{"id":762317,"date":"2026-06-26T11:21:11","date_gmt":"2026-06-26T11:21:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/762317\/"},"modified":"2026-06-26T11:21:11","modified_gmt":"2026-06-26T11:21:11","slug":"nba-free-agency-2026-point-guard-class-offers-several-options-for-interested-teams","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/762317\/","title":{"rendered":"NBA free agency 2026: Point guard class offers several options for interested teams"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Free-agent market: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7357990\/2026\/06\/16\/nba-free-agents-lebron-james-harden-jalen-duren\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Top 25<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7358353\/2026\/06\/17\/nba-free-agency-austin-reaves-norman-powell-bronny-james\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">shooting guards<\/a> | <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7358390\/2026\/06\/18\/nba-free-agency-tari-eason-lu-dort\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">small forwards<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The NBA\u2019s free-agent point guard market may be the strongest position overall, with two All-Stars adding star power to the group (even if they\u2019re likely to stay put) plus at least six potential starters who are likely to be unrestricted free agents. Several plus backups dot the market after that, based on my BORD$ valuations. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/2708140\/2021\/08\/05\/2021-nba-free-agency-john-hollingers-top-20-free-agents-by-bord-projections-with-formula-tweaks\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">More on the methodology here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>As always, I\u2019ve included all free agents and potential free agents because of player options, team options and non-guaranteed contracts, except for absurd cases where there is no chance of a player being waived and \u2014 importantly \u2014 also no chance for other cap shenanigans by declining options and signing new contracts. For one example, Miami won\u2019t be waiving ball hawk Dru Smith from his non-guaranteed minimum deal.<\/p>\n<p>(PO = player option; TO = team option; NG = non-guaranteed; PG = partial guarantee; POPG = player option, partial guarantee; R = restricted; R-2w = restricted two-way)<\/p>\n<p>Tier 1: Max guys<\/p>\n<p>None<\/p>\n<p>Tier 2: More than MLE, less than max1. James Harden, Cleveland (POPG): $36,396,260 <\/p>\n<p>Harden has a complicated contract structure that contains both a player option for $42 million and a partial guarantee that lets the Cavs sever him for just $13.3 million if he picks up the option.<\/p>\n<p>You probably needn\u2019t worry about either, as it is in both Harden\u2019s and the Cavs\u2019 interests to decline the option and ink a new deal, likely in the range of two years and $65 million to $70 million. That arrangement would slightly lessen the Cavs\u2019 imposing salary obligations for the coming season while giving Harden a bit more long-term insurance (at least to the extent that\u2019s possible entering an age-37 season). Either way, it would be stunning if he\u2019s anywhere but Cleveland on opening night.<\/p>\n<p>2. Trae Young, Washington (PO): $29,495,966<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve probably seen more of Young over the last half-decade than anybody who doesn\u2019t either work for the Hawks or cover them full-time. He\u2019s definitely a one-man offensive engine for a team that badly needs one, definitely an elite passer, definitely lost a step two years ago and has more trouble beating switches than he used to and definitely highly flammable on defense, although he at least tries now. (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6953358\/2026\/01\/08\/trae-young-trade-return-hawks-future\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">More on that here.<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>As a small guard entering his age-28 season, the danger is less the money and more the years. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7382866\/2026\/06\/22\/trae-young-washington-wizards-new-contract\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">He\u2019s agreed to a four-year deal<\/a> (with a player option) for approximately $212 million, far above his BORD$ valuation. It probably would\u2019ve worked better for the Wizards\u2019 cap management to just tack on new years to that number.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, getting to a total of three years, $110 million would have put two new seasons at $30 million on the Wizards\u2019 books, which would not only accommodate additions and re-signings vis-\u00e0-vis the luxury tax but also crack the door open for a cap-room play in summer 2027. Still, even after opting out of his deal, there was little to no chance that Young would change teams.<\/p>\n<p>How excited is AJ Dybantsa about being the number 1 pick?<\/p>\n<p>Josh Robbins and Jeshua Kidd<\/p>\n<p>Tier 3: MLE guys3. Collin Gillespie, Phoenix: $21,472,942<\/p>\n<p>Gillespie <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7379453\/2026\/06\/20\/collin-gillespie-suns-contract-4-years-nba\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">agreed last week to a four-year, $48 million deal<\/a>. This even larger valuation may sound pretty extreme because Gillespie\u2019s career had little traction until he blew up in his age-26 season, but he was fantastic last year. He\u2019s also a career 40.5 percent 3-point shooter on serious volume, holds his own on defense and can run an offense.<\/p>\n<p>The Suns only have early <a href=\"https:\/\/sportsbusinessclassroom.com\/understanding-the-value-of-bird-rights\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Bird rights<\/a> on Gillespie, capping what they could have paid him at an estimated $15.6 million in 2026-27 salary. The average salary on his agreed-upon deal is a few million less than that, and the Suns should manage to keep him, Jordan Goodwin and Mark Williams while staying under the second-apron payroll threshold.<\/p>\n<p>4. Kevin Porter Jr. Milwaukee (PO): $19,960,319<\/p>\n<p>Porter was the Bucks\u2019 second-best player in 2025-26 and might be the best one when camp opens, even while going cold from 3 (just 32.2 percent) in his 38 games.<\/p>\n<p>Porter\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/5222137\/2024\/01\/23\/kevin-porter-jr-plea-deal\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">issues<\/a> at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/2329971\/2021\/01\/18\/kevin-porter-jr-cleveland-cavaliers-trade-release\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">other stops<\/a> and iffy commitment to defense are likely going to cap his salary south of this BORD$ valuation, as the Bucks may not have much competition for his services at eight-figure prices. He surely will opt out of his $5.4 million deal for 2026-27, however, and as an early Bird rights player, the Bucks can pay an estimated $15.6 million in 2026-27 salary to retain him if need be \u2014 just beating the non-taxpayer MLE amount ($15 million) that would let other teams in the door. A deal for a bit less than that, in the neighborhood of three years and $40 million, seems like a reasonable sweet spot.<\/p>\n<p>5. Fred VanVleet, Houston (PO): $17,526,557<\/p>\n<p>VanVleet missed the season with a torn ACL, so BORD$ is triangulating here based on his age and previous track record. He also has a player option for $25 million; he could just opt into it and try his luck as an unrestricted free agent next year.<\/p>\n<p>What might work better for all parties, however, would be if he declines the option and immediately re-signs with Houston on a deal that pays him less money for 2026-27 (so the Rockets can manage the tax aprons) but gives the 32-year-old more security for the years that follow. Maybe something in the neighborhood of three years and $70 million.<\/p>\n<p>6. CJ McCollum, Atlanta: $16,536,607<\/p>\n<p>McCollum was the perfect spark plug for Atlanta\u2019s offense once he came over from Washington; he also, alas, turns 35 in September and doesn\u2019t really fit the timeline of this Hawks roster full of 20-somethings.<\/p>\n<p>Still, McCollum and the Hawks have already <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7380959\/2026\/06\/21\/cj-mccollum-hawks-contract-extension\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">agreed to a one-year, $21 million deal<\/a>, though BORD$ values him just a whisker above the non-taxpayer MLE. A two-year deal would\u2019ve been about the maximum tolerable risk given McCollum\u2019s age. Atlanta is miles from the projected tax line, and McCollum\u2019s expiring contract possibly could be used in a midseason swap for elite talent.<\/p>\n<p>7. Jamal Shead, Toronto (TO): $16,103,212 <\/p>\n<p>Shead is an interesting situation. Normally, you might think he\u2019d be a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7336075\/2026\/06\/12\/nba-offseason-free-agency-2026-player-team-options\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">\u201cdecline and re-sign\u201d candidate<\/a> because of his value contract (just $2.3 million), but Toronto\u2019s situation with the tax aprons argues for the opposite approach. The Raptors can barely stay under the projected first apron even with Shead at his current number, much less if he gets a raise, but they will have a lot more money a year from now.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, they were likely to lock in Shead at his current number, which they reportedly did Thursday, and then try to sign an extension based on that. There is also a scenario where the Raptors hold off on an extension to preserve the possibility of 2027 cap room, because Shead\u2019s minimum cap hold would go a long way toward achieving that.<\/p>\n<p>8. Collin Sexton, Chicago: $14,248,237 <\/p>\n<p>At this point, we basically know the drill: Sexton isn\u2019t really a point guard and is too small and defensively suspect to start on the wing, but he can fill it up when he gets cooking. Sexton is a career 38.9 percent 3-point shooter who averaged over 30 points per 100 possessions for four different teams across eight seasons. The full non-taxpayer MLE might be slightly aggressive for a bench microwave type, but a two-year deal between $25 million and $30 million would likely return value.<\/p>\n<p>Chicago has Sexton\u2019s Bird rights but seems unlikely to pursue him as the Bulls pivot to a rebuild centered on their heap of cap space; however, Chicago could play a part in sign-and-trade scenarios for teams that don\u2019t have access to the MLE.<\/p>\n<p>  9. Anfernee Simons, Chicago: $12,468,211<\/p>\n<p>Similar to Sexton above, Simons is a scoring guard who shoots well (38.1 percent from 3 for his career) and goes on torrid scoring jags, but his defense leaves a lot to be desired. Also similar to Sexton, Chicago has full Bird rights on Simons and seemingly not much interest in bringing him back; that could open sign-and-trade scenarios. And like Sexton, he\u2019s probably looking at a two-year deal in the $25 million range.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7390294 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/USATSI_28299318-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>\n      Anfernee Simons joined the Bulls last season as part of a trade with Boston. (Kamil Krzaczynski \/ Imagn Images)<\/p>\n<p>Tier 4: Less than MLE, more than minimum10. Marcus Smart, Lakers (PO): $11,578,784<\/p>\n<p>Smart played his way back into free agency with a solid year for the Lakers, albeit in an extremely low-usage role for a guard. His offense has cratered since leaving Boston, and he might be considered a wing at this point, given that somebody else is likely to be handling the shot-creation work.<\/p>\n<p>Smart still adds a lot of value on the defensive end and is willing enough to let it rip from 3 that opponents feel compelled to guard him despite his iffy percentages. That makes him more valuable than his $5.4 million player option, so he likely opts out and tests the market. The Lakers have no Bird rights on Smart and are likely to be a cap space team regardless, but an alternative would be to retain him via their room exception on a one-year, $9.4 million deal.<\/p>\n<p>11. Jose Alvarado, New York (PO): $10,549,738<\/p>\n<p>The newly minted NBA champ has a player option for just $4.5 million that he seems likely to decline, even if it\u2019s just to sign a longer deal to stay with the Knicks. New York will have full Bird rights on him, so for the Knicks, it\u2019s more a question of where his contract fits in their tax-apron strategy. He\u2019s one of the best backup point guards on the market, so New York will have competition.<\/p>\n<p>Watch This: Knicks win first title in 53 years<\/p>\n<p>12. Brandon Williams, Dallas: $10,288,416<\/p>\n<p>Williams is a hard player to value, as he\u2019s a slashing guard who gets bucket after bucket at the rim but offers little floor spacing (28.0 percent career from 3) and is undersized at the other end. Williams proved himself to be a viable rotation player with Dallas\u2019 other injuries, and the Mavs will have his Bird rights. Kyrie Irving\u2019s return obviously moves Williams to a backup role, but that\u2019s his best usage anyway. I\u2019d be shocked if Williams got a contract as high as this BORD$ value, but he could be a popular name for the $5.5 million biannual exception on a two-year deal.<\/p>\n<p>13. Craig Porter Jr., Cleveland: (TONG): $6,293,009<\/p>\n<p>On paper, Porter is a classic <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7336075\/2026\/06\/12\/nba-offseason-free-agency-2026-player-team-options\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">\u201cdecline and re-sign\u201d<\/a> candidate, but in reality, the Cavs\u2019 tax situation makes that virtually impossible. Having Porter occupy a roster spot while making just $2.4 million next year is far more important to making their tax-apron math work, even if it results in his being an unrestricted free agent a year from now. If the Cavs are Porter believers, however, one thing they could do is pick up the guarantee and then sign him to an extension off that number.<\/p>\n<p>14. Bones Hyland, Minnesota: $6,236,405<\/p>\n<p>Hyland regained some career footing by becoming part of Minnesota\u2019s rotation, although his role mostly vanished in the playoffs because of defensive concerns. The Wolves have serious tax issues, but they do have early Bird rights on Hyland; that makes him easier to ink than an outside free agent due to the aprons. Realistically, his price ceiling is likely the $5.5 million biannual exception. Even getting to that number may get tricky for the Wolves, given their seeming need to stay below the tax line and their $112 million commitment to Ayo Dosunmu.<\/p>\n<p>15. Mike Conley Jr., Minnesota, $6,151,040<\/p>\n<p>Entering his age-39 season, Conley showed in the playoffs that he still has something left in his legs. However, his offensive output has dipped sharply over the past two seasons, culminating in last season\u2019s 9.4 PER on just 51.7 percent true shooting.<\/p>\n<p>While I will forever stan for Conley (I was in the Grizzlies\u2019 front office for his final seven seasons in Memphis), this BORD$ estimate likely overshoots his market. He\u2019s probably playing on a minimum next year, whether back with the Wolves or someplace else that needs a steady stabilizer in the backcourt and in the locker room.<\/p>\n<p>16. D\u2019Angelo Russell, Washington (PO): $5,945,486<\/p>\n<p>BORD$ has always liked Russell way more than his NBA employers have. While Russell has a player option for $5.96 million, almost his exact BORD$ valuation, I would be shocked to see him opt out of it because there is such a tepid market for his services. Given the numbers on Washington\u2019s roster, there\u2019s even a scenario where he ends up as a buyout guy after picking up the option and lands someplace else on a minimum deal.<\/p>\n<p>17. Daniss Jenkins, Detroit (TO): $5,256,936<\/p>\n<p>Jenkins contract is set up for a \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/7336075\/2026\/06\/12\/nba-offseason-free-agency-2026-player-team-options\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">decline and re-sign<\/a>\u201c that will allow the Pistons to ink him to a longer deal as a non-Bird free agent. His team option is for $4 million, but I\u2019d look for Detroit to ink him to a deal around three years and $15 million, which is the most they can do without tapping into exception money.<\/p>\n<p>The one wrinkle here is that the Pistons have cap room scenarios; in that event, Detroit could decline the option and then bring Jenkins back via a chunk of their room exception. Doing things that way would give them $3 million in extra cap room for a potential pursuit of Austin Reaves or some other unrestricted free agent.<\/p>\n<p>18. Dennis Schr\u00f6der, Cleveland: $4,889,681<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve included Schr\u00f6der here because his contract structure means there\u2019s at least some chance that the Cavaliers waive and stretch him, making him a free agent, to cope with a potentially mammoth tax bill.<\/p>\n<p>Schr\u00f6der is owed $14.9 million for the coming season, but his 2027-28 season is guaranteed for only $4.35 million. Thus, the Cavs could take that entire $19.25 million guarantee and stretch it over five seasons if they waived him, slashing $11 million from their tax calculation for the coming season and saving millions beyond that in luxury tax.<\/p>\n<p>If set free, Schr\u00f6der is still a valuable player, with BORD$ suggesting he\u2019s basically worth the $5.4 million room exception on a one-year deal for a team that needs a veteran backup point guard. Note that the Cavs would also receive a set-off on their tax bill from any new contract Schr\u00f6der signed, removing 50 percent of the amount above the one-year veteran minimum of $2.1 million.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7390307 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/USATSI_29027718-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>\n      Dennis Schr\u00f6der and Jose Alvarado are two of the better backup point guards on the market this summer. (Vincent Carchietta \/ Imagn Images)<\/p>\n<p>19. Jaden Ivey, Chicago (R): $4,809,589<\/p>\n<p>The lottery pick\u2019s NBA future is in question after the Bulls waived him after just four games last season. Ivey improved quite a bit as a shooter in his third and fourth seasons and could provide a solid third or fourth guard if he\u2019s healthy and focused, but his journey back to relevance probably starts with a one-year minimum deal.<\/p>\n<p>Tier 5: Good minimums20. Blake Wesley, Portland <\/p>\n<p>I\u2019ve been a believer in Wesley\u2019s ability to impact the game as an agent of chaos on the defensive end, and he showed that before injuries sidetracked his first season as a Blazer. At some point, however, he will need to make a jump shot. A career 29.4 percent mark from 3 is tough to overcome.<\/p>\n<p>21. Cameron Payne, Philadelphia<\/p>\n<p>Everyone\u2019s favorite sideways-standing southpaw put up decent numbers last season in his 22 games, with a 14.4 PER and positive BPM, but entering his age-32 season, he\u2019s likely signing on as a third point guard.<\/p>\n<p>22. Aaron Holiday, Houston<\/p>\n<p>Holiday is only 6-0, isn\u2019t a true point guard and turns 30 in September, but he\u2019s a career 38.4 percent shooter from 3 who is tough as nails on defense. Those attributes made him a solid end-of-rotation option in Houston the past three years and a good fit as a fifth guard on a minimum deal.<\/p>\n<p>23. Ryan Nembhard, Dallas (TO)<\/p>\n<p>Dallas\u2019 deal with Nembhard last season is another potential decline and re-sign, since it\u2019s only for $2.15 million. The angle for the Mavs would be to sign him to a longer minimum deal (either two or three years with another team option) that carries them to his restricted free agent year in 2028.<\/p>\n<p>24. Jamaree Bouyea, Phoenix (TO)<\/p>\n<p>An undersized guard who depends heavily on pull-ups, Bouyea gave Phoenix solid minutes on his two-way deal last season and earned a roster promotion. The Suns\u2019 roster math and cap situation could lead to them declining his $2.58 million team option, even if Phoenix still brings him back. For instance, signing another one-year minimum would cut $134,539 from the Suns\u2019 tax calculation without costing Bouyea a penny. Every bit counts as they try to dodge repeater penalties, which punish teams that were luxury-tax payers in three of the preceding four seasons.<\/p>\n<p>25. Jevon Carter, Orlando<\/p>\n<p>Carter managed the rare feat of being cut by a bad team to become a rotation player on a good one, entering the Magic\u2019s top nine in the playoffs after being waived by the Bulls. He\u2019s only 6-0 but isn\u2019t a creator. He fits on a roster where he doesn\u2019t need to initiate offense and can thrive as an off-ball shooter who pressures the ball on defense. Obviously, Orlando seems to be one place where his game fits.<\/p>\n<p>26. Pat Spencer, Golden State (R)<\/p>\n<p>You don\u2019t see a lot of 30-year-old restricted free agents, but here we are. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/athletic\/6341236\/2025\/05\/08\/pat-spencer-warriors-playoffs-lacrosse\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">After a meandering path to the NBA<\/a>, Spencer was good enough on his two-way deal last year to earn a promotion, as well as brief meme status for his in-game histrionics. He doesn\u2019t provide a ton of scoring juice but is a good passer with some defensive toughness, plus an elite mustache.<\/p>\n<p>Tier 6: Fringe guys, two-ways27. Gabe Vincent, Atlanta<\/p>\n<p>Coaches seem fond of playing Vincent despite the paucity of output. He had a 6.5 PER last year on 51.1 percent true shooting and a minus-4.3 BPM but was a mainstay in the Hawks\u2019 playoff rotation. I joke that his role in Atlanta was \u201cjust don\u2019t kill us\u201d because he just played off the ball and stayed out of the way, but it\u2019s kept him in the league for seven seasons. I\u2019d bet on a minimum deal as a fifth guard for Year 8.<\/p>\n<p>28. Jordan McLaughlin, San Antonio<\/p>\n<p>McLaughlin somehow hung on to a roster spot all season as the fourth point guard on an elite contender, and even saw some non-garbage playoff run when De\u2019Aaron Fox was injured in the second round.<\/p>\n<p>McLaughlin can manage a team but is seriously undersized and doesn\u2019t have amazing burst to make up for it. If he sticks around this year, it will be as a 15th man, and perhaps only in 10-day increments.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7390313 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/USATSI_28895841-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"427\"  \/><\/p>\n<p>\n      Jordan McLaughlin saw a little playing time in the playoffs for San Antonio. (Daniel Dunn \/ Imagn Images)<\/p>\n<p>29. Jalen Pickett, Denver (TO)<\/p>\n<p>Pickett\u2019s minutes last year were more of a tell on the rest of the Nuggets\u2019 bench than any emergence on his own. He\u2019s at his best when he can play beast ball against smaller guards, which doesn\u2019t often translate at the NBA level. Denver has a $2.4 million team option on him, which is just a hair less than the projected veteran\u2019s minimum, and the Nuggets\u2019 tax calculations are so tight that it could influence them to pick up the option.<\/p>\n<p>30. Jahmir Young, Miami (TONG)<\/p>\n<p>Young has been one of the best players in the G League but only played 88 NBA minutes over the past two seasons. Because he is still two-way eligible, it seems like the endgame for his deal would be for Miami to decline his team option and then sign him to another two-way.<\/p>\n<p>31. Kam Jones, Indiana (PG)<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s perhaps an ominous sign for Jones\u2019 future in Indy that the Pacers, while otherwise tanking and playing all the young guys, managed to avoid triggering Jones\u2019 guarantee for this season by keeping him just short of the necessary games-played threshold.<\/p>\n<p>That seems set up for Indiana to waive him, eat his $1.075 million partial guarantee and use the roster spot for more veteran help as the Pacers return to the ranks of the living. If that\u2019s the case, Jones becomes an attractive two-way candidate. Note that he would be ineligible to sign such a deal with Indiana.<\/p>\n<p>32. Chucky Hepburn, Toronto (R-2w)<\/p>\n<p>I\u2019m flagging Hepburn even though he only played two games for the Raptors last season. He was one of my favorite sleepers in the 2025 draft and had a solid G League season for the 905s. I\u2019m assuming Toronto brings him back on a two-way deal, with the chance to play his way to an in-season promotion.<\/p>\n<p>33. Monte Morris, last with Indiana<\/p>\n<p>Morris turns 31 this weekend and only played six NBA games with the Pacers last season, so he\u2019s definitely on the fringe now. But his two previous seasons in Phoenix and Minnesota were reasonably solid for a bench guard.<\/p>\n<p>34. Keaton Wallace, Atlanta (R)<\/p>\n<p>Wallace is 27 but is still two-way eligible, and that could be his place after playing on a roster deal with the Hawks last season. Wallace\u2019s defense at either guard spot is his calling card, with a lefty 3-point stroke that is adequate but little juice as either a creator or playmaker. He\u2019s technically a restricted free agent if the Hawks make him a qualifying offer, which seems highly unlikely.<\/p>\n<p>35. JD Davison, Houston (TONG) <\/p>\n<p>Davidson\u2019s contract seems set up for Houston to use in a trade or, otherwise, likely waive him. Because he is no longer two-way eligible, he\u2019ll have to snag a roster spot somewhere, and that may require a stint in the G League first.<\/p>\n<p>36. Terry Rozier, last with Miami<\/p>\n<p>Rozier is radioactive as he faces charges as part of a federal investigation into alleged NBA gambling and insider information trading. His trial isn\u2019t scheduled to begin until February 2027. He also wasn\u2019t good even before this situation blew up, so the 33-year-old was unlikely to have much of a market even in the best of circumstances.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Free-agent market: Top 25 | shooting guards | small forwards The NBA\u2019s free-agent point guard market may be&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":762318,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[434],"tags":[6703,1222,6996,49,48,11002,5184,2357,2695,2898,8028,8217,8223,2697,1527,8231,15718,8224,8216,14102,459,8214,2901,3555,15716,1528,6002,6683,10679,2696,82,10676,15717,8027],"class_list":["post-762317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nba","tag-atlanta-hawks","tag-boston-celtics","tag-brooklyn-nets","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-charlotte-hornets","tag-chicago-bulls","tag-cleveland-cavaliers","tag-dallas-mavericks","tag-denver-nuggets","tag-detroit-pistons","tag-golden-state-warriors","tag-houston-rockets","tag-indiana-pacers","tag-los-angeles-clippers","tag-los-angeles-lakers","tag-memphis-grizzlies","tag-miami-heat","tag-milwaukee-bucks","tag-minnesota-timberwolves","tag-nba","tag-new-orleans-pelicans","tag-new-york-knicks","tag-oklahoma-city-thunder","tag-orlando-magic","tag-philadelphia-76ers","tag-phoenix-suns","tag-portland-trail-blazers","tag-sacramento-kings","tag-san-antonio-spurs","tag-sports","tag-toronto-raptors","tag-utah-jazz","tag-washington-wizards"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=762317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/762317\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/762318"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=762317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=762317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=762317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}