![\"Text](\"https:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/a\/assets\/texttospeech.svg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Listen to this article<\/p>\n
Estimated 6 minutes<\/p>\n
The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.<\/p>\n
Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal has granted a hearing to five women who contend Cycling Canada’s decision to not enter a women’s track pursuit team in the world championships was discriminatory. <\/p>\n
Cycling Canada announced Wednesday its 10-member team for the Oct. 14-16 championships in Shanghai. <\/p>\n
Canada’s contingent includes a men’s pursuit team in the first qualification event for the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles, but not a women’s team. <\/p>\n
Fiona Majendie, Skyler Goudswaard, Jenna Nestman, Lily Plante and Justine Thomas took their case for pursuit team inclusion to Ontario’s Human Rights Tribunal on Aug. 18 after their appeal was denied by the Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada. <\/p>\n
Their request for an interim order requiring Cycling Canada to enter a women’s team into Shanghai by the Sept. 21 entry deadline was denied. The Tribunal deemed there wasn’t enough time for an expedited hearing and decision in a 34-day window. <\/p>\n
But the Tribunal granted Wednesday a hearing of up to three days in December to hear oral submissions from the five women and Cycling Canada. <\/p>\n
The Tribunal had directed the women and Cycling Canada to try mediation, but that was unsuccessful. <\/p>\n
The Sport Dispute Resolution Centre of Canada denied the women’s appeal in a decision released Aug. 10. <\/p>\n
Cycling Canada denied sexual discrimination in its response to the Human Rights Tribunal and said the women’s complaint should be dismissed “as an abuse of process” under the Human Rights Code because the SDRCC had already dealt with the issue. <\/p>\n
“The SDRCC found that the decision was not discriminatory, nor was it unfairly based on any prescribed personal characteristics,” Cycling Canada’s chief executive officer Mathieu Boucher said in a previous statement. <\/p>\n
‘Women in Canadian sport deserve better’<\/p>\n
Cycling Canada asked the Human Rights Tribunal to separate the hearing into two parts and determine whether the women’s complaint was an abuse of process before proceeding to the question of discrimination, but that was denied. <\/p>\n
“Again, to its credit, the Human Rights Tribunal continues to keep the wheels turning,” said Emir Crowne, who is representing the athletes, in a statement Wednesday. <\/p>\n
“Despite Cycling Canada’s attempt to have the issues heard separately, the case is now ‘on track’, so to speak, for a combined hearing this December. These athletes are ready to have their case heard. Women in Canadian sport deserve better than this.” <\/p>\n
Cycling Canada didn’t shut down the women’s team pursuit program but shifted to a development model. It said the decision to enter only a men’s pursuit team in Shanghai’s world championships was based on both performance analysis, which showed the men were closer to closing the gap on a top six world ranking than the women, and budget limitations. <\/p>\n
Boucher said in May the door was open to pursuing Olympic qualification for the women for 2028 if “we see amazing talent and we can demonstrate that with proper training, we can be competitive, we’re going to find the money to qualify the team for L.A. and to be competitive.” <\/p>\n
But Boucher and team coach Phil Abbott wrote in correspondence to athletes earlier that month that Los Angeles was unlikely for the women’s pursuit team and that developing a team for 2032 was the objective. <\/p>\n
A Cycling Canada spokesperson said in an email that a women’s pursuit team will compete in a Next Gen event in Apeldoorn, Netherlands, in January, in the Pan American Championships in February and in a World Cup in Milton, Ont., in April. <\/p>\n
Secretary of Sport Adam van Koeverden announced Sept. 25 up to $6.8 million in new funding for Cycling Canada in 2026-27, including an additional investment of $846,000 for this year. <\/p>\n