I AM devoting today’s column to some information received in the past couple of days from an expert in the Philippine electricity market. In the interest of transparency, let me stress that this was my idea, and not in any way sponsored content. I believe that the information is extremely valuable and should be shared, and I thank Green Tiger Markets (GTM) and its CEO John Knorring for his permission to republish this otherwise subscriber-only content. GTM is the operator of the only electricity forwards market accessible to the Philippines, and has in the past months been working with the Energy Regulatory Commission and other stakeholders to expand the use of this valuable tool. I’ve taken the liberty of editing John’s commentary to some degree for space considerations.
***
The ongoing United States-Iran conflict, now in its second week as of March 2026, has escalated into direct military strikes, driving global oil prices to their highest levels since 2022. This war threatens energy supplies through the Strait of Hormuz, amplifying risks for energy-importing nations like the Philippines.
Oil prices surged early in the conflict and, in short order, nearly doubled. The Friday before the conflict started, WTI Crude was trading in the mid-$60/barrel. Ten days later, as markets reopened on Sunday night, WTI Crude hit highs around $120/barrel due to fears of prolonged Strait of Hormuz disruptions, through which approximately 18 percent of the world’s crude flows. The spread between April delivery oil and December delivery oil also exploded from approximately $2 to $42/barrel.
Iran’s threats to tankers and threats to block the strait have fueled supply shortage risks for crude, refined products like diesel and jet fuel, and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)/propane. Availability of products is already starting to be an issue and will impact other markets as well. While prices dipped significantly in the last 48 hours on Trump’s signals of a quick end, prolonged closure could, and will likely, sustain prices at $100+, pushing global inflation much higher.
Get the latest news
delivered to your inbox
Sign up for The Manila Times newsletters
By signing up with an email address, I acknowledge that I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Energy dependence
The Philippines imports 95 percent of its crude oil and nearly all refined products from the Middle East, with 91 percent of LPG/propane also sourced there, leaving it highly vulnerable. It relies on coal (50 to 60 percent of power) and growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports (up 508 percent projected through 2029), both sensitive to global price spikes and potential coal demand shifts from LNG shortages. Domestic stocks offer a 30- to 60-day buffer, but regional refinery cuts exacerbate risks.
Impacts on energy prices
Higher fuel prices, combined with seasonal outages, are pressuring Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM) rates via higher generator costs. Inflation could climb 0.4 to 1.4 percentage points per $10/barrel oil increase, with WESM prices spiking further if outages tighten supply. Electricity and transport costs will rise most, indirectly hitting food via fertilizers and manufacturing.
Govt response
Manila has mandated energy-saving measures, like flexible work and online meetings, while eyeing a four-day workweek and fuel subsidies for vulnerable sectors. Congress may grant emergency powers to suspend oil taxes, and apps allow “virtual fuel” pre-purchases to hedge volatility. The peso faces depreciation to 60+ versus the US dollar if oil stays elevated, complicating imports.
LNG
Qatar is one of the world’s key LNG exporters, and the US Iran conflict has disrupted those flows, tightened global gas balances, and pushed more demand toward coal as a substitute fuel. With shipping lanes in and around the Gulf closed and buyers wary of transit risk, all Qatari cargoes are delayed or not being tendered at all, cutting into spot availability just as oil and product prices spike.
Related commodity prices
As spot LNG prices in Asia and Europe reprice sharply higher on reduced Qatari supply and heightened route risk, power utilities are reassessing generation stacks and fuel procurement strategies. Gas-fired plants at the margin become uneconomic versus coal, especially in markets with spare coal capacity and more flexible emissions regimes, leading to incremental coal burn and stronger bids for seaborne thermal coal. This fuel-switching dynamic reinforces the move already underway from the crude complex: tight LNG plus expensive oil creates a two-pronged squeeze that channels additional demand into the coal market.
Coal as a critical backup
In this environment, coal is not just a cheap alternative; it is being repriced as a critical backup fuel that can be ramped up when LNG cargoes do not arrive on schedule. Utilities, traders and some governments are, therefore, rebuilding coal stockpiles and layering in hedges in Newcastle and Indonesian benchmarks, amplifying the rally that began in sympathy with crude and products.
Newcastle thermal coal, the key Asia Pacific benchmark, was trading around $120/ton before the conflict and spiked to about $150/ton at the peak, its highest level in more than a year. It has since eased back, with last trades near $130/ton, still materially higher than prewar levels and tracking the elevated crude complex. Indonesian seaborne coal has followed a similar percentage move, with 4,200–4,300 GAR grades pushing up toward the high $50s/ton as buyers bid up lower-rank supply.
Coal is trading in “sympathy” with oil, because even though coal itself is not physically constrained by the Strait of Hormuz, it is being repriced as a substitute fuel and as part of a broader “energy basket” where all molecules now carry a geopolitical premium. In the derivative markets, the net result is a classic correlated energy rally: oil leads on direct supply shock, gas and LNG overshoot on route and infrastructure risk, and coal is dragged higher both as a hedge and as the marginal backup fuel.
Effect on PH power prices
For Philippines electricity prices, the key point is that the recent rally in coal is taking us back to roughly the same coal cost environment seen in 2024, not to completely new territory. With Newcastle and key Asean coal benchmarks trading around levels last seen in 2024, it is reasonable to think that, if fuel costs remain in this band and the system avoids prolonged large outages, average Luzon spot prices could gravitate back toward something like the 2024 full-year level of about P5.1/kWh rather than a structurally higher regime. That view is also consistent with the Independent Electricity Market Operator of the Philippines’ preliminary simulations, which flag upside from higher global fuel but do not, by themselves, imply a break to unprecedented WESM averages absent additional supply stress.
What has changed since 2024 is the supply stack: there is now more renewable generation in the system, and that is already showing up in softer prices, especially in hours when solar output is strongest. Additional renewable energy (RE), particularly solar, tends to push down midday prices and, by extension, compress baseload averages, because more zero marginal cost energy clears ahead of coal and gas in those intervals. This helps to explain why, despite the geopolitical headlines and higher fuel curves, the spot market reaction has been fairly muted so far, with only a modest pop in WESM prices about a week ago, which market operators attribute mainly to plant outages and localized supply tightness rather than to fuel costs alone. Put together, higher coal narrows the downside for Luzon prices versus 2025 lows, but the larger RE fleet and currently comfortable supply margins argue that any move back toward a P5.1/kWh market spot price is more likely a ceiling scenario than the new floor.
Bluesky: @benkritz.bsky.social
Website: www.badmannersgunclub.com