The first week of September found me at the Catholic Medical Association’s annual conference in Kansas City. The gathering of faithful Catholic health-care professionals featured several prominent speakers who delved into substantive topics rarely entertained by our mainstream medical authorities. For me and other Catholics in medicine, engaging conversations about living one’s faith through medical practice are a balm for the soul.
Among the weightier questions pondered was this: What is the purpose, or telos, of medicine and toward what end is medical care rightly ordered? This question may not be one that the ordinary American, or even the average Catholic, has given much consideration. However, I believe it is a timely issue affecting all believers navigating the morass of confusion and chaos in which our contemporary medical establishment now finds itself.
As a Catholic and a family physician, I’ve contemplated my profession’s societal role a lot over the course of my 20-odd years of practice. During my career, the prevailing medical culture has become more openly antagonistic to the foundational Western concept of the human person grounded in a Judeo-Christian ethos. For example, while the medical establishment—already disposed toward liberal progressivism—might have been more accepting of colleagues’ viewpoints opposing abortion, recent years have seen an entrenchment of strident anti-Christian and anti-life positions by mainstream medical societies.
Orthodox. Faithful. Free.
Sign up to get Crisis articles delivered to your inbox daily
The most recent attempt to embed abortion absolutism into the fabric of family medicine is exemplified by two proposed resolutions entertained by the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Congress of Delegates that would make abortion training mandatory for family medicine residency programs. Thus, the AAFP systematically subverts the ethics of Hippocratic medicine and delegitimizes its sizeable physician-constituency opposed to killing unborn human life.
To be sure, medicine’s leftward shift mirrors larger disruptive changes in American society. As Archbishop Charles Chaput explains, “America can’t be the way it once was…changes in the country’s sexual, religious, technological, demographic, and economic fabric make that impossible.” Still, mainstream medicine’s complicit abetment of ideological regimes that contradict the shared Western cultural understanding of the human person have done tremendous damage to the countless victims of their lies while eroding the confidence of many Americans in the health establishment.
The confused state of our contemporary mainstream medical culture may provoke passing distress in the average right-thinking person who has not jumped on the ideological bandwagon of the zeitgeist. Medicine’s politicized shift might seem like a peripheral concern for those not employed in the health-care industry. However, the implications of medicine’s ideological capture are consequential for all Americans—particularly engaged Catholics—if we strive to live an integrated life in our pilgrimage toward Heaven. As with other areas of daily life, such as the education of our children, decisions about where we seek out medical care have implications for our integrity as Christians.
The aftermath of the Covid pandemic debacle has made many Americans aware of the pernicious ideological indoctrination foisted on their children at all levels of education. This has resulted in an increase in the number of homeschooling families and a rise in enrollment in private—particularly religious—schools. Many state legislatures have responded to the demand for educational alternatives by enacting school-choice programs that support families’ educational decisions. The importance of an educational culture that nurtures the domestic church brings to mind the old adage “you are what you eat.”
In the realm of medicine, mainstream institutions have taken positions that ape the general culture’s obsession with self-identity and hyper-individualism. They have twisted the culture’s historical understanding of the meaning of human dignity by qualifying it on certain terms and conditions—such as “consciousness,” “sentience,” or societal utility. A proper Catholic response promotes a medical culture girded in the profession’s commitment to the common good by honoring the authentic human dignity inherent in each person’s condition as a reflection of the Creator. Thus, medicine fulfills its primary purpose—to promote restoration of health and human flourishing through its uncompromising commitment to safeguard human life in the light of truth.
Once aware of the fallacies proclaimed by the prevailing medical culture, we must ask ourselves, “What can be done?” As Christians, we are called not to despair in our fallen world but rather to act as the hands and feet of Jesus in our own place and time. We cannot pretend we can correct the gargantuan problems in the culture singlehandedly or all at once. Like the proverb about eating an elephant, we must go about this monumental task by taking one bite at a time.
The natural “first bite” for a renovation of medicine is the reinvigoration of independent primary care practice based on Judeo-Christian ethics and Hippocratic principles. Primary care must be the beachhead for medicine’s renewal because it takes place where people live and work. Its currency is time and relationship, which foster bonds of trust between doctors and patients. Primary care is where most people turn first when they encounter a medical concern; it is the area of medicine that seeks to make sense of patients’ complaints as they describe them. The trusting bonds of the therapeutic relationship mean that doctors and patients are not interchangeable, as our 15-minute-visit conveyor-belt clinic protocols imply.
For Christian doctors and patients committed to medical care that reflects Christ’s healing mission, I propose the following hallmarks of primary care rooted in Catholic social teaching:
Christian practice must uphold authentic human dignity, from conception to natural death. It must recognize medicine’s duty to preserve and restore flourishing of the human person as designed by God. Failures to affirm life or the binary sexual nature of the human person are nonstarters.
A Christian medical practice demonstrates a proper understanding of Christian solidarity—open to serving all for the promotion of the common good. This call to solidarity is an individual Christian commitment that cannot be fulfilled by legislation, social safety-net programs, or nongovernmental organizations.
The call to Subsidiarity compels Christians to create local responses to local problems. It states that higher orders of societal organization should not interfere in lower orders’ competent exercise of agency in addressing societal concerns. Top-down, one-size-fits-all health-care policies undermine Christian subsidiarity on the regular.
Good stewardship means we are called to use God’s abundant gifts judiciously in promotion of the common good. Primary care practices should remain as independent as possible of external forces that can hold sway over the way they carry out their healing vocation. In this way, they fulfill their purpose by rejecting wastefulness and coercion.
The steps to restore our corroded medical culture—the way to “eat the elephant”—begin with the establishment of independent primary care practices rooted in Catholic social teaching. Taking a cue from changes in education, Christian communities need medical care rooted in human dignity, solidarity, subsidiarity, and stewardship to be leaven in the world. In my book Benedict Medicine: A Catholic Response to Rescuing the Profession’s Healing Mission, I outline how clinicians and patients can employ these principles so that independent Catholic physicians and the patients they serve can be models of true healing—shining a light in the darkness of our present health-care malaise.