{"id":75285,"date":"2025-10-12T06:29:09","date_gmt":"2025-10-12T06:29:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/75285\/"},"modified":"2025-10-12T06:29:09","modified_gmt":"2025-10-12T06:29:09","slug":"questions-about-irelands-neutrality-on-the-ballot-in-this-election-the-irish-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/75285\/","title":{"rendered":"Questions about Ireland\u2019s neutrality on the ballot in this election \u2013 The Irish Times"},"content":{"rendered":"

Debates about neutrality <\/a>during the presidential election <\/a>have highlighted important questions about the formal and informal powers of the role. <\/p>\n

The first question on foreign and defence policy posed by presenter \u00c1ine Lawlor to Heather Humphreys<\/a> during the RT\u00c9 The Week In Politics presidential debate<\/a> was whether she was \u201cthe best person to safeguard our neutrality.\u201d <\/p>\n

The implication of the question was clear \u2013 neutrality is a fixture of Irish politics, one that should be cherished by any president, not a policy to be adopted or jettisoned by a Government as it sees fit. Humphreys responded accordingly: \u201cWe are a neutral country, and we want to remain a neutral country. And I fully, fully support our neutrality.\u201d<\/p>\n

Despite Humphreys swearing fealty to this tenet of Irish foreign policy, the debate revealed much about increasingly divergent foreign policy and defence positions. On one side are those favoured by President Michael D Higgins, advocated for by Independent candidate Catherine Connolly<\/a>. And on the other are the diplomacy and defence commitments adopted by the Government. <\/p>\n

Connolly was quick to criticise Humphreys for, in her view, undermining Irish neutrality by supporting the removal of one of the \u201clocks\u201d on Irish defence policy \u2013 UN approval for overseas operational deployments of Irish military units. <\/p>\n

When challenged on the Republic\u2019s defence policy, Humphreys argued that Connolly needed to respect that the executive had primacy when it comes to foreign and defence, and that a president should not interfere in such policy matters. But the risk for Humphreys is that while she talks down the formal political power of the presidency \u2013 giving what is an accurate representation of the office\u2019s limited constitutional role \u2013 her rival is articulating a much grander vision of the office, building on a precedent already established by President Higgins of acting as a vocal guardian of precepts of Irish foreign policy. <\/p>\n

Catherine Connolly has refused to be drawn on whether she represented financial institutions in repossession cases as a barrister. Video: Jack Horgan-Jones. <\/p>\n

For Higgins and for Connolly, neutrality is more than a position taken by any Government; it is part of this State\u2019s identity. Although the president self-evidently does not have the formal powers to overturn any policy shift that undermines neutrality, an incumbent can use the office to speak over the Government and warn against change. <\/p>\n

Here, President Higgins has not held back. He has criticised what he regards as a dangerous \u201cdrift\u201d in the Government\u2019s foreign policy towards \u201cmilitary alliances\u201d such as Nato and the militarisation of the European Union. Connolly has echoed such views. Rather than jettisoning the triple lock, she believes that the Republic should expand its relations with Asian, South American and African countries to save the United Nations from the damage inflicted on the organisation by the permanent five members of the UN Security Council. <\/p>\n

Connolly\u2019s views are long-standing and clearly articulated \u2013 even if some of her remedies to address the UN\u2019s malaise have an uncertain prospect of success. For example, she has expressed her faith in the UN General Assembly to use its powers to overcome vetoes exercised by the United States and other permanent members of the UN Security Council. Assembly resolutions are not legally binding; that power remains with the security council and there is little prospect of a fundamental realignment of UN structures. <\/p>\n

A positive, if ambitious, vision of UN reform contrasts with the contortions of Humphreys and Fine Gael when it comes to the issue of neutrality. <\/p>\n

The party does not want to say out loud what many now regard as increasingly obvious \u2013 that the Republic is an aligned country. Defence alignment is not the same as being in an alliance. The State is not, and will not be, for the foreseeable future, a Nato member. However, it is involved, primarily through the European Union\u2019s Common Security and Defence Policy, in regional defence arrangements based on mutual assistance and support. The European Union\u2019s mutual defence clause is more ambiguous than the requirements of Article 5 of the Nato treaty \u2013 which states that \u201can armed attack … shall be considered an attack against them all\u201d \u2013 but EU defence integration and military co-operation have rapidly accelerated since the Russian invasion of Ukraine. <\/p>\n

T\u00e1naiste Simon Harris <\/a>has concluded, based on strategic threats to our critical infrastructure from interference by hostile states like Russia, that the State requires much more co-operation with the EU and Nato in areas like cybersecurity, intelligence and maritime security. Yet Fine Gael also believes that any attempt to explain why our foreign and defence policy has shifted further away from conventional understandings of neutrality \u2013 including non-alignment \u2013 is a losing bet, and so prefers to avoid the conversation altogether. <\/p>\n

\"\"Calamity for Fianna F\u00e1il as Jim Gavin drops out of the presidential race<\/p>\n

However, during the Week in Politics debate, Humphreys criticised Connolly for comparing increases in defence spending by the current German Government with the rearmament policies of Nazi Germany in the 1930s, reminding Connolly that she had repeatedly \u201cspoken out against our allies, against Germany, against France, against the UK\u201d.<\/p>\n

The word \u201callies\u201d is revealing. Harris has also used the term, telling the D\u00e1il that, \u201cIreland will fully participate at EU level on all matters of defence. Our allies and colleagues in eastern Europe are under attack.\u201d The directness of both Harris and Humphreys in expressing solidarity with other EU member states gives way to hesitancy and defensiveness when asked if Irish neutrality remains in play following the rapid changes to defence policy since the war in Ukraine. (The Republic is \u201cnot politically neutral, but we are militarily neutral,\u201d as Taoiseach Miche\u00e1l Martin has put it.)<\/p>\n

It will become increasingly difficult for the Government to continue to reassure both adherents to Irish neutrality and its allies in the EU during our presidency next year, when defence is expected to top the agenda. Meanwhile, if she is elected, Connolly is likely to continue to advocate for Irish neutrality. Divergences on foreign and defence policy between the executive and the presidency may widen. An alternative approach to foreign policy is also very much on the ballot on October 24th. <\/p>\n

Edward Burke is a lecturer in War Studies at University College Dublin<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Debates about neutrality during the presidential election have highlighted important questions about the formal and informal powers of…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":75286,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3656,2244,895,3775,2044,61,60,977,1843,43,978,70],"class_list":["post-75285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ireland","tag-catherine-connolly","tag-eu","tag-fianna-fail","tag-fine-gael","tag-heather-humphreys","tag-ie","tag-ireland","tag-michael-d-higgins","tag-micheal-martin","tag-news","tag-presidential-election","tag-simon-harris"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/75286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.newsbeep.com\/ie\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}