Strekalov, D., Sergienko, A., Klyshko, D. & Shih, Y. Observation of two-photon \u201cghost\u201d interference and diffraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3600 (1995).<\/p>\n
Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pittman, T. B., Shih, Y., Strekalov, D. & Sergienko, A. V. Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429 (1995). This work is one of the earliest demonstrations that spatial correlations in entangled photon pairs can be used to form an image, establishing the experimental foundation for what later became known as quantum ghost imaging.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pittman, T. et al. Two-photon geometric optics. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2804 (1996).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J., Boyd, R. W. & Howell, J. C. Quantum and classical coincidence imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 033601 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Correlated imaging, quantum and classical. Phys. Rev. A 70, 013802 (2004). This paper establishes a theoretical framework for correlated light imaging, clarifying the connections and distinctions between quantum and classical schemes.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Jedrkiewicz, O. et al. Detection of sub-shot-noise spatial correlation in high-gain parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 243601 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Morris, P. A., Aspden, R. S., Bell, J. E., Boyd, R. W. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with a small number of photons. Nat. Commun. 6, 5913 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gatti, A., Brambilla, E., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Ghost imaging with thermal light: comparing entanglement and classical correlation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 093602 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ferri, F. et al. High-resolution ghost image and ghost diffraction experiments with thermal light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183602 (2005).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Valencia, A., Scarcelli, G., D\u2019Angelo, M. & Shih, Y. Two-photon imaging with thermal light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 063601 (2005).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aspden, R. S., Tasca, D. S., Boyd, R. W. & Padgett, M. J. EPR-based ghost imaging using a single-photon-sensitive camera. New J. Phys. 15, 073032 (2013). This work demonstrates Einstein\u2013Podolsky\u2013Rosen-based ghost imaging, showing that imaging with position correlations yields an upright image, whereas momentum correlations produce an inverted image, in direct analogy with classical lens systems.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Meyers, R., Deacon, K. S. & Shih, Y. Ghost-imaging experiment by measuring reflected photons. Phys. Rev. A 77, 041801 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Malik, M., Maga\u00f1a-Loaiza, O. S. & Boyd, R. W. Quantum-secured imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 241103 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aspden, R. S. et al. Photon-sparse microscopy: visible light imaging using infrared illumination. Optica 2, 1049\u20131052 (2015).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lloyd, S. Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination. Science 321, 1463\u20131465 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brida, G., Genovese, M. & Ruo Berchera, I. Experimental realization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics 4, 227\u2013230 (2010). This work presents an experimental realization of sub-shot-noise imaging, providing a clear demonstration of the potential for quantum advantage in signal-to-noise ratio.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Defienne, H., Reichert, M., Fleischer, J. W. & Faccio, D. Quantum image distillation. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0307 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging through noise with quantum illumination. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2652 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Johnson, S., Rarity, J. & Padgett, M. Transmission of quantum-secured images. Sci. Rep. 14, 11579 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 D\u2019Angelo, M., Chekhova, M. V. & Shih, Y. Two-photon diffraction and quantum lithography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 013602 (2001).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Tsang, M. Quantum imaging beyond the diffraction limit by optical centroid measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253601 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Toninelli, E. et al. Resolution-enhanced quantum imaging by centroid estimation of biphotons. Optica 6, 347\u2013353 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Cameron, P. et al. Adaptive optical imaging with entangled photons. Science 383, 1142\u20131148 (2024). This study demonstrates adaptive optical imaging using entangled photons, showing how spatial correlations between photon pairs can be utilized to correct aberrations.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lemos, G. B. et al. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature 512, 409\u2013412 (2014). This study introduces quantum imaging with undetected photons, showing that objects can be imaged at one wavelength while only detecting photons at a different wavelength, using interference between nonlinear crystals.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chekhova, M. & Ou, Z. Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics. Adv. Opt. Photonics 8, 104\u2013155 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Caves, C. M. Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zou, X. Y., Wang, L. J. & Mandel, L. Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 318\u2013321 (1991).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, L. J., Zou, X. Y. & Mandel, L. Induced coherence without induced emission. Phys. Rev. A 44, 4614\u20134622 (1991).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kviatkovsky, I., Chrzanowski, H. M., Avery, E. G., Bartolomaeus, H. & Ramelow, S. Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd0264 (2020). This study extends undetected photon imaging to the mid-IR, demonstrating its applicability to microscopy with label-free molecular contrast, while relying solely on visible-wavelength detection.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brambilla, E., Gatti, A., Bache, M. & Lugiato, L. A. Simultaneous near-field and far-field spatial quantum correlations in the high-gain regime of parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 69, 023802 (2004).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moreau, P.-A. et al. Resolution limits of quantum ghost imaging. Opt. Express 26, 7528\u20137536 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics 4th edn (Academic, 2020).<\/p>\n Schneeloch, J. & Howell, J. C. Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone. J. Opt. 18, 053501 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Kviatkovsky, I., Chrzanowski, H. M. & Ramelow, S. Mid-infrared microscopy via position correlations of undetected photons. Opt. Express 30, 5916\u20135925 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Howell, J. C., Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J. & Boyd, R. W. Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox using momentum- and position-entangled photons from spontaneous parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 210403 (2004). This study provides one of the clearest experimental demonstrations of the Einstein\u2013Podolsky\u2013Rosen paradox using position-entangled and momentum-entangled photon pairs generated by SPDC.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Jost, B. M., Sergienko, A. V., Abouraddy, A. F., Saleh, B. E. & Teich, M. C. Spatial correlations of spontaneously down-converted photon pairs detected with a single-photon-sensitive CCD camera. Opt. Express 3, 81\u201388 (1998).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Fickler, R., Krenn, M., Lapkiewicz, R., Ramelow, S. & Zeilinger, A. Real-time imaging of quantum entanglement. Sci. Rep. 3, 1914 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Aspden, R. S., Padgett, M. J. & Spalding, G. C. Video recording true single-photon double-slit interference. Am. J. Phys. 84, 671\u2013677 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhang, L., Neves, L., Lundeen, J. S. & Walmsley, I. A. A characterization of the single-photon sensitivity of an electron multiplying charge-coupled device. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 114011 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moreau, P.-A., Devaux, F. & Lantz, E. Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in twin images. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160401 (2014).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Edgar, M. P. et al. Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera. Nat. Commun. 3, 984 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gregory, T., Moreau, P.-A., Mekhail, S., Wolley, O. & Padgett, M. Noise rejection through an improved quantum illumination protocol. Sci. Rep. 11, 21841 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lantz, E., Blanchet, J.-L., Furfaro, L. & Devaux, F. Multi-imaging and Bayesian estimation for photon counting with EMCCDs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 386, 2262\u20132270 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Roberts, K., Wolley, O., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. A comparison between the measurement of quantum spatial correlations using qCMOS photon-resolving and electron multiplying CCD camera technologies. Sci. Rep. 14, 14687 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wolley, O., Gregory, T., Beer, S., Higuchi, T. & Padgett, M. Quantum imaging with a photon counting camera. Sci. Rep. 12, 8286 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Portaluppi, D., Conca, E. & Villa, F. 32 \u00d7 32 CMOS SPAD imager for gated imaging, photon timing, and photon coincidence. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 24, 1\u20136 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ulku, A. C. et al. A 512 \u00d7 512 SPAD image sensor with integrated gating for widefield FLIM. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 25, 1\u201312 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Henderson, R. K. et al. A 192 \u00d7 128 time correlated SPAD image sensor in 40-nm CMOS technology. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 54, 1907\u20131916 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ndagano, B. et al. Imaging and certifying high-dimensional entanglement with a single-photon avalanche diode camera. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 94 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hadfield, R. H. et al. Single-photon detection for long-range imaging and sensing. Optica 10, 1124\u20131141 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Morozov, D. V., Casaburi, A. & Hadfield, R. H. Superconducting photon detectors. Contemp. Phys. 62, 69\u201391 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Couteau, C. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Contemp. Phys. 59, 291\u2013304 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Boeuf, N. et al. Calculating characteristics of noncollinear phase matching in uniaxial and biaxial crystals. Opt. Eng. 39, 1016\u20131024 (2000).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Morgan, R. A. & Hopf, F. A. Measurement of the temperature tuning coefficient of lithium niobate using nonlinear optical interferometry. Appl. Opt. 25, 3011_1\u20133013 (1986).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Shen, Y. R. The Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley, 1984).<\/p>\n Klyshko, D. A simple method of preparing pure states of an optical field, of implementing the Einstein\u2013Podolsky\u2013Rosen experiment, and of demonstrating the complementarity principle. Sov. Phys. Usp. 31, 74 (1988).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Shapiro, J. H. & Boyd, R. W. The physics of ghost imaging. Quantum Inf. Process. 11, 949\u2013993 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 D\u2019Angelo, M., Valencia, A., Rubin, M. H. & Shih, Y. Resolution of quantum and classical ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. A 72, 013810 (2005).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Goodman, J. W. Introduction to Fourier Optics 3rd edn (Roberts and Company, 2005).<\/p>\n Tasca, D. et al. The influence of non-imaging detector design on heralded ghost-imaging and ghost-diffraction examined using a triggered ICCD camera. Opt. Express 21, 30460\u201330473 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sheppard, C. J., Mehta, S. B. & Heintzmann, R. Superresolution by image scanning microscopy using pixel reassignment. Opt. Lett. 38, 2889\u20132892 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhang, Y. et al. Interaction-free ghost-imaging of structured objects. Opt. Express 27, 2212\u20132224 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moodley, C. & Forbes, A. All-digital quantum ghost imaging: tutorial. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 40, 3073\u20133095 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nape, I., Sephton, B., Ornelas, P., Moodley, C. & Forbes, A. Quantum structured light in high dimensions. APL Photonics 8, 051101 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Boudoux, C. Fundamentals of Biomedical Optics (Blurb, 2023).<\/p>\n Rubin, M. H. & Shih, Y. Resolution of ghost imaging for nondegenerate spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 78, 033836 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moreau, P.-A. et al. Demonstrating an absolute quantum advantage in direct absorption measurement. Sci. Rep. 7, 6256 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hong, C.-K., Ou, Z.-Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ndagano, B. et al. Quantum microscopy based on Hong\u2013Ou\u2013Mandel interference. Nat. Photonics 16, 384\u2013389 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pepe, F. V., Di Lena, F., Garuccio, A., Scarcelli, G. & D\u2019Angelo, M. Correlation plenoptic imaging with entangled photons. Technologies 4, 17 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhang, Y., England, D., Orth, A., Karimi, E. & Sussman, B. Quantum light-field microscopy for volumetric imaging with extreme depth of field. Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 024029 (2024). This work demonstrates an emerging use of photon-pair correlations for light-field microscopy, taking advantage of advances in time-resolved detection to access both position and momentum information, and achieve volumetric imaging.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Yan, F. & Venegas-Andraca, S. E. Lessons from twenty years of quantum image processing. ACM Trans. Quantum Comput. 6, 1\u201329 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Marks, R. J. II Handbook of Fourier Analysis & Its Applications (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).<\/p>\n Zerom, P., Chan, K. W. C., Howell, J. C. & Boyd, R. W. Entangled-photon compressive ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. A 84, 061804 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Duarte, M. F. et al. Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25, 83\u201391 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rodr\u00edguez-Fajardo, V., Pinnell, J. & Forbes, A. Towards time-efficient ghost imaging. J. Mod. Opt. 67, 1176\u20131183 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nothlawala, F., Moodley, C., Gounden, N., Nape, I. & Forbes, A. Quantum ghost imaging by sparse spatial mode reconstruction. Adv. Quantum Technol. 8, 2400577 (2025). This work demonstrates that imaging time can be reduced by orders of magnitude by shifting from the pixel basis to a spatial mode basis, matching object symmetry with basis symmetry.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ferri, F., Magatti, D., Lugiato, L. & Gatti, A. Differential ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 253603 (2010).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Losero, E. et al. Quantum differential ghost microscopy. Phys. Rev. A 100, 063818 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Luo, K.-H., Huang, B.-Q., Zheng, W.-M. & Wu, L.-A. Nonlocal imaging by conditional averaging of random reference measurements. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 074216 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Liu, H.-C., Yang, H., Xiong, J. & Zhang, S. Positive and negative ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 034019 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sun, B., Welsh, S. S., Edgar, M. P., Shapiro, J. H. & Padgett, M. J. Normalized ghost imaging. Opt. Express 20, 16892\u201316901 (2012).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moodley, C. & Forbes, A. Advances in quantum imaging with machine intelligence. Laser Photonics Rev. 18, 2300939 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Hinton, G. E. & Salakhutdinov, R. R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313, 504\u2013507 (2006).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lyu, M. et al. Deep-learning-based ghost imaging. Sci. Rep. 7, 17865 (2017).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moodley, C., Sephton, B., Rodr\u00edguez-Fajardo, V. & Forbes, A. Deep learning early stopping for non-degenerate ghost imaging. Sci. Rep. 11, 8561 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moodley, C. & Forbes, A. Super-resolved quantum ghost imaging. Sci. Rep. 12, 10346 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Li, L., Kumar, S., Sua, Y. M. & Huang, Y.-P. Noise-resilient single-pixel compressive sensing with single photon counting. Commun. Phys. 7, 110 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Wang, Y., Xia, H., Zhou, M., Xie, L. & He, W. A deep learning-based target recognition method for entangled optical quantum imaging system. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 72, 1\u201312 (2023).<\/p>\n Defienne, H. et al. Advances in quantum imaging. Nat. Photonics 18, 1024\u20131036 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Gilaberte Basset, M. et al. Perspectives for applications of quantum imaging. Laser Photonics Rev. 13, 1900097 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moreau, P.-A., Toninelli, E., Gregory, T. & Padgett, M. J. Imaging with quantum states of light. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 367\u2013380 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Ryan, D. P. et al. Infrared quantum ghost imaging of living and undisturbed plants. Optica 11, 1261\u20131267 (2024). This study demonstrates IR quantum ghost imaging of living plants under extremely low illumination, highlighting the potential of quantum imaging for studying light-sensitive biological samples.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Zhang, Y. et al. Quantum imaging of biological organisms through spatial and polarization entanglement. Sci. Adv. 10, eadk1495 (2024). This work shows quantum imaging of biological organisms using spatial and polarization entanglement, illustrating how multiple degrees of freedom can enhance contrast.<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Brida, G. et al. Measurement of sub-shot-noise spatial correlations without background subtraction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 213602 (2009).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Blanchet, J.-L., Devaux, F., Furfaro, L. & Lantz, E. Measurement of sub-shot-noise correlations of spatial fluctuations in the photon-counting regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 233604 (2008).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Nape, I. et al. Measuring dimensionality and purity of high-dimensional entangled states. Nat. Commun. 12, 5159 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Mukai, Y., Okamoto, R. & Takeuchi, S. Quantum Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in the fingerprint region. Opt. Express 30, 22624\u201322636 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Paterova, A. V., Toa, Z. S., Yang, H. & Krivitsky, L. A. Broadband quantum spectroscopy at the fingerprint mid-infrared region. ACS Photonics 9, 2151\u20132159 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schunemann, P. G., Zawilski, K. T., Pomeranz, L. A., Creeden, D. J. & Budni, P. A. Advances in nonlinear optical crystals for mid-infrared coherent sources. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, D36\u2013D43 (2016).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Schunemann, P. G. New nonlinear crystals for ultrafast frequency conversion in the mid-infrared. In Proc. Ultrafast Optics 2023 \u2014 UFOXIII paper Th3.2 (Optica Publishing Group, 2023).<\/p>\n Xiao, Y. & Chen, W. Ghost diffraction in complex scattering media: principles and applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 12, 021329 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Bina, M. et al. Backscattering differential ghost imaging in turbid media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 083901 (2013).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Dixon, P. B. et al. Quantum ghost imaging through turbulence. Phys. Rev. A 83, 051803 (2011).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Defienne, H. et al. Pixel super-resolution with spatially entangled photons. Nat. Commun. 13, 3566 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Pearce, E. et al. Practical quantum imaging with undetected photons. Opt. Contin. 2, 2386\u20132397 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Rizvi, S., Cao, J., Zhang, K. & Hao, Q. Deepghost: real-time computational ghost imaging via deep learning. Sci. Rep. 10, 11400 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Li, F., Sun, Y. & Zhang, X. Deep-learning-based quantum imaging using NOON states. J. Phys. Commun. 6, 035005 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Moodley, C., Ruget, A., Leach, J. & Forbes, A. Time-efficient object recognition in quantum ghost imaging. Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2200109 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Strekalov, D., Sergienko, A., Klyshko, D. & Shih, Y. Observation of two-photon \u201cghost\u201d interference and diffraction. Phys. Rev.…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":296279,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[1437,61,64489,60,248,24013,82],"class_list":{"0":"post-296278","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-physics","8":"tag-general","9":"tag-ie","10":"tag-imaging-and-sensing","11":"tag-ireland","12":"tag-physics","13":"tag-quantum-optics","14":"tag-science"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=296278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/296278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/296279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=296278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=296278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=296278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}