{"id":285268,"date":"2026-02-07T06:44:09","date_gmt":"2026-02-07T06:44:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/285268\/"},"modified":"2026-02-07T06:44:09","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T06:44:09","slug":"something-mysteriously-powerful-slammed-into-earth-in-2023-scientists-now-have-a-theory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/285268\/","title":{"rendered":"Something Mysteriously Powerful Slammed Into Earth in 2023. Scientists Now Have a Theory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In astrophysics, extreme events may call for extreme interpretations. Sometimes, that means weighing every possible option for what something could have been\u2014or what it could explain.<\/p>\n<p>In 2023, a detector buried off the Mediterranean Sea spotted an impossibly powerful neutrino signal\u2014tens of thousands of times more energetic than anything produced by humanity\u2019s most powerful particle accelerators. But the signal raised more questions than answers, particularly with regard to its origins. Now, one team offers an ambitious solution: the explosion of primordial black holes leaking dark electrons.<\/p>\n<p>A <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.aps.org\/prl\/accepted\/10.1103\/r793-p7ct\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Physical Review Letters<\/a> paper on the proposal, set for publication\u00a0on February 10, is currently available as a preprint on <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2505.22722\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">arXiv<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAt the moment, no one knows what actually caused this neutrino\u2014our proposal is one possibility,\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.umass.edu\/physics\/about\/directory\/andrea-thamm\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Andrea Thamm<\/a>, study senior author and a particle physicist at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, told Gizmodo. \u201cWith time we may observe more highly energetic particles\u2014or not\u2014and this will inform whether our proposal is right.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> The most powerful \u201cghost particle\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Trillions of neutrinos\u2014nearly massless, neutrally charged particles\u2014pass through us every second, but we only acknowledge their existence when these so-called \u201cghost particles\u201d slam against the many giant neutrino detectors on Earth.<\/p>\n<p>In February 2023, a neutrino of undefined origins entered the detection range of the European neutrino facility KM3NeT, located off the coast of Malta in the Mediterranean. The tiny particle\u2019s energy level was unfathomably large\u2014<a href=\"https:\/\/gizmodo.com\/physicists-detect-most-energetic-ghost-particle-ever-30000-times-more-powerful-than-lhc-particles-2000562298\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">roughly 30,000 times higher<\/a> than any particle produced by CERN\u2019s Large Hadron Collider, the world\u2019s most powerful accelerator.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt was not expected that such a high-energy neutrino would be seen, and there were no known astrophysical sources,\u201d Thamm noted.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the signal was an enigma to physicists for a variety of reasons. For one, the neutrino only appeared to KM3NeT, but not to experiments like IceCube. In fact, the similarly capable detector \u201cnot only didn\u2019t register the event [but] had never clocked anything with even one hundredth of its power,\u201d the researchers explained in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.umass.edu\/news\/article\/did-we-just-see-black-hole-explode-physicists-umass-amherst-think-so-and-it-could\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">statement<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p> To see the invisible, try the impossible <\/p>\n<p>Thamm and her colleagues believe the answer could lie in the quirky characteristics of primordial black holes\u2014hypothetical black holes born from the Big Bang as opposed to a dying star. Astronomers have yet to actually spot any, although they suspect such ancient black holes would be \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/svs.gsfc.nasa.gov\/14524\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">featherweight<\/a>\u201d entities with masses similar to Earth\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs Stephen Hawking pointed out in the 1970s, black holes radiate [a phenomenon referred to as Hawking radiation] and thereby lose mass,\u201d Thamm explained to Gizmodo. The mass of a black hole is inversely proportional to its temperature, so lighter primordial black holes would heat up and radiate even more and lose mass faster than standard black holes, she added.<\/p>\n<p>But the new research isn\u2019t interested in any primordial black hole. Instead, it considers the feasibility of a \u201cquasi-extremal primordial black hole.\u201d According to the paper, this special type of black hole has its Hawking radiation suppressed by the unseen mass of \u201cdark electrons,\u201d a much heavier\u2014yet hypothetical\u2014counterpart of regular electrons.<\/p>\n<p>Eventually, however, the dark electric field around the black hole grows so powerful that even the heavier dark electrons start leaking from the black hole. When that happens, the black hole loses its (dark) charge very rapidly, leading to an enormous explosion lasting mere seconds, Thamm explained to Gizmodo.<\/p>\n<p>What this means is that the explosion only emits neutrinos within a specific range of energy levels. And if that coincided with energy levels typically captured by IceCube, it could explain why the 2023 signal only showed up in KM3NeT\u2019s radars, the paper explained.<\/p>\n<p> The truth remains in the dark <\/p>\n<p>The model entertains an interesting bunch of ideas but admittedly relies on many hypothetical assumptions. As Thamm notes, this is just one of many competing accounts for the origin of the ultra-powerful neutrino. For the foreseeable future, physicists will be comparing notes to arrive at an acceptable conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile we are very excited about the physics in our paper, this doesn\u2019t mean that it is definitely the correct explanation of the origin of the neutrino,\u201d she said. \u201cMore theoretical analysis and experimental data will be needed to tell which one is correct.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In astrophysics, extreme events may call for extreme interpretations. Sometimes, that means weighing every possible option for what&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":285269,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[13035,1747,61,60,8663,6410,82,247],"class_list":{"0":"post-285268","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-space","8":"tag-black-holes","9":"tag-dark-matter","10":"tag-ie","11":"tag-ireland","12":"tag-neutrinos","13":"tag-particle-physics","14":"tag-science","15":"tag-space"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=285268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/285268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/285269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=285268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=285268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=285268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}