb the wavelength of light. In the SmAF state at high electric field, the transmission is a minimum as the sample has homeotropic alignment and the effective birefringence of the sample is close to zero. Reducing the electric field leads to reformation the tilt and regaining of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) state. The out of plane field means the homeotropic alignment is retained, and so the effective birefringence is low, leading to high transmission. As the field moves towards 0\u2009V\/\u03bcm the homeotropic alignment is lost, resulting in an increased birefringence and a loss in transmission. Increasing the field beyond the polarisation reversal peak results in a flip of the molecules and a field-induced phase transition into the SmAF state, reducing the birefringence to zero. It does not seem that the polarisation reversal motion from a \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) state to SmAF state involves an intermediate \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) state with reversed polarisation.<\/p>\n For the NTBF phase the current response does not show a tilt peak and only shows a single polarisation reversal peak (Fig.\u00a02c<\/a>). However, it has been shown that the tilt in the NTBF phase can be manipulated41<\/a> making the lack of an obvious tilt peak surprising. This will be revisited later in the manuscirpt. The electro-optic response is also strange with no significant change in transmission as a function of the applied triangle wave. We expect that at high electric field the molecules are in the homeotropic state giving low transmission, where only very small fields are required to maintain this state. At low fields the tilt is regained along with the helix, resulting in reduced transmission, which counteracts the increased transmission due to increased birefringence and loss of the homeotropic state.<\/p>\n In-plane electro-optics of the \\({{{\\mathbf{SmC}}}}_{{\\mathbf{{P}}}}^{{\\mathbf{{H}}}}\\) phase<\/p>\n To confirm that the tilt peak is indeed associated with the reformation of molecular tilt POM observation and birefringence measurements of the in-plane switching mechanism is used. The birefringence was measured in the centre of the electrodes using a Berek Compensator with further details given in the SI. Due to the strong formation of defects in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) of 2 we instead will mostly focus on the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) of 1. 1 was filled into parallel rubbed 5.5\u2009\u03bcm thick cell with two in-plane electrodes with a gap of 100\u2009\u03bcm. The rubbing direction was parallel to the direction of the electric field across the electrode gap.<\/p>\n Applying a weak electric field (0.225\u2009V\/\u03bcm) opposite to the initial director orientation results in the formation of elongated diamond-shaped domains of reversed director (Fig.\u00a03a<\/a>). These domains grow perpendicular to the applied field until the entire active area is filled (0.3\u2009V\/\u03bcm). They can extend beyond the active area similar to the NF phase and in direct contrast to that of the SmAF phase where polarisation reversal is confined to the active area33<\/a> (Fig.\u00a03a<\/a>). This phenomena is likely due to the reduced field threshold for polarisation reversal of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase vs the SmAF phase presumably allowing the resulting depolarisation field to propagate beyond the active area. We note that the diamond domains of reversed polarisation that form outside the active area tend to form on the side opposite to the direction of the applied field, though this does not mean that cannot form in the region in the direction of applied field. Increasing the field beyond the switching threshold sees a continuous gain in birefringence and a removal of the striations (Fig.\u00a03a<\/a>). The final texture is uniform in colour with a birefringence value similar to that of the SmAF phase at the \\({{{\\rm{SmA}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition. Flickering undulations in the texture can be observed, indicating some hydrodynamic flow due to the applied field, but these do not have any obvious pattern to them. The edges of the active area show slightly different birefringence colours due to the non-uniformity of the field in those areas. Removal of the field results in a texture that is reminiscent of the initial texture though some of the reversed polarisation domains remain outside of the active area as well as a domain line along the edges of the active area, indicating the different polarisation domains. The complete process is shown in Fig.\u00a03b<\/a>. The sample starts in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) state. Further increase of the electric field reorients the polarisation direction while leaving the helix intact (though we do not speculate on any changes to the helical pitch here). Further increasing the field causes a transition into the non-tilted SmAF state. Removal of the field reforms the tilt and helix.<\/p>\n Fig. 3: Inplane electro-optics of\u00a01\u00a0with an anti-parallel field. a POM images of compound 1 at 75\u2009\u00b0C in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase in an IPS cell under applied field. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limits of the active area, while the vertical dashed arrow indicates the electric field direction. The cell is 5.5\u2009\u03bcm thick with parallel rubbed planar alignment. The gap between the two electrodes is 100\u2009\u03bcm and the DC field is initially applied anti-parallel the the initial polarisation state. For all POM images, polarisor axes and rubbing direction are marked by the blue, purple and black arrows, respectively. b Schematic diagrams of the different states in the switching profile are shown for the IPS cell as described in the text. Only half the pitch length is shown for the helical states.<\/p>\n In-plane electro-optics of the NTBF phase<\/p>\n The current response of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase clearly shows a second peak, which we have shown to be related to tilt reformation, indicating that the larger polarisation reversal peak also contains a field-induced phase transition back into the SmAF phase. The NTBF phase is also heliconical, but its current response does not show a second peak to associate with any field-induced transition. To investigate whether full tilt removal is still possible, we probe the NTBF phase via in-plane switching observations in the same 5.5\u2009\u03bcm thick parallel rubbed cells as for the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase.<\/p>\n The transition to the NF phase to the NTBF phase is clear by the formation of stripes parallel to the rubbing direction (Fig.\u00a04a<\/a>). As the temperature is decreased, these stripes split along the rubbing direction into regions of stripe domains and uniform texture. Since these stripes are parallel to the rubbing direction and thus parallel to the helicoidal axis, they are not pitch repeat units. These are also not regions of opposite polarity as they remain under application of a moderate in-plane dc field and a strong field removes them without evidence of polarisation reversal.<\/p>\n Fig. 4: Inplane electro-optics of 2\u00a0with\u00a0an anti-parallel field. a POM images of compound 2 at 100\u2009\u00b0C in the NTBF phase in an IPS cell under application of a DC electric field. The horizontal dashed lines indicate the limits of the active area, while the vertical dashed arrow indicates the electric field direction. The cell is 5.5\u2009\u03bcm thick with parallel rubbed planar alignment. The gap between the two electrodes is 100\u2009\u03bcm and the DC field is initially applied anti-parallel the the initial polarisation state. For all POM images polarisor axes and rubbing direction are marked by the blue, purple and black arrows, respectively. b Schematic diagrams of the different states in the switching profile are shown for the IPS cell as described in the text. Only half the pitch length is shown for the helical states.<\/p>\n For the NTBF phase the direction of the in-plane polarity can be switched by a dc in-plane electric field, just as for the NF21<\/a>,31<\/a>,54<\/a>,55<\/a> although the switching is somewhat different. At low dc fields (below \u00a0~0.02\u2009V\/\u03bcm) there is a small reduction in birefringence without significant disruption of the texture (Fig.\u00a04a<\/a>), consistent with the NF phase where this behaviour has been associated with increased director twist55<\/a>. At a critical voltage (~0.02\u2009V\/\u03bcm), there is a significant reduction in birefringence and the sample breaks into many domains (Fig.\u00a04a<\/a>). Slight uncrossing of the polarisers does not reveal any difference in optical activity of these domains. As the voltage is increased further (up to 0.06\u2009V\/\u03bcm) these domains coalesce and there is a steady increase in birefringence up to the amount of the unperturbed NTBF state with no signs of the undulations found in that unperturbed state (Fig.\u00a04a<\/a>). Further increase in the voltage sees an increase in the birefringence beyond the unperturbed state and eventually (above 0.15\u2009V\/\u03bcm) the undulations return before finally (around 0.3\u2009V\/\u03bcm) obtaining a uniform NF like texture with a birefringence similar to that of the NF phase just before transition to the NTBF phase. Just as for the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase, the effect of the in-plane field can extend beyond the active area. However, due to the lower threshold for switching in the NTBF phase, the full polarisation reversal spreads significantly beyond the active area and it is just the increase of birefringence that is limited to the out of active area region opposite the applied field. The complete process of the NTBF phase is shown in Fig.\u00a03b<\/a>. The sample starts in the NTBF state where increasing the electric field reorients the polarisation direction while leaving the helix intact. Further increasing the field causes a transition into the non-tilted NF state. Removal of the field reforms the tilt and helix. It is clear that both the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) and NTBF phases can undergo a field-induced phase transition the non-tilted state, which by necessity would remove the helix entirely.<\/p>\n Ferrielectric switching in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase<\/p>\n Applying a electric field anti-parallel to the polarisation axis of both the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) and NTBF phases results in full reversal of the polarisation direction. Further increase in the field results in an increase in birefringence, where this second stage is due to the reduction in molecular tilt. If the electric field is applied syn-parallel to the polarisation direction, no reversal in the polarisation direction is observed. However, an increase in birefringence, associated with the tilt removal, is still observed for both phases (Fig.\u00a04<\/a>). If the field is removed the tilt is reformed and a drop in birefringence back to the original value is observed. For the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase of 1, full tilt removal could only be completed in a specific temperature window close to the SmAF – \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) transition (Fig.\u00a05a<\/a>) due to an increase in field threshold for this effect. Presumably, if higher electric fields were achieved, either through higher voltages or a narrower active area, full tilt removal could be completed for the entire phase window. For the NTBF phase of 2 full tilt removal could be completed for the entire phase (Fig.\u00a05b<\/a>). We also note that if an in-plane field is applied to the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase of 2 a uniform birefringent texture could be obtained (Fig.\u00a0S3<\/a>) which reverted back to the defect texture upon removal of the field indicating that tilt removal is possible here too. The hysteresis of tilt removal and switching behaviour is clear also in out of plane measurements (Fig.\u00a0S4<\/a>). where tilt is clearly recovered only at lower field strength values than it is lost.<\/p>\n Fig. 5: Inplane electro-optics of 1 and 2 with a syn-parallel field. POM images of a compound 1 at 75\u2009\u00b0C in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase and b compound 2 at 100\u2009\u00b0C in the NTBF phase both an IPS cell under application of a DC electric field where the cell is 5.5\u2009\u03bcm thick with parallel rubbed planar alignment. Here, the DC field is applied syn-parallel to the polarisation direction. For all POM images polarisor axis\u2019 and rubbing direction are marked by the blue, purple and black arrows, respectively. Temperature dependence of the birefringence of c 1 and e 2 both with and without an applied DC field. Electric field dependence of the birefringence of d compound 1 at 75\u2009\u00b0C and f compound 2 at 100\u2009\u00b0C, indicating the hysteresis of the tilt removal for the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase and the lack of hysteresis for the NTBF phase.<\/p>\n To investigate the threshold and field dependence of the tilt removal, we measure birefringence as a function of applied field. This is measured in the very centre of the active area where the in-plane field is most parallel to the cell plane. For the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase of 1, we see that the birefringence only increases after some critical value, where it sharply increases up to a value slightly beyond that of the untitled SmAF phase. We attribute this increase beyond the SmAF value either due to a increase in alignment quality over that of the SmAF or some electrically modified order parameter effect56<\/a>. When the field is reduced the increased birefringence is retained to lower voltages than the threshold for tilt removal indicating a hysteresis in the tilt removal (Fig.\u00a05c<\/a>). For analogous measurements on the NTBF phase of 2 the tilt removal is threshold-less, despite the presence of an alignment layer, and has no evidence of hysteresis (Fig.\u00a05d<\/a>). The threshold-less nature of the change in tilt is due to the avoidance of bound charges that would form in the bulk. Instead, the tilt is maintained homogenous across the active area and bound charges are expelled to the electrodes, similar to director oscillations in the NF phase57<\/a>. The obtained birefringence is slightly higher than the NF phase however, not as significant as for the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase.<\/p>\n The helix in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) and NTBF phases allows for partial polarisation compensation and so removal of the tilt results in an increase in polarisation. A ferroelectric phase has two stable states at E\u2009=\u20090, while an anti-ferroelectric phase would only have a single stable state58<\/a>. A ferrielectric phase has two stable states at E\u2009=\u20090, but two separate sub-lattices of non-equal polarisation59<\/a>. These sub-lattices can be reversed going through a field-induced phase transition to the ferroelectric state at high electric field. As a result a ferrielectric phase has three hysteresis loops in its P-E curve. The \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase has three separate hysteresis components (polarisation reversal and then tilt hysteresis in both the positive and negative polarisation states) and so has a pseudo-ferrielectric switching response. However, it is not a true ferrielectric phase as its ground state is ferroelectric like with all of its constituent dipoles orientated along the same direction. The NTBF phase has the same ground state as the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) but does not exhibit hysteresis in its tilt removal and so only exhibits ferroelectric switching with an additional pseudo-paraelectric component at higher electric fields. We note that this pseudo-ferrielectricity is reminiscent of the concept of reducible and irreducible ferrielectricity in solid state materials60<\/a>.<\/p>\n Beyond the NTBF phase, current responses consisting of a small peak pre-polarity reversal and a subsequent larger peak have been observed for the non-helical SmCP phase37<\/a>,39<\/a>,61<\/a>, though this is apparently not always observed38<\/a>. This peak has been associated with tilt reformation and indicates the possibility of a pseudo-ferrielectric responses for the the non-helical SmCP phase.<\/p>\n Pre-transitional helix formation<\/p>\n We have demonstrated how variation of the phase ordering from \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{TBF}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}\\) to \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\)-SmAF varies the properties of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase. Both of the aforementioned transitions to heliconic order are 2nd order indicated by their lack of enthalpy from DSC and their continuous, rather than discontinuous, tilt dependence at the transition to heliconic order (Fig.\u00a0S11<\/a>). Variation in fluorination is a now well established technique to obtained various polar phases30<\/a>,42<\/a>,62<\/a> and so changing the chemical structure to that of compound 3 (Table\u00a01<\/a>) results in a phase order of \\({{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}-{{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\). POM observations reveal the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}\\) transition on cooling occurs as a wave edged with dendritic tendrils (Fig.\u00a06a, b<\/a>). The transition front moves across the cell, forming a similar scattering texture as observed for 2, nucleating from specific points across the cell. This is contrary to the smooth uniform change in texture as observed for the NTBF\u2013NF transition of 2. On heating the scattering texture melts with a sharp boundary between \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) and NF domains.<\/p>\n Fig. 6: Physical properties of compound 3. POM images in the a NF and b \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phases of 3 in a 5\u2009\u03bcm planar aligned parallel rubbed cell. Arrows indicate direction of polarisers and rubbing direction. 2D X-ray scattering images of 3 in the c NF and d \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phases. e Temperature dependence of the d-spacing and molecular tilt of 3. Current responses for 3 in the f NF and g \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phases. h Microscopy image of 3 with the polarisor inserted parallel to the rubbing direction (no analyser) of the boundary between the NF phase (top) and \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase (bottom) showing selective reflection in the boundary region. i diffraction pattern from the boundary region demonstrating a pitch of \u00a0~ 800\u2009\u03bcm. j Transmission spectrum from the boundary region of image (a).<\/p>\n X-ray scattering measurements show a large jump in tilt angle formation up to \u00a0~ 12\u00b0 molecular tilt immediately at the transition, indicating a strong first-order character (Fig.\u00a06c\u2013e<\/a>). We also observe a comparatively large enthalpy compared to the lack of enthalpy for the 2nd order transitions \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\)-SmAF and NTBF\u2013NF as well as the 1st order \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{TBF}}}}\\) transition. All of this points to the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}\\) transition of 3 as being the first 1st order transition to spontaneous heliconic order. Current response measurements show a single polarisation reversal peak for the NF phase (Fig.\u00a06f<\/a>). Upon transition into the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase the peak splits into two with a smaller tilt peak at pre-polarity voltages and larger polarisation reversal peak (Fig.\u00a06g<\/a>), which moves to longer time scales with reducing temperature. The larger initial size of the tilt peak is owed to the first-order nature of the transition leading to an discontinuous large change in the molecular tilt and so a larger change in polarisation upon tilt reformation.<\/p>\n If the boundary between the NF and \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) domains is observed on cooling, a narrow region of \u00a0~ 300\u2009\u03bcm width exists where selective reflection can be seen (Fig.\u00a06h<\/a>). Across this boundary layer the colour varies from red to purple, indicating an increasing in bandgap wavelength from the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) domain to the NF domain. Measuring the wavelength of the selective reflection directly shows it does indeed shift rapidly though the visible window in 0.2\u2009\u00b0C indicating rapid change of the helical pitch in this region (Fig.\u00a06j<\/a>). Direct remeasurements of the pitch via laser diffraction confirm this indicating a change in pitch from 920\u2009\u03bcm to less than 600\u2009\u03bcm within that same 0.2\u2009\u00b0C window (Fig.\u00a06i<\/a>). We considered whether this is a narrow temperature window of NTBF phase existence, however on heating the region of selective reflection and light diffraction due to the helical pitch is not observed (Supplementary Videos\u00a01<\/a> and 2<\/a>). We interpret this as either the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase front growing across the cell and forming initially in a thin area nearer the base due to any vertical temperature gradients, which then produces the selective reflection and pitch. Alternatively, this is a pre-transitional effect where the helix in the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) acts in induce some helical ordering in the neighbouring NF regions. As this is not the lowest free energy state for the NF phase this helix unwinds as distance from the phase front is increased until it smoothly merges with the non-helical NF regions.<\/p>\n Further changes in the fluorination pattern results in compound 4, however, this results in a destabilisation of any smectic or helical phases and instead only an enantiotropic NF phases is observed. We also note the strong destabilisation of the apolar-polar transition by \u00a0~ 20\u2009\u00b0C. This is explained as a decreased spatial uniformity of the alternating charge regions across the molecule preventing reducing the strength of the lateral interactions that promote polar phases25<\/a>,30<\/a>.<\/p>\n Conclusions<\/p>\n The discovery of spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking in the ferroelectric nematic realm36<\/a>,41<\/a> is extremely exciting due to the potential for replicating the behaviours seen in hard matter systems such as ferromagnets in fluid soft matter systems. Here we have demonstrated that the SmCF phase found in 241<\/a> is helical and is in fact a \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase, as observed for 136<\/a>. We show that there is at least three phase pathways to the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) (we expect that there could well be more pathways then the three presented here). Namely \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\)-SmAF, \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{TBF}}}}\\) and \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}-{{{\\rm{N}}}}_{{{\\rm{F}}}}\\) and that each leads to an array of different polymorphs and interesting properties.<\/p>\n We account for the double peak structure of the current response for the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase, demonstrating that the smaller pre-polarity peak is associated with reformation of the tilt and show how the behaviour of this tilt peak is influenced by the phase preceding it. The tilt peak of the \\({{{\\rm{SmC}}}}_{{{\\rm{P}}}}^{{{\\rm{H}}}}\\) phase is indicative of field-induced phase transitions to the SmAF state. This phase transition shows clear hysteresis, indicating that it is pseudo-ferrielectric due to the increase in polarisation that occurs by removing molecular tilt from a partially compensated helical phase.<\/p>\n Looking forward, spontaneous symmetry breaking due to polar order may yield interesting new phase types and states when superimposed on more complex liquid crystal organisations, for example, the twisted polar smectic structures described recently by Nishikawa et al.46<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Materials Table\u00a01 shows the chemical structures and phases transitions of the materials presented here. Details of chemical synthesis…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":70945,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[49,48,35496,1099,20344,1100,314,66],"class_list":{"0":"post-70944","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-ca","9":"tag-canada","10":"tag-ferroelectrics-and-multiferroics","11":"tag-humanities-and-social-sciences","12":"tag-liquid-crystals","13":"tag-multidisciplinary","14":"tag-physics","15":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70944"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70944\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/70945"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig1_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig2_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig3_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig4_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig5_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n![\"figure](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/41467_2025_62684_Fig6_HTML.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n