Doctors may be able to spare patients unnecessarily aggressive breast cancer treatments by collecting and testing cancer cells in patients’ blood, research published by the University of Kansas Medical Center and the University of Michigan suggests.
“Our goal is to identify biomarkers that distinguish patients who would benefit from aggressive interventions, including surgery, radiation and anti-hormonal therapy, from those who may require only surgery or could safely forgo treatment,” said Fariba Behbod, Pharm.D., Ph.D., professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at KU Medical Center and an author on the study, which was published Oct. 29 in Science Advances.
Fariba Behbod, Pharm.D.,
Ph.D., professor of pathology
and laboratory medicine at
KU Medical Center
Of the 2.3 million women with breast cancer today, around a quarter are diagnosed at an early stage when cancer hasn’t spread, called ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS. While these patients tend to have a good prognosis, the cancer can become invasive in 10% to 53% of untreated cases.
With such high stakes, and no accurate way to predict what will happen for any single patient, clinicians recommended that all women with ductal carcinoma in situ receive treatment, which can include lumpectomy or mastectomy. Radiation therapy is recommended for patients that get a lumpectomy, and patients that test positive for hormone receptor-positive DCIS can also receive anti-hormonal therapy.
“Since early detection can save lives, physicians are now recommending mammograms at younger ages, so more young women have to make some life-altering choices,” said Sunitha Nagrath, Ph.D., professor of chemical engineering at the University of Michigan and a study author. “Currently, patients are often presented with treatment options without adequate information regarding which choice may be most effective based on their individual risk factors.”
Some patients may receive aggressive treatments although their cancer might not have spread. For others, treatment might not be aggressive enough. Cancer recurs within 10 years for around 10% of cases treated with surgery alone, research suggests.
Patients’ blood may contain the markers of a progressing disease — cancer cells that shed from tumors and circulate below the detection levels of common lab techniques. Such cells may go on to seed new tumors. To find them, Nagrath launched a “labyrinth chip” in 2017 with Max Wicha, professor of oncology and of internal medicine at the University of Michigan Medical School. Pushing a blood sample through the chip’s maze-like channels separates the larger cancer and white blood cells into a separate stream from smaller blood cells. After processing a few milliliters, researchers can obtain enough cancer cells for diagnostic testing.
In the new study, the researchers used the labyrinth chip to collect cancer cells from the blood of 34 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ at KU Medical Center. They then determined what genes were turned on in individual cancer cells circulating in the blood, as well as in the cancer cells collected from breast tissue in the same patients.
The cancer cells from the tissue biopsies could be classified into four subtypes based on their active genes, two of which were found in blood at significant levels. Those types had active genes associated with disease progression, chemotherapy resistance and platelet binding, which some research suggests could be a way for cancer cells to escape the immune system. Other genes active in the cancer cells may help them avoid detection by immune cells.
“That helps us narrow down what could have been indicative that these cells would circulate,” said Neha Nagpal, a University of Michigan doctoral student in chemical engineering and the study’s first author.
The six Black patients who participated in the study tended to have more cancer cells in their blood than white patients as well as more immune suppression, which aligns with a higher breast cancer mortality in Black patients. As race is not a biologically meaningful designation, the disproportionate cancer signatures are likely due to environmental factors.
“In the future, we plan to identify which of these cell types and biomarkers are able to get to a secondary site and stay there,” Nagpal said.
The researchers are gathering that data by transplanting cancer cells from their study participants into mice. After four months, the mice had elevated cancer cells in their blood, which the researchers collected for gene sequencing. They also plan to track the disease progression in the mice and human patients.
The research was funded by the University of Michigan Forbes Institute for Cancer Discovery, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, the Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences’ Clinical and Translational Science Awards program.