148 <\/p>\n
For those unfamiliar, Reet Padda is the sister of actor Aneet Padda, who rose to prominence after her role in Saiyaara (2025). Unlike her sister, Reet is a marketing professional based in Paris and is actively involved in human and civil rights work, according to her LinkedIn profile.<\/p>\n
Her remarks have clearly struck a chord online. While some applauded her for speaking candidly, others criticised her views as being one-sided. What\u2019s evident, however, is that conversations around cinema, politics, and celebrity influence are far from fading. Once again, a film has transcended entertainment to become part of a broader cultural and political debate.<\/p>\n
A fresh social media storm has now emerged\u2014not from a film itself, but from a comment thread. Reet Padda has sparked intense online debate after labelling Dhurandhar 2 a \u201cpropaganda movie\u201d and questioning Priyanka Chopra Jonas\u2019 silence during a viral Oscars moment on March 27, 2026. What began as a simple reply quickly evolved into a detailed exchange touching on films, politics, and the responsibility of public figures, leaving the internet sharply divided.<\/p>\n
You Might Be Interested In<\/p>\n
\u2018Propaganda\u2019 remark fuels debate<\/p>\n
Reet, who has previously voiced opinions on films like The Kashmir Files and The Kerala Story, did not hold back this time either. Responding to a user, she wrote, \u201cOh, look at me, actually responding to a comment on social media\u2014shocking, I know,\u201d before elaborating on her views. Speaking about Dhurandhar 2, she described it as promoting a government-friendly narrative, even referencing political speeches to justify events like demonetisation. \u201cCall it propaganda? Yep. Deny it? Not a chance,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n
Her blunt stance quickly drew attention, with reactions split between support for her honesty and criticism of her strong wording.<\/p>\n
On \u2018ground reality\u2019 and film narratives<\/p>\n
In another response, Reet addressed a user who claimed a better understanding of \u201cground reality.\u201d She clarified that she was not denying real issues but argued that such films tend to present only one perspective. \u201cI never said the problems didn\u2019t exist, but these films clearly push a certain narrative\u2014and deviation is apparently optional,\u201d she wrote. Her comment sparked a wider question: do films shape public opinion or merely reflect reality\u2014and where should the line be drawn?<\/p>\n
Priyanka Chopra Jonas\u2019 Oscars moment questioned<\/p>\n
Reet also brought Priyanka Chopra Jonas into the discussion, criticising her silence during a viral Oscars moment. \u201cShe\u2019s got a chance to oppose an illegal war next to someone taking a stand, and she can\u2019t even clap,\u201d she wrote. She further added that if her own sister were ever in such a position, she would expect her to speak up. Her remarks have added another layer to the debate over whether celebrities should always voice opinions on global issues.<\/p>\n
In her final comment, Reet clarified her stance on religion and politics, stating that while she does not discriminate against individuals, she strongly opposes the use of religion in political discourse. \u201cI do not discriminate against anyone, ever. What I do discriminate against are political figures who drag religion into politics,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n
Following the backlash, her social media account has reportedly been set to private.<\/p>\n