{"id":494288,"date":"2026-06-11T13:01:09","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T13:01:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/494288\/"},"modified":"2026-06-11T13:01:09","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T13:01:09","slug":"ruling-that-cast-doubt-on-hundreds-of-drink-driving-cases-overturned-by-supreme-court-the-irish-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/494288\/","title":{"rendered":"Ruling that cast doubt on hundreds of drink-driving cases overturned by Supreme Court \u2013 The Irish Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">A ruling that cast doubt on hundreds of drink-driving prosecutions has been overturned by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/supreme-court\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/supreme-court\/\">Supreme Court<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The five-judge court on Thursday unanimously granted an appeal by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/director-of-public-prosecutions\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/director-of-public-prosecutions\/\">Director of Public Prosecutions<\/a> against the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/high-court\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" title=\"https:\/\/www.irishtimes.com\/tags\/high-court\/\">High Court<\/a> ruling affecting what lawyers for the director described as a \u201cvery large\u201d number of drink-driving prosecutions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Prosecutions across the country were put on hold after the July 2025 decision by Judge Sara Phelan quashing a man\u2019s drink-driving conviction over issues concerning the chain of custody of his blood sample.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The appeal concerned legal requirements relating to the custody of blood and urine specimens before their analysis by the Medical Bureau of Road Safety (MBRS).<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The courts annually deal with up to 7,000 drink-driving prosecutions based on blood or urine specimens.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The High Court ruled that because of a break in the chain of custody of a man\u2019s blood specimen taken after his arrest for suspected drink driving, he was entitled to have his conviction and two-year driving ban overturned.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The specimen was taken on August 21st, 2022, by a doctor who halved it into two glass bottles before sealing the bottles in separate containers labelled with the man\u2019s name and the date.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The doctor sealed both containers before handing them to the arresting garda and completed a certificate, required under section 15 of the Road Traffic Act 2010, relating to the taking and sealing of the specimen.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The man retained one container and the garda put the second in a box with the section 15 form before sealing the box and posting it for analysis. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The MBRS certified that the specimen contained a concentration of 126mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood, more than twice the legal limit of 50mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">During the District Court trial, the garda witness did not provide direct evidence about the whereabouts of the container, or who had access to it, before it was posted.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">In refusing a defence application to dismiss over that failure, the District Court relied on statutory presumptions in the Road Traffic Acts that the completed certificates regarding the sample were proof of the facts stated in them unless the contrary was shown.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">On appeal, the High Court ruled the statutory presumptions did not extend to covering the chain of custody after the container was sealed. The prosecution was required to provide evidence on storage of the specimen, from sealing to posting, to exclude the possibility of interference with it, Phelan said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">In her appeal, the DPP argued she was entitled to rely on the statutory presumptions that the certificates relating to the sample were sufficient evidence of its integrity unless an accused could show otherwise.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The \u201clogical follow-on\u201d from the \u201cproblematic\u201d High Court judgment was that several witnesses might have to be called to prove evidence of the chain of custody, the director\u2019s senior counsel, Eilis Brennan, with barrister David Staunton, argued.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Giving the Supreme Court judgment today, Judge Iseult O\u2019Malley said the results of the analysis of a specimen, rather than the specimen itself, was evidence. The Act makes the analysis certificate evidence of those results.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">There was no general rule of law requiring proof of a chain of custody for real evidence, she said. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">A failure to prove a chain of custody relating to the specimen did not render the certificate of analysis inadmissible, she said. The issue was rather the weight to be attached to the certificate if evidence was adduced questioning its reliability.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Any interference with the seal of the bottles would have been immediately apparent to the analyst opening it and would have meant it could not have been certified, she said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">Under the Act, the forms completed constitute sufficient evidence unless the contrary was shown, she held. The prosecution \u201cis not required to exclude every hypothetical possibility\u201d. <\/p>\n<p class=\"c-paragraph paywall \">The High Court erred in finding that \u201cany\u201d failure to comply strictly with a penal statute results in the failure of the prosecution, she ruled. On those and other grounds, the appeal was dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"A ruling that cast doubt on hundreds of drink-driving prosecutions has been overturned by the Supreme Court. The&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":494289,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[16186,73,61,60,43,8779],"class_list":["post-494288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ireland","tag-director-of-public-prosecutions","tag-high-court","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-news","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494288","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=494288"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/494288\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/494289"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=494288"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=494288"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=494288"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}