{"id":588673,"date":"2026-08-10T07:06:39","date_gmt":"2026-08-10T07:06:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/588673\/"},"modified":"2026-08-10T07:06:39","modified_gmt":"2026-08-10T07:06:39","slug":"the-role-of-conservation-bioacoustics-in-achieving-global-biodiversity-goals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/588673\/","title":{"rendered":"The role of conservation bioacoustics in achieving global biodiversity goals"},"content":{"rendered":"

Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Magrath, M. J. L. A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring and conservation. BioScience 71, 1038\u20131062 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grinfeder, E., Lorenzi, C., Haupert, S. & Sueur, J. What do we mean by \u201cSoundscape\u201d? A functional description. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 894232 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pijanowski, B. C. et al. Soundscape ecology: the science of sound in the landscape. BioScience 61, 203\u2013216 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Farina, A. Soundscape Ecology: Principles, Patterns, Methods and Applications (Springer, 2014).<\/p>\n

Rice, A. N. Conservation bioacoustics: listening to the heartbeat of the earth. Acoust. Today 19, 46 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision 15\/4. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).<\/p>\n

Watson, J. E. M. et al. Priorities for protected area expansion so nations can meet their Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework commitments. Integr. Conserv. 2, 140\u2013155 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

International Union for Conservation of Nature. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2016).<\/p>\n

Seddon, N. et al. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190120 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Directorate General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). Nature-Based Solutions: State of the Art in EU-Funded Projects (Publications Office, 2020).<\/p>\n

Eggermont, H. et al. Nature-based solutions: new influence for environmental management and research in Europe. GAIA – Ecol. Perspect. Sci. Soc. 24, 243\u2013248 (2015).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ford, H. V. et al. A technological biodiversity monitoring toolkit for biocredits. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 2007\u20132019 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro, J. W. & Llusia, D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives. BioScience 69, 15\u201325 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ross, S. R. P.-J. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring provides a fresh perspective on fundamental ecological questions. Funct. Ecol. 37, 959\u2013975 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Desjonqu\u00e8res, C., Gifford, T. & Linke, S. Passive acoustic monitoring as a potential tool to survey animal and ecosystem processes in freshwater environments. Freshw. Biol. 65, 7\u201319 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Linke, S., Gifford, T. & Desjonqu\u00e8res, C. Six steps towards operationalising freshwater ecoacoustic monitoring. Freshw. Biol. 65, 1\u20136 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Duarte, C. M. et al. The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean. Science 371, eaba4658 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Williams, D. R., Balmford, A. & Wilcove, D. S. The past and future role of conservation science in saving biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12720 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sloyan, B. M., Roughan, M. & Hill, K. in New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography (eds Chassignet, E. P. et al.) 75\u201389 (GODAE OceanView, 2018).<\/p>\n

Howe, B. M. et al. Observing the oceans acoustically. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 426 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roe, P. et al. The Australian acoustic observatory. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1802\u20131808 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Delory, E., \u0160irovic, A. & Jesus, S. Editorial: observing ocean sound. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1205835 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z. et al. Bioacoustic baselines for intact forests. Glob. Change Biol. 32, e70917 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Astaras, C. et al. Boots on the ground: the role of passive acoustic monitoring in evaluating anti-poaching patrols. Environ. Conserv. 47, 213\u2013216 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pardo, J. M. et al. Predicting poaching hotspots in the largest remnant of the Atlantic Forest by combining passive acoustic monitoring and occupancy models. Biol. Conserv. 272, 109600 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Braulik, G. et al. Acoustic monitoring to document the spatial distribution and hotspots of blast fishing in Tanzania. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 125, 360\u2013366 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kline, L. R. et al. Sleuthing with sound: understanding vessel activity in marine protected areas using passive acoustic monitoring. Mar. Policy 120, 104138 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mariani, A. C. B., Godoy, S. N. & Santos, M. C. D. O. The use of passive acoustic monitoring as an auxiliary tool for monitoring marine protected areas. Ocean Coast. Res. 72, e24081 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Simiyu, D., Vikiru, A., Muchiri, H., Gu, F. & Butime, J. A chainsaw-sound recognition model for detecting illegal logging activities in forests. In Proc. Unified Conference of DAMAS, Income and TEPEN Conferences (UNIfied 2023) Vol. 152 (eds Ball, A. D. et al.) 797\u2013806 (Springer, 2024).<\/p>\n

Rajesh, M. et al. Preventing illegal deforestation using acoustic surveillance. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manag. Appl. 16, 70\u201386 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schrodt, F. et al. Advancing causal inference in ecology: pathways for biodiversity change detection and attribution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 16, 2276\u20132304 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Siegel, K. & Dee, L. E. Foundations and future directions for causal inference in ecological research. Ecol. Lett. 28, e70053 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sagar, H. S. S. C. et al. Carbon finance initiatives can provide biodiversity benefits. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 8, e70254 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Showen, R. et al. Locating fish bomb blasts in real-time using a networked acoustic system. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 128, 496\u2013507 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hedley, R. W., Joubert, B., Bains, H. K. & Bayne, E. M. Acoustic detection of gunshots to improve measurement and mapping of hunting activity. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 46, e1370 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vu, T. T., Phan, D. V., Le, T. S. & Clink, D. J. Investigating hunting in a protected area in Southeast Asia using passive acoustic monitoring with mobile smartphones and deep learning. Ecol. Indic. 167, 112501 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yoh, N. et al. Impacts of logging, hunting, and conservation on vocalizing biodiversity in Gabon. Biol. Conserv. 296, 110726 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Huang, Z. et al. TinyChirp: bird song recognition using TinyML models on low-power wireless acoustic sensors. In 2024 IEEE 5th International Symposium on the Internet of Sounds (IS2) 1\u201310 (IEEE, 2024).<\/p>\n

Froese, G. Z. L. et al. Coupling paraecology and hunter GPS self-follows to quantify village bushmeat hunting dynamics across the landscape scale. Afr. J. Ecol. 60, 229\u2013249 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sandbrook, C. et al. Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e374 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Strong, M. & Silva, J. A. Impacts of hunting prohibitions on multidimensional well-being. Biol. Conserv. 243, 108451 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leung, F. K. W., Schwarzkopf, L. & Allen-Ankins, S. Advancing invasive species monitoring: a free tool for detecting invasive cane toads using continental-scale data. Ecol. Inform. 89, 103172 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Amorim, M. C. P. et al. Detection of invasive fish species with passive acoustics: discriminating between native and non-indigenous sciaenids. Mar. Environ. Res. 188, 106017 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bota, G. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring and automated detection of the American bullfrog. Biol. Invasions 26, 1269\u20131279 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ribeiro, J. W. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring as a tool to investigate the spatial distribution of invasive alien species. Remote Sens. 14, 4565 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hofstadter, D. F. et al. Arresting the spread of invasive species in continental systems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 278\u2013284 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M. et al. Real-time acoustic monitoring facilitates the proactive management of biological invasions. Biol. Invasions 26, 3989\u20133996 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mankin, R. W., Hagstrum, D. W., Smith, M. T., Roda, A. L. & Kairo, M. T. K. Perspective and promise: a century of insect acoustic detection and monitoring. Am. Entomol. 57, 30\u201344 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kohlberg, A. B., Myers, C. R. & Figueroa, L. L. From buzzes to bytes: a systematic review of automated bioacoustics models used to detect, classify and monitor insects. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 1199\u20131211 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bota, G., Traba, J., Sard\u00e0-Palomera, F., Giralt, D. & P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. Passive acoustic monitoring for estimating human-wildlife conflicts: the case of bee-eaters and apiculture. Ecol. Indic. 142, 109158 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. & Schuchmann, K.-L. The sound of the illegal: applying bioacoustics for long-term monitoring of illegal cattle in protected areas. Ecol. Inform. 74, 101981 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reo, N. J. & Ogden, L. A. Anishnaabe Aki: an indigenous perspective on the global threat of invasive species. Sustain. Sci. 13, 1443\u20131452 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jari\u0107, I. et al. Bridging worlds: exploring synergies between the arts and biodiversity conservation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 23, e70012 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tsujii, K. et al. Change in singing behavior of humpback whales caused by shipping noise. PLoS ONE 13, e0204112 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Erbe, C. et al. The effects of ship noise on marine mammals\u2014a review. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 606 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wrege, P. H., Bambi, F. B.-D., Malonga, P. J. F., Samba, O. J. & Brncic, T. Early detection of human impacts using acoustic monitoring: an example with forest elephants. PLoS ONE 19, e0306932 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gordon, T. A. C. et al. Habitat degradation negatively affects auditory settlement behavior of coral reef fishes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5193\u20135198 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rossi, T., Connell, S. D. & Nagelkerken, I. Silent oceans: ocean acidification impoverishes natural soundscapes by altering sound production of the world\u2019s noisiest marine invertebrate. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20153046 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wiens, J. A. & Hobbs, R. J. Integrating conservation and restoration in a changing world. BioScience 65, 302\u2013312 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Belote, R. T. et al. Options for prioritizing sites for biodiversity conservation with implications for \u201c30 by 30\u201d. Biol. Conserv. 264, 109378 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wyborn, C. & Evans, M. C. Conservation needs to break free from global priority mapping. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1322\u20131324 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grinfeder, E. et al. Soundscape dynamics of a cold protected forest: dominance of aircraft noise. Landsc. Ecol. 37, 567\u2013582 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kleinschroth, F., Healey, J. R., Gourlet-Fleury, S., Mortier, F. & Stoica, R. S. Effects of logging on roadless space in intact forest landscapes of the Congo Basin. Conserv. Biol. 31, 469\u2013480 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lindenmayer, D. Small patches make critical contributions to biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 717\u2013719 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Blumstein, D. T. et al. Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus: acoustic monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 758\u2013767 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McGeady, R. et al. A review of new and existing non-extractive techniques for monitoring marine protected areas. Front. Mar. Sci. 10, 1126301 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Whisson, D. A., Rivera, P. & Rendall, A. R. Systematic acoustic surveys inform priority conservation areas for koalas in a modified landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 38, 1279\u20131290 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brunk, K. M. et al. Bioregional-scale acoustic monitoring can support fire-prone forest restoration planning. Front. Ecol. Environ. 23, e2843 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Johnson, B. A., Barrett, K., Homyack, J. A. & Baldwin, R. F. Anuran occupancy and breeding site use of aquatic systems in a managed pine landscape. For. Ecol. Manag. 368, 45\u201354 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bender, M. J., Castleberry, S. B., Miller, D. A. & Bently Wigley, T. Site occupancy of foraging bats on landscapes of managed pine forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 336, 1\u201310 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perea, S. et al. Bat winter foraging habitat use in working forests: a multispecies spatial occupancy approach. Anim. Conserv. 27, 478\u2013491 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perea, S. et al. Disentangling winter relationships: bat responses to forest stand structure, environmental conditions, and prey composition. For. Ecol. Manag. 578, 122484 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rankin, D. T. & Perlut, N. G. The effects of Forest Stand Improvement Practices on occupancy and abundance of breeding songbirds. For. Ecol. Manag. 335, 99\u2013107 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

James, R. et al. Modelling the occupancy of two bird species of conservation concern in a managed Acadian Forest landscape: applications for forest management. For. Ecol. Manag. 555, 121725 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Peterson, T. S., Mcgill, B., Hein, C. D. & Rusk, A. Acoustic exposure to turbine operation quantifies risk to bats at commercial wind energy facilities. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 45, 552\u2013565 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Behr, O. et al. Standardised and referenced acoustic monitoring reliably estimates bat fatalities at wind turbines: comments on \u2018Limitations of acoustic monitoring at wind turbines to evaluate fatality risk of bats\u2019. Mammal Rev. 53, 65\u201371 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Peterson, T., Rusk, A., Byrne, C., Aghababian, S. & Edwards, S. Acoustic exposure reveals variation in curtailment effectiveness at reducing bat fatality at wind turbines. Ecosphere 16, e70277 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Erbe, C., MacGillivray, A. & Williams, R. Mapping cumulative noise from shipping to inform marine spatial planning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 132, EL423\u2013EL428 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Costa, B., Taylor, J. C., Kracker, L., Battista, T. & Pittman, S. Mapping reef fish and the seascape: using acoustics and spatial modeling to guide coastal management. PLoS ONE 9, e85555 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Barlow, D. R. & Torres, L. G. Planning ahead: dynamic models forecast blue whale distribution with applications for spatial management. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2493\u20132504 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bosi, S. et al. Is maritime spatial planning a tool to mitigate the impacts of underwater noise? A review of adopted and upcoming maritime spatial plans in Europe. Mar. Policy 155, 105725 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tanaka, K. et al. Spatiotemporal variations in the acoustic presence of dugongs and vessel traffic around Talibong Island, Thailand: inputs for local coastal management from passive acoustical aspects. Ocean Coast. Manag. 245, 106810 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Southall, B. L. et al. Marine mammal noise-exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Bioacoustics 17, 273\u2013275 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tougaard, J., Henriksen, O. D. & Miller, L. A. Underwater noise from three types of offshore wind turbines: estimation of impact zones for harbor porpoises and harbor seals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3766\u20133773 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Blackwell, S. B. et al. Effects of airgun sounds on bowhead whale calling rates in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Mar. Mammal Sci. 29, E342\u2013E365 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mooney, T. A., Andersson, M. H. & Stanley, J. Acoustic impacts of offshore wind energy on fishery resources: an evolving source and varied effects across a wind farm\u2019s lifetime. Oceanography 33, 82\u201395 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stocker, M. Best available science? Are NOAA Fisheries marine mammal noise exposure guidelines up to date? In Proc. 177th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America 36, 010001 (Acoustical Society of America, 2019).<\/p>\n

Van Parijs, S. M. et al. Establishing baselines for predicting change in ambient sound metrics, marine mammal, and vessel occurrence within a US offshore wind energy area. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 82, fsad148 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fouquet, A. et al. Simulated chorus attracts conspecific and heterospecific Amazonian explosive breeding frogs. Biotropica 53, 63\u201373 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spatz, D. R. et al. Tracking the global application of conservation translocation and social attraction to reverse seabird declines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2214574120 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Znidersic, E. & Watson, D. M. Acoustic restoration: using soundscapes to benchmark and fast-track recovery of ecological communities. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1597\u20131603 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gordon, T. A. C. et al. Acoustic enrichment can enhance fish community development on degraded coral reef habitat. Nat. Commun. 10, 5414 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Aoki, N. et al. Soundscape enrichment increases larval settlement rates for the brooding coral Porites astreoides. R. Soc. Open Sci. 11, 231514 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bomford, M. & O\u2019Brien, P. H. Sonic deterrents in animal damage control: a review of device tests and effectiveness. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 18, 411\u2013422 (Wiley, 1990).<\/p>\n

Dong, Z.-J. et al. High-frequency and high-amplitude sounds enhance bird deterrence. Sci. Rep. 15, 30945 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Weaver, S. P., Hein, C. D., Simpson, T. R., Evans, J. W. & Castro-Arellano, I. Ultrasonic acoustic deterrents significantly reduce bat fatalities at wind turbines. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 24, e01099 (2020).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Veneranta, L., Lehtonen, T. K., Lehtonen, E. & Suuronen, P. Acoustic seal deterrents in mitigation of human\u2013wildlife conflicts in the whitefish fishery of the River Iijoki in the northern Baltic Sea area. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 31, e12680 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Beattie, M., Nowacek, D. P., Bogdanoff, A. K., Akins, L. & Morris, J. A. The roar of the lionfishes Pterois volitans and Pterois miles. J. Fish Biol. 90, 2488\u20132495 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Holmes, R. B., Hamilton, N. M., Dunkley, K. & Herbert-Read, J. E. Lionfish (Pterois volitans) show social attraction to conspecifics when selecting shelters. Ethology 131, 31\u201338 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schakner, Z. A. & Blumstein, D. T. Behavioral biology of marine mammal deterrents: a review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv. 167, 380\u2013389 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hans Enukwa, E. Human-elephant conflict mitigation methods: a review of effectiveness and sustainability. J. Wildl. Biodivers. 1, 69\u201378 (2017).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wijayagunawardane, M. P. B. et al. The use of audio playback to deter crop-raiding Asian elephants. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 40, 375\u2013379 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Abrahms, B. et al. Climate change as a global amplifier of human\u2013wildlife conflict. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 224\u2013234 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wiley, D., Leila, H., Michael, T., Kurt, S. & Craig, M. Marine sanctuaries and marine planning. Coast Guard Proc. Mar. Saf. Secur. Counc. 70, 10\u201315 (2013).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Indeck, K. L., Baumgartner, M. F., Lecavalier, L., Whoriskey, F. & Davies, K. T. A. Passive acoustic gliders are effective monitoring tools for dynamic management plans aimed at mitigating whale-vessel strikes. Conserv. Lett. 18, e13102 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Baumgartner, M. Efficacy of real-time passive acoustic monitoring near wind energy industrial activities for mitigating risks to right whales. Endanger. Species Res. 57, 413\u2013430 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Metcalf, O. C., Ewen, J. G., McCready, M., Williams, E. M. & Rowcliffe, J. M. A novel method for using ecoacoustics to monitor post-translocation behaviour in an endangered passerine. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 626\u2013636 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brancalion, P. H. S., Hua, F., Joyce, F. H., Antonelli, A. & Holl, K. D. Moving biodiversity from an afterthought to a key outcome of forest restoration. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 248\u2013261 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z., Yoh, N., Butler, R. A., Chandra Sagar, H. S. S. & Game, E. T. Broadening the focus of forest conservation beyond carbon. Curr. Biol. 33, R621\u2013R635 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

La Manna, G. et al. Soundscape analysis can be an effective tool in assessing seagrass restoration early success. Sci. Rep. 14, 20910 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vega-Hidalgo, \u00c1, Flatt, E., Whitworth, A. & Symes, L. Acoustic assessment of experimental reforestation in a Costa Rican rainforest. Ecol. Indic. 133, 108413 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Choksi, P. et al. Listening for change: quantifying the impact of ecological restoration on soundscapes in a tropical dry forest. Restor. Ecol. 31, e13864 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

M\u00fcller, J. et al. Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests. Nat. Commun. 14, 6191 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ramesh, V. et al. Using passive acoustic monitoring to examine the impacts of ecological restoration on faunal biodiversity in the Western Ghats. Biol. Conserv. 282, 110071 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

K\u00fcmmet, S. et al. Acoustic indices predict recovery of tropical bird communities for taxonomic and functional composition. Conserv. Lett. 18, p.e13131 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lamont, T. A. C. et al. The sound of recovery: coral reef restoration success is detectable in the soundscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 742\u2013756 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Robinson, J. M., Breed, M. F. & Abrahams, C. The sound of restored soil: using ecoacoustics to measure soil biodiversity in a temperate forest restoration context. Restor. Ecol. 31, e13934 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Larkin, J. T. et al. A large-scale assessment of eastern whip-poor-will (Antrostomus vociferus) occupancy across a gradient of forest management intensity using autonomous recording units. J. Environ. Manag. 366, 121786 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fiss, C. J. et al. Performance of unmarked abundance models with data from machine-learning classification of passive acoustic recordings. Ecosphere 15, e4954 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ng, E. M.-Y. et al. Severe fire has impacted populations of the California spotted owl more than fuels management or drought-related tree mortality. For. Ecol. Manag. 603, 123469 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Parmentier, E., Lecchini, D., Frederich, B., Brie, C. & Mann, D. Sound production in four damselfish (Dascyllus) species: phyletic relationships?\u00a0Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 97, 928\u2013940 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Parmentier, E., K\u00e9ver, L., Casadevall, M. & Lecchini, D. Diversity and complexity in the acoustic behaviour of Dacyllus flavicaudus (Pomacentridae). Mar. Biol. 157, 2317\u20132327 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Parmentier, E. et al. First use of acoustic calls to distinguish cryptic members of a fish species complex. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 195, 964\u2013975 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chase, T. J., Pratchett, M. S., Frank, G. E. & Hoogenboom, M. O. Coral-dwelling fish moderate bleaching susceptibility of coral hosts. PLoS ONE 13, e0208545 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shantz, A. A. et al. Positive interactions between corals and damselfish increase coral resistance to temperature stress. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 417\u2013431 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Campos-Cerqueira, M. et al. How does FSC forest certification affect the acoustically active fauna in Madre de Dios, Peru? Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 6, 274\u2013285 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zwerts, J. A., Wiegers, J. N. (Y.), Sterck, E. H. M. & Van Kuijk, M. (M.). Exploring spatio-temporal variation in soundscape saturation of an African tropical forest landscape. Ecol. Indic. 137, 108712 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burivalova, Z. et al. Using soundscapes to investigate homogenization of tropical forest diversity in selectively logged forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 2493\u20132504 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burivalova, Z., Miteva, D., Salafsky, N., Butler, R. A. & Wilcove, D. S. Evidence types and trends in tropical forest conservation literature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 669\u2013679 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deichmann, J. L. et al. It\u2019s time to listen: there is much to be learned from the sounds of tropical ecosystems. Biotropica 50, 713\u2013718 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover-Kapfer, P. & Jones, K. E. Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 169\u2013185 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reynolds, N., Mota, B. & Nightingale, J. M. Open-access satellite data for peatland condition and restoration monitoring in the UK: a review. Front. Environ. Sci. 13, 1685165 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dr\u00f6ge, S., Prasetyo, L. B. & Muys, B. Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity in certified and non-certified cocoa plantations in Indonesia. Environ. Monit. Assess. 197, 61 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zwerts, J. A. et al. Methods for wildlife monitoring in tropical forests: comparing human observations, camera traps, and passive acoustic sensors. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e568 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kitzes, J. & Schricker, L. The necessity, promise and challenge of automated biodiversity surveys. Environ. Conserv. 46, 247\u2013250 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sarkar, D. & Chapman, C. A. The smart forest conundrum: contextualizing pitfalls of sensors and AI in conservation science for tropical forests. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 14, 19400829211014740 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Longdon, J., Gabrys, J. & Blackwell, A. F. Taking data science into the forest. Interdiscip. Sci. Rev. 49, 82\u2013103 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bell, K. & Malerba, M. E. Biodiversity monitoring for biocredits: a case study comparing acoustic, eDNA, and traditional methods. Biodivers. Conserv. 34, 2513\u20132528 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hoefer, S., Allen-Ankins, S., McKnight, D. T., Nordberg, E. J. & Schwarzkopf, L. Sensors versus surveyors: comparing passive acoustic monitoring, camera trapping and observer-based monitoring for terrestrial mammals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 16, 2603\u20132621 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Darras, K., Furnas, B., Fitriawan, I., Mulyani, Y. & Tscharntke, T. Estimating bird detection distances in sound recordings for standardizing detection ranges and distance sampling. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1928\u20131938 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Crunchant, A., Borchers, D., K\u00fchl, H. & Piel, A. Listening and watching: do camera traps or acoustic sensors more efficiently detect wild chimpanzees in an open habitat? Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 542\u2013552 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dalpaz, L. et al. Better together: analysis of integrated acoustic and visual methods when surveying a cetacean community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 678, 197\u2013209 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dantzker, M. S. et al. Deciphering complex coral reef soundscapes with spatial audio and 360\u00b0 video. Methods Ecol. Evol. 16, 2622\u20132637 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Growcott, J. et al. The secret acoustic world of leopards: a paired camera trap and bioacoustics survey facilitates individual identification of leopards via their roars. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 11, 361\u2013374 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Au, W. W. L. & Hastings, M. C. Principles of Marine Bioacoustics (Springer, 2008).<\/p>\n

Suthers, R. A., Fitch, W. T., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N. (eds) Vertebrate Sound Production and Acoustic Communication, Vol. 53 (Springer, 2016).<\/p>\n

Sueur, J. Sound Analysis and Synthesis with R (Springer, 2018).<\/p>\n

Salafsky, N. et al. Defining and using evidence in conservation practice. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, e27 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Teixeira, D., Maron, M. & Van Rensburg, B. J. Bioacoustic monitoring of animal vocal behavior for conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, e72 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Campos-Cerqueira, M. & Aide, T. M. Improving distribution data of threatened species by combining acoustic monitoring and occupancy modelling. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1340\u20131348 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Hoeck, R. V. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring complements traditional methods for assessing marine habitat enhancement outcomes. Ecosphere 12, e03840 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M., Barceinas Cruz, A. & Kahl, S. Pairing a user-friendly machine-learning animal sound detector with passive acoustic surveys for occupancy modeling of an endangered primate. Am. J. Primatol. 85, e23507 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Duarte, A. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring and convolutional neural networks facilitate high-resolution and broadscale monitoring of a threatened species. Ecol. Indic. 162, 112016 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ca\u00f1as, J. S. et al. A dataset for benchmarking Neotropical anuran calls identification in passive acoustic monitoring. Sci. Data 10, 771 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tan, M. K. et al. The calling songs of some katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) from the tropical forests of Southeast Asia. J. Orthoptera Res. 32, 1\u201324 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Funosas, D. et al. A finely annotated dataset for the automated acoustic identification of European Orthoptera and Cicadidae. Sci. Data 13, 830 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Callaghan, C. T., Poore, A. G. B., Hofmann, M., Roberts, C. J. & Pereira, H. M. Large-bodied birds are over-represented in unstructured citizen science data. Sci. Rep. 11, 19073 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

J\u00e4ckel, D. et al. Opportunities and limitations: a comparative analysis of citizen science and expert recordings for bioacoustic research. PLoS ONE 16, e0253763 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Johnston, A., Matechou, E. & Dennis, E. B. Outstanding challenges and future directions for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 103\u2013116 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rumelt, R., Mere Roncal, C., Basto, A., Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z. & Searcy, C. Combining acoustic survey and citizen science data yields enhanced species distribution models for tropical rainforest birds. PLoS ONE 20, e0327944 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Looby, A. et al. A quantitative inventory of global soniferous fish diversity. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 32, 581\u2013595 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Looby, A. et al. FishSounds version 1.0: a website for the compilation of fish sound production information and recordings. Ecol. Inform. 74, 101953 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kahl, S., Wood, C. M., Eibl, M. & Klinck, H. BirdNET: a deep learning solution for avian diversity monitoring. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101236 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

van Merri\u00ebnboer, B. et al. Perch 2.0: the bittern lesson for bioacoustics. Preprint at arXiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2508.04665<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Knight, E. C. et al. Recommendations for acoustic recognizer performance assessment with application to five common automated signal recognition programs. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 12, art14 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Villon, S. et al. A new method to control error rates in automated species identification with deep learning algorithms. Sci. Rep. 10, 10972 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M. & Kahl, S. Guidelines for appropriate use of BirdNET scores and other detector outputs. J. Ornithol. 165, 777\u2013782 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tseng, S., Hodder, D. P. & Otter, K. A. Setting BirdNET confidence thresholds: species-specific vs. universal approaches. J. Ornithol. 166, 1123\u20131135 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scanferla, J. et al. Determining species-specific thresholds to improve precision in passive acoustic monitoring. Ecol. Inform. 91, 103423 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M. et al. Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework. Ecol. Indic. 98, 492\u2013507 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Katsis, L. K. D. et al. A comparison of statistical methods for deriving occupancy estimates from machine learning outputs. Sci. Rep. 15, 14700 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M. & Peery, M. Z. What does \u2018occupancy\u2019 mean in passive acoustic surveys? Ibis 164, 1295\u20131300 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gaston, K. J. How large is a species\u2019 geographic range? Oikos 61, 434 (1991).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nichols, J. D. in Applied Ecology and Human Dimensions in Biological Conservation (eds Verdade, L. et al.) 117\u2013131 (Springer, 2014).<\/p>\n

Callaghan, C. T., Santini, L., Spake, R. & Bowler, D. E. Population abundance estimates in conservation and biodiversity research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 515\u2013523 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Marques, T. A. et al. Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics. Biol. Rev. 88, 287\u2013309 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. & Traba, J. Estimating bird density using passive acoustic monitoring: a review of methods and suggestions for further research. Ibis 163, 765\u2013783 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hutschenreiter, A. et al. How to count bird calls? Vocal activity indices may provide different insights into bird abundance and behaviour depending on species traits. Methods Ecol. Evol. 15, 1071\u20131083 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Garcia, M. et al. Acoustic abundance estimation for Critically Endangered North Atlantic right whales in Cape Cod Bay, Massachusetts, USA. Endanger. Species Res. 56, 101\u2013115 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kitzes, J. et al. Integrating AI models into ecological research workflows: the case of terrestrial bioacoustics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 17, 257\u2013271 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Royle, J. A. & Nichols, J. D. Estimating abundance from repeated presence\u2013absence data or point counts. Ecology 84, 777\u2013790 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Strebel, N. et al. Estimating abundance based on time-to-detection data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 909\u2013920 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rhinehart, T. A. et al. Addressing widespread detection heterogeneity in avian occupancy modeling using passive acoustic surveys. Ornithol. Appl. 128, 1\u201315 (2026).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chiatante, G. & Canestrelli, D. Temporal dynamics of animal vocal behavior affect semi-automatic identifications. Ecol. Process. 15, 4 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Royle, J. A., Dawson, D. K. & Bates, S. Modeling abundance effects in distance sampling. Ecology 85, 1591\u20131597 (2004).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sebasti\u00e1n-Gonz\u00e1lez, E. et al. Density estimation of sound-producing terrestrial animals using single automatic acoustic recorders and distance sampling. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 13, art7 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yip, D. A. et al. Sound level measurements from audio recordings provide objective distance estimates for distance sampling wildlife populations. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 6, 301\u2013315 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Royle, J. A. Modelling sound attenuation in heterogeneous environments for improved bioacoustic sampling of wildlife populations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1939\u20131947 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Patricelli, G. L., Dantzker, M. S. & Bradbury, J. W. Acoustic directionality of red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) song relates to amplitude and singing behaviours. Anim. Behav. 76, 1389\u20131401 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. et al. Vocal activity rate index: a useful method to infer terrestrial bird abundance with acoustic monitoring. Ibis 161, 901\u2013907 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. et al. Assessment of cue counting for estimating bird density using passive acoustic monitoring: recommendations for estimating a reliable cue rate. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 16, art11 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Navine, A. K., Camp, R. J., Weldy, M. J., Denton, T. & Hart, P. J. Counting the chorus: a bioacoustic indicator of population density. Ecol. Indic. 169, 112930 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zwart, M. C., Baker, A., McGowan, P. J. K. & Whittingham, M. J. The use of automated bioacoustic recorders to replace human wildlife surveys: an example using nightjars. PLoS ONE 9, e102770 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Buxton, R. T. & Jones, I. L. Measuring nocturnal seabird activity and status using acoustic recording devices: applications for island restoration: acoustic monitoring of nocturnal seabirds. J. Field Ornithol. 83, 47\u201360 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00e9rez-Granados, C. et al. Effort needed to accurately estimate vocal activity rate index using acoustic monitoring: a case study with a dawn-time singing passerine. Ecol. Indic. 107, 105608 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pillay, R., Fletcher, R. J., Sieving, K. E., Udell, B. J. & Bernard, H. Bioacoustic monitoring reveals shifts in breeding songbird populations and singing behaviour with selective logging in tropical forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 2482\u20132492 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Staicer, C. A., Ingalls, V. & Sherry, T. W. Singing behavior varies with breeding status of American redstarts (Setophaga ruticilla). Wilson J. Ornithol. 118, 439\u2013451 (2006).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Blackwell, S. B. et al. Effects of airgun sounds on bowhead whale calling rates: evidence for two behavioral thresholds. PLoS ONE 10, e0125720 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Navine, A. K., Denton, T., Weldy, M. J. & Hart, P. J. All thresholds barred: direct estimation of call density in bioacoustic data. Front. Bird Sci. 3, 1380636 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wilson, S. J. & Bayne, E. M. Use of an acoustic location system to understand how presence of conspecifics and canopy cover influence ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) space use near reclaimed wellsites in the boreal forest of Alberta. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 13, art4 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Spillmann, B. et al. Validation of an acoustic location system to monitor Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) long calls. Am. J. Primatol. 77, 767\u2013776 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hedwig, D., DeBellis, M. & Wrege, P. H. Not so far: attenuation of low-frequency vocalizations in a rainforest environment suggests limited acoustic mediation of social interaction in African forest elephants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 33 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kershenbaum, A., Owens, J. L. & Waller, S. Tracking cryptic animals using acoustic multilateration: a system for long-range wolf detection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 145, 1619\u20131628 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kyhn, L. A. et al. From echolocation clicks to animal density\u2014acoustic sampling of harbor porpoises with static dataloggers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131, 550\u2013560 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rhinehart, T. A., Chronister, L. M., Devlin, T. & Kitzes, J. Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: current practices and future opportunities. Ecol. Evol. 10, 6794\u20136818 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Terry, A. M., Peake, T. M. & McGregor, P. K. The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Front. Zool. 2, 10 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Knight, E. et al. Individual identification in acoustic recordings. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 947\u2013960 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xie, J., Yang, J., Ding, C. & Li, W. High accuracy individual identification model of crested ibis (Nipponia nippon) based on autoencoder with self-attention. IEEE Access 8, 41062\u201341070 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lapp, S. et al. Automated identification of individual birds by song enables multi-year recapture from passive acoustic monitoring data. Preprint at bioRxiv https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/2025.06.26.661638<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Balantic, C. & Donovan, T. Dynamic wildlife occupancy models using automated acoustic monitoring data. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01854 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Winiarski, J. M. et al. Passive acoustic monitoring can provide insights into occupancy dynamics and impacts of disturbance for at-risk species. Ecol. Appl. 36, e70177 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Perea, S. et al. Seven-year impact of white-nose syndrome on tri-colored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) populations in Georgia, USA. Endanger. Species Res. 48, 99\u2013106 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Udell, B. J. et al. Using mobile acoustic monitoring and false-positive N-mixture models to estimate bat abundance and population trends. Ecol. Monogr. 94, e1617 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fleishman, E. et al. Ecological inferences about marine mammals from passive acoustic data. Biol. Rev. 98, 1633\u20131647 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chao, A. et al. Quantifying sample completeness and comparing diversities among assemblages. Ecol. Res. 35, 292\u2013314 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sethi, S. S. et al. Large-scale avian vocalization detection delivers reliable global biodiversity insights. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2315933121 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Noble, A. E. et al. Unsupervised clustering reveals acoustic diversity and niche differentiation in pulsed calls from a coral reef ecosystem. Front. Remote Sens. 5, 1429227 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bradfer-Lawrence, T., Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z. & Dent, D. H. Deriving meaning from acoustic data in hyper-diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 431\u2013435 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bradfer-Lawrence, T., Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z. & Dent, D. H. Conservation needs curiosity, innovation and complementarity: reply to Sugai and Costa-Pereira. Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 937\u2013938 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, Z. & Wiens, J. J. The origins of acoustic communication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 11, 369 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harris, S. A., Shears, N. T. & Radford, C. A. Ecoacoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity on temperate reefs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 713\u2013724 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sethi, S. S. et al. Characterizing soundscapes across diverse ecosystems using a universal acoustic feature set. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 17049\u201317055 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keen, S. C. et al. A machine learning approach for classifying and quantifying acoustic diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1213\u20131225 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M. & Llusia, D. Acoustic indices as proxies for biodiversity: a meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 97, 2209\u20132236 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bradfer-Lawrence, T., Desjonqueres, C., Eldridge, A., Johnston, A. & Metcalf, O. Using acoustic indices in ecology: guidance on study design, analyses and interpretation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 2192\u20132204 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bradfer-Lawrence, T. et al. The Acoustic Index User\u2019s Guide: a practical manual for defining, generating and understanding current and future acoustic indices. Methods Ecol. Evol. 16, 1040\u20131050 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fairbrass, A. J., Rennert, P., Williams, C., Titheridge, H. & Jones, K. E. Biases of acoustic indices measuring biodiversity in urban areas. Ecol. Indic. 83, 169\u2013177 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Minello, M., Calado, L. & Xavier, F. C. Ecoacoustic indices in marine ecosystems: a review on recent developments, challenges, and future directions. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 78, 3066\u20133074 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sethi, S. S. et al. Limits to the accurate and generalizable use of soundscapes to monitor biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1373\u20131378 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sugai, L. S. M. et al. Acoustic indices are not useful for biodiversity research. Methods Ecol. Evol. 17, 1506\u20131518 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sueur, J., Farina, A., Gasc, A., Pieretti, N. & Pavoine, S. Acoustic indices for biodiversity assessment and landscape investigation. Acta Acust. United Acust. 100, 772\u2013781 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Farina, A. & Gage, S. H. (eds) Ecoacoustics: The Ecological Role of Sounds (Wiley, 2017).<\/p>\n

Towsey, M. et al. Visualization of long-duration acoustic recordings of the environment. Procedia Comput. Sci. 29, 703\u2013712 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Berman, L. M. et al. Acoustic indices reveal fundamental differences in daily phenology of tropical and temperate forest soundscapes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 35, e70224 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xie, X. et al. Are river protected areas sufficient for fish conservation? Implications from large-scale hydroacoustic surveys in the middle reach of the Yangtze River. BMC Ecol. 19, 42 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vermeij, M. J. A., Marhaver, K. L., Huijbers, C. M., Nagelkerken, I. & Simpson, S. D. Coral larvae move toward reef sounds. PLoS ONE 5, e10660 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Swider, C. R., Gemelli, C. F., Wrege, P. H. & Parks, S. E. Passive acoustic monitoring reveals behavioural response of African forest elephants to gunfire events. Afr. J. Ecol. 60, 882\u2013894 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Avicena, N. R. et al. Living with elephants: deep learning models performance in examining Asian elephant (Elephas maximus) sounds from Sri Lanka and Malaysia with considerations for application. Biol. Conserv. 309, 111272 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McDonald-Madden, E. et al. Monitoring does not always count. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 547\u2013550 (2010).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lennox, R. J. et al. A novel framework to protect animal data in a world of ecosurveillance. BioScience 70, 468\u2013476 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Longdon, J. et al. Justice-oriented Design Listening: participatory ecoacoustics with a Ghanaian forest community. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1\u201312 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n

L\u00f3pez-Baucells, A. et al. Optimizing bat bioacoustic surveys in human-modified Neotropical landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02366 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

L\u00f3pez-Baucells, A. et al. Stronger together: combining automated classifiers with manual post-validation optimizes the workload vs reliability trade-off of species identification in bat acoustic surveys. Ecol. Inform. 49, 45\u201353 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Wood, C. M., Kahl, S., Chaon, P., Peery, M. Z. & Klinck, H. Survey coverage, recording duration and community composition affect observed species richness in passive acoustic surveys. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 885\u2013896 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Darras, K. F. A. et al. High microphone signal-to-noise ratio enhances acoustic sampling of wildlife. PeerJ 8, e9955 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van Parijs, S. et al. Management and research applications of real-time and archival passive acoustic sensors over varying temporal and spatial scales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395, 21\u201336 (2009).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roch, M. A. et al. Management of acoustic metadata for bioacoustics. Ecol. Inform. 31, 122\u2013136 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Araya-Salas, M., Smith-Vidaurre, G. & Webster, M. Assessing the effect of sound file compression and background noise on measures of acoustic signal structure. Bioacoustics 28, 57\u201373 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

MacPhail, A. G. et al. Audio data compression affects acoustic indices and reduces detections of birds by human listening and automated recognisers. Bioacoustics 33, 74\u201390 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sueur, J., Aubin, T. & Simonis, C. Seewave, a free modular tool for sound analysis and synthesis. Bioacoustics 18, 213\u2013226 (2008).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Araya-Salas, M. & Smith-Vidaurre, G. warbleR: an R package to streamline analysis of animal acoustic signals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 184\u2013191 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Araya-Salas, M. et al. ohun: an R package for diagnosing and optimizing automatic sound event detection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 2259\u20132271 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lapp, S. et al. OpenSoundscape: an open-source bioacoustics analysis package for Python. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 2321\u20132328 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nguyen Hong Duc, P. et al. Assessing inter-annotator agreement from collaborative annotation campaign in marine bioacoustics. Ecol. Inform. 61, 101185 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Becker, F. K., Shabangu, F. W., Gridley, T., Wittmer, H. U. & Marsland, S. Sounding out a continent: seven decades of bioacoustics research in Africa. Bioacoustics 31, 646\u2013667 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brown, A., Garg, S. & Montgomery, J. Scalable preprocessing of high volume environmental acoustic data for bioacoustic monitoring. PLoS ONE 13, e0201542 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kershenbaum, A. et al. Automatic detection for bioacoustic research: a practical guide from and for biologists and computer scientists. Biol. Rev. 100, 620\u2013646 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Michielsen, R. J. et al. The effectiveness of ecoacoustic indices in representing bird species richness relies on technical parameters. Ecol. Inform. 92, 103493 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yoh, N., Haley, C. L. & Burivalova, Z. Time series methods for the analysis of soundscapes and other cyclical ecological data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 15, 1158\u20131176 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Paris, D., Winn, M., Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities (SAGE Publications, 2014).<\/p>\n

Kukutai, T. & Taylor, J. (eds) Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda (ANU Press, 2016).<\/p>\n

Ritts, M. & Bakker, K. Conservation acoustics: animal sounds, audible natures, cheap nature. Geoforum 124, 144\u2013155 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Podolskiy, E. A., Ogawa, M., Otsuki, M., Hasegawa, K. & Sugiyama, S. Repeated narwhal interactions with moorings challenge safety assumptions of passive acoustic monitoring in the Arctic. Commun. Biol. 8, 1557 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lindenmayer, D. & Scheele, B. Do not publish. Science 356, 800\u2013801 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Donald, P. F. et al. Assessing the global prevalence of wild birds in trade. Conserv. Biol. 38, e14350 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DePuy, W., Thung, P., Schreer, V. & Erb, W. M. Navigating scale and interdisciplinary dynamics in conservation social science. Conserv. Biol. 39, e70005 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stefanoudis, P. V. et al. Turning the tide of parachute science. Curr. Biol. 31, R184\u2013R185 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Asase, A., Mzumara-Gawa, T. I., Owino, J. O., Peterson, A. T. & Saupe, E. Replacing \u201cparachute science\u201d with \u201cglobal science\u201d in ecology and conservation biology. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e517 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

De Vos, A. & Schwartz, M. W. Confronting parachute science in conservation. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12681 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rayadin, Y. & Bu\u0159ivalov\u00e1, Z. What does it take to have a mutually beneficial research collaboration across countries? Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e528 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hood, J. D., Flogeras, D. G. & Theriault, J. A. Improved passive acoustic band-limited energy detection for cetaceans. Appl. Acoust. 106, 36\u201341 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lapp, S. et al. Automated recognition of ruffed grouse drumming in field recordings. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 47, e1395 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Mellinger, D. K. & Clark, C. W. Methods for automatic detection of mysticete sounds. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 29, 163\u2013181 (1997).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fodor, G. The ninth annual MLSP competition: first place. In 2013 IEEE International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), 1\u20132 (IEEE, 2013).<\/p>\n

Kitzes, J. & Merenlender, A. Large roads reduce bat activity across multiple species. PLoS ONE 9, e96341 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lasseck, M. Large-scale identification of birds in audio recordings. In CLEF 2014 Working Notes, 643\u2013653 (CEUR-WS.org, 2014).<\/p>\n

Corrada Bravo, C. J., \u00c1lvarez Berr\u00edos, R. & Aide, T. M. Species-specific audio detection: a comparison of three template-based detection algorithms using random forests. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e113 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Stowell, D. Computational bioacoustics with deep learning: a review and roadmap. PeerJ 10, e13152 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ghani, B., Denton, T., Kahl, S. & Klinck, H. Global birdsong embeddings enable superior transfer learning for bioacoustic classification. Sci. Rep. 13, 22876 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Miao, Z. et al. New frontiers in artificial intelligence for biodiversity research and conservation with multimodal language models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 17, 238\u2013256 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chronister, L. M. et al. Evaluating the predictors of habitat use and successful reproduction in a model bird species using a large-scale automated acoustic array. Ecography 2025, e06940 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jacuzzi, G. & Olden, J. D. Few-shot transfer learning enables robust acoustic monitoring of wildlife communities at the landscape scale. Ecol. Inform. 90, 103294 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Magrath, M. J. L. A comprehensive overview of technologies for species and habitat monitoring…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":588674,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[851,2134,2138,2139,246,9705,21680,1437,61,60,2137,2136,82],"class_list":["post-588673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-biodiversity","tag-conservation-biology","tag-ecology","tag-ecosystems","tag-environment","tag-environmental-impact","tag-forestry","tag-general","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-life-sciences","tag-nature-conservation","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/588673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=588673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/588673\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/588674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=588673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=588673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=588673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}