{"id":663941,"date":"2026-10-24T10:18:17","date_gmt":"2026-10-24T10:18:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/663941\/"},"modified":"2026-10-24T10:18:17","modified_gmt":"2026-10-24T10:18:17","slug":"beating-the-break-even-point-with-autonomous-quantum-error-correction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/663941\/","title":{"rendered":"Beating the break-even point with autonomous quantum error correction"},"content":{"rendered":"

Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science 309, 1704 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Shor, P. W. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1484 (1997).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Google Quantum AI Hartree-fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer. Science 369, 1084 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bernstein, D. J. & Lange, T. Post-quantum cryptography. Nature 549, 188 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Google Quantum AI Phase transitions in random circuit sampling. Nature 634, 328 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sun, W., Wei, F., Shao, Y. & Wei, Z. Sudden death of quantum advantage in correlation generations. Sci. Adv. 10, eadr5002 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).<\/p>\n

Terhal, B. M. Quantum error correction for quantum memories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 307 (2015).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kitaev, A. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A. & Preskill, J. Topological quantum memory. J. Math. Phys. 43, 4452 (2002).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Bluvstein, D. et al. Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays. Nature 626, 58 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Scholl, P. et al. Erasure conversion in a high-fidelity rydberg quantum simulator. Nature 622, 273 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Devoret, M. H. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Superconducting circuits for quantum information: an outlook. Science 339, 1169 (2013).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lim, S., Vaganov, M. V., Liu, J. & Ardavan, A. Demonstrating experimentally the encoding and dynamics of an error-correctable logical qubit on a hyperfine-coupled nuclear spin qudit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 070603 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Egan, L. et al. Fault-tolerant control of an error-corrected qubit. Nature 598, 281 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Erhard, A. et al. Entangling logical qubits with lattice surgery. Nature 589, 220 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Self, C. N., Benedetti, M. & Amaro, D. Protecting expressive circuits with a quantum error detection code. Nat. Phys. 20, 219 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Pogorelov, I. et al. Experimental fault-tolerant code switching. Nat. Phys. 21, 298 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Hong, Y., Durso-Sabina, E., Hayes, D. & Lucas, A. Entangling four logical qubits beyond break-even in a nonlocal code. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 180601 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ryan-Anderson, C. et al. High-fidelity teleportation of a logical qubit using transversal gates and lattice surgery. Science 385, 1327 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Paetznick, A. et al. Improved quantum processor logical error rates via correction and detection. Nature 654, 349 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ofek, N. et al. Extending the lifetime of a quantum bit with error correction in superconducting circuits. Nature 536, 441 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Sivak, V. V. et al. Real-time quantum error correction beyond break-even. Nature 616, 50 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ni, Z. et al. Beating the break-even point with a discrete-variable-encoded logical qubit. Nature 616, 56 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Google Quantum AI Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature 638, 920 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Dasu, S. et al. Computing with many encoded logical qubits beyond break-even. Preprint at https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2602.22211<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n

Wang, P. et al. Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour. Nat. Commun. 12, 233 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gaebler, J. et al. High-fidelity universal gate set for 9Be+ ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060505 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ballance, C. J., Harty, T. P., Linke, N. M., Sepiol, M. A. & Lucas, D. M. High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Monroe, C. et al. Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Chen, W., Gan, J., Zhang, J.-N., Matuskevich, D. & Kim, K. Quantum computation and simulation with vibrational modes of trapped ions. Chin. Phys. B 30, 060311 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Zhang, M. et al. Observation of spin-tensor induced topological phase transitions of triply degenerate points with a trapped ion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 250501 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ringbauer, M. et al. A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions. Nat. Phys. 18, 1053 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Meth, M. et al. Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer. Nat. Phys. 21, 570 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Calaj\u00f3, G. et al. Digital quantum simulation of a (1+1)D SU(2) lattice gauge theory with ion qudits. PRX Quantum 5, 040309 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kubischta, E. & Teixeira, I. Family of quantum codes with exotic transversal gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 240601 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kubischta, E. & Teixeira, I. Quantum codes from twisted unitary t-groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 030602 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gross, J. A., Godfrin, C., Blais, A. & Dupont-Ferrier, E. Hardware-efficient error-correcting codes for large nuclear spins. Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 014006 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lim, S., Liu, J. & Ardavan, A. Fault-tolerant qubit encoding using a spin-7\/2 qudit. Phys. Rev. A 108, 062403 (2023).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gross, J. A. Designing codes around interactions: the case of a spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 010504 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Omanakuttan, S., Buchemmavari, V., Gross, J. A., Deutsch, I. H. & Marvian, M. Fault-tolerant quantum computation using large spin cat-codes. PRX Quantum 5, 020355 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yu, X. et al. Schr\u00f6dinger cat states of a nuclear spin qudit in silicon. Nat. Phys. 21, 362 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Jain, S. P., Hudson, E. R., Campbell, W. C. & Albert, V. V. Absorption\u2013emission codes for atomic and molecular quantum information platforms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260601 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kruckenhauser, A. et al. Dark spin-cat states as biased qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020601 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n MathSciNet<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Fl\u00fchmann, C. et al. Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator. Nature 566, 513 (2019).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cai, W., Ma, Y., Wang, W., Zou, C.-L. & Sun, L. Bosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits. Fund. Res. 1, 50 (2021).<\/p>\n


\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Reiter, F., S\u00f8rensen, A. S., Zoller, P. & Muschik, C. A. Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions. Nat. Commun. 8, 1822 (2017).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, Y. et al. Error-transparent operations on a logical qubit protected by quantum error correction. Nat. Phys. 16, 827 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Gertler, J. M. et al. Protecting a bosonic qubit with autonomous quantum error correction. Nature 590, 243 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Z. et al. Autonomous error correction of a single logical qubit using two transmons. Nat. Commun. 15, 1681 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lachance-Quirion, D. et al. Autonomous quantum error correction of gottesman-kitaev-preskill states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 150607 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Lihm, J.-M., Noh, K. & Fischer, U. R. Implementation-independent sufficient condition of the knill-laflamme type for the autonomous protection of logical qudits by strong engineered dissipation. Phys. Rev. A 98, 012317 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

van Mourik, M. W. et al. Experimental realization of nonunitary multiqubit operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 040602 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Brock, B. L. et al. Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even. Nature 641, 612 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281 (2003).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Allcock, D. T. C. et al. omg blueprint for trapped ion quantum computing with metastable states. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 214002 (2021).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Yang, H.-X. et al. Realizing coherently convertible dual-type qubits with the same ion species. Nat. Phys. 18, 1058 (2022).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Schmidt, P. O. et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science 309, 749 (2005).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Ma, W. L. et al. Path-independent quantum gates with noisy ancilla. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 110503 (2020).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Xu, X., Beaudrap, N. D., O\u2019Gorman, J. & Benjamin, S. C. An integrity measure to benchmark quantum error correcting memories. New J. Phys. 20, 023009 (2018).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Cai, W. et al. Protecting entanglement between logical qubits via quantum error correction. Nat. Phys. 20, 1022 (2024).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Putterman, H. et al. Hardware-efficient quantum error correction via concatenated bosonic qubits. Nature 638, 927 (2025).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n ADS<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Kwon, H., Fischer, U. R., Lee, S.-W. & Jiang, L. Restoring Heisenberg scaling in time via autonomous quantum error correction. npj Quantum Inf. 12, 103 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

DeBry, K. et al. Error correction of a logical qubit encoded in a single atomic ion. Nat. Phys. 22, 1446\u20131452 (2026).<\/p>\n

Article<\/a>\u00a0
\n
\n Google Scholar<\/a>\u00a0\n <\/p>\n

Li, Y. et al. Replication data for: Beating the break-even point with autonomous quantum error correction. Zenodo https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5281\/zenodo.20768851<\/a> (2026).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J. & Head-Gordon, M. Simulated quantum computation of molecular energies. Science…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":663942,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[2301,2300,2304,1440,1437,61,60,2299,2302,2303,248,6112,5336,82,2298],"class_list":["post-663941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-physics","tag-atomic","tag-classical-and-continuum-physics","tag-complex-systems","tag-condensed-matter-physics","tag-general","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-mathematical-and-computational-physics","tag-molecular","tag-optical-and-plasma-physics","tag-physics","tag-quantum-information","tag-qubits","tag-science","tag-theoretical"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=663941"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/663941\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/663942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=663941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=663941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=663941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}