Moqri, M. et al. Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell 186, 3758–3775 (2023).
McMurray, J. J. V. & Pfeffer, M. A. Heart failure. Lancet 365, 1877–1889 (2005).
Savarese, G. et al. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc. Res. 118, 3272–3287 (2022).
Van Den Eeden, S. K. et al. Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Am. J. Epidemiol. 157, 1015–1022 (2003).
Knopman, D. S. et al. Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 7, 33–33 (2021).
Teschendorff, A. E. On epigenetic stochasticity, entropy and cancer risk. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 379, 20230054 (2024).
Hoeijmakers, J. H. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1475–1485 (2025).
Sayer, A. A. et al. Sarcopenia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primer 10, 68–68 (2024).
Tepp, K. et al. Bioenergetics of the aging heart and skeletal muscles: modern concepts and controversies. Ageing Res. Rev. 28, 1–14 (2016).
Guo, J. et al. Aging and aging-related diseases: from molecular mechanisms to interventions and treatments. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 7, 391 (2022).
Kennedy, B. K. et al. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell 159, 709–713 (2014).
Sierra, F. The emergence of geroscience as an interdisciplinary approach to the enhancement of health span and life span. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, a025163 (2016).
Zhang, Y. et al. Global scientific trends in healthy aging in the early 21st century: a data-driven scientometric and visualized analysis. Heliyon 10, e23405 (2024).
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217 (2013).
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M. & Kroemer, G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell 186, 243–278 (2023).
Moqri, M. et al. PRC2-AgeIndex as a universal biomarker of aging and rejuvenation. Nat. Commun. 15, 5956 (2024).
Horvath, S. & Raj, K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 371–384 (2018).
Horvath, S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 14, 3156–3156 (2013).
Levine, M. E. et al. An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan. Aging 10, 573–591 (2018).
Grolaux, R., Jones-Freeman, B., Jacques, M. & Eynon, N. The benefits of exercise on aging: focus on muscle biomarkers. Aging 16, 11482–11483 (2024).
Gladyshev, V. N. et al. Disagreement on foundational principles of biological aging. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae499 (2024).
Hannum, G. et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell 49, 359–367 (2013).
Rutledge, J., Oh, H. & Wyss-Coray, T. Measuring biological age using omics data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 715–727 (2022).
Ahadi, S. et al. Personal aging markers and ageotypes revealed by deep longitudinal profiling. Nat. Med. 26, 83–90 (2020).
Harley, C. B., Futcher, A. B. & Greider, C. W. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 345, 458–460 (1990).
de Magalhães, J. P., Curado, J. & Church, G. M. Meta-analysis of age-related gene expression profiles identifies common signatures of aging. Bioinformatics 25, 875–881 (2009).
Christensen, B. C. et al. Aging and environmental exposures alter tissue-specific DNA methylation dependent upon CpG island context. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000602 (2009).
Seale, K., Teschendorff, A., Reiner, A. P., Voisin, S. & Eynon, N. A comprehensive map of the aging blood methylome in humans. Genome Biol. 25, 240–240 (2024).
Jones, O. R. et al. Diversity of ageing across the tree of life. Nature 505, 169–173 (2014).
Chao, Y.-S., Wu, H.-C., Wu, C.-J. & Chen, W.-C. Stages of biological development across age: an analysis of canadian health measure survey 2007–2011. Front. Public. Health 5, 355 (2018).
Hägg, S. & Jylhävä, J. Sex differences in biological aging with a focus on human studies. eLife 10, e63425 (2021).
Huang, Y., Li, H., Liang, R., Chen, J. & Tang, Q. The influence of sex-specific factors on biological transformations and health outcomes in aging processes. Biogerontology 25, 775–791 (2024).
Cohen, A. A. et al. A complex systems approach to aging biology. Nat. Aging 2, 580–591 (2022).
Nielsen, P. Y., Jensen, M. K., Mitarai, N. & Bhatt, S. The Gompertz law emerges naturally from the inter-dependencies between sub-components in complex organisms. Sci. Rep. 14, 1196 (2024).
Burton, A. & Torres-Padilla, M.-E. Epigenome dynamics in early mammalian embryogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 26, 587–603 (2025).
Wilkinson, A. L., Zorzan, I. & Rugg-Gunn, P. J. Epigenetic regulation of early human embryo development. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1569–1584 (2023).
Guo, H. et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature 511, 606–610 (2014).
Zhu, Q. et al. Dissecting pre- to post-implantation transition of DNA methylome–transcriptome dynamics in early mammalian development. Cell Rep. 44, 115790 (2025).
Zhou, F. et al. Reconstituting the transcriptome and DNA methylome landscapes of human implantation. Nature 572, 660–664 (2019).
Robertson, K. D. DNA methylation and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 597–610 (2005).
Bjornsson, H. T. The Mendelian disorders of the epigenetic machinery. Genome Res. 25, 1473–1481 (2015).
Grolaux, R. et al. Identification of differentially methylated regions in rare diseases from a single-patient perspective. Clin. Epigenet. 14, 174 (2022).
Morton, S. U. & Brodsky, D. Fetal physiology and the transition to extrauterine life. Clin. Perinatol. 43, 395–407 (2016).
Anthony, R. & McKinlay, C. J. D. Adaptation for life after birth: a review of neonatal physiology. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med. 24, 1–9 (2023).
Hillman, N. H., Kallapur, S. G. & Jobe, A. H. Physiology of transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life. Clin. Perinatol. 39, 769–783 (2012).
Pearson Murphy, B. E. Human fetal serum cortisol levels related to gestational age: evidence of a midgestational fall and a steep late gestational rise, independent of sex or mode of delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 144, 276–282 (1982).
Reyman, M. et al. Impact of delivery mode-associated gut microbiota dynamics on health in the first year of life. Nat. Commun. 10, 4997 (2019).
Francino, M. P. Birth mode-related differences in gut microbiota colonization and immune system development. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 73, 12–16 (2018).
Bermick, J. & Schaller, M. Epigenetic regulation of pediatric and neonatal immune responses. Pediatr. Res. 91, 297–327 (2022).
Wikenius, E., Moe, V., Smith, L., Heiervang, E. R. & Berglund, A. DNA methylation changes in infants between 6 and 52 weeks. Sci. Rep. 9, 17587 (2019).
Solomon, O. et al. Meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies in newborns and children show widespread sex differences in blood DNA methylation. Mutat. Res. Mutat. Res. 789, 108415–108415 (2022).
Abreu, A. P. & Kaiser, U. B. Pubertal development and regulation. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 4, 254–264 (2016).
Binder, A. M. et al. Faster ticking rate of the epigenetic clock is associated with faster pubertal development in girls. Epigenetics 13, 85–94 (2018).
Levine, M. E. et al. Menopause accelerates biological aging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9327–9332 (2016).
Argente, J. et al. Molecular basis of normal and pathological puberty: from basic mechanisms to clinical implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 11, 203–216 (2023).
Almstrup, K. et al. Pubertal development in healthy children is mirrored by DNA methylation patterns in peripheral blood. Sci. Rep. 6, 28657 (2016).
Han, L. et al. Changes in DNA methylation from pre- to post-adolescence are associated with pubertal exposures. Clin. Epigenet. 11, 176 (2019).
Thompson, E. E. et al. Global DNA methylation changes spanning puberty are near predicted estrogen-responsive genes and enriched for genes involved in endocrine and immune processes. Clin. Epigenet. 10, 62 (2018).
deSteiguer, A. J. et al. Salivary DNA methylation and pubertal development in adolescents. Sci. Rep. 15, 35970 (2025).
Mulder, R. H. et al. Epigenome-wide change and variation in DNA methylation in childhood: trajectories from birth to late adolescence. Hum. Mol. Genet. 30, 119–134 (2021).
Zhao, H.-Y. et al. Comprehensive analysis of untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics in girls with central precocious puberty. Front. Pediatr. 11, 1157272 (2023).
Perng, W. et al. Metabolomic profiles and development of metabolic risk during the pubertal transition: a prospective study in the ELEMENT Project. Pediatr. Res. 85, 262–268 (2019).
Mäkinen, V.-P. et al. Metabolic transition from childhood to adulthood based on two decades of biochemical time series in three longitudinal cohorts. Int. J. Epidemiol. 54, dyaf026 (2025).
Karppinen, J. E. et al. Menopause modulates the circulating metabolome: evidence from a prospective cohort study. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 29, 1448–1459 (2022).
Xie, B. et al. Years since menopause and its metabolomic signature with biological aging in women at midlife: a population-based study. NPJ Aging 11, 58 (2025).
Daredia, S. et al. Timing of menarche and menopause and epigenetic aging among U.S. adults: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey 1999–2002. Clin. Epigenet. 17, 31 (2025).
Ena, G. & Soyfoo, M. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: from molecular pathways to therapeutic targets—a mechanism-to-practice framework integrating pharmacotherapy, fall prevention, and adherence into patient-centered care. J. Clin. Med. 15, 102 (2026).
Liu, Q. et al. Molecular mechanisms regulating natural menopause in the female ovary: a study based on transcriptomic data. Front. Endocrinol. 14, 1004245 (2023).
Mosconi, L. et al. Menopause impacts human brain structure, connectivity, energy metabolism, and amyloid-β deposition. Sci. Rep. 11, 10867 (2021).
Brinton, R. D., Yao, J., Yin, F., Mack, W. J. & Cadenas, E. Perimenopause as a neurological transition state. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 11, 393–405 (2015).
Gunter-Rahman, F. et al. Multiomic profiling reveals timing of menopause predicts prefrontal cortex aging and cognitive function. Aging Cell 24, e14395 (2025).
Dohm-Hansen, S. et al. The ‘middle-aging’ brain. Trends Neurosci. 47, 259–272 (2024).
Matsui, Y. et al. The decline in cognitive function with age and its changes over time in cognitively normal older adults. Eur. Geriatr. Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01377-8 (2025).
Logan, R. W. & McClung, C. A. Rhythms of life: circadian disruption and brain disorders across the lifespan. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 49–65 (2019).
Dolan, M., Libby, K. A., Ringel, A. E., van Galen, P. & McAllister, S. S. Ageing, immune fitness and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 25, 848–872 (2025).
Weng, C. et al. Deciphering cell states and genealogies of human haematopoiesis. Nature 627, 389–398 (2024).
Scherer, M. et al. Clonal tracing with somatic epimutations reveals dynamics of blood ageing. Nature 643, 478–487 (2025).
Mitchell, E. et al. Clonal dynamics of haematopoiesis across the human lifespan. Nature 606, 343–350 (2022).
Lawson, A. R. J. et al. Somatic mutation and selection at population scale. Nature 647, 411–420 (2025).
Gavrilov, L. A. & Gavrilova, N. S. The reliability theory of aging and longevity. J. Theor. Biol. 213, 527–545 (2001). This paper introduces the reliability theory of ageing, proposing that age-related increases in mortality emerge from the progressive loss of redundancy in complex biological systems.
Gavrilov, L. A. & Gavrilova, N. S. The reliability-engineering approach to the problem of biological aging. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1019, 509–512 (2004).
McLoughlin, M. A. et al. Telomere attrition becomes an instrument for clonal selection in aging hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. Nat. Genet. 57, 2215–2225 (2025).
Ye, Q. et al. Telomere length and chronological age across the human lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 414 study samples including 743,019 individuals. Ageing Res. Rev. 90, 102031 (2023).
Li, J. S. Z. et al. TZAP: a telomere-associated protein involved in telomere length control. Science 355, 638–641 (2017).
Schaum, N. et al. Ageing hallmarks exhibit organ-specific temporal signatures. Nature 583, 596–602 (2020).
Dönertaş, H. M. et al. Gene expression reversal toward pre-adult levels in the aging human brain and age-related loss of cellular identity. Sci. Rep. 7, 5894 (2017).
Işıldak, U., Somel, M., Thornton, J. M. & Dönertaş, H. M. Temporal changes in the gene expression heterogeneity during brain development and aging. Sci. Rep. 10, 4080 (2020).
Bahar, R. et al. Increased cell-to-cell variation in gene expression in ageing mouse heart. Nature 441, 1011–1014 (2006).
Hernando-Herraez, I. et al. Ageing affects DNA methylation drift and transcriptional cell-to-cell variability in mouse muscle stem cells. Nat. Commun. 10, 4361 (2019).
Cao, K., Ryvkin, P., Hwang, Y.-C., Johnson, F. B. & Wang, L.-S. Analysis of nonlinear gene expression progression reveals extensive pathway and age-specific transitions in aging human brains. PLoS ONE 8, e74578 (2013).
Lehallier, B. et al. Undulating changes in human plasma proteome profiles across the lifespan. Nat. Med. 25, 1843–1850 (2019). This study uses a sliding window-based approach to identify waves of dysregulation in the proteome across the lifespan.
Shen, X. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of multi-omics profiles during human aging. Nat. Aging 4, 1619–1634 (2024).
Oh, H. S.-H. et al. Organ aging signatures in the plasma proteome track health and disease. Nature 624, 164–172 (2023). This study highlights non-linear ageing trajectories in plasma-derived proteomic organ signatures.
Ding, Y. et al. Comprehensive human proteome profiles across a 50-year lifespan reveal aging trajectories and signatures. Cell 188, 5763–5784.e26 (2025).
Martino, C. et al. Microbiota succession throughout life from the cradle to the grave. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 20, 707–720 (2022).
Smith, Z. D. et al. DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo. Nature 511, 611–615 (2014).
Lu, A. T. et al. Universal DNA methylation age across mammalian tissues. Nat. Aging 3, 1144–1166 (2023).
Freire-Aradas, A. et al. A common epigenetic clock from childhood to old age. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 60, 102743 (2022).
Snir, S., Farrell, C. & Pellegrini, M. Human epigenetic ageing is logarithmic with time across the entire lifespan. Epigenetics 14, 912–926 (2019).
Vershinina, O., Bacalini, M. G., Zaikin, A., Franceschi, C. & Ivanchenko, M. Disentangling age-dependent DNA methylation: deterministic, stochastic, and nonlinear. Sci. Rep. 11, 9201 (2021).
Johnson, N. D. et al. Non-linear patterns in age-related DNA methylation may reflect CD4+ T cell differentiation. Epigenetics 12, 492–503 (2017).
Okada, D., Cheng, J. H., Zheng, C., Kumaki, T. & Yamada, R. Data-driven identification and classification of nonlinear aging patterns reveals the landscape of associations between DNA methylation and aging. Hum. Genomics 17, 8 (2023).
Grolaux, R. et al. Sex-specific nonlinear DNA methylation aging trajectories reveal biomarkers of cancer risk and inflammation. Genome Biol. 27, 2–2 (2026). This study introduces a framework based on a GAM to identify and cluster CpGs following non-linear patterns across age and sex.
Slieker, R. C. et al. Age-related accrual of methylomic variability is linked to fundamental ageing mechanisms. Genome Biol. 17, 191 (2016).
Seale, K., Horvath, S., Teschendorff, A., Eynon, N. & Voisin, S. Making sense of the ageing methylome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 585–605 (2022).
Tong, H. et al. Quantifying the stochastic component of epigenetic aging. Nat. Aging 4, 886–901 (2024).
Moqri, M., Poganik, J. R., Horvath, S. & Gladyshev, V. N. What makes biological age epigenetic clocks tick. Nat. Aging 5, 335–336 (2025).
Sturm, G. et al. Human aging DNA methylation signatures are conserved but accelerated in cultured fibroblasts. Epigenetics 14, 961–976 (2019).
Márquez, E. J. et al. Sexual-dimorphism in human immune system aging. Nat. Commun. 11, 751 (2020).
Holzscheck, N. et al. Multi-omics network analysis reveals distinct stages in the human aging progression in epidermal tissue. Aging 12, 12393–12409 (2020).
Li, J. et al. Determining a multimodal aging clock in a cohort of Chinese women. Med 4, 825–848.e13 (2023).
Mitnitski, A. B., Mogilner, A. J. & Rockwood, K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci. World J. 1, 321027 (2001).
Hoogendijk, E. O. et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet 394, 1365–1375 (2019).
Mitnitski, A., Song, X. & Rockwood, K. Assessing biological aging: the origin of deficit accumulation. Biogerontology 14, 709–717 (2013). This paper describes age-related deficit accumulation under Little’s law queuing model.
Mitnitski, A. & Rockwood, K. The rate of aging: the rate of deficit accumulation does not change over the adult life span. Biogerontology 17, 199–204 (2016).
Pridham, G., Rockwood, K. & Rutenberg, A. Aging health dynamics cross a tipping point near age 75. Prepint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07795 (2025).
Antal, B. B. et al. Brain aging shows nonlinear transitions, suggesting a midlife “critical window” for metabolic intervention. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2416433122 (2025).
Bethlehem, R. A. I. et al. Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature 604, 525–533 (2022).
Fjell, A. M. et al. Critical ages in the life course of the adult brain: nonlinear subcortical aging. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 2239–2247 (2013).
Luo, Q. et al. A meta-analysis of immune-cell fractions at high resolution reveals novel associations with common phenotypes and health outcomes. Genome Med. 15, 59 (2023).
Guo, X., Huang, Z., Ju, F., Zhao, C. & Yu, L. Highly accurate estimation of cell type abundance in bulk tissues based on single-cell reference and domain adaptive matching. Adv. Sci. 11, 2306329 (2024).
Laurie, C. C. et al. Detectable clonal mosaicism from birth to old age and its relationship to cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 642–650 (2012).
Tong, H. et al. Cell-type specific epigenetic clocks to quantify biological age at cell-type resolution. Aging 16, 13452–13504 (2024).
Martincorena, I. et al. Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age. Science 362, 911–917 (2018).
Lu, Z. et al. Organism-wide cellular dynamics and epigenomic remodeling in mammalian aging. Science 391, eadw6273 (2026).
Lu, J. Y. et al. Prevalent mesenchymal drift in aging and disease is reversed by partial reprogramming. Cell 188, 5895–5911.e17 (2025).
Coenders, G. & González, M. in Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (ed. Michalos, A. C.) 4369–4373 (Springer Netherlands, 2014).
Monaghan, C., de Andrade Moral, R. & Power, J. M. Modelling the non-linear associations between age and health: implications for care. Age Ageing 53, afae178.084 (2024).
Hall, C. B., Lipton, R. B., Sliwinski, M. & Stewart, W. F. A change point model for estimating the onset of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Stat. Med. 19, 1555–1566 (2000).
van den Hout, A., Muniz-Terrera, G. & Matthews, F. E. Smooth random change point models. Stat. Med. 30, 599–610 (2011).
Das, R., Banerjee, M., Nan, B. & Zheng, H. Fast estimation of regression parameters in a broken-stick model for longitudinal data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111, 1132–1143 (2016).
Li, C., Dowling, N. M. & Chappell, R. Quantile regression with a change-point model for longitudinal data: an application to the study of cognitive changes in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Biometrics 71, 625–635 (2015).
Aminikhanghahi, S. & Cook, D. J. A survey of methods for time series change point detection. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 51, 339–367 (2017).
Mujica-Parodi, L. R. et al. Diet modulates brain network stability, a biomarker for brain aging, in young adults. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 6170–6177 (2020).
Belsky, D. W. et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4104–E4110 (2015). This study establishes the pace of ageing framework based on longitudinal measurements.
Belsky, D. W. et al. Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test, the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm. eLife 9, e54870 (2020).
Belsky, D. W. et al. DunedinPACE, a DNA methylation biomarker of the pace of aging. eLife 11, e73420 (2022). This study describes a DNAm-based biological clock based on the pace of ageing framework.
Kuo, P.-L. et al. A roadmap to build a phenotypic metric of ageing: insights from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J. Intern. Med. 287, 373–394 (2020).
Kuo, P.-L. et al. Longitudinal phenotypic aging metrics in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Nat. Aging 2, 635–643 (2022).
Balachandran, A. et al. Pace of Aging analysis of healthspan and lifespan in older adults in the US and UK. Nat. Aging 5, 1132–1142 (2025).
Bartz, J., Jung, H., Wasiluk, K., Zhang, L. & Dong, X. Progress in discovering transcriptional noise in aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 3701 (2023).
de Jong, T. V., Moshkin, Y. M. & Guryev, V. Gene expression variability: the other dimension in transcriptome analysis. Physiol. Genom. 51, 145–158 (2019).
Jacques, M. et al. Meta-analysis of DNA methylation aging signatures in 17 human tissues. Nat. Aging https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-026-01164-5 (2026).
Jenkinson, G., Pujadas, E., Goutsias, J. & Feinberg, A. P. Potential energy landscapes identify the information-theoretic nature of the epigenome. Nat. Genet. 49, 719–729 (2017).
Chan, J., Rubbi, L. & Pellegrini, M. DNA methylation entropy is a biomarker for aging. Aging 17, 685–698 (2025).
Farrell, C., Snir, S. & Pellegrini, M. The epigenetic pacemaker: modeling epigenetic states under an evolutionary framework. Bioinformatics 36, 4662–4663 (2020).
Farrell, C. et al. The multi-state epigenetic pacemaker enables the identification of combinations of factors that influence DNA methylation. GeroScience 47, 2439–2454 (2025).
Snir, S., vonHoldt, B. M. & Pellegrini, M. A statistical framework to identify deviation from time linearity in epigenetic aging. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005183 (2016).
Teschendorff, A. E. & Horvath, S. Epigenetic ageing clocks: statistical methods and emerging computational challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-024-00807-w (2025).
Lu, A. T. et al. DNA methylation GrimAge strongly predicts lifespan and healthspan. Aging 11, 303–327 (2019).
Lu, A. T. et al. DNA methylation GrimAge version 2. Aging 14, 9484–9549 (2022).
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).
Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In KDD ‘16: Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (eds Krishnapuram, B. et al.) 785–794 (ACM, 2016).
Drucker, H., Burges, C. J. C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A. & Vapnik, V. Support vector regression machines. In NIPS’96: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Jordan, M. I. & Petsche, T.) 155–161 (MIT Press, 1996).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Eraslan, G., Avsec, Ž, Gagneur, J. & Theis, F. J. Deep learning: new computational modelling techniques for genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 389–403 (2019).
Zhou, W., Yan, Z. & Zhang, L. A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction. Sci. Rep. 14, 5905 (2024).
Schultz, M. B. et al. Age and life expectancy clocks based on machine learning analysis of mouse frailty. Nat. Commun. 11, 4618 (2020).
Pyrkov, T. V. et al. Longitudinal analysis of blood markers reveals progressive loss of resilience and predicts human lifespan limit. Nat. Commun. 12, 2765–2765 (2021). This study introduces a dynamical systems framework in which ageing is driven by the progressive loss of resilience.
Avchaciov, K. et al. Unsupervised learning of aging principles from longitudinal data. Nat. Commun. 13, 6529–6529 (2022). This study develops an unsupervised deep learning framework to identify a dynamic frailty indicator, supporting the view that ageing reflects the stochastic evolution of a latent organismal state approaching a critical instability.
Bommasani, R. et al. On the opportunities and risks of foundation models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.07258 (2022).
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In NIPS’17: Proc. 31st Int. Conf. Neural Information Processing Systems (eds von Luxburg, U. et al.) 4768–4777 (Curran, 2017).
de Lima Camillo, L. P. et al. CpGPT: a foundation model for DNA methylation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.24.619766 (2024).
Ying, K. et al. MethylGPT: a foundation model for the DNA methylome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.30.621013 (2024).
Li, R. et al. A body map of somatic mutagenesis in morphologically normal human tissues. Nature 597, 398–403 (2021).
Spisak, N., de Manuel, M., Milligan, W., Sella, G. & Przeworski, M. The clock-like accumulation of germline and somatic mutations can arise from the interplay of DNA damage and repair. PLoS Biol. 22, e3002678 (2024). This study shows that the clock-like accumulation of somatic mutations can arise from constant rates of cell division, DNA damage and repair, helping explain why some mutational processes exhibit remarkably linear age-related trajectories.
Voisin, S. et al. An epigenetic clock for human skeletal muscle. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 11, 887–898 (2020).
Cummings, S. R. et al. Biomarkers of cellular senescence and major health outcomes in older adults. GeroScience 47, 3407–3415 (2025).
Mak, J. K. L. et al. Temporal dynamics of epigenetic aging and frailty from midlife to old age. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 79, glad251 (2024).
Jiang, N. et al. Deciphering the timing and impact of life-extending interventions: temporal efficacy profiler distinguishes early, midlife, and senescence phase efficacies. Nat. Commun. 16, 10164 (2025).
Teschendorff, A. E. & Feinberg, A. P. Statistical mechanics meets single-cell biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 459–476 (2021).
Alberti, S. & Hyman, A. A. Are aberrant phase transitions a driver of cellular aging? BioEssays 38, 959–968 (2016).
Zane, F. et al. Ageing as a two-phase process: theoretical framework. Front. Aging 5, 1378351 (2024).
Stanley, H. E. Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford Univ. Press, 1971).
Chen, L., Liu, R., Liu, Z.-P., Li, M. & Aihara, K. Detecting early-warning signals for sudden deterioration of complex diseases by dynamical network biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 2, 342 (2012).
Wang, R. et al. Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state. Nature 492, 419–422 (2012).
Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009).
Teschendorff, A. E. et al. The dynamics of DNA methylation covariation patterns in carcinogenesis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003709 (2014).
Varshavsky, M. et al. Accurate age prediction from blood using a small set of DNA methylation sites and a cohort-based machine learning algorithm. Cell Rep. Methods 3, 100567 (2023).
Gutierrez Becker, B., Klein, T. & Wachinger, C. Gaussian process uncertainty in age estimation as a measure of brain abnormality. NeuroImage 175, 246–258 (2018).
Dablander, F. & Bury, T. M. Deep learning for tipping points: preprocessing matters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2207720119 (2022).
Ahlmann-Eltze, C., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines. Nat. Methods 22, 1657–1661 (2025).
de Lima Camillo, L. P., Lapierre, L. R. & Singh, R. A pan-tissue DNA-methylation epigenetic clock based on deep learning. npj Aging 8, 4 (2022).
Li, Z.-P., Du, Z., Huang, D.-S. & Teschendorff, A. E. Interpretable deep learning of single-cell and epigenetic data reveals novel molecular insights in aging. Sci. Rep. 15, 5048 (2025).
Hofer, S. M. & Sliwinski, M. J. Understanding ageing: an evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes. Gerontology 47, 341–352 (2001).
Petersen, G. L. et al. Inverse probability weighting for self-selection bias correction in the investigation of social inequality in mortality. Int. J. Epidemiol. 53, dyae097 (2024).
Wulfsohn, M. S. & Tsiatis, A. A. A joint model for survival and longitudinal data measured with error. Biometrics 53, 330–339 (1997).
Metten, M.-A., Costet, N., Multigner, L., Viel, J.-F. & Chauvet, G. Inverse probability weighting to handle attrition in cohort studies: some guidance and a call for caution. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 22, 45 (2022).
Little, R. J., Carpenter, J. R. & Lee, K. J. A comparison of three popular methods for handling missing data: complete-case analysis, inverse probability weighting, and multiple imputation. Sociol. Methods Res. 53, 1105–1135 (2024).
Yashin, A. I. et al. Stochastic model for analysis of longitudinal data on aging and mortality. Math. Biosci. 208, 538–551 (2007).
Arbeev, K. G. et al. Methods for joint modeling of longitudinal omics data and time-to-event outcomes: applications to lysophosphatidylcholines in connection to aging and mortality in the long life family study. Aging 17, 1221–1260 (2025).
Kristman, V. L., Manno, M. & Côté, P. Methods to account for attrition in longitudinal data: do they work? A simulation study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 20, 657–662 (2005).
Carbonneau, M. et al. LOESS and DE-SWAN can induce artifactual “waves” of molecular aging. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.06.24.734079 (2026).
Kuo, P.-L. et al. Longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks predict survival in the InCHIANTI cohort. Nat. Aging 6, 534–540 (2026).
Teschendorff, A. E. Avoiding common pitfalls in machine learning omic data science. Nat. Mater. 18, 422–427 (2019).
de Magalhães, J. P. An overview of contemporary theories of ageing. Nat. Cell Biol. 27, 1074–1082 (2025). This review describes the current theoretical frameworks of ageing.
Gladyshev, V. N. et al. Molecular damage in aging. Nat. Aging 1, 1096–1106 (2021).
Kirkwood, T. B. L. Evolution of ageing. Nature 270, 301–304 (1977).
de Magalhães, J. P. & Church, G. M. Genomes optimize reproduction: aging as a consequence of the developmental program. Physiology 20, 252–259 (2005).
Williams, G. C. Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ. 2001, cp13 (2001).
Gems, D. The hyperfunction theory: an emerging paradigm for the biology of aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 74, 101557 (2022).