World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Key Facts. ESA/P/WP/248 (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2018).
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Childers, D. L., Mcdonnell, M. J. & Zhou, W. Evolution and future of urban ecological science: ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2, e01229 (2016).
Collins, M. K., Magle, S. B. & Gallo, T. Global trends in urban wildlife ecology and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109236 (2021).
Magle, S. B., Fidino, M. A., Lehrer, E. W., Magle, T. & Aronson, M. F. J. in Urban Biodiversity and Equity 133–144 (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Magle, S. B. et al. Advancing urban wildlife research through a multi-city collaboration. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 232–239 (2019).
Callaghan, C. T. et al. How to build a biodiverse city: environmental determinants of bird diversity within and among 1581 cities. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 217–234 (2021).
La Sorte, F. A., Clark, J. A. G., Lepczyk, C. A. & Aronson, M. F. J. Collections of small urban parks consistently support higher species richness but not higher phylogenetic or functional diversity. Proc. R. Soc. B 290, 20231424 (2023).
Lepczyk, C. A. et al. in Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments (eds Murgui, E. & Hedblom, M.) 13–33 (Springer, 2017).
Marzluff, J. M. & Rodewald, A. D. Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities Environ. 1, 6 (2008).
Schell, C. J. et al. The ecological and evolutionary consequences of systemic racism in urban environments. Science 369, eaay4497 (2020).
Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D. Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180082 (2018).
Knapp, S. et al. A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience 71, 268–279 (2021).
Casanelles-Abella, J. et al. Biodiversity modeling to manage urban ecosystems for people and nature. Nat. Cities 2, 573–584 (2025).
Fidino, M. et al. Gentrification drives patterns of alpha and beta diversity in cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2318596121 (2024).
Magle, S. B. et al. Wealth and urbanization shape medium and large terrestrial mammal communities. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 5446–5459 (2021).
Geurts, E. M., Reynolds, J. D. & Starzomski, B. M. Turning observations into biodiversity data: broadscale spatial biases in community science. Ecosphere 14, e4582 (2023).
Bowler, D. E. et al. Temporal trends in the spatial bias of species occurrence records. Ecography 2022, e06219 (2022).
Grade, A. M., Chan, N. W., Gajbhiye, P., Perkins, D. J. & Warren, P. S. Evaluating the use of semi-structured crowdsourced data to quantify inequitable access to urban biodiversity: a case study with eBird. PLoS ONE 17, e0277223 (2022).
Callaghan, C. T., Rowley, J. J. L., Cornwell, W. K., Poore, A. G. B. & Major, R. E. Improving big citizen science data: moving beyond haphazard sampling. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000357 (2019).
Ellis-Soto, D., Chapman, M. & Locke, D. H. Historical redlining is associated with increasing geographical disparities in bird biodiversity sampling in the United States. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1869–1877 (2023).
Chen, G., Zhou, Y., Voogt, J. A. & Stokes, E. C. Remote sensing of diverse urban environments: from the single city to multiple cities. Remote Sens. Environ. 305, 114108 (2024).
Bauer, S. et al. The grand challenges of migration ecology that radar aeroecology can help answer. Ecography 42, 861–875 (2019).
Scarpignato, A. L. et al. Shortfalls in tracking data available to inform North American migratory bird conservation. Biol. Conserv. 286, 110224 (2023).
Van Doren, B. M. V. & Horton, K. G. A continental system for forecasting bird migration. Science 361, 1115–1118 (2018).
Elmore, J. A. et al. Predicting bird-window collisions with weather radar. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 1593–1601 (2021).
Horton, K. G. et al. Bright lights in the big cities: migratory birds’ exposure to artificial light. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 209–214 (2019).
Bonter, D. N., Gauthreaux, S. A. Jr & Donovan, T. M. Characteristics of important stopover locations for migrating birds: remote sensing with radar in the Great Lakes Basin. Conserv. Biol. 23, 440–448 (2009).
Buler, J. J. & Diehl, R. H. Quantifying bird density during migratory stopover using weather surveillance radar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47, 2741–2751 (2009).
Cohen, E. B. et al. A place to land: spatiotemporal drivers of stopover habitat use by migrating birds. Ecol. Lett. 24, 38–49 (2021).
Guo, F., Buler, J. J., Smolinsky, J. A. & Wilcove, D. S. Autumn stopover hotspots and multiscale habitat associations of migratory landbirds in the eastern United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2203511120 (2023).
Horton, K. G. et al. Artificial light at night is a top predictor of bird migration stopover density. Nat. Commun. 14, 7446 (2023).
Diehl, R. H. The airspace is habitat. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 377–379 (2013).
Guo, F., Buler, J. J., Smolinsky, J. A. & Wilcove, D. S. Seasonal patterns and protection status of stopover hotspots for migratory landbirds in the eastern United States. Curr. Biol. 34, 235–244 (2024).
Pennington, D. N., Hansel, J. & Blair, R. B. The conservation value of urban riparian areas for landbirds during spring migration: land cover, scale, and vegetation effects. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1235–1248 (2008).
Matthews, S. N. & Rodewald, P. G. Urban forest patches and stopover duration of migratory Swainson’s thrushes. Condor 112, 96–104 (2010).
Rodewald, P. G. & Matthews, S. N. Landbird use of riparian and upland forest stopover habitats in an urban landscape. Condor 107, 259–268 (2005).
Burt, C. S. et al. The effects of light pollution on migratory animal behavior. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 355–368 (2023).
Luck, G. W. A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 82, 607–645 (2007).
Van Doren, B. M. et al. Drivers of fatal bird collisions in an urban center. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101666118 (2021).
Pacheco-Muñoz, R., Ceja-Madrigal, A. & Schondube, J. E. Migratory birds benefit from urban environments in a highly anthropized Neotropical region. PLoS ONE 20, e0311290 (2025).
Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. & La Sorte, F. A. Cities as sanctuaries. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21, 251–259 (2023).
Jimenez, M. F. et al. Quantifying range- and topographical biases in weather surveillance radar measures of migratory bird activity. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 11, 282–293 (2025).
Snep, R. P. et al. Urban bird conservation: presenting stakeholder-specific arguments for the development of bird-friendly cities. Urban Ecosyst. 19, 1535–1550 (2016).
CDC. NCHS Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. National Center for Health Statistics https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data-analysis-tools/urban-rural.html (2024).
Chen, J., Theller, L., Gitau, M. W., Engel, B. A. & Harbor, J. M. Urbanization impacts on surface runoff of the contiguous United States. J. Environ. Manage. 187, 470–481 (2017).
Li, C. et al. Impacts of urbanization on watershed water balances across the conterminous United States. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2019WR026574 (2020).
Bounoua, L. et al. Impact of urbanization on US surface climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 084010 (2015).
Schleder, B. W. Residential Irrigation as a Driver of Urban Bird Community Structure (California State University, 2010).
Li, X. et al. Response of vegetation phenology to urbanization in the conterminous United States. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2818–2830 (2017).
Swatantran, A. et al. Mapping migratory bird prevalence using remote sensing data fusion. PLoS ONE 7, e28922 (2012).
Shipley, J. R., Kelly, J. F. & Frick, W. F. Toward integrating citizen science and radar data for migrant bird conservation. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 4, 127–136 (2018).
Ellis-Soto, D. et al. From biologging to conservation: tracking individual performance in changing environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2410947122 (2025).
Meehan, T. D. et al. Integrating data types to estimate spatial patterns of avian migration across the Western Hemisphere. Ecol. Appl. 32, e2679 (2022).
The ParkServe® database. Trust for Public Land https://www.tpl.org/parkserve/about (2024).
Wood, E. M. et al. Historical racial redlining and contemporary patterns of income inequality negatively affect birds, their habitat, and people in Los Angeles, California. Ornithol. Appl. 126, duad044 (2024).
Estien, C. O., Fidino, M., Wilkinson, C. E., Morello-Frosch, R. & Schell, C. J. Historical redlining is associated with disparities in wildlife biodiversity in four California cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2321441121 (2024).
Poulton Kamakura, R., Bai, J., Sheel, V. & Katti, M. Biodiversity is not a luxury: unpacking wealth and power to accommodate the complexity of urban biodiversity. Ecosphere 15, e70049 (2024).
Runge, C. A. et al. Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds. Science 350, 1255–1258 (2015).
DeLuca, W. V. et al. A framework for linking hemispheric, full annual cycle prioritizations to local conservation actions for migratory birds. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12975 (2023).
Thuiller, W. Ecological niche modelling. Curr. Biol. 34, R225–R229 (2024).
Lin, T.-Y. et al. MistNet: measuring historical bird migration in the US using archived weather radar data and convolutional neural networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1908–1922 (2019).
Wikelski, M. et al. Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature 423, 704 (2003).
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2024.04.2+764 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2024).
Bürkner, P.-C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Migratory Bird Program Administrative Flyways. US Fish & Wildlife Service https://www.fws.gov/partner/migratory-bird-program-administrative-flyways (2025).
Jimenez, M. Migratory bird stopover patterns linked to urbanization and social landscapes. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1jwstqk68 (2025).