{"id":572666,"date":"2026-07-28T20:40:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-28T20:40:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/572666\/"},"modified":"2026-07-28T20:40:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-28T20:40:10","slug":"microsoft-and-wiz-mind-meld-agents-catch-more-than-90-of-bugs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/572666\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft and Wiz mind-meld agents catch more than 90% of bugs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"kicker \" style=\"\">Security<\/p>\n<p class=\"subtitle \" style=\"\">Secret to their success:\u00a0Using the right model for the right security job<\/p>\n<p>Two agentic bug-hunting systems from Microsoft and Google-owned Wiz show that when it comes to finding and remediating software vulnerabilities, at least two models\u2019 minds work better than one &#8211; and Wiz tells us it\u2019s adding a third.<\/p>\n<p>Wiz on Monday said Project Atlas, its bug-hunting AI agent, bested Anthropic\u2019s Mythos Preview and OpenAI\u2019s GPT-5.5 Cyber with its vulnerability-analysis skills, achieving a 90.9 percent success rate on CyberGym, and uncovering more than 200 zero-day security holes in widely used open-source code.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/security\/2026\/07\/27\/microsofts-solution-to-ai-security-more-ai-and-more-acronyms\/5279140\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Microsoft boasted<\/a> its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/patches\/2026\/05\/14\/welcome-to-the-vulnpocalypse-as-vendors-use-ai-to-find-bugs-and-patches-multiply-like-rabbits\/5240027\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">MDASH bug-hunting harness<\/a> scored a 95.95 percent success rate on CyberGym, also beating Mythos, Gemini and GPT on the same benchmark for evaluating how well AI systems find real vulnerabilities in the code.<\/p>\n<p>For comparison, OpenAI\u2019s GPT-5.5 Cyber scored 85.6 percent <a href=\"https:\/\/microsoft.ai\/news\/introducing-mai-cyber-1-flash-inside-mdash\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">on CyberGym<\/a>, and its GPT-5.6 Sol scored 83.6 percent. Anthropic\u2019s Mythos 5 reproduced the target vulnerability on 83.8 percent of CyberGym challenges. And Google\u2019s Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in CodeMender achieved an 83.2 percent success rate.<\/p>\n<p>The secret to both Atlas and MDASH\u2019s success, according to the vendors, is that they use the right model for the right security job.<\/p>\n<p>Atlas uses Claude Opus 4.6 with GPT-5.5, Nir Ohfeld, head of vulnerability research at Wiz, told The Register. \u201cWe&#8217;re now working to incorporate Gemini, which is well timed given Wiz&#8217;s recent work with DeepMind on Gemini Flash Cyber,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft\u2019s MDASH &#8211; a combination of red-team agents that find and simulate real, exploitable vulnerabilities and attack paths, and green-team agents that remediate the issues &#8211; combines MAI-Cyber-1-Flash, based on Microsoft AI (MAI)\u2019s internally developed <a href=\"https:\/\/microsoft.ai\/pdf\/mai-thinking-1.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">MAI-Thinking-1<\/a> reasoning model, and GPT-5.4.<\/p>\n<p>MAI-Cyber-1-Flash is designed to handle up to 90 percent of all tasks, with MDASH detecting, patching, and validating vulnerabilities before handing the remaining 10 percent of more complex tasks to the larger GPT-5.4.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe were able to take an off-the-shelf model, within our harness, a multi-agent and multi-model implementation, and we achieved the best results you could have,\u201d Hayete Gallot, executive vice president of Microsoft Security, said on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>Atlas isn\u2019t commercially available yet &#8211; it\u2019s used internally, and stems from Wiz\u2019s efforts to understand how frontier models can be used for advanced code scanning. But it\u2019s proof that \u201cno single model is best at everything, and none stays state of the art for long,\u201d Ohfeld and fellow Wiz kid Yuval Avrahami <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wiz.io\/blog\/atlas-ai-vulnerability-researcher#how-atlas-works-14\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">wrote<\/a> in a Monday blog.<\/p>\n<p>The cloud security biz evaluates every new model using its internal benchmarking tool, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wiz.io\/cyber-model-arena\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Cyber Model Arena<\/a>, which scores each one on its success at completing various security-investigation tasks: threat modeling, hunting, validation, and proof generation.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe results are rarely uniform: the model that reasons best through a complex exploit chain is often not the one that triages most precisely,\u201d the duo wrote. \u201cAtlas routes each stage to whichever model wins on that task.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to doing a better job of finding and fixing vulnerabilities, a multi-model system also saves customers\u2019 money, according to Microsoft and Wiz.<\/p>\n<p>Combining its much smaller, in-house model with GPT-5.4 halves customers\u2019 costs, according to Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft AI.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAs the models hand off between each other, they are not just able to deliver better performance than all of the other models combined, they do so at 50 percent of the cost,\u201d he said on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>And while \u201ceach new generation of models expands what is possible,\u201d they are also expensive, Ohfeld told us. \u201cWe have also learned that pointing a frontier model at a codebase once is not a sustainable security strategy: deep scans are expensive, their results become stale as code changes by the minute, and a point-in-time analysis cannot provide the continuous coverage organizations need across every repository,\u201d he said.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the real question for code security shouldn\u2019t be which model a scanner uses, Ohfeld added. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s this: \u201cHow does your system take advantage of the best model available today, continuously and economically, and what continues to work when a better one arrives,\u201d he said. \u201cThat is the bet behind Atlas: frontier-model depth where expert reasoning is required, an architecture that improves as models evolve, and rigorous validation so every finding arrives with evidence, not just a plausible answer.\u201d\u00a0\u00ae<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Security Secret to their success:\u00a0Using the right model for the right security job Two agentic bug-hunting systems from&hellip;\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":572667,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[61,60,80],"class_list":["post-572666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-technology","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=572666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572666\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/572667"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=572666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=572666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=572666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}