Nyrup, R. & Robinson, D. Explanatory pragmatism: a context-sensitive framework for explainable medical AI. Ethics Inf. Technol. 24, 13 (2022).<\/p>\n
Article<\/a>\u00a0 Abr\u00e0moff, M. D., Tobey, D. & Char, D. S. Lessons learned about autonomous AI: finding a safe, efficacious, and ethical path through the development process. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 214, 134\u2013142 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Froomkin, A. M., Kerr, I. R. & Pineau, J. When AIs outperform doctors: confronting the challenges of a tort-induced over-reliance on machine learning. Minnesota Law Rev. 61, 33\u2013100 (2019).<\/p>\n Mansi, G., Karusala, N. & Riedl, M. O. Legally-informed explainable AI. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2504.10708<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Price, W. N., Gerke, S. & Cohen, I. G. Potential liability for physicians using artificial intelligence. JAMA. 322, 1765\u20131766 (2019).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Lipton, Z. C. The mythos of model interpretability. Commun. ACM 61, 36\u201343 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chari, S. et al. Explanation ontology: a model of explanations for user-centered AI. In Proc. 19th International Semantic Web Conference, Part II (eds Pan, J. Z. et al.) 228\u2013243 (Springer, 2020).<\/p>\n Guidotti, R. et al. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 1\u201342 (2018).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sun, Q., Akman, A. & Schuller, B. W. Explainable artificial intelligence for medical applications: a review. ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare 6, 17 (2025).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Corti, L. et al. \u201cIt is a moving process\u201d: understanding the evolution of explainability needs of clinicians in pulmonary medicine. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 441 1\u201321 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Zajkac, H. D. et al. Towards clinically useful AI: from radiology practices in global south and north to visions of AI support. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 32, 20 (2025).<\/p>\n Xie, Y., et al. CheXplain: enabling physicians to explore and understand data-driven, AI-enabled medical imaging analysis. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1\u201313 (ACM, 2020).<\/p>\n Galsgaard, A. et al. Artificial intelligence and multidisciplinary team meetings; a communication challenge for radiologists\u2019 sense of agency and position as spider in a web? Eur. J. Radiol. 155, 110231 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Yang, Q., Steinfeld, A. & Zimmerman, J. Unremarkable AI: fitting intelligent decision support into critical, clinical decision-making processes. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 238 1\u201311 (ACM, 2019).<\/p>\n Babic, B. & Cohen, I. G. The algorithmic explainability \u2018bait and switch\u2019. Minnesota Law Rev. 108, 857\u2013909 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Desai, D. R. & Kroll, J. A. Trust but verify: a guide to algorithms and the law. Harvard J. Law Technol. 31, 1\u201364 (2017).<\/p>\n Ross, C. & Herman, B. How Medicare Advantage plans use AI to cut off care for seniors. STAT https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/2023\/03\/13\/medicare-advantage-plans-denial-artificial-intelligence<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Metcalf, J. et al. Taking algorithms to courts: a relational approach to algorithmic accountability. In Proc. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 1450\u20131462 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Kuo, T.S. et al. Understanding frontline workers\u2019 and unhoused individuals\u2019 perspectives on AI used in homeless services. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 860 1\u201317 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Phillips, J. A. Algorithms deny humans health care. The Regulatory Review https:\/\/www.theregreview.org\/2025\/03\/18\/phillips-algorithms-deny-humans-health-care<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Jin, A. & Salehi, N. (Beyond) reasonable doubt: challenges that public defenders face in scrutinizing AI in court. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 467 1\u201319 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Mansi, G. & Riedl, M. O. Recognizing lawyers as AI creators and intermediaries in contestability. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2409.17626<\/a> (2024).<\/p>\n Karusala, N. et al. Understanding contestability on the margins: implications for the design of algorithmic decision-making in public services. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 478 1\u201316 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Warren, R. B. & Salehi, N. Trial by file formats: exploring public defenders\u2019 challenges working with novel surveillance data. In Proc. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 6 1\u201326 (ACM, 2022).<\/p>\n Gerke, S. et al. The need for a system view to regulate artificial intelligence\/machine learning-based software as medical device. npj Digit. Med. 3, 53 (2020).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chan, B. Applying a common enterprise theory of liability to clinical AI systems. Am. J. Law Med. 47, 351\u2013385 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Price, W. N. Distributed governance of medical AI. SMU Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 25, 2 (2022).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Artificial intelligence and machine learning in software as a medical device. FDA https:\/\/www.fda.gov\/medical-devices\/software-medical-device-samd\/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-software-medical-device<\/a> (2023).<\/p>\n Sundholm, B. Trust the process. Arizona State Law J. 56, 1404\u20131469 (2024).<\/p>\n Maliha, G. et al. Artificial intelligence and liability in medicine: balancing safety and innovation. Milbank Quart. 99, 629\u2013647 (2021).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 DAIL\u2014The Database of AI Litigation. George Washington University Law https:\/\/blogs.gwu.edu\/law-eti\/ai-litigation-database<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Health Litigation Tracker. George Washington University Law https:\/\/litigationtracker.law.georgetown.edu<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Research citations and mentions\u2014AI, Algorithmic and Automation Incidents and Controversies database. AIAAIC https:\/\/www.aiaaic.org\/<\/a> (2025).<\/p>\n Pellegrino, E. D. The commodification of medical and health care: the moral consequences of a paradigm shift from a professional to a market ethic. J. Med. Philos. 24, 243\u2013266 (1999).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Oliva, J. Regulating healthcare coverage algorithms. Indiana Law J. 100, 1861\u20131889 (2025).<\/p>\n Alfrink, K. et al. Contestable AI by design: towards a framework. Minds Mach. 33, 613\u2013639 (2023).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Chromik, M., Eiband, M., V\u00f6lkel, S. & Buschek, D. Dark patterns of explainability, transparency, and user control for intelligent systems. In Proc. Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI Workshops 1\u20136 (ACM, 2019).<\/p>\n Ehsan, U. & Riedl, M. O. Explainability pitfalls: beyond dark patterns in explainable AI. Patterns 5, 100971 (2024).<\/p>\n Article<\/a>\u00a0 Sun, J. et al. Investigating explainability of generative AI for code through scenario-based design. In Proc. 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces 212\u2013228 (ACM, 2022).<\/p>\n Ehsan, U. & Riedl, M. O. Human-centered explainable AI: towards a reflective sociotechnical approach. In Proc. 22nd International Conference On Human-Computer Interaction 449\u2013466 (Springer, 2020).<\/p>\n Ehsan, U. et al. Human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI): reloading explainability in the era of large language models (LLMs). In Proc. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 477 1\u20136 (ACM, 2024).<\/p>\n Kaur, H. et al. Sensible AI: Re-imagining interpretability and explainability using sensemaking theory. In Proc. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 702\u2013714 (ACM, 2022).<\/p>\n Chen, S. et al. Inclusive emotion technologies: addressing the needs of d\/Deaf and hard of hearing learners in video-based learning. In Proc. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 9 1\u201327 (ACM, 2025).<\/p>\n Ehsan, U. et al. Human-centered explainable AI (HCXAI): coming of age. In Proc. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 353 1\u20137 (ACM, 2023).<\/p>\n Vines, J., Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J. & Olivier, P. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proc. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 429\u2013438 (ACM, 2013).<\/p>\n van Otterlo, M. & Atzmueller, M. On requirements and design criteria for explainability in legal AI. In Proc. 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL ’21) 60\u201368 (ACM, 2018).<\/p>\n Oswald, M. Something bad might happen: lawyers, anonymization and risk. In XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students Vol. 20 22\u201326 (ACM, 2013).<\/p>\n Spaa, A. et al. Understanding the boundaries between policymaking and HCI. In Proc. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Vol. 84 1\u201315 (ACM, 2019).<\/p>\n Leofante, F. et al. Contestable AI needs computational argumentation. In Proc. 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Vol. 21 888\u2013896 (2024).<\/p>\n Oregon drops \u2018unfair\u2019 child abuse safety at screening tool. AIAAIC https:\/\/www.aiaaic.org\/aiaaic-repository\/ai-algorithmic-and-automation-incidents\/oregon-dhs-safety-at-screening-tool<\/a> (2022).<\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n CAS<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n
\n PubMed<\/a>\u00a0
\n PubMed Central<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n