If you want to measure human movement accurately, sticking sensors tightly to the body may not be the best approach.
A new study suggests that sensors on loose, everyday clothing can actually capture motion more precisely – and with far less data – than the tight suits, straps, and skin-hugging wearables we usually associate with “serious” tracking.
The study comes from scientists at King’s College London. The team says their findings could improve everything from health trackers like smart watches to motion capture for CGI characters.
The research may even make it easier to monitor conditions that affect mobility, including Parkinson’s, outside of a lab.
Challenging what everyone assumed
Until now, the common belief was simple: if a sensor is loose, it jiggles around and creates “noisy” data, so you need it strapped down. The researchers expected the same.
“When we think about technology that tracks movement – like a Fitbit on your wrist or the suits actors wear to play CGI characters – we had thought that the sensors need to be tight against the body to produce the most accurate results,” said study co-author Matthew Howard.
The common belief is that if a sensor is loose, the data will be “noisy” or messy,” noted Howard.
“However, our research has proven over multiple experiments that loose, flowing clothing actually makes motion tracking significantly more accurate.”
“Meaning, we could move away from “wearable tech” that feels like medical equipment and toward “smart clothing” – like a simple button or pin on a dress – that tracks your health while you feel completely natural going about your day.”
That’s the real promise here: motion tracking that doesn’t feel like you’re being wired up for a clinical trial.
Better accuracy, less data
The study reports that loose fabric can predict and capture the body’s movements with 40% more accuracy than a sensor stuck to your skin. Even more striking, it needed 80% less data to do it.
If those numbers hold up across more settings, that’s a big deal.
Better accuracy with less data means simpler systems, faster learning, and less battery and processing demand – the kind of improvements that can actually change products and real-world research methods.
The role of loose fabric
So how could loose clothing possibly do better than a sensor firmly attached to your body?
The key idea is that loose fabric doesn’t just move along with you. It reacts. It exaggerates tiny shifts in posture and limb movement in ways that can be easier to detect.
The researchers describe loose fabric as a “mechanical amplifier,” making movement signals larger and more distinct.
“When you start to move your arm, a loose sleeve doesn’t just sit there; it folds, billows, and shifts in complex ways – reacting more sensitively to the movements than a tighter fitting sensor,” Howard said.
In other words, the sensor isn’t only measuring the body. It’s also measuring the fabric’s “response pattern,” which contains extra information about what the body is doing.
Testing fabrics, bodies, and robots
To make sure this wasn’t a one-off fluke, the scientists tested sensors on a wide range of fabrics. They also tested both human subjects and robot subjects doing different kinds of movements.
The researchers compared the fabric-based measurements with standard approaches: motion sensors attached to straps and tight clothing.
The pattern stayed consistent. Every time, the fabric-based approach detected movement faster, more accurately, and with less movement data needed to make predictions.
One especially useful detail: looser fabric could also distinguish between very similar movements – including subtle motions that are “barely detectable.”
That matters because in many real-world situations, the movement you most want to track is not a dramatic arm swing. It’s the small, early, easy-to-miss changes.
Parkinson’s and other conditions
This is where the study moves from “cool tech” to something potentially meaningful for health monitoring.
However, a common problem is that tight wearables can miss small movements, which means the data can be less reliable for patients whose movement is limited or subtle.
“Sometimes, a patient’s movements are too small for a tight wristband to catch and therefore we can’t always get the most accurate data on how conditions like Parkinson’s are affecting people’s everyday lives.”
“Through this approach we could ‘amplify’ people’s movement, which will help capture them even when they are smaller than typical abled-bodied movements. This could allow us to track people in the comfort of their own homes or a care home, in their everyday clothing.”
“It could become easier for doctors to monitor their patients, as well as medical researchers to gather vital data needed to inform our understanding of these conditions and develop new therapies including wearable technologies that cater for these kinds of disabilities.”
A big part of that is comfort and realism. People don’t live in labs. If you can gather better data while someone wears normal clothes at home, you get a truer picture of daily life – and probably better long-term participation too.
From Fitbits to smart buttons
The study also points toward a different design future for consumer tech.
Instead of bulky wearables that scream “device,” the researchers imagine sensors integrated into clothing in subtle ways – like a button on a shirt or a pin on a dress.
That kind of change could make motion tracking more acceptable in everyday life. It could also widen who uses it, especially people who find traditional wearables uncomfortable, stigmatizing, or impractical.
A robotics angle
Howard also frames this as a major opportunity for robotics. Robots learn from data. But collecting high-quality human movement data at scale is hard, partly because the current tools are inconvenient.
“A lot of robotics research is about learning from human behavior for robots to mimic, but to do this you need huge amounts of data collected from every day human movements, and not many people are willing to strap up in a Lycra suit and go about their daily business,” he explained.
“This research offers the possibility of attaching discreet sensors to everyday clothing, so we can start to collect the internet-scale of human behavior data, needed to revolutionize the field of robotics.”
If you could gather huge amounts of natural movement data without people feeling “instrumented,” you’d unlock a different kind of training set – one that reflects how humans actually move in daily life, not how they move in a lab.
The most interesting part of this study is how counterintuitive it is. Loose fabric sounds like it should add mess. Instead, it may add information.
If that holds up, it could shift the whole vibe of motion tracking away from straps and suits and toward clothing that simply blends into normal life.
The study is published in the journal Nature Communications.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–