For 75 years, one of the most influential ideas in science has been quietly depressing. The prisoner’s dilemma – a famous thought experiment from game theory – tells us that selfishness beats cooperation every time.
Put two players in a situation where they can either work together or cheat, and cheating always pays off more. Both players cheat, both lose out, and the system collapses.
The lesson, applied to everything from microbes to human societies, has been bleak: in the long run, cheaters win.
New research led by Alexandre Morozov, a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Rutgers University, suggests the theory is far too simple.
What the classic model left out
The prisoner’s dilemma, in its standard form, pits two players against each other in a single interaction. Cheat or cooperate.
The math shows cheating wins. Game over.
But real life doesn’t work like that. Real organisms – whether microbes, insects, or humans – interact repeatedly, and often with the same individuals.
The scientists asked a simple question: what happens if you let players remember who they’ve met before? The answer changed everything.
“All you have to do is remember who you interacted with and react in the same way,” Morozov said. “That’s enough for cooperation to emerge by itself in many scenarios. It’s what physicists call an emergent property.”
In other words, recognition is the missing ingredient. Once individuals can tell each other apart – and adjust their behavior based on past interactions – cooperation emerges.
Cooperation beyond small groups
Previous attempts to explain how cooperation survives in a Darwinian world required extra machinery.
Helping your genetic relatives, staying within tight-knit groups, reciprocal altruism enforced by punishment all work – but they require specific conditions that don’t apply everywhere.
Morozov’s model doesn’t need any of that. It works in simple scenarios, with no family ties and no group dynamics.
This means it could apply to organisms that don’t have complex social lives, such as bacteria exchanging chemical signals or insects recognizing each other through physical traits.
“The prisoner’s dilemma has told us for 75 years that cheaters always take over in the long run,” Morozov said. “The end point of any society, based on this, is complete breakdown.”
“But that’s not at all the case. Even in a very simple scenario, cheaters don’t always win. In fact, it’s easier for cooperation to rise.”
Cooperation is the foundation of life
There’s a deeper reason this matters. Cooperation isn’t just a nice feature of living systems – it’s the foundation of complex life itself.
Without cells cooperating, there are no tissues; without organisms cooperating, there are no ecosystems; without people cooperating, there are no societies.
And yet Darwinian evolution, as usually described, rewards selfishness. If the prisoner’s dilemma were truly the whole story, cooperation should have been strangled at birth and complex life should never have gotten off the ground.
“Evolution likes shaping things over long periods of time if it has some material to work with,” Morozov said.
“If cooperation always dies off, there’s nothing to evolve. But if there’s a chance, evolution will refine it and make it more stable.”
One of biology’s oldest puzzles
Morozov started his career studying protein folding and statistical mechanics – the mathematics of complex systems.
Over time, he realized those same tools could be applied to evolutionary dynamics, and began building models of how traits spread through populations under natural selection.
During a sabbatical at the Hebrew University, he encountered game theory and saw an immediate connection.
The mathematical machinery he’d been using to study molecules, he realized, could shed new light on one of biology’s oldest puzzles.
Cooperation persists in many systems
The team used mathematical models and computer simulations, including populations of neural networks – computer systems modelled on the brain – playing repeated games against each other.
They also produced a theoretical generalization of Fisher’s fundamental theorem of natural selection, one of the foundational principles of evolutionary biology.
The patterns the model produces – periods of stable cooperation interrupted by bouts of upheaval – will feel recognizable to anyone who has paid attention to human history.
“Cheaters don’t always win,” Morozov said. “Cooperation can persist, and it does persist in many systems scientists look at, such as multi-cellular organisms in which individual cells have to cooperate to survive.”
The next step, Morozov noted, is for other researchers to take the model and run with it – testing whether the same dynamics play out in real biological systems.
The study is published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–