Using data from NASA’s Juno spacecraft, scientists have discovered that the solar system’s most volcanic body is even hotter than we thought. In fact, Jupiter’s moon Io could be emitting hundreds of times as much heat from its surface as was previously estimated.

The reason for this underestimate wasn’t due to a lack of data, but was a result of how Juno’s data was interpreted. The results also demonstrate that about half of the heat radiating from Io comes from just 17 of 266 the moon’s known volcanic sources. The team behind this research thinks that this clear concentration of heat, rather than a global emission, could suggest that an Io-wide lava lake may not exist beneath the surface of this moon of Jupiter as has previously been theorized.

“In recent years, several studies have proposed that the distribution of heat emitted by Io, measured in the infrared spectrum, could help us understand whether a global magma ocean existed beneath its surface,” team leader Federico Tosi of the National Institute for Astrophysics (INAF) said in a translated statement. “However, comparing these results with other Juno data and more detailed thermal models, we realized that something wasn’t right: the thermal output values ​​appeared too low compared to the physical characteristics of known lava lakes.”

You may like

Tosi continued by explaining that until now, studies of Io have focused heavily on a specific band of infrared light known as the M-band. M-band data collected by the Jovian InfraRed Auroral Mapper (JIRAM) aboard Juno have been invaluable in identifying the hottest regions of Io and thus for understanding its volcanism, but Tosi says the measurements collected in this spectral band could have influenced previous heat estimates

“The problem is that this band is sensitive only to the highest temperatures, and therefore tends to favor the most incandescent areas of volcanoes, neglecting the colder but much more extensive ones,” Tosi said. “In practice, it’s like estimating the brightness of a bonfire by observing only the flames and not the surrounding embers: you capture the brightest spots, but you don’t measure all the energy actually emitted.”

published on Wednesday (Nov. 5) in the journal Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences.