Charlie’s $2.4 million portfolio supports a 4% safe withdrawal rate — $96,000 annually — but he spends only $50,000. He’s stuck in a scarcity loop.

This pattern affects first-generation wealth builders in their 60s and 70s with seven-figure portfolios and sufficient monthly income. The scarcity mindset that enabled accumulation now prevents retirement spending that the math fully supports.

“That fear, it’s not rational, right?,” said host Rachel Cruze. “You got $2.4 million sitting there.”

The analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks. Get them here FREE.

Charlie is a retired IBM computer engineer with $2.4 million in net worth and 50 years of sports officiating under his belt. Before a recent road trip with his wife, he “hooked up for like five additional volleyball games” to cover the cost “even though I could pay for it.” His wife has told him he needs to transition “from a saver to a spender.” Charlie’s response: “I can’t seem to let go.”

The Ramsey Show’s George Kamel told Charlie to loosen up. “You’re stuck in your scarcity loop right now,” he said. His fear of spending is irrational.

READ: The analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks

Here’s the psychological pattern Kamel identified: People who build wealth from nothing, first-generation millionaires who didn’t grow up with money, typically get there by treating every dollar as scarce. That discipline is the engine of accumulation. The problem is the brain doesn’t automatically switch modes when the accumulation phase ends. The same neural wiring that helped Charlie save now prevents him from spending, even when spending is financially rational.

Co-host Rachel Cruze explained: “[Money] almost becomes an idol because it has so much control over us out of this fear that something’s gonna happen and I’m not gonna be okay. And that fear, it’s not rational, right? You got $2.4 million sitting there.” Charlie’s fear is costing him something real: quality time with his wife and 17 grandkids.

Kamel walked Charlie through the reality. “You’re spending $50,000 a year out of this much of your nest egg,” he said. “That’s a 1% spend. You can go up to 3%, 4%, 5% without ever running out of money.”

This is the safe withdrawal rate concept, an important number that a retiree with a large portfolio needs to understand. The research-backed baseline is that a diversified portfolio can sustain roughly a 4% annual withdrawal indefinitely, adjusted for inflation. Charlie is only pulling  1% annually. That gap between what he’s spending and what his portfolio can safely support is the financial permission he keeps refusing to give himself.

His $8,000 to $9,000 monthly income already covers his baseline needs. The portfolio isn’t being touched for living expenses in any meaningful way. So the side hustles aren’t filling a financial gap, but they may be filling a psychological one.

Charlie’s profile is more common than it sounds. First-generation wealth builders in their 60s and 70s, with portfolios well above $1 million and monthly income exceeding expenses, frequently under-spend by a wide margin. The scarcity loop is not uncommon among people who built wealth through sustained sacrifice rather than inheritance or windfall.

The fix isn’t willpower alone, Kamel said. “What if you just cut the side hustle for 6 months and said, ‘I’m not going to do it, and I’m going to spend money?'” He also recommended a “dream date” with his wife to identify specific spending targets, then pre-committing those as line items in the budget. Pre-decided spending removes the in-the-moment guilt that triggers the scarcity response.

Cruze suggested that Charlie (and any retiree in a similar situation) meet with a financial advisor to calculate exactly how much extra they can safely spend per year, then assign that money to experiences and time-buying services. Seeing a specific, advisor-validated number could make the spending easier.

The math already says Charlie can spend more. The only remaining job is retraining the part of his brain that built $2.4 million by never believing that.

Wall Street is pouring billions into AI, but most investors are buying the wrong stocks. The analyst who first identified NVIDIA as a buy back in 2010 — before its 28,000% run — has just pinpointed 10 new AI companies he believes could deliver outsized returns from here. One dominates a $100 billion equipment market. Another is solving the single biggest bottleneck holding back AI data centers. A third is a pure-play on an optical networking market set to quadruple. Most investors haven’t heard of half these names. Get the free list of all 10 stocks here.