Most financial experts recommend delaying Social Security as long as possible,
often until age 70, to maximize monthly benefits. But personal finance expert
Dave Ramsey offers a different perspective, and it’s one that may resonate with
retirees seeking flexibility, freedom, or financial peace of mind.

While his advice goes against conventional thinking, Ramsey lays out a case for
why taking benefits at 62 could be the right move in certain situations. Here’s
a closer look at his reasoning and how it compares to the traditional “wait
longer” strategy.

Health and financial flexibility matter

Ramsey emphasizes a simple truth: life doesn’t always go according to plan.
Health concerns, unexpected expenses, or just a desire to enjoy retirement
earlier can make waiting feel risky.

“Taking Social Security early is usually a really good idea, especially if
you have (or expect to have) health issues in retirement,” Ramsey explains.

In his view, claiming early provides immediate financial support, whether to
cover medical bills, help family members, or simply enjoy more active retirement
years. For those facing uncertainty, that upfront income may offer far more
value than a larger benefit years down the road.

Find Out: 13 moves seniors could benefit from but often forget about.

More years of payments, even if they’re smaller

When you claim at 62, your check is permanently reduced by about 30% compared to
waiting until full retirement age. But Ramsey points out that taking it earlier
means more total payments over your retirement, especially if your life
expectancy is shorter.

He argues that the math shifts if you don’t expect to live into your late 80s or
beyond. The break-even point for delaying often falls around age 80. If you
don’t reach it, you may end up with less lifetime income by waiting.

Use the benefit while you keep working

Ramsey also encourages people to keep working after age 62, even if they begin
drawing Social Security. In this strategy, the benefit becomes a supplement, not
a replacement.

“If you can keep working during that time, you can use that extra cash to
continue growing your nest egg,” he says.

The idea is to invest the money while still earning a paycheck. That allows your
retirement accounts to keep growing and gives you a larger cushion when you’re
finally ready to stop working.

If you’re under full retirement age and earning above the annual limit (which is
$24,480 in 2026), Social Security may temporarily withhold some of your benefit.
But once you hit full retirement age, your benefit is recalculated to account
for those withheld months, so the money isn’t lost.

Invest instead of waiting

Another core point Ramsey makes: you could do more with the money now than
waiting for a bigger check later.

He believes that someone who claims early and invests the payments in growth
stock mutual funds could outpace the roughly 8% annual increase that Social
Security offers for waiting.

Ramsey is blunt: “You will retire broke if you don’t invest. No one is coming to
save you.”

He encourages people to save at least 15% of their income during their working
years. In that scenario, Social Security is the “dessert,” not the main course,
and claiming early can help you redirect funds to more productive uses.

Bottom line

Dave Ramsey’s argument for claiming Social Security at 62 challenges the
standard advice, but it could make sense for:

Retirees who are debt-free

People who want more control over their income

Workers planning to invest or keep earning

Still, this strategy isn’t right for everyone. If you expect to live well into
your 80s or beyond, delaying could mean more money over time. That’s why it’s
important to look at your health, income needs, investment plan, and comfort
with risk.

Whether you take it early or wait, the right decision is the one that matches
your retirement plan and helps you sleep well at night.

More from FinanceBuzz:

Editor’s Note: Portions of this story were drafted with assistance from generative AI tools. All final creative decisions, edits, and fact checking were done by human writers and editors.