The evolution of high-throughput mass spectrometry (MS) has necessitated the development of robust proteomics data formats to manage the vast quantities of data generated during protein identification and quantification. As laboratory workflows move toward more integrated multiomic approaches, the ability to store, share, and re-analyze MS data across different software platforms is critical for scientific transparency. Historically, the field was fragmented by proprietary binary formats specific to instrument manufacturers, which hindered large-scale meta-analyses and data sharing. The Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI) of the Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) has since introduced open-source, XML-based standards to address these challenges, fostering a more collaborative and reproducible research ecosystem.
The transition from proprietary formats—often referred to as “vendor lock-in”—to open standards has been a decade-long endeavor. While manufacturer-specific formats are optimized for data acquisition speed and storage efficiency on local workstations, they lack the transparency required for peer review and cross-platform validation. By standardizing the way mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios, intensities, and metadata are recorded, the scientific community has established a foundation for the “Big Data” era of proteomics, enabling the growth of global repositories and cloud-based re-analysis pipelines.
The technical architecture of the mzML format
The mzML format serves as the foundational standard for representing raw mass spectrometry data (Table 1). Developed through the merger of the earlier mzData and mzXML formats in 2008, mzML provides a unified container for metadata and mass spectral peaks. This format is designed to be instrument-agnostic, allowing researchers to convert vendor-specific files into a single, standardized structure that third-party processing tools can readily interpret.
The structure of an mzML file is hierarchical, utilizing eXtensible Markup Language (XML) to define the experimental parameters. It includes comprehensive descriptions of the instrument hardware, software settings, data acquisition parameters, and the actual scan data. The raw data—specifically the m/z and intensity arrays—are typically encoded using Base64 to transform binary data into a text-based format compatible with XML. To mitigate the significant file size increases associated with XML, mzML supports specialized compression algorithms such as MS-Numpress, which can reduce the footprint of binary arrays without losing the numerical precision required for high-resolution mass spectrometry.
Key components of an mzML file include:
Controlled vocabularies (CV): These are perhaps the most critical element of the PSI standards. By using standardized terms (e.g., MS:1000045 for “collision-induced dissociation”), the format ensures that metadata is machine-readable and semantically consistent across different laboratories and software versions. Data processing history: This section tracks any transformations applied to the data, such as peak picking, smoothing, or deisotoping. This “provenance” metadata is essential for auditing the steps taken from raw acquisition to the final peak list. Scan settings and precursor information: For tandem MS (MS/MS) experiments, mzML records the isolation window, collision energy, and the properties of the precursor ion, allowing downstream algorithms to link fragment spectra back to their parent ions with high confidence.
Streamlining identification results with mzIdentML
While mzML handles raw data, mzIdentML is the standard for reporting the results of protein and peptide identification. In a typical laboratory workflow, raw spectra are searched against protein databases using algorithms to match experimental spectra with theoretical ones. The mzIdentML format captures these results, providing a structured way to report peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs), protein groups, and the confidence scores associated with those identifications.
One of the primary advantages of mzIdentML is its ability to handle the “protein inference” problem. Because many peptides are shared between different protein isoforms or members of a protein family, reporting a single protein identification can be misleading. mzIdentML allows for the representation of protein groups and the evidence supporting each member of that group. Furthermore, it records the specific search engine used, the sequence database version (including decoys), and the modifications (both fixed and variable) considered during the search. This level of detail is essential for the verification of results and for ensuring that other researchers can replicate the identification process precisely, meeting the rigorous standards of modern peer-reviewed journals.
Table 1. Comparison of common proteomics data formats.
Format
Primary purpose
Data structure
Data type
mzML
Raw data representation
XML (hierarchical)
Spectra, m/z, intensities
mzIdentML
Identification results
XML (hierarchical)
Peptides, proteins, PSMs
mzTab
Summary reporting
Tab-delimited (flat)
Quantitation, IDs, metadata
mzQuantML
Quantitative evidence
XML (hierarchical)
Peak areas, reporter ions
mzXML
Legacy raw data
XML (hierarchical)
Spectra (legacy format)
Standardizing quantitative data through mzQuantML and mzTab
The quantification of proteins—determining their relative or absolute abundance—adds another layer of complexity to proteomics data formats. To address this, the PSI developed mzQuantML. This format is capable of representing data from various quantitative workflows, including label-free quantification (LFQ), metabolic labeling (e.g., SILAC), and isobaric labeling (e.g., TMT or iTRAQ). mzQuantML focuses on the evidence for quantification, such as peak areas, elution profiles, or reporter ion intensities, rather than just the final ratios. This allows researchers to re-examine the underlying data to ensure that quantitative differences are statistically significant and not artifacts of the processing pipeline.
However, the complexity and verbosity of XML-based formats like mzQuantML often exceed the practical needs of laboratories requiring simple summary reports for biological interpretation. For these use cases, mzTab was introduced. mzTab is a tab-delimited text format designed to be easily readable by both humans and machines (e.g., using Microsoft Excel, R, or Python). It provides a high-level summary of identification and quantification results, making it an ideal format for submitting results to public repositories like the PRIDE (Proteomics Identifications Database) archive.
In 2019, mzTab 2.0 was released, expanding the format’s capabilities to handle metabolomics data as well. This highlights a broader trend in the life sciences: the convergence of data standards across different “omics” disciplines. By providing a simpler alternative to XML, mzTab has significantly increased the compliance rate for data sharing in the proteomics community, as it is much easier for developers to implement in custom scripts and bioinformatics tools.
The role of data repositories and the FAIR principles
The adoption of standardized proteomics data formats is intrinsically linked to the FAIR principles: Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability. Global consortia, such as ProteomeXchange, mandate the use of PSI standards for data deposition. When a researcher uploads a dataset to repositories like PRIDE, MassIVE, or jPOST, the use of mzML and mzIdentML ensures that the data can be integrated into larger meta-analyses.
Without these standards, the community would be unable to perform large-scale re-analysis projects, such as the ProteomicsDB or the Human Protein Atlas, which aggregate data from thousands of experiments to build a comprehensive map of the human proteome. Standardized formats allow for the automated validation of uploaded data, ensuring that the reported identifications meet specific false discovery rate (FDR) thresholds and that the metadata provided is sufficient for another researcher to understand the experimental design.
Challenges and limitations in standardized data implementation
Despite the widespread adoption of standardized proteomics data formats, several technical hurdles persist. The primary limitation remains file size; XML-based formats are inherently verbose because every data point is wrapped in descriptive tags. For example, a 1GB vendor file may expand to 5GB or more when converted to mzML. This creates significant storage and data transfer burdens for laboratories producing terabytes of data daily, necessitating the use of high-performance computing (HPC) environments.
Furthermore, the conversion process—often performed using tools like ProteoWizard’s msconvert—requires constant updates to keep pace with new instrument firmware. If the converter is not perfectly aligned with the latest vendor APIs, metadata can be lost or misrepresented. There is also the issue of “information loss” during centroiding; while many researchers convert profile data to centroided data to save space, this process can discard information about peak shape and isotopic distributions that might be useful for advanced post-processing algorithms.
This content includes text that has been created with the assistance of generative AI and has undergone editorial review before publishing. Technology Networks’ AI policy can be found here.