![\"increase\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/up.png\")
<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/p>\n
Released:\u00a02026-07-10<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\n Select geography
\n
\n Canada
\n Newfoundland and Labrador
\n Prince Edward Island
\n Nova Scotia
\n New Brunswick
\n Quebec
\n Ontario
\n Manitoba
\n Saskatchewan
\n Alberta
\n British Columbia
<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Canada
\n<\/p>\n
21,140,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.1%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Canada
\n<\/p>\n
6.5%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.1\u00a0pts\u00a0![\"decrease\"\/](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/down.png\")
<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.L.
\n<\/p>\n
244,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.2%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.L.
\n<\/p>\n
8.2%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-1.4\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 P.E.I.
\n<\/p>\n
97,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.1%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 P.E.I.
\n<\/p>\n
7.6%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.9\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.S.
\n<\/p>\n
533,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.9%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.S.
\n<\/p>\n
6.5%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.6\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 N.B.
\n<\/p>\n
406,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.5%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 N.B.
\n<\/p>\n
7.3%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.1\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Que.
\n<\/p>\n
4,607,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.3%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Que.
\n<\/p>\n
5.4%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.2\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Ont.
\n<\/p>\n
8,273,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.2%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Ont.
\n<\/p>\n
7.0%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Man.
\n<\/p>\n
750,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.0%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Man.
\n<\/p>\n
5.4%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.1\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Sask.
\n<\/p>\n
617,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.5%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Sask.
\n<\/p>\n
6.1%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.1\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 Alta.
\n<\/p>\n
2,677,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.3%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 Alta.
\n<\/p>\n
7.0%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.4\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nEmployment level \u2014 B.C.
\n<\/p>\n
2,937,000<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
0.3%\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nUnemployment rate \u2014 B.C.
\n<\/p>\n
6.5%<\/p>\n
June\u00a02026<\/p>\n
-0.3\u00a0pts\u00a0<\/p>\n
(monthly change)<\/p>\n
\nHighlights<\/p>\n
Employment was little changed in June (+18,000; +0.1%) and the employment rate rose\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a060.8%. The unemployment rate declined\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a06.5%.<\/p>\n
Employment was up among youth (15\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0years old) (+33,000; +1.2%) and among core-aged people (25\u00a0to\u00a054\u00a0years old) (+33,000;\u00a00.2%), while it fell among those aged\u00a055\u00a0and older (-47,000; -1.1%).<\/p>\n
In June, the youth unemployment rate fell\u00a00.7\u00a0percentage points to\u00a012.7%. The unemployment rate held steady for women (5.5%) and men (5.7%) in the core working age. For people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older, the unemployment rate rose\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a05.2%.<\/p>\n
Employment increased in accommodation and food services (+15,000; +1.2%) while it decreased in manufacturing (-17,000; -0.9%), agriculture (-7,600; -3.3%), and utilities (-7,300; -4.3%).<\/p>\n
Employment rose in Nova Scotia (+4,800; +0.9%) and Saskatchewan (+2,900; +0.5%) and was little changed in the remaining provinces.<\/p>\n
Average hourly wages among employees were up\u00a03.3% (+$1.19\u00a0to $37.20) on a year-over-year basis in June, following growth of\u00a03.0% in May (not seasonally adjusted).<\/p>\n
Employment holds steady <\/p>\n
Employment was little changed in June (+18,000; +0.1%), following an increase of\u00a088,000\u00a0(+0.4%) in May. On a year-over-year basis, employment was up by\u00a099,000\u00a0(+0.5%) in June, driven by a net increase in full-time employment (+131,000; +0.8%).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Chart\u00a01\u00a0
<\/p>\n The employment rate\u2014the proportion of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0and older who are employed\u2014rose\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a060.8% in June. The employment rate in June matched the rate observed at the start of the year (60.8% in January) and was little changed on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Infographic\u00a01\u00a0
<\/p>\n The number of public sector employees declined by\u00a031,000\u00a0(-0.7%) in June. At the same time, employment edged up among private sector employees (+32,000; +0.2%), following an increase of\u00a056,000\u00a0(+0.4%) in May. Overall employment growth in the\u00a012\u00a0months to June (+99,000; +0.5%) was concentrated among private sector employees (+94,000; +0.7%). Over the same period, there was little change in the number of public sector employees and self-employed workers.<\/p>\n Unemployment rate falls for second consecutive month<\/p>\n The unemployment rate fell\u00a00.1\u00a0percentage points to\u00a06.5% in June\u2014matching the rate last observed in January. The decline in June follows a\u00a00.3\u00a0percentage point decline in May. On a year-over-year basis, the unemployment rate was down\u00a00.4\u00a0percentage points in June.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a02\u00a0
<\/p>\n The job finding rate\u2014the proportion of unemployed people who found a job between May and June\u2014was\u00a024.3%. This was higher than the proportion observed for the same period\u00a012\u00a0months earlier (21.3%). The layoff rate remained stable at\u00a00.6% in June, unchanged compared with a year earlier and compared with the average observed from\u00a02017\u00a0to\u00a02019, prior to the COVID-19\u00a0pandemic (not seasonally adjusted).<\/p>\n The number of people in the labour force was little changed and the participation rate\u2014the proportion of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0and older who were employed or looking for work\u2014held steady at\u00a065.0%.<\/p>\n Youth unemployment rate declines <\/p>\n The unemployment rate for youth aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0fell\u00a00.7\u00a0percentage points to\u00a012.7% in June, following a\u00a00.9\u00a0percentage point decline in May. The youth unemployment rate in June was comparable to the recent low of\u00a012.8% observed in November\u00a02025\u00a0and January\u00a02026. However, it remains higher than the pre-pandemic average of\u00a010.8% observed during the period from\u00a02017\u00a0to\u00a02019.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Infographic\u00a02\u00a0
<\/p>\n The decline in the youth unemployment rate in June was associated with an increase in employment (+33,000; +1.2%), driven primarily by part-time work (+25,000; +1.9%). The employment rate for youth in June (55.1%) was up both in the month (+0.7\u00a0percentage points) and compared with\u00a012\u00a0months earlier (+0.9\u00a0percentage points).<\/p>\n Unemployment rate holds steady among people of core working age and rises among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older<\/p>\n Among people in the core working age (25\u00a0to\u00a054\u00a0years old), the unemployment rate was unchanged for both women (5.5%) and men (5.7%) in June. On a year-over-year basis, the unemployment rate for women was little changed while among men it was down\u00a00.4\u00a0percentage points. Employment varied little for both core-aged women (+18,000; +0.3%) and core-aged men (+15,000; +0.2%) in June.<\/p>\n The unemployment rate among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older rose\u00a00.2\u00a0percentage points to\u00a05.2% in June, following three consecutive months of little variation. The increase in the unemployment rate in June was associated with a decline in employment (-47,000; -1.1%). Despite this, both employment and the unemployment rate among people aged\u00a055\u00a0and older were little changed on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n More favourable student summer job market compared with\u00a02025\u00a0<\/p>\n From May to August, the Labour Force Survey (LFS<\/a>) collects labour market information about students who attended school full time in March and who intend to return to school full time in the fall.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a03\u00a0
<\/p>\n The unemployment rate for returning students aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0was\u00a015.3% in June, down\u00a02.1\u00a0percentage points from June\u00a02025\u00a0(17.4%) (not seasonally adjusted). However, this remained higher than the pre-pandemic average of\u00a013.0% for the month of June during the period from\u00a02017\u00a0to\u00a02019.<\/p>\n The employment situation of returning students differed markedly by age group. Among returning students aged\u00a020\u00a0to\u00a024\u2014those more likely to be in post-secondary education\u2014the unemployment rate was\u00a08.2% in June,\u00a04.1\u00a0percentage points lower than a year earlier. For those aged\u00a017\u00a0to\u00a019\u00a0years, the unemployment rate was\u00a016.5%, down\u00a02.5\u00a0percentage points from June of last year.<\/p>\n The unemployment rate among returning students aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a016\u00a0was\u00a030.6% in June and was up\u00a02.8\u00a0percentage points year over year. Unemployed returning students in that age group during the June LFS<\/a> reference week (June\u00a014\u00a0to June\u00a020) were most often searching for a summer job while still attending high school. <\/p>\n Among all returning students who were employed in June, most worked in retail trade (25.7%), accommodation and food services (23.3%) and information, culture and recreation (13.0%).<\/p>\n Employment increases in accommodation and food services while it falls in manufacturing<\/p>\n Employment in accommodation and food services rose by\u00a015,000\u00a0(+1.2%) in June, the third consecutive monthly increase. Gains in June were concentrated in Quebec (+11,000; +4.3%) and Ontario (+9,800; +2.3%). On a year-over-year basis, employment in accommodation and food services was up by\u00a039,000\u00a0(+3.4%).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a04\u00a0
<\/p>\n On the other hand, employment in manufacturing decreased by\u00a017,000\u00a0(-0.9%) in June, offsetting the increase in May (+15,000; +0.8%). Employment in manufacturing has recorded a net decline of\u00a061,000\u00a0(-3.2%) from the recent peak in January\u00a02025, coinciding with a period of tariff-related uncertainty for the sector.<\/p>\n Employment rises in Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan<\/p>\n After holding steady for two consecutive months, employment in Nova Scotia increased by\u00a04,800\u00a0(+0.9%) in June. The unemployment rate in Nova Scotia in June (6.5%) was down\u00a00.6\u00a0percentage points from the previous month, but little changed on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Map\u00a01\u00a0
<\/p>\n Employment also rose in Saskatchewan (+2,900; +0.5%) in June, partly offsetting consecutive monthly declines over the previous two months. The unemployment rate in Saskatchewan was little changed at\u00a06.1% in June.<\/p>\n Employment in Quebec edged up in June (+14,000; +0.3%) for a second consecutive month, following a net decline of\u00a091,000\u00a0(-1.9%) from January to April. The unemployment rate in the province was\u00a05.4% in June, little changed compared with the previous month but down\u00a00.8\u00a0percentage points from the recent peak of\u00a06.2% recorded in April. In the Montr\u00e9al census metropolitan area (CMA<\/a>), the unemployment rate fell\u00a00.6\u00a0percentage points to\u00a05.9% in June and was down\u00a01.1\u00a0percentage points from a year earlier.<\/p>\n In Ontario, employment varied little in June following a cumulative increase of\u00a084,000\u00a0(+1.0%) over the previous two months. The unemployment rate in the province was\u00a07.0%, unchanged from May but down\u00a00.8\u00a0percentage points from\u00a012\u00a0months earlier. In the Toronto CMA<\/a>, the unemployment rate was little changed at\u00a06.9% in June, following a downward trend from a recent high of\u00a08.5% in February.<\/p>\n Employment was also little changed in British Columbia in June, after increasing in May (+25,000; +0.9%). The unemployment rate in the province fell\u00a00.3\u00a0percentage points to\u00a06.5% in June. In the Vancouver CMA<\/a>, the unemployment rate held steady at\u00a06.6%, but was down\u00a00.7\u00a0percentage points on a year-over-year basis.<\/p>\n In the spotlight: quarterly labour market trends in the territories<\/p>\n According to the most recent population estimates<\/a>, approximately\u00a0136,500\u00a0people lived in the three territories in the first quarter of\u00a02026, including\u00a048,500\u00a0in Yukon,\u00a045,800\u00a0in the Northwest Territories, and\u00a042,200\u00a0in Nunavut. In Nunavut, the vast majority of the population (84.3% as of the latest available census data) is Inuit. Indigenous people also comprise large shares of the populations in the Northwest Territories (49.6%) and in Yukon (22.3%).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Chart\u00a05\u00a0
<\/p>\n LFS<\/a> data for the territories are collected using a questionnaire that is nearly identical to that used in the provinces. However, a different methodology is applied<\/a> to account for the unique nature of data collection in the North. Estimates for the territories are reported separately from national and provincial totals and as three-month averages.<\/p>\n Unemployment rates have trended up from recent lows in both Yukon and the Northwest Territories. In Yukon, the unemployment rate rose\u00a03.4\u00a0percentage points to\u00a07.3% in the second quarter of\u00a02026, its highest level since the second quarter of\u00a02021. Similarly, the unemployment rate in the Northwest Territories reached\u00a08.1% in the second quarter of\u00a02026, up from a low of\u00a04.2% recorded in the fourth quarter of\u00a02025.<\/p>\n In Nunavut, the unemployment rate in the second quarter of\u00a02026\u00a0was\u00a011.6%, little changed from the previous quarter, when it was\u00a012.1%. The Nunavut unemployment rate reached a recent peak of\u00a015.4% in the fourth quarter of\u00a02025, before easing to recent levels. However, it remained elevated relative to averages recorded over all of\u00a02024\u00a0(8.3%) and the first three quarters of\u00a02025\u00a0(8.5%).<\/p>\n
On January\u00a01,\u00a02016, the world officially began implementation of the 2030\u00a0Agenda for Sustainable Development<\/a>\u2014the United Nations’ transformative plan of action that addresses urgent global challenges over the next\u00a015\u00a0years. The plan is based on\u00a017\u00a0specific sustainable development goals.<\/p>\n The Labour Force Survey is an example of how Statistics Canada supports the reporting on the Global Goals for Sustainable Development. This release will be used in helping to measure the following goals:<\/p>\n
The Labour Force Survey (LFS<\/a>) estimates for June reflect labour market conditions during the reference week of June\u00a014\u00a0to\u00a020,\u00a02026.<\/p>\n The sample size of the LFS<\/a> is approximately\u00a065,000\u00a0households, representing over\u00a0100,000\u00a0respondents each month. For more information, see the Guide to the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n This analysis focuses on differences between estimates that are statistically significant at the\u00a068% confidence level. Monthly estimates may show more sampling variability than trends observed over longer periods. For more information, see “Interpreting Monthly Changes in Employment from the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.”<\/p>\n LFS<\/a> estimates at the Canada level do not include the territories.<\/p>\n The LFS<\/a> estimates are the first in a series of labour market indicators released by Statistics Canada, which includes indicators from programs such as the Survey of Employment, Payrolls and Hours (SEPH<\/a>); Employment Insurance Statistics; and the Job Vacancy and Wage Survey. For more information on the conceptual differences between employment measures from the LFS<\/a> and those from the SEPH<\/a>, refer to section\u00a08\u00a0of the Guide to the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n The employment rate is the number of employed people as a percentage of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older. The rate for a particular group (for example, youth aged\u00a015\u00a0to\u00a024\u00a0years) is the number employed in that group as a percentage of the population for that group.<\/p>\n The unemployment rate is the number of unemployed people as a percentage of the labour force (employed and unemployed).<\/p>\n The participation rate is the number of employed and unemployed people as a percentage of the population aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older.<\/p>\n Full-time employment consists of persons who usually work\u00a030\u00a0hours or more per week at their main or only job.<\/p>\n Part-time employment consists of persons who usually work less than\u00a030\u00a0hours per week at their main or only job.<\/p>\n Total hours worked refers to the number of hours actually worked at the main job by the respondent during the reference week, including paid and unpaid hours. These hours reflect temporary decreases or increases in work hours (for example, hours lost due to illness, vacation, holidays or weather; or more hours worked due to overtime).<\/p>\n This release refers to the gender of a person<\/a>. The category “men” includes men, as well as some non-binary persons. The category “women” includes women, as well as some non-binary persons. Given that the non-binary population is small, data aggregation to a two-category gender variable is necessary to protect the confidentiality of responses provided.<\/p>\n Seasonal adjustment<\/p>\n Unless otherwise stated, estimates presented in this release are seasonally adjusted, which facilitates comparisons by removing the effects of typical seasonal variations. For more information on seasonal adjustment, see Seasonally adjusted data: Concepts and interpretation<\/a>.<\/p>\n Population totals in the Labour Force Survey<\/p>\n The LFS<\/a> target population includes all persons aged\u00a015\u00a0years and older whose usual place of residence is in Canada, with some exceptions (those living on reserves, full-time members of the regular Armed Forces and persons living in institutions). The target population includes temporary residents\u2014that is, those with a valid work or study permit, their families, and refugee claimants\u2014as well as permanent residents (landed immigrants) and the Canadian-born.<\/p>\n Information gathered from LFS<\/a> respondents is weighted to represent the survey target population using population calibration totals. These totals are updated each month, using the most recently available information on population changes derived from Canada’s official population estimates, with minor adjustments being made to reflect the LFS<\/a> target population.<\/p>\n While the LFS<\/a> population totals are generally aligned with official demographic estimates, the official estimates should be considered the official measure of population change in Canada. More information on how population totals in the LFS<\/a> are calculated can be found in the article “Interpreting population totals from the Labour Force Survey<\/a>.”<\/p>\n Next release<\/p>\n The next release of the LFS<\/a> will be on August\u00a07,\u00a02026. July\u00a02026\u00a0data will reflect labour market conditions during the week of July\u00a012\u00a0to\u00a018.<\/p>\n
More information about the concepts and use of the Labour Force Survey is available online in the Guide to the Labour Force Survey (Catalogue number71-543-G<\/a>).<\/p>\n The product “Labour Force Survey in brief: Interactive app<\/a>” (Catalogue number14200001<\/a>) is also available. This interactive visualization application provides seasonally adjusted estimates by province, gender, age group and industry.<\/p>\n The product “Labour Market Indicators, by province and census metropolitan area, seasonally adjusted<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This interactive dashboard provides customizable access to key labour market indicators.<\/p>\n The product “Labour Market Indicators, by province, territory and economic region, unadjusted for seasonality<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This dynamic web application provides access to labour market indicators for Canada, provinces, territories and economic regions.<\/p>\n The product “Labour market indicators, census metropolitan areas, census agglomerations and self-contained labour areas: Interactive dashboard<\/a>” (Catalogue number71-607-X<\/a>) is also available. This dashboard allows users to visually explore the estimates using an interactive map as well as time series charts and tables.<\/p>\n The product Labour Force Survey: Public Use Microdata File (Catalogue number71M0001X<\/a>) is also available. This public use microdata file contains non-aggregated data for a wide variety of variables collected from the Labour Force Survey. The data have been modified to ensure that no individual or business is directly or indirectly identified. This product is for users who prefer to do their own analysis by focusing on specific subgroups in the population or by cross-classifying variables that are not in our catalogued products.<\/p>\n Contact information<\/p>\n For more information, or to enquire about the concepts, methods or data quality of this release, contact us (toll-free 1-800-263-1136; 514-283-8300; infostats@statcan.gc.ca<\/a>) or Media Relations (statcan.mediahotline-ligneinfomedias.statcan@statcan.gc.ca<\/a>).<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Released:\u00a02026-07-10
Select geography
Canada
Newfoundland and Labrador
Prince Edward Island
Nova Scotia
…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":202767,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[45,49,48],"class_list":["post-792917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-business","tag-business","tag-ca","tag-canada"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=792917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792917\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/202767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=792917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=792917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=792917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/magnify-clip.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
<\/a>
\nEmployment rate increases in June
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/cg260710a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nEmployment rate by age group, June\u00a02026
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/g260710a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate falls to\u00a06.5% in June
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/cg260710a002-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate by age group, June\u00a02026
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/g260710a002-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate for returning students, month of June,\u00a01977\u00a0to\u00a02026
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/cg260710a003-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nEmployment change by industry, June\u00a02026
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/cg260710a004-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate by province and territory, June\u00a02026
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Thumbnail](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/mc260710a001-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n <\/a>
\nUnemployment rate in the territories
<\/p>\n
\n ![\"Chart](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/cg260710a005-eng.png\" "\\"Enlarge")
\n <\/a><\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nSustainable Development Goals<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/05_SDG_EN.png\"\/ "\\"Goal")
\n![](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/08_SDG_EN.png\"\/ "\\"Goal")
\n![](\"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/09_SDG_EN.png\"\/ "\\"Goal")
<\/p>\n
\n \u00a0\u00a0Note to readers
\n <\/p>\n
\n
\nProducts
<\/p>\n