{"id":605623,"date":"2026-08-26T23:10:16","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T23:10:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/605623\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T23:10:16","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T23:10:16","slug":"the-policy-relevance-of-climate-change-scenarios-for-biodiversity-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/605623\/","title":{"rendered":"The policy relevance of climate-change scenarios for biodiversity research"},"content":{"rendered":"

P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. et al. Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 380, eabl4881 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IPBES. The Methodological Assessment Report on Scenarios and Models of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Secretariat, 2016).<\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. UNFCCC https:\/\/unfccc.int\/documents\/184656<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n

Kunming\u2013Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. CBD\/COP\/DEC\/15\/4. Convention on Biological Diversity\/United Nations Environment Programme https:\/\/www.cbd.int\/doc\/decisions\/cop-15\/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n

O\u2019Neill, B. C. et al. The scenario model intercomparison project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 3461\u20133482 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schoeman, D. S. et al. Demystifying global climate models for use in the life sciences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 843\u2013858 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Resolution A\/RES\/70\/1). United Nations General Assembly https:\/\/www.refworld.org\/legal\/resolution\/unga\/2015\/en\/111816<\/a> (2015).<\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009157896<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).<\/p>\n

Matthews, H. D. & Wynes, S. Current global efforts are insufficient to limit warming to 1.5. Science 376, 1404\u20131409 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bevacqua, E., Schleussner, C.-F. & Zscheischler, J. A year above 1.5 \u00b0C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 262\u2013265 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bindl, M., Edwards, M. R. & Cui, R. Y. Risks of relying on uncertain carbon dioxide removal in climate policy. Nat. Commun. 16, 5958 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Emissions gap report 2025: off target \u2014 continued collective inaction puts global temperature goal at risk. 53 United Nations Environment Programme https:\/\/wedocs.unep.org\/items\/9f0bf855-2069-42a6-a856-4b389f740c5c<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Molinos, J. G. et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 83\u201388 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Warren, R., Price, J., Graham, E., Forstenhaeusler, N. & VanDerWal, J. The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5\u00b0C rather than 2\u00b0C. Science 360, 791\u2013795 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Franklin, J. Species distribution modelling supports the study of past, present and future biogeographies. J. Biogeogr. 50, 1533\u20131545 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pereira, H. M. et al. Global trends and scenarios for terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystem services from 1900 to 2050. Science 384, 458\u2013465 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reygondeau, G. et al. AquaX: an enhanced and revised AquaMaps framework to model marine species distributions and biodiversity. PLoS ONE 21, e0335823 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meynard, C. N., Record, S., Galiana, N., Gravel, D. & Ara\u00fajo, M. B. Emerging horizons in predictive biogeography. Ecography https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ecog.07910<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yates, K. L. et al. Outstanding challenges in the transferability of ecological models. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 790\u2013802 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zurell, D., Fritz, S. A., R\u00f6nnfeldt, A. & Steinbauer, M. J. Predicting extinctions with species distribution models. Camb. Prism. Extinction 1, e8 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Urban, M. C. Climate change extinctions. Science 386, 1123\u20131128 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deure, T., van der, Nogu\u00e9s-Bravo, D., Njotto, L. L. & Stensgaard, A. Climate change favors African malaria vector mosquitoes. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70610 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kopsco, H. L., Smith, R. L. & Halsey, S. J. A scoping review of species distribution modeling methods for tick vectors. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 893016 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Valdez-Espinoza, U. M. et al. Current and future applications of species distribution and ecological niche modelling for the study of ticks and tick-borne pathogens. M\u00e9d. Vet. \u00c8ntomol. 39, 399\u2013421 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Godefroid, M. Species distribution models predicting climate suitability for the psyllid Trioza erytreae, vector of citrus greening disease. Crop. Prot. 168, 106228 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hubab, M., Lorestani, N., Al-Awabdeh, R. A. M. & Shabani, F. Climate change-driven shifts in the global distribution of tomato and potato crops and their associated bacterial pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 16, 1520104 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Esser, L. F., Neves, D. & Jarenkow, J. A. Species distribution models to help integrate community ecology. Austral Ecol. 50, e70091 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kass, J. M., Fukaya, K., Thuiller, W. & Mori, A. S. Biodiversity modeling advances will improve predictions of nature\u2019s contributions to people. Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 338\u2013348 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tittensor, D. P. et al. Next-generation ensemble projections reveal higher climate risks for marine ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 973\u2013981 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bergkvist, J. et al. Quantifying the impact of climate change and forest management on Swedish forest ecosystems using the Dynamic Vegetation Model LPJ-GUESS. Earth\u2019s Futur. 13, e2024EF004662 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Murphy, K. et al. Developing a Southern Ocean marine ecosystem model ensemble to assess climate risks and uncertainties. Earth\u2019s Future 13, e2024EF004849 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Verma, A. et al. Integrating high-resolution data and species-level traits for enhanced ecosystem projections using a dynamic vegetation model: case study in Wallonia, Belgium. J. Environ. Manag. 375, 124329 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Trisos, C. H., Merow, C. & Pigot, A. L. The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 580, 496\u2013501 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Duffy, K., Gouhier, T. C. & Ganguly, A. R. Climate-mediated shifts in temperature fluctuations promote extinction risk. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1037\u20131044 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meyer, A. S. et al. Temporal dynamics of climate change exposure and opportunities for global marine biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 15, 5836 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Penn, J. L. & Deutsch, C. Avoiding ocean mass extinction from climate warming. Science 376, 524\u2013526 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Saintilan, N. et al. Widespread retreat of coastal habitat is likely at warming levels above 1.5 \u00b0C. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-023-06448-z<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Future climate risks from stress, insects and fire across US forests. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1510\u20131520 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

van den Bosch, M., Costanza, J. K., Peek, R. A., Mola, J. M. & Steel, Z. L. Climate change scenarios forecast increased drought exposure for terrestrial vertebrates in the contiguous United States. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 708 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arafeh-Dalmau, N. et al. Global floating kelp forests have limited protection despite intensifying marine heatwave threats. Nat. Commun. 16, 3173 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Torres-V\u00e1zquez, M. \u00c1 et al. Large increase in extreme fire weather synchronicity over Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 024045 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dabal\u00e0, A. et al. Safeguarding climate-resilient mangroves requires only a moderate increase in the global protected area. Nat. Commun. 17, 2063 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Buenafe, K. C. V. et al. Current approaches and future opportunities for climate-smart protected areas. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s44358-025-00041-0<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Parmesan, C. et al. Terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems and their services. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 197\u2013377, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844.004<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Lin, W. et al. Projecting suitable habitats and prioritizing conservation areas for Dendrobium shixingense under climate change. Front. Plant. Sci. 16, 1620580 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zou, Y., Backus, G. A., Safford, H. D., Sawyer, S. & Baskett, M. L. Quantifying the capacity for assisted migration to achieve conservation and forestry goals under climate change. J. Biogeogr. 51, 2440\u20132455 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pielke, R. & Ritchie, J. Distorting the view of our climate future: the misuse and abuse of climate pathways and scenarios. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 72, 101890 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kemp, L. et al. Climate endgame: exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 119, e2108146119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Overconfidence in climate overshoot. Nature 634, 366\u2013373 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kahn, H. & Wiener, A. J. The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty Years (MacMillan, 1967).<\/p>\n

Amer, M., Daim, T. U. & Jetter, A. A review of scenario planning. Futures 46, 23\u201340 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

van Vuuren, D. P., Kok, M. T. J., Girod, B., Lucas, P. L. & de Vries, B. J. M. Scenarios in global environmental assessments: key characteristics and lessons for future use. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 884\u2013895 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).<\/p>\n

Meinshausen, M. et al. A perspective on the next generation of Earth system model scenarios: towards representative emission pathways (REPs). Geosci. Model. Dev. 17, 4533\u20134559 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

M\u00f6ller, V. R. et al. Annex II: glossary. In Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. et al.) 2897\u20132930, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844.029<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2023).<\/p>\n

IPCC Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009157926<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

O\u2019Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: narratives for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 169\u2013180 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153\u2013168 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, D. et al. Framing, context, and methods. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 147\u2013286, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009157896.003<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).<\/p>\n

Hausfather, Z. & Moore, F. C. Net-zero commitments could limit warming to below 2\u00b0C. Nature 604, 247\u2013248 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5 (2011).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

O\u2019Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387\u2013400 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vuuren, D. P. V. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7). Geosci. Model. Dev. 19, 2627\u20132656 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kim, H. et al. Towards a better future for biodiversity and people: modelling nature futures. Glob. Environ. Change 82, 102681 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Maury, O. et al. From Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) to Oceanic System Pathways (OSPs): building policy-relevant scenarios for global oceanic ecosystems and fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change 45, 203\u2013216 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Maury, O. et al. The ocean system pathways (OSPs): a new scenario and simulation framework to investigate the future of the world fisheries. Earth\u2019s Future https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2024EF004851<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cooley, S. et al. Ocean and coastal ecosystems and their services. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. et al.) 379\u2013550, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844.005<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Shin, Y. J. et al. Chapter 4: Plausible futures of nature, its contributions to people and their good quality of life. In The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Brond\u00edzio, E. S., Settele, J., D\u00edaz, S. & Ngo, H. T.) https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.3832074<\/a> (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Secretariat, 2019).<\/p>\n

O\u2019Neill, B. C. et al. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1074\u20131084 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burgess, M. G. & Dancer, A. Keeping emissions scenarios current. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 131\u2013132 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Van de Ven, D. J. et al. Energy and socioeconomic system transformation through a decade of IPCC-assessed scenarios. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 218\u2013226 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burgess, M. G., Ritchie, J., Shapland, J. & Pielke, R. IPCC baseline scenarios have over-projected CO\u2082 emissions and economic growth. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 014016 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Burgess, M. G., Becker, S. L., Langendorf, R. E., Fredston, A. & Brooks, C. M. Climate change scenarios in fisheries and aquatic conservation research. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 80, 1163\u20131178 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hausfather, Z. & Peters, G. P. Emissions \u2014 the \u2018business as usual\u2019 story is misleading. Nature 577, 618\u2013620 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hausfather, Z., Marvel, K., Schcmidt, G. A., Nielsen-Gammon, J. W. & Zelinka, M. Climate simulations: recognize the \u2018hot model\u2019 problem. Nature 605, 26\u201329 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Anderson, C. M. et al. Planning for change: conservation-related impacts of climate overshoot. BioScience 70, 115\u2013118 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

King, A. D. et al. Transient and quasi-equilibrium climate states at 1.5\u00b0C and 2\u00b0C gobal warming. Earth\u2019s Future 9, e2021EF002274 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jewell, J. & Cherp, A. The feasibility of climate action: bridging the inside and the outside view through feasibility spaces. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Clim. Change 14, e838 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

United Nations decade on ecosystem restoration (2021\u20132030): resolution adopted by the General Assembly (A\/RES\/73\/284). UN General Assembly https:\/\/digitallibrary.un.org\/record\/3794317<\/a> (2019).<\/p>\n

Glasgow leaders\u2019 declaration on forests and land use. UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021 https:\/\/ukcop26.org\/glasgow-leaders-declaration-on-forests-and-land-use<\/a> (2021).<\/p>\n

Lee, J.-Y. et al. Future global climate: scenario-based projections and near term information. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) 553\u2013672, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009157896.006<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).<\/p>\n

Schwalm, C. R., Glendon, S. & Duffy, P. B. RCP8.5 tracks cumulative CO\u2082 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 19656\u201319657 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sarofim, M. C. et al. High radiative forcing climate scenario relevance analyzed with a ten-million-member ensemble. Nat. Commun. 15, 8185 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Rogelj, J. et al. Credibility gap in net-zero climate targets leaves world at high risk. Science 380, 1014\u20131016 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deng, Z. et al. Global carbon emissions and decarbonization in 2024. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 6, 231\u2013233 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Trisos, C. H. et al. Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 475\u2013482 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tang, A. & Kemp, L. A fate worse than warming? Stratospheric aerosol injection and global catastrophic risk. Front. Clim. 3, 720312 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meyer, A. L. S. & Trisos, C. H. Ecological impacts of temperature overshoot: the journey and the destination. One Earth 6, 1614\u20131617 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Keller, D. P. et al. The Carbon Dioxide Removal Model Intercomparison Project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 11, 1133\u20131160 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kravitz, B. et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results. Geosci. Model. Dev. 8, 3379\u20133392 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 17, 965\u20131039 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Friedlingstein, P. et al. Emerging climate impact on carbon sinks in a consolidated carbon budget. Nature https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41586-025-09802-5<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tavoni, M. et al. Implications of overshoot for climate mitigation strategies. Nat. Clim. Change 16, 261\u2013272 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

MacMartin, D. G. et al. Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 119, e2202230119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brunner, C., Hausfather, Z. & Knutti, R. Durability of carbon dioxide removal is critical for Paris climate goals. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 645 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Taylor, G. & Vink, S. Managing the risks of missing international climate targets. Clim. Risk Manag. 34, 100379 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reisinger, A. et al. Overshoot: a conceptual review of exceeding and returning to global warming of 1.5\u00b0C. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-environ-111523-102029<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Visioni, D., Bednarz, E. M., MacMartin, D. G., Kravitz, B. & Goddard, P. B. The choice of baseline period influences the assessments of the outcomes of stratospheric aerosol injection. Earth\u2019s Future. 11, e2023EF003851 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brody, E. et al. Kicking the can down the road: understanding the effects of delaying the deployment of stratospheric aerosol injection. Environ. Res. Clim. 3, 035011 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Morrison, A. L., Pathak, D., Barnes, E. A. & Hurrell, J. W. Projected changes to Arctic shipping routes after stratospheric aerosol deployment in the ARISE-SAI scenarios. Front. Clim. 6, 1426679 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Quagraine, K. T., O\u2019Brien, T. A., Quagraine, K. A., Kravitz, B. & Tilmes, S. Assessing changes in atmospheric rivers under stratospheric aerosol injection using ARISE-SAI-1.5. Environ. Res. Clim. 4, 025016 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gay, B. A., Mandrake, L., Miner, K. R. & Miller, C. E. Assessing the impacts of mitigation and geoengineering intervention scenarios on Earth system dynamics and climatological variability with multimodal simulations. Sci. Rep. 15, 8158 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302\u20134315 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Assis, J. et al. Bio-ORACLE v3.0. Pushing marine data layers to the CMIP6 Earth system models of climate change research. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 33, e13813 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sudakow, I., Pokojovy, M. & Lyakhov, D. Statistical mechanics in climate emulation: challenges and perspectives. Environ. Data Sci. 1, e16 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Tebaldi, C., Selin, N. E., Ferrari, R. & Flierl, G. Emulators of climate model output. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 50, 709\u2013737 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ruane, A. C. et al. CMIP7 data request: impacts and adaptation priorities and opportunities. Geosci. Model. Dev. 18, 9497\u20139540 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pirani, A. et al. Scenarios in IPCC assessments: lessons from AR6 and opportunities for AR7. npj Clim. Action 3, 1 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Roberts, K. E. et al. Potential impacts of climate interventions on marine ecosystems. Rev. Geophys. 64, e2024RG000876 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McCormack, C. G. et al. Key impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future research. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 13, 103\u2013128 (2016).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Levin, L. A. et al. Deep-sea impacts of climate interventions. Science 379, 978\u2013981 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boyd, P. & Vivian, C. Should we fertilize oceans or seed clouds? No one knows. Nature 570, 155\u2013157 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Boyd, P. W., Gattuso, J.-P., Hurd, C. L. & Williamson, P. Limited understanding of basic ocean processes is hindering progress in marine carbon dioxide removal. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 061002 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Doney, S. C., Wolfe, W. H., McKee, D. C. & Fuhrman, J. G. The science, engineering, and validation of marine carbon dioxide removal and storage. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 17, 55\u201381 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00f6rtner, H. O. & Gutt, J. Impacts of climate variability and change on (marine) animals: physiological underpinnings and evolutionary consequences. Integr. Comp. Biol. 56, 31\u201344 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. Climate impacts on organisms, ecosystems and human societies: integrating OCLTT into a wider context. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb238360 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cabral, J. S. et al. The road to integrate climate change projections with regional land-use\u2013biodiversity models. People Nat. 6, 1716\u20131741 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schweizer, V. J. et al. Integrated climate-change assessment scenarios and carbon dioxide removal. One Earth 3, 166\u2013172 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Vuuren, D. P. et al. A comprehensive view on climate change: coupling of Earth system and integrated assessment models. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 024012 (2012).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Smith, S. et al. The State of Carbon Dioxide Removal 2024 2nd edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2024).<\/p>\n

Dooley, K., Harrould-Kolieb, E. & Talberg, A. Carbon-dioxide removal and biodiversity: a threat identification framework. Glob. Policy 12, 34\u201344 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gattuso, J.-P., Williamson, P., Duarte, C. M. & Magnan, A. K. The potential for ocean-based climate action: negative emissions technologies and beyond. Front. Clim. 2, 575716 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Macreadie, P. I. et al. Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 826\u2013839 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sekera, J. et al. Carbon dioxide removal \u2014 what\u2019s worth doing? A biophysical and public need perspective. PLoS Clim. 2, e0000124 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lamb, W. F. et al. The carbon dioxide removal gap. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 644\u2013651 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sacco, A. D. et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1328\u20131348 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Doelman, J. C. et al. Afforestation for climate change mitigation: potentials, risks and trade-offs. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1576\u20131591 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kaufhold, C., Willeit, M., Talento, S., Ganopolski, A. & Rockstr\u00f6m, J. Interplay between climate and carbon cycle feedbacks could substantially enhance future warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 044027 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brent, K., Simon, M. & McDonald, J. From informal to formal governance of solar radiation management. Clim. Policy 25, 947\u2013964 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gasparini, B., McGraw, Z., Storelvmo, T. & Lohmann, U. To what extent can cirrus cloud seeding counteract global warming? Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 054002 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Biermann, F. et al. Solar geoengineering: the case for an international non-use agreement. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Clim. Change 13, e754 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Santos, F. D., Ferreira, P. L. & Pedersen, J. S. T. The climate change challenge: a review of the barriers and solutions to deliver a Paris solution. Climate 10, 75 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McEvoy, D. M., McGinty, M., Cherry, T. L. & Kroll, S. International climate agreements under the threat of solar geoengineering. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 11, 853\u2013886 (2024).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Findlay, H. S., Feely, R. A., Jiang, L., Pelletier, G. & Bednar\u0161ek, N. Ocean acidification: another planetary boundary crossed. Glob. Change Biol. 31, e70238 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ellis, S. L. et al. Shading responses are species-specific in thermally stressed corals. Front. Mar. Sci. 11, 1333806 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bourgeois, T. et al. Mapping the safe operating space of marine ecosystems under contrasting emission pathways. Biogeosciences 22, 5435\u20135462 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Munday, G. et al. Risks of unavoidable impacts on forests at 1.5\u00b0C with and without overshoot. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 650\u2013655 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ritchie, P. D. L., Clarke, J. J., Cox, P. M. & Huntingford, C. Overshooting tipping point thresholds in a changing climate. Nature 592, 517\u2013523 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

McKay, D. I. A. et al. Exceeding 1.5\u00b0C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377, eabn7950 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Santana-Falc\u00f3n, Y. et al. Irreversible loss in marine ecosystem habitability after a temperature overshoot. Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 343 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044\u20131059 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schoeman, D. S., Bolin, J. A. & Cooley, S. R. Quantifying the ecological consequences of climate change in coastal ecosystems. Camb. Prism. Coast. Future 1, e39 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Grinder, R. M. & Wiens, J. J. Niche width predicts extinction from climate change and vulnerability of tropical species. Glob. Change Biol. 29, 618\u2013630 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Arif, S., Graham, N. A. J., Wilson, S. & MacNeil, M. A. Causal drivers of climate-mediated coral reef regime shifts. Ecosphere 13, e3956 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hesterberg, S. G., Jackson, K. & Bell, S. S. Climate drives coupled regime shifts across subtropical estuarine ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 119, e2121654119 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Moss, W. E. et al. Drought as an emergent driver of ecological transformation in the twenty-first century. BioScience 74, 524\u2013538 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Turner, M. G. & Seidl, R. Novel disturbance regimes and ecological responses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 54, 63\u201383 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meyer, A. L. S., Bentley, J., Odoulami, R. C., Pigot, A. L. & Trisos, C. H. Risks to biodiversity from temperature overshoot pathways. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20210394 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jeltsch-Thmmes, A., Stocker, T. F. & Joos, F. Hysteresis of the Earth system under positive and negative CO\u2082 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 124026 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Liu, L., Hauser, M., Windisch, M. & Seneviratne, S. I. Hysteresis and reversibility of agroecological droughts in response to carbon dioxide removal. Nat. Water 3, 1017\u20131024 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hueholt, D. M., Barnes, E. A., Hurrell, J. W. & Morrison, A. L. Speed of environmental change frames relative ecological risk in climate change and climate intervention scenarios. Nat. Commun. 15, 3332 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schuster, L. et al. Irreversible glacier change and trough water for centuries after overshooting 1.5 \u00b0C. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 634\u2013641 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Deprez, A. et al. Sustainability limits needed for CO\u2082 removal. Science 383, 484\u2013486 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

M\u00f6ller, T. et al. Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions critical to limit climate tipping risks. Nat. Commun. 15, 6192 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Clim. 25, 1965\u20131978 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Assis, J. et al. Bio-ORACLE v2.0: extending marine data layers for bioclimatic modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 277\u2013284 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. et al.) 3\u201333, https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781009325844.001<\/a> (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).<\/p>\n

Hughes, T. P. et al. Ecological memory modifies the cumulative impact of recurrent climate extremes. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 40\u201343 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Harris, R. M. B. et al. Climate projections for ecologists. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 5, 621\u2013637 (2014).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"P\u00f6rtner, H.-O. et al. Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 380, eabl4881…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":605624,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[851,10836,2138,2139,246,4799,1437,61,60,2137,2136,82],"class_list":["post-605623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-environment","tag-biodiversity","tag-climate-change-ecology","tag-ecology","tag-ecosystems","tag-environment","tag-environmental-health","tag-general","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-life-sciences","tag-nature-conservation","tag-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/605623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=605623"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/605623\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/605624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=605623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=605623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=605623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}