Along with the conflict in the Strait of Hormuz and Iran slowing the flow of oil, Benavidez said global diesel supplies also have been affected by damage to Russian refineries from the war with Ukraine.<\/p>\n
As DTN has reported, there are growing calls in Congress and the Trump administration to impose a ban or restrictions on diesel exports. President Donald Trump told reporters Tuesday he has called for a ban, and a decision will be coming soon.<\/p>\n
Currently, the U.S. exports roughly 25% of its refined diesel fuel, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.<\/p>\n
Agricultural economists had their own take on how a diesel export ban could play out.<\/p>\n
“Economically speaking, export bans are difficult to enforce,” Benavidez said.<\/p>\n
While a ban would increase domestic supplies, there are questions over whether the infrastructure is in place to move more diesel fuel around the country at a lower price.<\/p>\n
“I don’t think that would be automatically a solution,” Swanson said. She added, “When we start playing a game like that, we start seeing retaliation on our ag products.”<\/p>\n
Scott Meyer, a former USDA chief economist, said decisions such as export bans can create other consequences that linger.<\/p>\n
“This is not the action we normally take,” said Meyer, who now is director of the Food & Agricultural Policy Research Institute at the University of Missouri. “Very few actions in the government go away as soon as the need no longer exists.”<\/p>\n
FERTILIZER IMPORTS<\/p>\n
Trump on Monday also suggested on social media the U.S. was working on a deal to buy potash from Belarus, which he said would be cheaper than buying from Canada.<\/p>\n
Josh Linville, vice president of fertilizer markets for Stone X, dismissed that idea as unrealistic. Since the war in Ukraine began, Belarus has been landlocked, leaving it dependent on moving products solely through Russia. Linville said that makes it unrealistic to expect large volumes of potash coming out of Belarus to the U.S.<\/p>\n
Currently, 90% of potash used by U.S. farmers comes from Canada while 7% comes from Russia.<\/p>\n
Linville had one suggestion. “Quit getting in fights with Canada. It’s just that simple. They are the single biggest manufacturer. They are the single biggest exporter. Ninety percent of our imports are from Canada.”<\/p>\n
At an average of $495 a ton, potash prices this week are about $9 a ton higher than a year ago. Anhydrous ammonia, a popular fall nitrogen application, has been the fertilizer with the highest jump in prices, and is averaging $945 a ton, more than 20% higher than last year’s price, according to DTN Fertilizer Trends this week.<\/p>\n
AD-HOC AID, ARC and PLC<\/p>\n
While Congress works on a farm bill, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman, R-Ark., told DTN Political Correspondent Jerry Hagstrom last week that he still expects Congress to provide more aid to farmers this year. Boozman said he had talked to Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and White House officials about the need.<\/p>\n
In July, the House passed a budget that authorized $12 billion in additional farm aid.<\/p>\n
Highlighting both the fertilizer and fuel pressures, Linville said, “If ever there has been a time to justify a payment to a farmer, this has been it.”<\/p>\n
Still, Benavidez later pushed back on the idea of more ad-hoc payments, saying officials are hearing from farmers who don’t support them.<\/p>\n
“A lot of producers are telling us they are not in favor of additional ad-hoc support and want to get back to letting those One Big Beautiful Bill and safety net programs kick in and really take over as they were intended to,” Benavidez said.<\/p>\n
Richard Fordyce, USDA’s undersecretary for Farm Production and Conservation, briefly discussed Agricultural Risk Coverage and Price Loss Coverage (ARC and PLC) payments expected to go out in October for the 2025 crop year. Fordyce said total payments are projected to run north of $15 billion.<\/p>\n
Also see, “Lawmakers Weigh Export Curbs, Aid as Diesel Tops $6.50 Per Gallon,” https:\/\/www.dtnpf.com\/\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n Also see, “Johanns: Beef Imports Send Wrong Message, Hurting Ranchers Just as Profits Return,” https:\/\/www.dtnpf.com\/\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n