{"id":925865,"date":"2026-10-08T23:42:23","date_gmt":"2026-10-08T23:42:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/925865\/"},"modified":"2026-10-08T23:42:23","modified_gmt":"2026-10-08T23:42:23","slug":"human-vs-chatgpt-nfl-week-5-betting-picks-ai-wins-a-round-but-the-human-still-leads-the-season","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/925865\/","title":{"rendered":"Human vs ChatGPT NFL Week 5 betting picks: AI wins a round, but the human still leads the season"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

It finally happened. The robot beat me.<\/p>\n

After three straight weeks of me earning more<\/a> units in NFL betting than ChatGPT, GPT edged me out in Week 4 by going 3-2 against my 2-2-1. Not only that, but it beat me head-to-head in both games where we took opposite sides.<\/p>\n

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX News may be compensated. This content was created by a team that works independently from the FOX newsroom.<\/p>\n

Suddenly, the robot<\/a> apocalypse seems more realistic than ever. Please forgive me, humanity.<\/p>\n

CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Tired <\/p>\n

I feel like I let down humanity by losing to Chat GPT in NFL picks for Week 4 (important note: this photo isn’t actually me, just some random guy I found on Getty Images). (Getty Images)<\/p>\n

That being said, I’m not letting one week deter me and we\u2019re back for another round of human vs. machine. Both of us get five selections from the same odds board, with a maximum price of -120.<\/p>\n

The stakes are adjusted so every winning bet produces one unit of profit. For example, -110 requires risking 1.10 units, while +110 requires 0.91 units. A push returns the stake and counts as zero units.<\/p>\n

Odds were captured Thursday at 4 p.m. ET.<\/p>\n

Before we get to the Week 5 picks, let\u2019s review last week.<\/p>\n

Week 4 NFL Betting ResultsDan\u2019s Week 4 NFL Betting Picks (2-2-1, -0.30 units)Cincinnati Bengals -2\u00bd (-115) \u274c (-1.15 units)Tampa Bay Buccaneers +3 (+100) \u2194\ufe0f PUSH (0 units)New England Patriots +7 (-115) \u2705 (+1 unit)Miami Dolphins +10 (-107) \u2705 (+1 unit)New Orleans Saints -1\u00bd (-115) \u274c (-1.15 units)<\/p>\n

GPT tried to warn me about taking the Bengals and the Saints and I just didn’t listen. And I tried to warn myself about the Bucs but I didn’t listen to myself, either. At least the Bucs pushed; I’ve got nothing positive to say about Cincinnati or New Orleans.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s Week 4 NFL Betting Picks (3-2, +0.80 units)Arizona Cardinals -2\u00bd (-110) \u274c (-1.10 units)Jacksonville Jaguars Moneyline (+125) \u2705 (+1 unit)Miami Dolphins-Minnesota Vikings Under 38\u00bd (-107) \u2705 (+1 unit)Detroit Lions -3\u00bd (-110) \u274c (-1.10 units)Atlanta Falcons Moneyline (+115) \u2705 (+1 unit)<\/p>\n

For the second straight week, GPT predicted more games correctly than it got wrong. Congratulations, GPT. I’m proud of you (and please remember I said that when you take over the world).<\/p>\n

SEASON REPORT CARD<\/p>\n

DAN: 11-8-1, +2.52 units<\/p>\n

GPT: 8-12, -4.81 units<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s Week 5 NFL Betting CardPhiladelphia Eagles<\/a> +7\u00bd (-110)Minnesota Vikings-New Orleans Saints Over 42 (-107)Las Vegas Raiders<\/a>-New England Patriots Under 45 (-109)Denver Broncos-Los Angeles Chargers Under 42 (-108)Seattle Seahawks -3 (-110)1. Philadelphia Eagles +7\u00bd (-110)<\/p>\n

Philadelphia Eagles at Jacksonville Jaguars, Sunday at 9:30 a.m. ET (London)<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

OK, this is the official “Dan Z.’s Plug Your Nose and Hit ‘Place Bet’ Bet of the Week.” I know I promised to workshop the title and come up with something better, but I’m busy so deal with it. The Eagles have been inconsistent all year and are honestly lucky to even be 2-2. Meanwhile, the Jags have looked dominant. So why in the world would I back the Eagles? Because the second you’re sure of something in the NFL (the Eagles stink and the Jaguars are Super Bowl contenders is the common refrain this week), that’s when you know you’re about to be proven wrong.<\/p>\n

\"Jalen <\/p>\n

Jalen Hurts and the Philadelphia Eagles haven’t looked great this season, but I’m backing them anyway. (Icon Sportswire)<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Getting more than a touchdown in a neutral-site game is the strongest argument for Philadelphia. Jacksonville\u2019s defense just allowed Joe Burrow to throw for 428 yards, giving Jalen Hurts<\/a> a route to keeping this competitive. My concern is Philadelphia\u2019s depleted offense: Lane Johnson has retired, Cam Jurgens was traded, and Saquon Barkley and DeVonta Smith missed practice again Thursday with hamstring injuries. At +7\u00bd, a seven-point loss still cashes, but those personnel questions kept the Eagles outside my five.<\/p>\n

2. Minnesota Vikings-New Orleans Saints Over 42 (-107)<\/p>\n

Minnesota Vikings at New Orleans Saints, Sunday at 1 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

This is a confusing line. The Saints just allowed 45 points against the Falcons while scoring 24. New Orleans has scored at least 24 points in all four games this season. Yes, the Vikings defense is good. But it’s also benefited from a weak schedule and one game played in a monsoon.<\/p>\n

Minnesota only managed 15 points against the Dolphins last week, but that’s a bit misleading. They couldn’t score in the red zone, but that\u2019s largely because they were missing Justin Jefferson and he’s expected to play this week. Plus, T.J. Hockenson could have scored a late TD, but slid just outside the end zone so the Vikings could kneel down and end the game. I also expect Kevin O’Connell to have a game plan ready to attack this very vulnerable Saints defense.<\/p>\n

FANS ROAST ESPN’S ‘SHOUGH FLOW’ CAPTION AHEAD OF SAINTS-FALCONS ON MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL<\/a><\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

New Orleans\u2019s defense allows five yards per rush, giving Minnesota a favorable opportunity to improve its scoring. Tyler Shough has nine touchdown passes and returned to full practice Thursday, while Jefferson expects to play for Minnesota. Those developments strengthen your over case. My hesitation remains the Vikings\u2019 strong defense, limited offensive production and Christian Darrisaw\u2019s uncertain availability. The Saints can contribute points, but Minnesota could still turn this into a defensive game. I see the argument, but passed on over 42.<\/p>\n

3. Las Vegas Raiders-New England Patriots Under 45 (-109)<\/p>\n

Las Vegas Raiders at New England Patriots, Sunday at 1 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

As I have mentioned most weeks, my general NFL betting philosophy is to fade what we saw most recently. The Las Vegas offense has looked explosive through four weeks, especially since Brock Bowers returned. But this is still a team quarterbacked by Kirk Cousins and due for a letdown, especially in an early-afternoon game multiple time zones over.<\/p>\n

The Patriots offense has struggled most of the year so far but, aside from a 35-point disaster against Jacksonville, the defense has been elite. They held the Seahawks to 13 points, the Steelers to 3 points and the Bills to 26. Sure, 26 points is a lot, but the Raiders aren’t the Bills and that’s the only New England game this season that went over 45 points.<\/p>\n

\"Kirk <\/p>\n

Kirk Cousins has made the Las Vegas Raiders look pretty good through four weeks, so they’re clearly due for a letdown. (AP Photo\/David Becker)<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Las Vegas\u2019s pass rush and struggling running game give this under a credible foundation. Pressure on Drake Maye could stall New England\u2019s drives, while the Raiders may struggle to generate consistent production on the ground. My concern is Kirk Cousins\u2019s 11 touchdown passes against a Patriots secondary dealing with injuries to Christian Gonzalez and Carlton Davis. Maye\u2019s improvement against Buffalo also raises New England\u2019s scoring ceiling. I prefer Raiders +3\u00bd, which can cash in either a defensive game or a shootout.<\/p>\n

4. Denver Broncos-Los Angeles Chargers Under 42 (-108)<\/p>\n

Denver Broncos at Los Angeles Chargers, Sunday at 4:05 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Where are the points going to come from? The completely broken Chargers offense? The offense led by Bo Nix? I just don’t see it. The Chargers defense hasn’t been the problem and it has actually been a solid unit this year that has been let down by the offense. The Denver defense isn’t as good as last year, but it’s still a pretty solid group. In this divisional clash, I see it being very low-scoring where both teams look to control time of possession.<\/p>\n

DRE GREENLAW’S SEAN PAYTON BEEF EXPOSES ANOTHER SIDE OF THE NFL’S MOST OVERRATED HEAD COACH<\/a><\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Denver\u2019s offensive struggles and the Chargers\u2019 protection problems make your under understandable. Both Los Angeles starting tackles missed Wednesday\u2019s practice, and Ladd McConkey is also managing an injury. Those concerns could make sustained touchdown drives difficult. The opposing argument is Denver\u2019s secondary: Pat Surtain II and Riley Moss missed practice again Thursday, potentially improving Justin Herbert\u2019s matchup. Defensive injuries on both sides and turnover-created short fields kept this outside my five, although I lean under rather than over.<\/p>\n

5. Seattle Seahawks -3 (-110)<\/p>\n

San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks, Sunday at 4:25 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

This line is BEGGING for people to jump on San Francisco. After all, I just declared the 49ers the best team in the NFL. So why would I take the Seahawks? Because when Vegas wants you to do something, you should do the opposite. My hunch is that the public is going to hammer San Francisco as an underdog, so this is a simple zig when they zag play.<\/p>\n

\"New <\/p>\n

It’s tough to go against San Francisco, but I expect a big game from Sam Darnold and the Seattle Seahawks in Week 5. (Kevin Sabitus\/Getty Images)<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Seattle\u2019s defense and home field give your pick a solid foundation, especially with San Francisco dealing with defensive injuries. The Seahawks allow just 3.9 yards per play, so this is a serious test for Brock Purdy<\/a>. My disagreement comes from San Francisco\u2019s offensive efficiency: 6.6 yards per play and a 57.5% third-down conversion rate. Seattle\u2019s own third-down struggles also make separation less convincing. A three-point win only pushes your bet; I prefer San Francisco +3 at -102.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s Week 5 NFL Betting Card<\/p>\n

For full transparency, I used GPT-6.1 Sol, and set the thinking effort to Ultra (highest available). Then, I fed it the OddsChecker board as it appeared Thursday at 4 p.m. ET and gave it the following prompt:<\/p>\n

“Pick your five best bets for Week 5 based on the odds provided. No bet can be priced worse than -120. Review every spread, total and moneyline that falls within those parameters and determine whether it belongs among your five picks. Explain exactly why you\u2019re selecting each of the five bets. Also explain exactly why you\u2019re passing on the eligible bets you don\u2019t select. Use at least 10 different sources for each game so you have a broad understanding of everything surrounding each game. Before delivering the results, do a fact-check and ensure that everything is correct.”<\/p>\n

After nearly 30 minutes of thinking, here\u2019s what it came up with:<\/p>\n

Tampa Bay Buccaneers +9 (-105)Chicago Bears-Green Bay Packers Under 46 (-110)Las Vegas Raiders +3\u00bd (-104)San Francisco 49ers +3 (-102)Buffalo Bills-Los Angeles Rams Under 54\u00bd (-102)1. Tampa Bay Buccaneers +9 (-105)<\/p>\n

Tampa Bay Buccaneers at Dallas Cowboys, Thursday Night Football<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Dallas has allowed 28 points and 150.3 rushing yards per game, making a comfortable Cowboys victory less dependable than their offense suggests. Tampa Bay\u2019s running game and defense provide a route to keeping this competitive, even with Baker Mayfield out. Rookie Jalon Daniels\u2019s turnovers and injuries in Tampa\u2019s secondary are the biggest concerns. Still, nine points leave room for Dallas to win without covering. I prefer that cushion to trusting the Cowboys\u2019 defense to create separation.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s projected score: Cowboys 27, Buccaneers 20<\/p>\n

NFL CALLS PREDICTION MARKETS A FORM OF SPORTS GAMBLING, URGES COURTS TO LET STATES REGULATE<\/a><\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Well, the Bucs have burned me back-to-back weeks (I mean they pushed in Week 4, but ties are like kissing your sister so I’m going to count it as burning me) so there’s no way I could back them in Week 5. That being said… I actually don’t hate this number and I considered backing the Bucs again. Why? I love pain, I guess?<\/p>\n

2. Chicago Bears-Green Bay Packers Under 46 (-110)<\/p>\n

Chicago Bears at Green Bay Packers, Sunday at 1 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Green Bay converts just 26.1% of third downs, while Chicago allows opponents to convert only 23.7%. The Packers also struggle to run, making sustained scoring drives difficult against this defense. Chicago averages 39.8 rushing attempts per game, giving the Bears a way to consume time and limit possessions. Green Bay\u2019s vulnerable run defense could allow Chicago to score efficiently, but the matchup still favors the under. A combined 45 points wins this bet, while 46 produces a push.<\/p>\n

\"Matt <\/p>\n

Green Bay Packers head coach Matt LaFleur might be on the hot seat after a rough start to the 2026 NFL season. (Getty Images)<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s projected score: Bears 23, Packers 17<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

This is an interesting one. I generally like the idea of going with the under in divisional matchups, so I feel like GPT is taking a page out of my own book here. I also think this play makes a lot of sense. The Bears have a messy QB situation but the defense has been mostly good. The Packers haven’t lit up the scoreboard through four weeks, either. I think I like this bet, too.<\/p>\n

3. Las Vegas Raiders +3\u00bd (-104)<\/p>\n

Las Vegas Raiders at New England Patriots, Sunday at 1 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Kirk Cousins has 11 touchdown passes against four interceptions, while Drake Maye has four touchdown passes and seven interceptions. Maye\u2019s improvement against Buffalo matters, but Las Vegas\u2019s pass rush can challenge him and prevent New England from building a comfortable lead. The Raiders\u2019 weak running game and early East Coast start are concerns. Getting more than a field goal at -104 is the attraction: a three-point Patriots victory still pays this ticket. I prefer that protection to the Raiders\u2019 moneyline.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s projected score: Patriots 24, Raiders 23<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

This one I don’t love. It feels like the books WANT people to back the Raiders, who are 3-1 and came very close to upsetting the Chiefs last week. New England beat Buffalo so the public isn’t exactly fading the Patriots, but this still feels like a bit of a trap line to me.<\/p>\n

4. San Francisco 49ers +3 (-102)<\/p>\n

San Francisco 49ers at Seattle Seahawks, Sunday at 4:25 p.m. ET<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

San Francisco averages 6.6 yards per play and converts 57.5% of third downs, giving the 49ers multiple ways to sustain drives. Seattle\u2019s defense is the strongest opposing argument, allowing just 3.9 yards per play. However, the Seahawks\u2019 own third-down struggles make a comfortable victory less convincing. San Francisco\u2019s defensive injuries are a concern, but I expect its offense to keep this competitive. At -102, +3 protects against a narrow defeat and pushes on a three-point Seattle win.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s projected score: 49ers 24, Seahawks 23<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

Well, this is the bet where GPT and I go directly head-to-head. I won the first round in Week 3, but GPT got me twice in Week 4. I guess that means pray for me on this one.<\/p>\n

5. Buffalo Bills-Los Angeles Rams Under 54\u00bd (-102)<\/p>\n

Buffalo Bills at Los Angeles Rams, Monday Night Football<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

The Rams allow just 4.0 yards per play and a 33.3% third-down conversion rate, giving them a credible way to slow Buffalo\u2019s scoring. Los Angeles also converts only about 53% of red-zone trips into touchdowns, despite producing substantial yardage. Both offenses have enough talent to threaten this under, and improved Rams finishing is the main risk. Still, 54.5 leaves room for a 30\u201324 game to cash. At -102, the defensive matchup and scoring threshold make this my fifth selection.<\/p>\n

GPT\u2019s projected score: Rams 27, Bills 24<\/p>\n

Dan\u2019s analysis:<\/p>\n

I like this one a lot. A primetime game between two teams with explosive offenses screams “UNDER” because the public loves betting overs, particularly in island games. I kinda really like GPT’s card this week (well except the two I said I don’t like).<\/p>\n

OUTKICK IS NOW AVAILABLE ON THE FOX NEWS APP: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD<\/a><\/p>\n

OK, that’s it for Week 5! Check back next week to see whether GPT can beat me in back-to-back weeks or if the human is due to remind the robot that our brains are still superior.<\/p>\n

Dan Zaksheske is a reporter at OutKick.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"It finally happened. The robot beat me. After three straight weeks of me earning more units in NFL…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":925866,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[436],"tags":[6359,49,48,514,231762,1747,948,1739,82,103859],"class_list":["post-925865","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-nfl","tag-betting","tag-ca","tag-canada","tag-nfl","tag-outkick-sports","tag-philadelphia-eagles","tag-san-francisco-49ers","tag-seattle-seahawks","tag-sports","tag-sports-gambling"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/925865","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=925865"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/925865\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/925866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=925865"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=925865"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=925865"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}